All Guardianships in Pennsylvania are Unconstitutional following

The Pennsylvania Constitution of 1968

By

Anthony J. Fejfar, B.A., J.D., Esq., Coif

©Copyright 2010 by Anthony J. Fejfar

Currently, the Pennsylvania Statutes purport to provide for the existence of

Guardianships, including, Adult Guardianships. It is clear, however, that the

Pennsylvania Guardianship statute is Unconstitutional, under Section 1 of the

Pennsylvania Constitution. Section 1 of the Pennsylvania Constitution provides as

follows:

All men are born equally free and independent, and have certain inherent

and indefeasible rights, among those of enjoying and defending life and

liberty, of acquiring, possessing and protecting property and reputation,

and of pursuing their own happiness.

Given the foregoing, it is absolutely clear that every person, including the

allegedly mentally ill, have inherent and indefeasible rights to Liberty, Ownership of

Property, and the Pursuit of Happiness. Therefore, any purported financial guardianship

of a mentally ill person, is absolutely illegal, null and void. Each mentally ill person has

an inherent, individual Natural Right under Natural Law of Property and Liberty which

is irrevocable, and thus cannot be taken away by anyone, not even a fascist Common

Pleas judge. Moreover, any purported guardianship of a person is also null and void.

Once again, every person, including any mentally ill person, has an inherent, individual

Natural Right under Natural Law to Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Therefore, it
is absolutely illegal for a personal guardian to be appoint who makes personal decisions

for the alleged ward. The alleged, mentally ill person cannot be divested of his or her

Constitutional Rights of Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness by some order of a fascist

Common Pleas judge. Finally, all evidence relating to the alleged mental health of the

proposed ward is absolutely inadmissible. Every single psychiatric label is based upon

Nazi categories from Nazi Germany, and, are irrational and illegal. All of the major

psychiatric labels are not supported by reasonable scientific evidence, and all violate each

person’s Liberty right of Individual Religious Liberty. Finally, following the

Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence, all purported psychiatric testimony must be struck as

hearsay and non-relevant. Moreover, following the Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence, it is

impossible to qualify a psychiatrist as an Expert Witness, since the practice psychiatry is

no based upon reasonable scientific certainty.