Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

A New View of an Old Therapy

Gestiva for
Preventing
Prematurity Major Rebecca Cypher, MSN, PNNP

There are
significant
consequences
iIn August 2006, the Food and Drug Administra-
tion’s (FDA) Advisory Committee for Repro-
ductive Health Drugs held a public meeting to
discuss the safety and efficacy of a new drug
application submitted by Adeza Biomedical in
May 2006. Gestiva, the proposed trade name
after FDA approval (FDA, 2006b). Approval
would make Gestiva the only FDA-approved
drug to prevent preterm birth in women with a
history of preterm delivery. At the time of this
writing, Gestiva has been given priority review
and a final decision is expected from the FDA
to the survivors for a progestin known as 17-P, was presented soon. Once approved, Gestiva will be supplied
as a medication indicated for the prevention of as a 5-mL multiple-dose vial with each milliliter
and their
preterm birth in pregnant women with a his- containing 250 mg of 17-P (FDA, 2006a).
families in terms
tory of at least one spontaneous preterm birth
of associated (FDA, 2006a). Preterm Birth:
disabilities and The agency’s committee recommended, by The Scope of the Problem
the related a vote of 13-8, that the clinical data regarding Defined as delivery before 37 completed weeks
Gestiva were adequate to recommend FDA from the first day of the last menstrual period
societal and
approval. The committee also recommended (Iams & Creasy, 2004), the U.S. preterm birth
economic costs. that further studies on Gestiva be conducted rate is now 12.7 percent, which is an increase

322 © 2007, AWHONN http://nwh.awhonn.org


of more than 20 percent since 1990 (Centers Physiology of
for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006). Progesterone in Pregnancy
Improvements in the care and treatment of pre- The woman, the fetus and the placenta act as
mature infants have increased survival rates, but one functional unit to sustain pregnancy until
data continue to show that preterm birth has delivery. Contributing to this unit are several
had a significant impact on infant mortality. hormones, which include estrogen, androgens,
A recent study found that in 2002, pre- and progestogens (Blackburn, 2003; Liu, 2004).
term birth contributed to more than one-third Progesterone and 17 alpha-hydroxyprogester-
of infant deaths within the first year of life one (17-OHP) are the major progestogens in
(Callaghan, MacDorman, Rasmussen, Qin, & pregnancy. These naturally occurring hormones
Lackritz, 2006). The National Center for Health have many actions and play an important role
Statistics (2006) noted that 17 percent of infant in maintaining pregnancy. Changes in proges-
deaths in 2002 were attributed to preterm birth; terone levels may also play a role in the initia-
however, two-thirds of the infants who died were tion of labor (Buster & Carson, 2002; Meis,
born prematurely. This has led to speculation 2005; Meis & Connors, 2004).
that prematurity plays a greater role in infant During pregnancy, naturally occurring Preterm birth
death than what the current reporting systems progesterone is produced and secreted by the
have led public health officials to believe. is a complex
ovaries, adrenal gland, corpus luteum and
In addition, there are significant conse- placenta. Specifically, the corpus luteum is the problem with
quences to the survivors and their families in main producer of progesterone until six weeks many overlapping
terms of associated disabilities and the related gestation, when the placenta takes over (Buster contributing
societal and economic costs. The latest statistics & Carson, 2002; Liu, 2004). Progesterone ap-
by the March of Dimes (2006a) estimate that risk factors and
pears to act as a smooth muscle relaxant on
more than $26.2 billion in costs including medi- possible causes.
the gravid uterus, helping to maintain uterine
cal care, educational needs and lost productivity quiescence. Progesterone has immunosuppres-
were associated with prematurity. As a result, sive properties that block the effects of oxytocin
these rising statistics have led research investiga- on the myometrium. Most importantly,
tors to focus on preterm birth prevention.

