Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Proposal
My initial research established that chivalry was the exclusive code of gentlemanly behaviour
adopted by knights of the Mediaeval age. Knights were expected to emulate qualities such as
love, honour, courtesy, loyalty, and other noble attributes. This code of conduct was the
embodiment of three sets of ideas: feudal chivalry, religious chivalry, and courtly love. I would
like to focus on courtly love, the concept which presented a new attitude toward love and
women in a society that viewed women as “second class citizens.” This noble and honourable
love encouraged knights to behave in a courteous and gentlemanly manner toward ladies. My
aim is to determine what led to the acceptance of this new idea as part of the code of chivalry.
Thesis and Outline
Thesis Statement: Although courtly love was a novel idea in Mediaeval France, society
accepted the idea as part of the knightly chivalric code largely because the literature of the
period presented it as an ideal to which knights should aspire.
I. Courtly love was one of three components of the knightly chivalric code.
A. Chivalry was the exclusive code of behaviour adopted by the knightly class.
1. Feudal chivalry: born of feudal system
2. Religious chivalry: dictated by Church
3. Courtly love: expressed through songs and poems
B. Courtly love was a novel idea that fitted the mould of ideal knightly
behaviour.
1. Characteristics: courtesy, humility, adultery, religion of love
2. Adopted guise of chivalric honour: exclusive to knights
II. Conditions in France, especially in the northern region, were, for the most part, not
favourable to this new idea.
IV. Although courtly love was not favoured by all, the concept was adopted as part of chivalry.
C. On the whole, courtly love blended into the code of behaviour already being
practised by the knights.
1. It presented a new concept of love in relation to women
2. But the underlying elements were common to other forms of chivalry
a. Honour
b. Loyalty
c. Courtesy
Annotated Bibliography
Barber, Richard W. The Knight and Chivalry. New York: Scribner, 1970. Part II of this book
examines the appearance of courtly love in the literature of 12th century France.
Burnley, J. D. “Fine amor: its meaning and context.” Review of English Studies 31 (May 1980):
129-48. Burnley discusses the range of meaning of fin’ amor to establish its relationship
to amor courteois (courtly love).
Calin, William. “Defence and Illustration of Fin’ Amor: Some Polemical Comments of the
Robertsonian Approach.” The Expansion and Transformation of Courtly Literature.
Ed. Nathaniel B. Smith and Joseph T. Snow. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1980.
Calin presents a rebuttal to Robertson’s view by using examples to illustrate the
existence of courtly love in Mediaeval France.
Cropp, Glynnis. “The Partimen between Folquet de Marseille and Tostemps.” The Interpretation
of Mediaeval Lyric Poetry. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980. This essay
studies the poem to determine its underlying ideas, namely fin’ amor.
Nelson, Deborah. “Marcabru, prophet of fin’ amors.” Studies in Philology 79 (Summer 1982):
227-41. This article shows that although Marcabru is considered to be a religious poet,
he is also an advocate of courtly love because he elevates human love by describing it in
religious terms.
Painter, Sydney. French Chivalry: Chivalric Ideals and Practices in Mediaeval France.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1940. Painter attempts to show how the idea of courtly
love came to be embodied in the chivalric code through practice.
Rudorff, Raymond. Knights and the Age of Chivalry. New York: Viking Press, 1955. In Ch. 3,
the author uses specific examples to trace the development of the three forms of
chivalry.
Shirt, D. J. “Le Chevalier de la Charrette: A World Upside Down?” Modern Language Review
76 (October 1981): 811-22. The article examines the poetry of the troubadour Crétien
de Troyes to show how he presented fin’ amor in an acceptable light to the public.