Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
~ Daniel, Ecclesiastes
(Koh~let), Zacharlah and Ruth appear here in a series for a reason.
These were six books on which Aklva was required to place his signature
and apparently also to translate into Hebrew. They end with Zachariah
jUSt before Piso’s death in llS and before he had the opportunity to
also include mention of Zachariah by insertion into Ezekiel. They
start a few years after 105 with the writing of Father, wherein
Akiva changed his Hebrew name from Yaacov which totals@ 182~ to Akiva
which totaled 183. That was in order to insert his signature on the
story which Piso had started with an 180 day feast in the third year
Ruth and perhaps Esther are massive books. He must have been the
and R. Meir. This implies the other two were his collea~ues in the
writing, and that he was the middle one in seniority, not the first.
2. Akiva was not the oldest of the rabbis who were writing. He
must have been actually at most 80 when 5he Romans murdered him by tearing
his flesh with hot combs after Bar Cochbah’s revolt was crushed
in 135. Thus n? m~st have been born about 60. When he went with four
other rabbis to Rome to confer with the certain min about the year 95
Bnal Brak--no doubt too with Roman approval. By then they must have
been "encouraged" and asEisted in setting up a scrlptorum in which to
do the writings. The ha~adah, ritual book [or the Passover [east,
written in the early 700s, mentions a conversation where rabbis had
the Shema\~he prays r stressing the oneness o[ Go~ The rabbis named
were~ Eliszer, Joshua, glazer the son o[ Azariah, Akiva~ and Tarphon.
Jewish scholars have sur~sed they were plotting revolt against Rome.
Thatis incorrect.
Theyhavebeenwriting
by candlelight
th o h
the night, meetin~ a ~eadline imposed by Piso.
Notice that the great Akiva was still not th~ senior rabbi.
H~ had moved up one place [rom when th~ live rabbis went ~c ~ome, but
older than he~ why were their names not mention~d on their works
as was his? H£a older ~llea~es had bean impo~ant since their
youn~er days when no dm~h~ ~F ~. priests and teachers in the ~
And suddenly the secret pieces fit together. The reason was
and the o~h~r scholars must have been writin~ by ~ommand ~er£ormancs
at hand. The head of the school when it was still at Yavneh~ Rsbban
"teacher of Israel."
Then ~ Jo~ ~.3~0, J~tus sets ~rth why he has inserted h~.
After Jose~ of ~i~thea ~osep~ obt~ns Jesus’ bo~ from Pilate
ben Oorion, will appear in the T~mud. Back in his Jewish ~ar
did no~ c~l him ~n of G~ali~ because he feared to imply the revol~
was ~r religious reasons, which it was. This Shimon ben Gamliel was
And when the Talmud mentions that Nakdimon be~Gorion was (the
first) one of the three wealthiest men in Jerusalem when the Romans
ben O~mliel had his prayer granted when he prayed for the s4~ to
son Kalba Shabua (an obviously fictional name) had in turn a daughter
the %ste£med Shimon ben Gamliel. And even more so, his father in law~
Xalba Shabua’s true identity was probably that of the venerable Rabban
Gamliel of Yavneh!
This accounts for Piso choosing him to superintend the writings
at Bnai Brak. It also accounts for Bnai Brak being known as having
been his (emphasis added) school, and for the fact that the older
although not formally the leader of the Judean tannayim, was the
unofficial lead,r, the one through whom Piso worked at the ~ime
aleph, k~, yUd, plus "9"; and in Daniel with bet and ayin plus
For the Family went back and added to Acts the names A~abus and Skevap
to "honor" him.
into the Hebrew versions, and why, when, where, and by whom they
had actually been written~.
Yet Akiva’s forced cooperation wi~h Piso in translating
Piso’s recent Greek "biblical" wrltin~s inSo Hebrew was no5 his
And i~ seems neither the grea~ Kkiva, who supposedly sent 25,O00
Gamliel. Yet thus far ~here was nothing, other than his name Shimon
to even hint at a connection with the leading family. And
even " thou~ the family (descendants)
of ~abban Gamli~l
1
Yavneh, was believed to have been at Beitar, which was Bar Cochbah’s
2 ~i Alon
last stronghold durin~ the war. And a Sanhedrin sat there. Vol.II
~2Dp~..6217bid6
Akiva himself had a son named Shimon. And at the
catastrophic end of the Bar Cochbah revolt, and before the ~omans
for his two sons, Shimon and Ishmael (b.Moed Katan 21b and Semacho~
7
And we suddenly r~member that Bar Cochb~h’s, name,meaning
son of a star, supposedly was taken from the H~brew biblical verse
in the OT Numbers 2~.17 that includes "there steppeth forth a star
Yet we suddenly recall that we have met the name Jacob previously:
~hat Akiva’s original name must have been Jacob before it was changed
to Akiva. And we perceive that the reason this biblical verse was
secretly hint that Bar Cochbah had come from that particular Jacob
whose name was later changed to Akiva. That is, that he was Akiva’s
And this shows that Bar Cochbah’s revolt was the last-gasp
military effor~ by the family of Hillel’s descendants. It was ¯
their last military effort against that other great Family in Rome
which rul~d the world and was using its personnel and legions to