The Mystery of Preterm Birth


Preterm birth is a complex problem with many Get the Facts
overlapping contributing risk factors and pos-
sible causes. The current methods for the diag- Centers for Disease
nosis and treatment of preterm labor are mostly Control and Prevention
based on literature in which there are significant http://www.cdc.gov/reproductive
gaps in evidence; ultimately very little is known health/MaternalInfantHealth/PBP.htm
about how preterm birth can be prevented.
March of Dimes
Interventions are primarily based on the
medical model of identifying each suspected
http://www.marchofdimes.com
cause or risk factor for preterm birth with the Prematurity.org
expectation that the preterm birth rate would Major Rebecca Cypher,
http://www.prematurity.org MSN, PNNP, is a clini-
decrease. Research studies have typically focused
cal specialist at Wilford
on interventions including early identification
Hall Medical Center in
of preterm labor through patient education,
San Antonio, TX. The
pharmacological suppression of contractions, views expressed in this
antimicrobial therapy of vaginal microorgan- article are those of the
isms, the use of cerclage to reinforce the cervix, author and do not reflect
maternal stress reduction, adequate nutrition, the official policy of the
better access to prenatal care, and reduced physi- Department of Defense or
cal activity (Behrman & Butler, 2006). Despite other departments of the
the many attempts at intervening, the overall U.S. government.
rate of preterm birth continues to steadily rise. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-486X.2007.00169.x

June | July 2007 Nursing for Women’s Health 323


oil placebo. Of these 463 women, 418
women (90.3 percent) completed dos-
ing through 36 + 6 weeks or delivery
(279 women in the 17-P group and
139 women in the placebo group).
A number of studies have
The trial was terminated early
examined whether because efficacy was attained at the
progesterone treatment time of the interim analysis. Final
may be effective in results showed a 34 percent reduc-
tion in preterm births prior to 37 + 0
preventing preterm
weeks. Infants born to women treated
birth. with 17-P had significantly lower rates
progesterone is a potent
inhibitor of the formation of necrotizing enterocolitis, intraven-
of gap junctions between the myome- tricular hemorrhage and supplemental
trial cells of the uterus. These intercel- oxygen use. A small increase in second
lular communications are essential in trimester miscarriages and stillbirths in
coordinating uterine activity leading to the 17-P group was noted as com-
labor (Liu; Meis, 2005; Meis & Con- a number of studies have examined pared with the placebo group, but this
nors, 2004). whether progesterone treatment may was not statistically significant (FDA,
17-OHP is known to be an inter- be effective in preventing preterm birth. 2006b; Meis et al., 2003).
mediary in the production of andro- These studies have yielded conflicting The second study was conducted
gens, estrogens and corticosteroids results, which have either supported or at a university in Brazil. The research-
(Meis & Connors, 2004). This type of questioned the effectiveness of 17-P for ers recruited 142 women with single-
progestogen predominantly originates preterm birth prevention. This dispar- ton pregnancies that were at risk for
in the corpus luteum during the first ity prompted the National Institute for preterm delivery. Of this group, 72
trimester and then the ovaries for the Child Health and Human Development women were started on 100 mg pro-
remainder of the pregnancy (Buster (NICHD) to conduct a multicenter trial gesterone vaginal suppositories daily
& Carson, 2002). Naturally occurring (Meis et al., 2003). and 70 women were given a placebo.
17-OHP has also been found to have a All women had contraction monitoring
weak action in prolonging pregnancy. Randomized Trials once a week for 60 minutes between 24
However, when 17-OHP is exposed to In 2003, the publication of two large and 36 weeks gestation. The incidence
caproic acid, 17 alpha-hydroxyproges- randomized placebo-controlled trials of preterm delivery in the progesterone
terone caproate (17-P) is created. In of 17-P and progesterone suppositories group was 13.8 percent (10/72) com-
this form, 17-P has been shown to have rekindled interest in the obstetric arena pared with 28.5 percent (20/70) in the
twice the progestational activity and (da Fonseca, Bittar, Carvalho, & Zugaib, placebo group, a statistically significant
acts twice as long when compared with 2003; Meis et al., 2003). Unlike studies finding (da Fonseca et al., 2003).
free progesterone (Meis & Connors). that targeted multiple risk factors such Several years later, two meta-analy-
as positive fetal fibronectin and prior ses were published using data from
Past and Future of preterm birth, these two studies looked these two studies as well as data from
Progesterone Therapy at supplemental progesterone as an earlier studies that used supplemental
Of all the treatments researched for pre- effective method of reducing the rates progesterone. The combined risk of
term birth prevention, progestational of preterm birth in women who had a recurrent preterm birth was reduced by
supplementation has demonstrated the history of a prior preterm birth. approximately 40 percent to 55 percent
greatest promise. Historically, proges- The primary clinical trial was in those who used progesterone supple-
terone was used as a therapy for women sponsored by the NICHD and con- mentation (Dodd, Flenady, Cincotta,
with threatened abortion, history of ducted by the Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Crowther, 2006; Sanchez-Ramos,
recurrent miscarriages and postpartum Units Network (Meis et al., 2003). This Kaunitz, & Delke, 2005). This suggests
uterine cramping. The medication used was the largest trial, with an enroll- that supplemental progesterone may
was Delalutin®, which was approved by ment of 463 women who had at least be effective in several ways including
the FDA in 1956 but taken off the mar- one documented prior preterm birth. inhibiting one pathway that is shared
ket in 2000 as it was no longer being Participants were randomized to either by the multiple causes of preterm birth,
produced (FDA, 2006a). Subsequently, weekly injections of 250 mg 17-P or an inhibiting several pathways or

