Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
UNIVERSITY OF LUCKNOW
First and foremost, I would like to thank our subject teacher Dr. Anjani
kant Sir, for the valuable guidance and advice. He inspired us greatly to
work on this interesting assignment. His willingness to motivate us
contributed tremendously to our assignment. I also would like to thank
him for showing us some sample assignments on how to go about the
research assignment. It gave me an opportunity to analyze and learn
about the operation of various sections of Transfer of Property Act 1882
relating to the topic . Besides, I would like to thank the Faculty staff for
providing us with a good environment and facilities for completing this
assignment. In addition, I would also like to thank my seniors who
provided me with the valuable information acting as a source of
guidance in making the assignment. Finally, an honorable mention goes
to my family and friends for their understandings and supports in
completing this assignment. Without the help of the particulars
mentioned above, making of this assignment would not have been
possible.
THANK YOU!
-SYNOPSIS-
• Introduction
• Estoppel of sec 43
• Estoppel by Deed
Ingredients of section 43
• Conclusion
• Bibliography
1-INTRODUCTION:
The principle embodied in Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act has been
estoppel' or as the doctrine of Equity that 'equity' treats that as done which
given to the principle, it is the section itself which must ultimately determine its
scope and the conditions of its application. In order that Section 43 may apply
person that he was authorized to transfer immoveable property and he must have
professed to transfer such property, but there is nothing in the section requiring that
the transferor should have been aware of the erroneousness of the representation
made by him. The transferor might have honestly believed in the truth of the
transfer, but that would not render the Section inapplicable. It will be noted that
even before the introduction of the word 'fraudulently' into the section in 1929,
tainted or untainted with fraud. The amendment has now made it clear that the
section will be applicable even it the transferor is unaware of the erroneous nature
The basis of the principle embodied in section 43 calling upon the transfer to
deliver the subsequently required property to the transferee, who must have
acted upon his false representation and did harm to himself by paying money
for , what he could not get , and thereby “feeding the estoppels” created against
him. If a person , who alienated property to which he has no present title, may
cannot derogate from his own grant , his subsequently acquired interest, feeds
the estoppel, raised by the prior grant and perfects the title of the alienee. The
“Where a grantor has purported to grant an interest in land which he did not, at
the time ,posses, but subsequently acquires , the benefit of his subsequent
IN INDIA:
The court of equity in England, applies a similar but wider principle in that it is
not based upon an estoppel by the recitals of the deed : “The doctrine of the
which he has not at the time of his contract a title to, but he afterwards acquires
such a title as enables him to perform his contract, he shall be bound to do so.
to his wife in compromise of the claim for maintenance. The wife claimed to
have become absolute owner under section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act,
1956. She filed suit for declaration. During pendency, husband sold that
property to the respondents. The wife died during pendency of suit. The
purchaser claimed that his seller (husband) had become full owner and must
comply with section 41 and 43. The High Court held section 41 would not
apply. The court observe, it is one thing to say that the respondent was aware of
the litigation but it is another thing to say that he did not purchase the property
title over the property. The court held that the principle of feeding the estoppel
being inapplicable , this plea could have been taken by Harcharan Singh and not
by the appellant Hardev Singh. The appeal was dismissed. The appellant could
not get declaration prayed for to be the owner of lands in terms of section 41
and 43.
4:-ESTOPPEL OF SEC:- 43
The rule enunciated by section 43, Transfer of Property Act is based partly on
the common law doctrine of “estoppels by the deed” and partly on the equitable
doctrine that a man who has promised more than, he can perform, must make
the Act gives expression to the rule of estoppel as well as equity regards that as
5:-ESTOPPEL BY DEED:
The doctrine of estoppels by deed is “if a man who has no title, whatever to
property, grants it by conveyance, which in form would carry the legal estate,
and he subsequently acquires an interest sufficient to satisfy the grant, the estate
instantly passes.”
The words “the estate instantly passes” are important, for under the common
law rule the estate passed without any further act of the transferor and the
estoppel prevailed even against a purchaser for value. The application of the
common law rule is complicated by many complexities, and it does not apply
in India.
RECOGNISED IN INDIA:
The whole of the doctrine, however, is not recognized in section 43 of the Act. The
section follows this doctrine only to the extent that the subsequent estate passes to
the transferee without any further act on the part of the transferor. The
illustration given to the section clearly marks the word ‘deliver’ in this context.
The estate feeds the estoppels and, therefore, becomes an interest. From the
moment, therefore, the transfer begins to operate on the interest acquired by the
interest and the commencement of the interest is from the date when the transferor
doctrine , neither does the estate pass instantly nor does the transferee get a title
which cannot be defeated by another transferee for value without notice. The
transferee under the section must call upon the transferor to deliver the property to
him, and before he does so , if it is transferred to another person for value and
without notice of the first transfer, he would not be able the title of the subsequent
transferee.
to his authority to transfer the property, the present section will apply. It is
essential that the transferee was misled by the representation of the transferor.
that the transferee has believed it and ion good faith acted upon it.; if the fact of the
defective title of the transferor is known to both the parties, there is collusion and
attorney which was not proved, the share which he inherited on her death, was held
consisting of himself and his two sons sold family property representating that it
was his self-acquired and one of the sons died pending the vendee’s suit for
possession, the vendee was held entitled to the benefit of his accession to the
makes an incorrect statement, to the other party to the contract whereby the
other party is induced to enter into the contract and the person making the
The next requirement for section is that the transferor must acquire some
does not matter if it cannot satisfy the transfer in toto, the reason being that
every acquisition of interest in the property transferred ensures for the benefit of
the transferee. Accordingly, where the plaintiff who was suing for pre-emption
mortgage the property in suit in order to raise money for the litigation in
anticipation of a decree and obtained a decree and got possession, equity
treating that as done which ought to have been done, gave the mortgage a
charge on the property and placed him in the position of a mortgagee. The
section will equally apply where the transferor has got lesser interest than that
The section only enables a transferee to claim an interest which the transferor
acquires subsequently and does not lay down the proposition that interest shall
vest in the transferee from the date of the execution of the document of transfer
in his favour. If he fails to claim it , his right becomes subject to the right of any
other transfer in good faith to whom it may be transferred by the transferor for
valuable consideration. Again, in order to exercise the option, he must see that
the transfer subsists and that the unperformed part of it, is not rescinded by him
Where the transferee obtains a decree on his transfer, it is not open to him to
merger when it becomes the subject of decree. The transferee need not
immediately to give notice to the transferor that he proposes to hold him bound
by the agreement. The transferor has option to leave the transfer to operate on
merely created interest. Option need not be exercised in specific form. The
section does not contemplate any exercise of option ( such as notice ) by the
transferee. All that is contemplated is indication of its existence by any overt act
If demand is late and meanwhile the transferor gives that property to third
person who is bona fide purchaser for value without notice, the right of first
transferee ends and that of bona fide purchaser for value without notice
prevails.
Both the section 41 and 43 are based on the principle of estoppels where on a
representation made by one party and acted upon by another, the rights of the
the representation is enough. The section does not cast on the transferee the
duty to make inquiry as regards the power of the transferor to transfer the
property.
CONCLUSION:-
The principle embodied in Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act has been
estoppels' or as the doctrine of Equity that 'equity' treats that as done which ought
the principle, it is the section itself which must ultimately determine its scope and
the conditions of its application. In order that Section 43 may apply there must
transfer such property, but there is nothing in the section requiring that the
transferor should have been aware of the erroneousness of the representation made
by him. The transferor might have honestly believed in the truth of the
transfer, but that would not render the Section inapplicable. It will be noted that
even before the introduction of the word 'fraudulently' into the section in 1929,
tainted or untainted with fraud. The amendment has now made it clear that the
section will be applicable even it the transferor is unaware of the erroneous nature
• Books referred :
. Website referred:
• Indian Kanoon
• SCC Online
• Manupatra