Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ir
Original Article (Pages: 7605-7614)
Abstract
Background: One of the symptoms of mucositis caused by chemotherapy is pain. Mucositis
management is initiated by assessment of oral hygiene and management of pain. Many uses have been
mentioned for Satureja hortensis in traditional medicine. The study was carried out with the aim of
determining the effect of Satureja hortensis extract mucoadhesive gel of 1% on severity of mucositis-
induced pain in children under chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
This randomized parallel double-blind clinical trial was carried out on 60 children who were affected
by mucositis following chemotherapy in 2016. The samples were randomly assigned into two groups
of intervention and control. The intervention group applied Satureja hortensis extract gel of 1% and
the control group applied the placebo gel twice daily for 5 days after the onset of mucositis along with
routine treatment. Oral mucosa was evaluated daily. Also, the Oucher pain tools and a demographic
checklist were used. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 13.0 software.
Results: The obtained data showed that the two groups had statistical difference in terms of the
severity of the pain relief during the time, and pain severity reduced from 3.5±2.1 to 0.0 ± 0.0 in
intervention group and 3.1 ± 1.8 to 0.4 ± 1.0 in control group in fifth day (p <0.001).
Conclusion
The study showed that the extract 1% of Satureja hortensis is effective in healing mucositis induced
pain and can be used as a new treatment method in relieving reducing mucositis pain.
Key Words: Children, Chemotherapy, Mucositis, Pain, Satureja hortensis.
*Please cite this article as: Arshadi Bostanabad M, Hiradfar Amirataollah, Mohammadpoorasl A, Javadzadeh Y,
Khalvati B, Alvandnezhad T. The Effect of Mucoadhesive Gel Containing Satureja Hortensis Extract 1% on
Severity of Chemotherapy-induced Mucositis Pain in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Pediatr 2018;
6(5): 7605-14. DOI: 10.22038/ijp.2017.25259.2143
*Corresponding Author:
Tahereh Alvandnezhad, Master of pediatric Nursing Student, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz
University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Fax: +984114796969, Postal code: 5138947977.
Email: nurs.alvand@gmail.com
Received date: Jun.27, 2017; Accepted date: Dec.12, 2017
Satureja hortensis compound that has anti- The inclusion criteria consisted of being in
inflammatory and analgesic properties may the hematology ward or blood clinic;
play an important role in reducing having a history of chemotherapy; full
mucositis-induced pain in these patients. consciousness, being under treatment with
Therefore, this study was carried out with Cisplatin, Cyclophosphamide,
the aim of determining the effect of Methotrexate, Adriamycin and Vincristine,
Satureja hortensis extract 1% on severity age range of 3-14 years, disease diagnosis
of mucositis-induced pain and it's healing such as: Acute Myloid Leukemia, Acut
in children under chemotherapy. Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Lymphoma,
Neuroblastoma, Wilms' tumor, connective
2- MATERIALS AND METHODS tissue sarcoma, brain tumor, and not
2-1. Trial design and patients suffering from recurrent oral infectious
damage. Also, the subjects were excluded
This randomized parallel double-blind from the study in cases of the child's and
clinical trial was carried out on 60 children parent's unwillingness to continue the
with cancer, who had been afflicted by participation in the study, child's death,
mucositis due to chemotherapy at the becoming connected to ventilator, and
Tabriz Children's Hospital from August to continuous use of narcotic painkillers for
November, 2016. Tabriz Children’s relieving the pain. Each child had same
Hospital is pediatric education center is the chance of being in the study according to
refugee center in the North West of Iran. inclusion and exclusion. The process of the
The oncology department of the hospital study has been shown in Figure.1.
has 40 active beds covering several Hospitalization in the oncology
provinces. After obtaining the consent, department, patients' clinical records and
eligible children were included in the study history of chemotherapy was the criterion
by the method convenience sampling, for diagnosis of cancer.
considering the inclusion and exclusion
criteria. Participants using software Rand 2-2. Data collection
list considering 60 samples in two groups A demographic information questionnaire,
of 30, permuted block randomization with as well as medical and pharmaceutical
four and six block sizes in two groups of history was used to collect clinical and
Satureja hortensis extract 1% gel and demographic information. The
placebo with a ratio of 1: 1 allocation were questionnaire was completed for each
given. To observe blinding of the study, child through the interview with the child's
the placebo gel had been prepared and healthcare provider and according to the
coded by a pharmaceutics group at the child treatment record. Also, the Oucher
Tabriz faculty of pharmacy, exactly like pain tools as the oldest, most valid and
Satureja hortensis extract gel, and the most usable self-report scale of pain
researcher and healthcare provider were severity in children were used to
not aware of the type of gel. Permuted investigate the severity of mucositis-
block randomization was done by the induced pain. This scale consists of 6
master of the first guide using the software photos of a child's face with various
Rand list, the randomization code was severity of the pain that has been rated
391836736. The gel containing Satureja from 0 to 5, with 0 being a child without
hortensis extract was applied in the the pain and 5 indicating a child with
intervention group, whereas the gel unbearable pain (25).
without extraction was applied in the
control group.
