Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
A. Slab:
• Bending m1 1 Modifier = 0.25
• Bending m2 2 Modifier = 0.25
• Bending m1 2 Modifier = 0.25
• Others value = 1.00
B. Column:
• Torsional Constant = 1.00
• Moment of inertia about2 = 0.70
• Moment of inertia about3 = 0.70
• Others value = 1.00
C. Beam:
• Torsional Constant = 0.01
• Moment of inertia about 2 = 0.35
• Moment of inertia about 3 = 0.35
• Others value = 1.00
D. Wall:
• Bending m1 1 Modifier = 0.35
• Bending m2 2 Modifier = 0.35
• Bending m3 3 Modifier = 0.35
• Others value = 1.00
Step-14: Assign Auto Edge Constraints
Step-15: Define Frame-Shell sway properties
Step-16: Check for model
Step-17: Run Analysis of the model
Step-18: Design of the Concrete Frame Sections
Step-19: Design of the Shear Walls
Step-20: Design of Mat
Step-21: Detailing of the Reinforcement
B Rebar (fy)
Add New Material Property >
Material Type > Rebar >Standard ASTM A615 >
Grade > Grade 60> OK.
Click to >
Add New Property >Concrete > Rect. Shape >
Note: B1 = 12x14
B2 = 14x16
B3 = 14x18
B4 = 16x20
B5 = 16x22
B6 = 16x24
B Beam (GB)
Add New Property >
Note: GB1 = 12x12
GB2 = 12x16
GB3 = 14x16
GB4 = 14x16
Note: Cover to Longitudinal Rebar Group Centroid.
Top Bars = 3”
Bottom Bars = 3”
Note: Top & Bottom Bars will be 3” for Great Beam Only. On the other case is same.
C Column
> Add New Property >Concrete > Rect. Shape >
Note: C1 = 12x16
C2 = 14x18
C3 = 18x22
C4 = 18x20
C5 = 20x24
C6 = 22x26
C7 = 24x28
C8 = 24x30
General Data > Property Name > C1 = 12x16 >
Material > CON 3.0 >
Section Dimensions >Depth = 16’ > Width = 12’ >
Set the P-Delta analysis parameters by making selections in the following areas of the Preset P-Delta
Options form.
Automation Method: An initial P-Delta analysis in this program considers the P-Delta effect of a single
loaded state upon the structure. Specify the load using one of the following options:
▪ None option. Use this option to not consider P-Delta effects, including removing previously
considered effects.
▪ Non-Iterative -- Based on Mass option. The load is computed automatically from the mass at
each level as a story-by-story load upon the structure. This approach is approximate, but does
not require an iterative solution. This method essentially treats the building as a simplified stick
model to consider the P-Delta effect. It is much faster than the iterative method. It does not
capture local buckling as well as the iterative method. This method works best if the model has
a single diaphragm at each floor level, although it also works for other cases as well. The
reason we provide this method is to allow consideration of P-Delta in cases for which gravity
loads have not been specified in the model. If gravity loads have been specified in the model, in
general, we recommend use of the Iterative Based on Loads option.
▪ Iterative -- Based on Loads option. The load case is computed from a specified combination of
static load patterns. This is called the P-Delta load case. For example, the load case may be the
sum of a dead load case plus a fraction of a live load case. This approach requires an iterative
solution to determine the P-Delta effect upon the structure. This method considers the P-Delta
effect on an element-by-element basis. It captures local buckling effects better than the non-
iterative method. We recommend the use of this iterative method in all cases except those for
which no gravity load is specified in the model.
▪
o Relative Convergence Tolerance: This area is active if the Iterative -- Based on
Loads option is selected in the Automation Method area of the form. See Iterative
Solution, Convergence Tolerance for more information.
o Iterative P-Delta Load Case: This area is active if the Iterative -- Based on
Loads option is selected in the Automation Method area of the form. Specify the single
load case from a combination of load patterns to be used for the initial P-Delta analysis
of the structure. As an example, assume that the building code requires the following
load combinations to be considered for design:
(4) 1.2 dead load + 0.5 live load - 1.3 wind load
For this case, the P-Delta effect associated with the overall sway of the structure can
usually be accounted for, conservatively, by specifying the P-Delta load case to be 1.2
times dead load plus 0.5 times live load. This will accurately account for this effect in
load combinations 3 and 4 above, and will conservatively account for this effect in load
combinations 5 and 6. This P-Delta effect is not generally important in load combinations
1 and 2 because there is no lateral load.
It is also possible to accurately account for the P-Delta effect associated with the
deformation of the members between their ends in the ETABS analysis, but we do not
recommend that you do this. Instead, we recommend that you account for this effect
using factors in your design. The ETABS design postprocessors assume that this has
occurred and includes those factors, where appropriate, in the design.
To account for the P-Delta effect associated with the deformation of the members
between their ends in the ETABS analysis, first break up all of the columns into at least
two objects between story levels. Then run each of the six load cases above separately
with a different P-Delta load combination for each. Again, it is recommended that this
effect be included using factors in your design, as is performed in the ETABS design
postprocessors.