XXRVIE SANTIAGO-CHICE | xy ternational Mineral
IMPC-2014 | Procecsina conoress
The flotation of pyrite and chalcopyrite in the
presence of biopolymers
Yufan Mu!, Yongjun Peng!’ and Rolf Lauten’
1, School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Australia
2, Julius Kruitschmitt Mineral Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Australia
3. Pionera, Norway
ABSTRACT
Biopolymers, produced from cellulosic biomass, have promising prospects of application as
depressants in mineral processing. In this study, three different types of biopolymers (i.e,, DP-1775,
DP-1777 and DP-1778) were used to study the effect of polymer structure on flotation of un:
activated pyrite, copper activated pyrite and chalcopyrite. It was found that the depressing effect of
DP-1775 and DP-1778 was much stronger than that of DP-1777, and pyrite was depressed to a
greater content than chalcopyrite with the same biopolymer at the same dosage.
The biopolymer concentration played a vital role in determining the degree of depression. For each
biopolymer, the higher the concentration, the greater the minerals were depressed. ‘The mechanism
underpinning the depressing effect of these biopolymers was explored in this paper. The
concentration of biopolymers could determine the properties of the adsorption layer and the
confirmation of biopolymer chains on mineral surfaces. The biopolymer molecules may aggregate
when polymer concentration was over a critical value. Molecular weight and functional groups of
biopolymers were the key factors characterizing the depressing capability of different biopolymers.
Differences between the tested biopolymers and features of the adsorbed layer might account for
the observed trends in ability to depress pyrite and chalcopyrite flotation. The greater depressing
effect of biopolymers on pyrite over chalcopyrite might result from the preferential adsorption of
biopolymers on pyrite over chalcopyrite.
132,XXVIISANTIAGO-CHILE | xy international Mineral
IMPC-2014 | Procossina conorece
INTRODUCTION
Pyrite (FeS), as a quasi-ubiquitous and usually barren mineral, is often found associated with copper
sulfide minerals, such as chalcopyrite (Huang et al, 2013, Wang and Peng, 2013, Derycke et al, 2013, Liu
et al,, 2009). When present in base metal concentrates it lowers the grade of the more valuable base metals.
Accordingly, itis desirable to separate pyrite from a base metal concentrate, for instance chalcopyrite. One
example of such a process, where the target was to optimize the recovery of copper and gold, was
described by Burns et al. (2012). In another study, Boulton et al. (2001b) examined how polyarylamides
with different functional groups modified the separation of pyrite from sphalerite. Depending upon
details of a flotation operation one may aspire to either float or depress pyrite and in doing so, increase
the purity and value of the concentrate.
The flotation behavior of pyrite is greatly influenced by pulp pl1 and activating ions (Li et al, 2012). Many
researchers have demonstrated that pyrite exhibits good flotation performance in acidic to neutral pH
conditions in the presence of xanthate, where dixanthogen, the oxidation product of xanthate, is formed
At alkaline conditions, dixanthogen (if used as a collector) is less stable and degrades to xanthate. At the
surface of pyrite, xanthates, hydroxyl ions and different iron hydroxides resulting from the oxidation of
pyrite will adsorb. The competitive adsorption process arising from this reduces the hydrophobicity of the
pyrite surface and lowers its flotation recovery (Li et al, 2012, Fuerstenau et al, 1985, Wang and Eric,
1991, He et al, 2005). However, pyrite flotation can be significantly improved after activation by cupric
species in alkaline conditions, either added intentionally or dissolved from copper minerals present in the
system, resulting, in the misreporting of pyrite to the concentrate, thus lowering the concentrate grade
Goulton et a., 20012, He etal, 2005, Peng etal, 2003a),
Chalcopyrite (CuFe&:) is one of the most important minerals for the production of copper, and floats
readily with thionocarbamate collector in a pH region 5-11.5, However, the separation of chalcopyrite and
other copper minerals from pyrite in many industry flotation plants is not straight forward and the use of
cyanide and other inorganic modifiers to depress pyrite is a common practice. To eliminate the use of
toxic inorganic chemicals, different polymers have been tested as depressants for pyrite. However, the
depression of iron sulfide minerals, especially pyrite, of which the surface is often covered with iron
oxidefhydroxide during grinding and can be activated by copper and other metal ions, is a very difficult
problem and existing polymer depressants have not gained a wide application.
In this work, the depressing effect of three different types of biopolymers being modified lignosulfonates,
con the flotation behavior of un-activated pyrite, copper activated pyrite and chalcopyrite was
investigated. The similarity and difference in depressing the effect of biopolymers were also discussed in
relation to their difference in molecular structure. The biopolymers are produced from renewable
cellulosic biomass. Similar biopolymers have been found effective in mitigating problems with
hydrophilic alumina-silicate clay gangue in the flotation of a copper-gold ore. In an attempt to address the
problem relating to processing clay ores, Newerest’s Telfer Operation investigated the addition of a small
amount of three dispersants (polyacrylate, modified carboxylic acid and Pionera’s F-100 lignosulfonate-
based polymer) in the flotation process, and found that the addition of all three dispersants, in particular
F-100, improved copper recovery and grade significantly in the laboratory (Seaman et a, 2012). However,
Seaman et al. (2012) indicated that there existed an inconsistent observation in the laboratory and in the
full-scale plant trial, where the positive effect of F-100 in improving copper and gold flotation from high
133XXUIE SANTIAGOCHILE | yn itematinat neat
IMPC-2014 | Procossina conorece
clayey ores was not clearly observed. In an attempt to resolve this Wei et al. (2013) performed floatation in
a similar system at different grinding conditions. When mild steel was used as the grinding media a large
amount of iron oxidation products formed in the pulp. In the presence of these oxidation products, the F-
1100 was less efficient as a clay gangue dispersant. If this lack of efficiency arises from interaction with iron
‘oxidation products or a competitive adsorption process similar to that described above for the floatability
of pyrite is uncertain, It is conjectured that lignosulfonate-based biopolymers have a potential to be used
as depressants for iron sulfide minerals due to its possibly selective interaction with iron oxide species.
Similar polymers have been used to depress calcite and barite, but it has seldom been reported to depress
sulfide minerals (Ansari and Pawlik, 2007).
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials and reagents
Single minerals, pyrite and chalcopyrite, were crushed through roll crushers and then screened to collect,
the +0.6-3.2 mm particle size fraction. The processed samples were then sealed in polyethylene bags.
The biopolymers used in the experiments were DP-1775, DP-1777, and DP-1778 powder supplied from
Pionera, Norway. The detailed composition of these three biopolymers is listed in Table I.
‘The collector, potassium amyl xanthate (PAX, AR grade), and frother, NASCOL 442 (AR grade), were
used in pyrite flotation. An industrial grade IPETC (isopropyl ethyl thionocarbamate) and plant frother
(an aliphatic alcohol based mixture) were used as collector and frother, respectively, in chalcopyrite
flotation. The collectors and frothers used in this study were based on those used in the industry flotation
plants chosen as case studies. Copper sulfate (CuSOrSHL:O, AR grade) was used to introduce copper ions
during flotation to activate pyrite. The pH was adjusted by the addition of AR grade NaOH and H:SO+
solutions. Brisbane tap water was used in the grinding and flotation.
Table 1 The molecular weight of the biopolymers used in this work and the content of main functional
groups
Molecular weight Main functional groups
Biopolymers Counterion
Mw Ms Sulfonic (%) _Carboxyl (%)
DP-175 Nav 39000 2400 61 a7
Dp-777 Nav 13700 2000 85 95
bp.178 car 6000800 48 145
Mineral grinding and flotation
Pyrite or chalcopyrite mineral (100g) was combined with 100 cm’ water and ground with 3.6 kg of
grinding media in a laboratory stainless steel rod mill for 6.45 min and 5.16 min respectively so that 80
wt% of the particles were less than 106 um and 75 um in diameter for pyrite and chalcopyrite,
respectively.
134