Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SPIVA
CONTRIBUTORS
Andrew Innes
SPIVA® South Africa Scorecard
Associate Director
Global Research & