b) Dissolved oxygen c) pH meter d) Conductivity meter e) Beaker f) Grab sampler g) Wash bottle h) Soft tissue 5.0 PROCEDURE
5.1. Field Observation
5.1.1 Observation of field conditions that could assist in the interpretation of
monitoring data was recorded during every sampling event. This provided useful information about the water being sampled, which helped to diagnose the source and potential impact of pollutants founded by chemical analysis.
5.1.2 Examples of such field conditions were as follows:
i. Potential pollutants were washed by recent rain from surrounding land into waterways. ii. Some constituents were drived by winds toward one side of the waterbody or created mixing which would help dissipated them more quickly. iii. Shading from cloud and vegetation were influenced the level of dissolved oxygen. iv. Any abnormalities that were indicated pollution or affected water quality, such as absence of flow, presence of surface scum, water colour or odours, excessive algal or plant growth, dead fish or invertebrates were also be noted. 5.2. Field Measurement
5.2.1 Surface Water Sample
5.2.1.1. Field measurements commonly were monitored within a cross
section of the surface-water body to help determined how well mixed the stream was, consequently the sampling method was to be used and to determine the field-property values of the water body at the selected site. 5.2.1.2. In situ use of multiparameter instrument is the most efficient means of obtaining such data. 5.2.1.3. Many instruments include a pressure transducer that produces a value for water depth or level. For instruments without pressure transducers, the approximate depth of the sonde as it is lowered through a transect can be noted by placing incremental marks along the instrument cable or be connected to a pressure transducer. 5.2.1.4. A minimum of 60 seconds was waited for the sensors to reach thermal equilibrium with the water temperature at each new location. 5.2.1.5. The field-measurement values on the instrument display was allowed to stabilize within an established criterion before recording final field measurements at each measuring point.
5.2.1.6. Field-measurement values generally were considered stable when
the variability among three or more consecutive readings, spaced some number of minutes apart, conforms to the designated criteria. 5.2.1.7. Sensor readings will adversely affected by biological growth or debris in the water. 5.2.1.8. Areas that will result in having to stop and clean algae, sediment, or debris were tried to avoid from the sensors.