In total, 60 children who had conformity children with mucositis according to the
with the inclusion and exclusion criteria physician's prescription.
were included in the study and randomly
2-5. Statistical analysis
assigned into two groups of intervention
and control. In eligible children who had The information was collected using SPSS
suffered mucositis because of version 13.0 software. The comparison of
chemotherapy, first, intraoral examination the qualitative variables was conducted by
was performed by cooperation of an Chi-square test; while the quantitative
oncologist; then, they were included in the variables were compared using t-test and
study after observing the randomization. repeated measures ANOVA (The results
To this end, first, the severity of oral ulcer were significant at (p≤0.05)
pain was determined and recorded. Then, 2-6. Ethical issues
the mucoadhesive gel was prescribed for
each child by the physician. The healthcare To observe ethical issues, an approval with
provider and child were orally trained the number IR.TBZMED.REC.1395.282
about how to apply the gel and after was obtained from the ethics committee of
receiving proper feedback, the gel was Tabriz University of Medical Sciences,
given to the healthcare provider. The and the study was registered in Iranian
educational pamphlets were also prepared Registry of Clinical Trial site with the
and given to the parents and ward nurses to number (IRCT- code)
instruct the method of applying the IRCT2016061813691N7.
mucoadhesive gel. For applying the
mucoadhesive gel, first, each child washed 3- RESULTS
their mouth with a soft toothbrush; then, Of the 93 children, 22 children were not
put a thin layer of gel with the size of a fin included in the study due to non-
on the healthy mucosa. compliance with the inclusion for
Also, the gel was applied after the meal admission to study, 7 children due to
and nothing was eaten until 1 hour after unwillingness of the child or parents and 3
applying the gel. The mucoadhesive gel children for other reasons and 61 eligible
was applied twice daily, preferably after children were enrolled in the study. One
breakfast and before sleep, and the routine child in the intervention group was
treatment of the ward was also continued excluded from the study due to their
along with mucoadhesive gel. Regular parents' unwillingness to continue their
consumption of the gel was controlled by collaboration. A total of 60 children who
the researcher and ward nurses. No child met the criteria for the inclusion criteria
was deprived of the ward’s routine included in this study. The mean age was
treatment that was used for oral ulcer, and 90.97±41.18 months in the intervention
the mucoadhesive gel was applied for each group, and 82.43±37.15 months in the
child along with the routine treatment. The control group, which were statistically
ward routine treatment consisted of a equal (P=0.403). The oral ulcer began in
Cocktail mixture containing 100ml 6.0±6.18 and 6.18±8.47 days of
Aluminum Hydroxide-Magnesium hospitalization in the intervention and
Hydroxide-Simethicone syrup control group, respectively (P=0.691). The
(Aluminum Mg.S) (Soha Co. Iran), and differences were statistically equal and no
30ml Diphenhydramine syrup (1 ml = significant difference was observed
25gr, Sina Daroo Co. Iran), and half of the between the both groups. Other
tube of lidocaine gel 2% (1gr, Sina Daroo demographic and clinical information of
Co. Iran), that was being applied for the patients has been shown in Table.1.
The analysis of the repeated measures
ANOVA was used in both the groups however, the reduction in the mucositis-
within 5 days for comparing the severity of induced pain severity was statistically
mucositis-induced pain, as shown in different between the both groups and
Table.2. As seen in the Table.2 and accordingly, the pain was more quickly
Figure.2, the severity of oral ulcer- or reduced with more acceleration in the
mucositis-induced pain has been reduced intervention group (P<0.05).
in the both groups during the time;
Table 1: The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients in the two groups of control
and intervention
Intervention group Control group
Variables Number (Percent) Number (Percent) P-value
n = 30 n = 30
Female 12 (40.0) 8 (26.8)
Gender 0.273
Male 18 (60.0) 22 (73.3)
Illiterate elementary 11 (36.7) 6 (20.7)
Mother's Intermediate high
13 (43.3) 20 (69.0) 0.139
education school
University education 6 (20.0) 3 (10.3)
Employee 4 (13.8) 5 (16.7)
Self-employed 13 (44.8) 11 (36.7)
Father's job 0.916
Worker 7 (26.1) 9 (30.0)
Other 5 (16.7) 6 (16.7)
ALL 12 (40.0) 17 (56.7)
Neuroblastoma 4 (13.3) 2 (6.7)
Connective tissue
Diagnosis 7 (23.3) 3 (10.0) 0.409
sarcoma
Other 2 (6.6) 3 (9.9)
Lymphoma 5 (16.7) 5 (16.7)
Normal 15 (50.0) 19 (63.3)
Diet 0.297
Low-salt 15 (50.0) 11 (36.7)
Prophylaxis Yes 4 (13.3) 2 (6.7)
0.389
mouthwash No 26 (86.7) 28 (93.3)
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Variables P-value
n = 30 n = 30
Times of hospitalization (month) 14.0 ± 10.8 15.2 ± 9.9 -0.434
Duration of chemotherapy (day) 4.6 ± 2.2 4.0 ± 1.6 1.11
Absolute count of neutrophil *1000 1.5 ± 1.8 2.2 ± 1.6 -1.49
Weight (kg) 25.5 ± 12.6 23.1 ± 10.5 0.814
SD: Standard deviation; ALL: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Table-2: The comparison of the severity of mucositis-induced pain in 5 days between the two groups
of intervention and control
Intervention group Control group
Time P- value*
Mean (SD), n = 30 Mean (SD), n =30
First day 3.5 ± 2.1 3.1 ± 1.8
Second day 1.8 ± 1.4 2.5 ± 2.0 P<0.001
Third day 0.2 ± 0.5 1.9 ± 1.6
Fourth day 0.0 ± 0.0 1.1 ± 1.4
Fifth day 0.0 ± 0.0 0.4 ± 1.0
*: Repeated measures ANOVA; SD: Standard deviation.
Fig.2: The diagram of the sererity mucositis pain in 5 day between two groups (intervention and
control).
project, all the children and their 9. Qian C-N, Mei Y, Zhang J. Cancer
parentsand honorable authorities of the metastasis: issues and challenges. Chinese
Tabriz children's educational-treatment Journal of Cancer. 2017;36(1):38.
center, especially Dr. Abbas Ali 10. Jayakrishnan R, Chang K, Ugurluer G,
Hosseinpour Feizi and Mrs. Jalili. Miller RC, Sio TT. Doxepin for radiation
therapy-induced mucositis pain in the
8- REFERENCES treatment of oral cancers. Oncology reviews.
2015;9(1): 290.
1. Minute M, Cozzi G, Plotti C, 11. Bennett M. Pain management for
Montanari G, Pecile P, Zanazzo GA, et al. chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Nursing
Children with cancer: a survey on the children and young people. 2016;28(10):25-9.
experience of Italian primary care
pediatricians. Italian Journal of Pediatrics. 12. Bornemann-Cimenti H, Kobald S,
2017;43(1):48. Szilagyi I, Sandner-Kiesling A. Topische
Schmerztherapie bei oraler Mukositis. Der
2. Rudowska J. Management of Schmerz. 2013;3(27):253-62.
breakthrough pain due to cancer.
Contemporary oncology. 2012;16(6):498. 13. Nielsen BN, Aagaard G, Henneberg
SW, Schmiegelow K, Hansen SH, Rømsing J.
3. Viet C, Corby P, Akinwande A, Topical morphine for oral mucositis in
Schmidt B. Review of preclinical studies on children: dose finding and absorption. Journal
treatment of mucositis and associated pain. of pain and symptom management.
Journal of dental research. 2014;93(9):868-75. 2012;44(1):117-23.
4. Shillingburg A, Kanate AS, Hamadani 14. Roldan CJ, Nouri K, Chai T, Huh B.
M, Wen S, Craig M, Cumpston A. Treatment Methylene Blue for the Treatment of
of severe mucositis pain with oral ketamine Intractable Pain Associated with Oral
mouthwash. Support Care Cancer. 2017; Mucositis. Pain Pract. 2017;17(8):1115-1121.
25(7):2215-2219.
15. Guo S-P, Wu S-G, Zhou J, Feng H-X,
5. Elad S, Zadik Y. Chronic oral Li F-Y, Wu Y-J, et al. Transdermal fentanyl
mucositis after radiotherapy to the head and for pain due to chemoradiotherapy-induced
neck: a new insight. Supportive Care in oral mucositis in nasopharyngeal cancer
Cancer. 2016;24(11):4825-30. patients: evaluating efficacy, safety, and
6. Askarifar M, Lakdizaji S, Ramzi M, improvement in quality of life. Drug design,
Rahmani A, Jabbarzadeh F. The Effects of development and therapy. 2014;8:497.
Oral Cryotherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced 16. Safarnezhad Tameshkel F, Khatami
Oral Mucositis in Patients Undergoing Nejad M, Nasrollahi A, Rahdari P, Gholam
Autologous Transplantation of Blood Stem Hossein Poor F, Rahnavard A. The
Cells: A Clinical Trial. Iranian Red Crescent antimicrobial effect of methanol extracts of
Medical Journal. 2016;18(4): e24775 . Eucalyptus, Satureia hortensis and Heracleum
7. Al-Ansari S, Zecha JA, Barasch A, de glabrescens on Giardia cysts. Medical
Lange J, Rozema FR, Raber-Durlacher JE. Laboratory Journal. 2012;6(2):21-7.
