Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Although the proceedings of the criminal law or law of evidence are not applicable to domestic
enquiry,the enquiry officer has to weigh the evidence and give his findings based only on the
evidence on record. In his findings he should narrate precisely what both the parties and other
witnesses have said. He should mention what he believes or does not believe and arrive at a
conclusion. The report of enquiring officer need not be elaborate but must be reasonable and
based on the evidence and must be conclusive.If the evidence is not enough, a guilty workman
must not be punished. Even
a single evidence is enough to arrive at a conclusion.
When Enquiry Officer does not mention the names of witnesses or the nature of evidence
produced and does not give any reasons for holding that the charges 1.·are established, then
the enquiry is vitiated~
Conviction in criminal court may be of use for imputation of misconduct but acquital in criminal
court is not a bar for taking disciplinary action against the chargesheeted workman.
The Enquiry Officer must give his reasons in support of his findings. Where the Enquiry Officer
has failed to give tenable reasons and has just submitted a cryptic report ending v-1ith the
statement "that all other relevant points from the proceedings will be explained personally", the
value of the report would be very much less.
The report should be submitted to the authority, along- with all the documents and the enquiry
proceedings.The punishing authority may or may not accept the findings of the enquiring officer
and, in case of non-acceptance, he has to mention the reasons for the same. The punishing
authority in awarding punishment should adhere to the Standing Orders. He should never award
a punishment unless he is sure that it will stand the test at the court of law. It is always safe to
be on the lenient side. It is seen that in the following. cases the labour court or Tribunal
interferes in the findings of the enquiring officers :
The competent disciplinary authority must carefully consider the enquiry report and the
explanation of the delinquent employee, apply his mind and come to definite conclusion as to
whether the delinquent is guilty of any charge of misconduct levelled against him. On receipt of
enquiry report, the authority shall at the first instant satisfy
himself :
i) if the enquiry has been conducted in accordance with the principles of Natural Justice;
ii) there is no procedural error in drawing up the proceedings of the enquiry;
iii) in case any objection has been raised either by the chargesheeted employee/chargesheeted
employee's witness Company's representative, the same has been properly recorded and that
the decision given by Enquiry Officer is technically correct and reasonable;
iv) report and findings have been drawn duly supported by proper documents;
v) if it is an exparte enquiry, whether necessary notice was served to the chargesheeted
employee.
The competent authority may differ with the findings
and conclusions of the Enquiry Officer, for which of course, he has to give cogent reasons
based on the evidence on record. He has the power to take steps, to accept,- reject ~Y order
fresh enquiry as aforesaid. If he ·finds the C.E. guilty of any charge of misconduct, he should
pass order of punishment after taking into consideration the nature and extent of the offence,
the past record of service of the employee concerned and the extenuating circumstances if any.
The punishment order to be issued should include the circumstances under which the charges
have been proved.The punishment order, particularly the discharge order or dismissal notice
shall have to be communicated to the employee concerned before it ·can be· effective,
In the above context, it is advisable that such case file are examined/scrutinised by Personnel
Department or,in absence, by the Labour Law Consultant.