Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
(2014-55553)
CHAPTER TWO I RESEARCH METHODS IN I/O PSYCHOLOGY
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH METHODS
Experimental Method
- A research design characterized by a high degree of control over the research setting to allow for the
determination of cause and effect relationships among variables
- Designed to give a high degree of control over the research setting
- Variables:
o Independent Variable-the variable that is manipulated by the researcher
o Dependent Variable/outcome variable-the variable that is acted on by the independent variable
o All other variables are held in constant
o Extraneous Variable-Variables other than the independent variable that may influence the
dependent variable
- Groups:
o Control Group- a comparison group that receives no treatment
o Treatment Group/Experimental Group- group that is subjected to the change in the
independent variable
o Comparison between the two groups allows the researcher to determine the magnitude of the
effect produced by the manipulation of the independent variable
- Random Assignment-a method of assigning subjects to groups by chance to control for the effects of
extraneous variables
- Advantage: allows to determine cause and effect relationship
- Drawback: superficial(concern whether these results will apply to real life)
Quasi-experiments
- Follows the experimental design but lacks the random assignment and/or manipulation of independent
variable
- Cause and effect relationships cannot be determined
- Common in I/O Psychology(difficult to control extraneous variables and unit of organization is in groups,
not individuals)
- Try to measure as many possible extraneous variables to statistically control for effects
Correlational Method
- Research design that examines the relationships among or between variables as they naturally occur
- No manipulation of variables by the researcher
- Measures two of more variables and then examines their statistical relationships to one another
- Distinction between independent and dependent variable is not as important
Segismundo, Isabelle D.(2014-55553)
- Advantages:
o Easy to use in actual work settings
o May be conducted with archival data(data that an organization already has)
- Disadvantages:
o Cannot determine cause and effect relationships
- Caution must be exercised when interpreting the results of correlational research
Complex Correlational Designs
- Involves complex statistical analyses that allow for the combining predictor variables, statistically
controlling for possible extraneous variables, and methods that allow for inferring the likelihood of
cause and effect
- Multiple Regression Design-examines the relationship between a particular outcome variable and
multiple predictors
o Allows researchers to determine how a number of variables correlate with a certain outcome
o Allows the researchers to control possible extraneous variables and examine the effect of one
variable on another, controlling for the effects of extraneous variables
- Some designs can be used to infer causality
o Mediation Model- relationship between two variables is hypothesized to be explained by or
mediated by a third variable(mediator variable)
Meta-Analysis
- A technique that allows the results of a number of studies to be combined and analyzed together to
draw a summary conclusion
- Effect size-an estimate of the magnitude of a relationship of effect found in a research investigation
o Correlation coefficient
- Uses:
o Summarize the relationship between variables examined in each of a set of studies and
determining other factors that are associated with increase/decrease in magnitude of
relationships between variables of interest
o Compare and combine data from all of the examined studies, taking into account the effect sizes
and the number of participants in each of the studies
Case Study Method
- A research investigation involving a one-time assessment of behavior
- A descriptive investigation
- Do not allow us to draw any firm conclusions
- Unable to test hypotheses or determine cause and effect relationships
- Provides rich, descriptive information about certain work behaviors and outcomes
- Such results might inspire the development of hypotheses that will later be tested
MEASUREMENT OF VARIABLES
Observational Techniques
- Through direct, systematic observation
- Researchers recording certain behaviors that they have defined as the operationalized variables
- Obtrusive Observation- researcher is visible to the persons being observed
o Dis: participants may behave differently because they know that they are being observed
Segismundo, Isabelle D.(2014-55553)
o Must always consider how their presence will affect participants’ behavior and results
- Unobtrusive Observation- participants are unaware of the researchers’ presence and do not know that
their behavior is being studies
o Adv: recorded behavior is typical
o Dis: ethical concerns about protecting the privacy of participants
Self-Report Techniques
- Measurement methods relying on research participants’ reports of their own behavior or attitudes
- Allows researcher to collect massive amounts of data relatively inexpensively
- Developing self-report tools and interpreting results are not easy
- Surveys
o A common self-report measure in which participants are asked to report on their attitudes,
beliefs and/or behaviors
o Typically in pencil and paper measures(but can also involve interviews)
o Dis: possibility of distortion or bias of responses
Key Issues
- Reliability
o stability of a measure over time or the consistency of the measure
o Refers to the agreement between two or more assessments made of the same event or
behavior
o Stable, consistent and free of random error
- Validity
o Accuracy of inferences or projections we draw from measurements
o Whether a set of measurements allows accurate inferences or projections about something else