324 Nursing for Women’s Health Volume 11 Issue 3


inhibiting one highly prevalent pathway priorities. The Prematurity Research ate for prevention of preterm birth:
or cause (Behrman & Butler, 2006). Expansion and Education for Moth- Overview of FDA background docu-
ment. Retrieved November 1, 2006,
ers Who Deliver Infants Early Act was
Safety and Dosing from http://www/fda.gov/ohrms/dock-
signed into law by President Bush in ets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4227B1-02-01-
The evidence for the safety of 17-P use December 2006, authorizing increased FDA-Background.pdf
in pregnancy is based on theoretical federal support for education and Food and Drug Administration. (2006b).
consideration, animal studies and clini- research on prematurity (March of Summary minutes of the advisory com-
cal trials. During pregnancy, progester- Dimes, 2006b). Focusing on preven- mittee for reproductive health drugs.
one and 17-P are produced in amounts tion may lead to significant progress Retrieved November 1, 2006, from
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/
that exceed the current pharmacologi- toward the reduction of preterm birth.
ac/06/minutes/2006-4227M1.pdf
cal dosing used for recurrent preterm Progesterone therapy in the form of
births. The safety of 17-P administra- Gestiva or similar medications might Iams, J., & Creasy, R. K. (2004). Preterm
labor and delivery. In R. K. Creasy & R.
tion in pregnancy is well-documented be an intervention that makes this hope Resnik (Eds.), Maternal-fetal medicine:
in a variety of studies. There appear to a reality. NWH Principles and practices (pp 623–661).
be no teratogenic effect on the fetus or Philadelphia: Saunders.
neonate. The researchers concluded that References
Liu, J. (2004). Endocrinology of pregnan-
there is no significant risk to the mother, Behrman, R. E., & Butler, A. S. (Eds.). cy. In R. K. Creasy & R. Resnik (Eds.),
fetus or newborn when 17-P is adminis- (2006). Preterm birth: Causes, conse- Maternal- fetal medicine: Principles and
quences, and prevention. Washington, practices (pp 121–134). Philadelphia:
tered in pregnancy (Meis, 2005). DC: National Academies Press. Saunders.
The NICHD is also completing a
Blackburn, S. T. (2003). Maternal, fetal, March of Dimes. (2006a). Born too soon
study exploring impact of the medica- and neonatal physiology: A clinical per- and too small in the United States.
tion on the developmental milestones spective. St. Louis, MO: Saunders. Retrieved January 27, 2007, from http://
and physical health in children born to www.marchofdimes.com/peristats/
Buster, J. E., & Carson, S. A. (2002). Endo-
women who received 17-P. There ap- crinology and diagnosis of pregnancy. pdflib/195/99.pdf
pears to be no teratogenic effects on the In S. G. Gabbe, J. R. Niebyl, & J. L. March of Dimes. (2006b). March of
fetus or neonate. Finally, initial results Simpson (Eds.). Obstetrics: Normal and Dimes thanks President Bush for sign-
from the NICHD study have failed to problem pregnancies (pp 3–36). New ing bill. Retrieved January 27, 2007,