Oral mucositis induced by anticancer 17. Abbasloo E, Dehghan F, Khaksari M,
therapies. Current oral health reports. Najafipour H, Vahidi R, Dabiri S, et al. The
2015;2(4):202-11. anti-inflammatory properties of Satureja
8. Gholizadeh N, Mehdipoor M, Sajadi khuzistanica Jamzad essential oil attenuate the
H, Moosavi M-S. Palifermin and effects of traumatic brain injuries in rats.
Chlorhexidine Mouthwashes in Prevention of Scientific reports. 2016;6: DOI:
Chemotherapy-Induced Mucositis in Children 10.1038/srep33769.
with Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia: a 18. Sharifzadeh A, Khosravi AR,
Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Ahmadian S. Chemical composition and
Dentistry. 2016;17(4):343. antifungal activity of Satureja hortensis L.
essentiall oil against planktonic and biofilm of pain intensity: scale selection, limitations
growth of Candida albicans isolates from and interpretation. Pain Research and
buccal lesions of HIV+ individuals. Microbial Management. 2006;11(3):157-62.
pathogenesis. 2016;96:1-9.
26. Rieber JG, Kessel KA, Witt O,
19. Moradian H, Bazargani A, Rafiee A, Behnisch W, Kulozik AE, Debus J, et al.
Nazarialam A. In vitro comparison of Treatment tolerance of particle therapy in
antimicrobial activity of aqueous decoction of pediatric patients. Acta Oncologica.
Coriandrum sativum, and Dentol Drop with 2015;54(7):1049-55.
chlorhexidine on Streptococcus mutans.
27. Hajhashemi V, Ghannadi A,
Iranian journal of microbiology.
Pezeshkian SK. Antinociceptive and anti-
2013;5(3):239.
inflammatory effects of Satureja hortensis L.
20. Landa P, Kokoska L, Pribylova M, extracts and essential oil. Journal of
Vanek T, Marsik P. In vitro anti-inflammatory ethnopharmacology. 2002;82(2):83-7.
activity of carvacrol: Inhibitory effect on
28. Samdariya S, Lewis S, Kauser H,
COX-2 catalyzed prostaglandin E 2
Ahmed I, Kumar D. A randomized controlled
biosynthesisb. Archives of pharmacal research.
trial evaluating the role of honey in reducing
2009;32(1):75-8.
pain due to radiation induced mucositis in
21. Shahab A, Haghighati F, Baeeri M, head and neck cancer patients. Indian journal
Jamalifar H, Abdollahi M. A clinical, of palliative care. 2015;21(3):268.
microbiological and immunological
29. Sabzghabaee AM, Davoodi N,
comparison between subgingival irrigation
Ebadian B, Aslani A, Ghannadi A. Clinical
with Dentol and chlorhexidine in advanced
evaluation of the essential oil of “Satureja
periodontitis. Arch Med Sci. 2011;7(1):154-
Hortensis” for the treatment of denture
60.
stomatitis. Dental research journal.
22. Tepe B, Cilkiz M. A pharmacological 2012;9(2):198.
and phytochemical overview on Satureja.
30. Mahboubi M, Kazempour N. The anti-
Pharmaceutical biology. 2016;54(3):375-412.
candidal activity of Satureja khuzistanica
23. Zolfagharian F, Razavi BM, ethanol extract against clinical isolates of C.
Hosseinzadeh H. Anticonvulsant effect of albicans. Journal de Mycologie
Satureja hortensis aerial parts extracts in mice. Médicale/Journal of Medical Mycology.
Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine. 2016;26(1):e6-e10.
2016;6(3):305.
31. Delfan b, Hashemnia m, Javanbakht a,
24. Vosough-Ghanbari S, Rahimi R, Nazari m, Jebreily r, Birjandi m, et al. The
Kharabaf S, Zeinali S, Mohammadirad A, effect of Satureja Khuzestanica essential oil on
Amini S, et al. Effects of Satureja the pain of patients with PHN. scientific
khuzestanica on serum glucose, lipids and magazine yafte. 2010;11(5):25-34.
markers of oxidative stress in patients with
32. Abdollahi SMaM. An Update on
type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double-blind
Pharmacology of Satureja Species; From
randomized controlled trial. Evidence-Based
Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Antidiabetes and
Complementary and Alternative Medicine.
Anti-hyperlipidemic to Reproductive
2010;7(4):465-70.
Stimulation. International Journal of
25. von Baeyer CL. Children’s self-reports Pharmacology. 2010;6:346-53.