York: Churchill Livingstone. from http://www.marchofdimes.com/
show any association with developmen-
Callaghan, W. M., MacDorman, M. F., aboutus/15796_22620.asp
tal delays in children between 30 and 64
Rasmussen, S.A., Qin, C., & Lackritz, Meis, P. J. (2005). 17 Hydroxyprogester-
months of age (FDA, 2006a; Meis et al.,
E.M. (2006). The contribution of one for the prevention of preterm de-
2003). preterm birth to infant mortality rates livery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 105(5),
At the time of this writing, 17-P in the United States. Pediatrics, 118(4), 1128–1135.
is not commercially available in the 1566–1573.
Meis, P. J., & Connors, N. (2004). Proges-
United States. In some facilities, 17-P Centers for Disease Control and Preven- terone treatment to prevent preterm
is now compounded by pharmacists. If tion. (2006) Birth: Preliminary data for birth. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecol-
approved, the proposed dosing regimen 2005. Retrieved January 27, 2007, from ogy, 47(4), 784–795.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/
of Gestiva is a weekly intramuscular Meis, P. J., Klebanoff, M., Thom, E., Dom-
pubs/pubd/hestats/prelimbirths05.htm
injection of 250 mg 17-P in 1 mL castor browski, M., Sabai, B., Spong, C., et al.
da Fonseca, E. B., Bittar, R. E., Carvalho, (2003). Prevention of recurrent preterm
oil with 46 percent benzyl benzoate
M., & Zugaib, M. (2003). Prophylac- delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogester-
and 2 percent benzyl alcohol (FDA, tic administration of progesterone one caproate. New England Journal of
2006a). Injections should ideally be by vaginal suppository to reduce the Medicine, 348(24), 2379–2385.
started between 16 + 0 weeks and 20 + incidence of spontaneous preterm birth
in women at increased risk: A random- National Center for Health Statistics.
weeks gestation. Injections should be (2006). Deaths: Final report for 2004.
ized placebo-controlled double-blind
concluded at 36+ weeks or at the time Retrieved January 27, 2007, from http://
study. American Journal of Obstetrics
of birth. The most common side effects and Gynecology, 188(2), 419–424. wwwcdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/
reported by women were injection site pubd/hestats/finaldeaths04.htm
Dodd, J. M., Flenady, V., Cincotta, R., &
pain and swelling (FDA, 2006a). Crowther, C. A. (2006). Prenatal admin- Sanchez-Ramos, L., Kaunitz, A. M., &
istration of progesterone for prevent- Delke, I. (2005). Progestational agents
Future of ing preterm birth. Cochrane Database to prevent preterm birth: A meta-analy-
Preterm Birth Prevention Systematic Reviews, 1, CD004947. sis of randomized controlled trials. Ob-
stetrics & Gynecology,105(2), 273–279.
Preterm birth and the consequences of Food and Drug Administration. (2006a).
prematurity are national health care 17 -alpha hydroxyprogesterone capro-

June | July 2007 Nursing for Women’s Health 325

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen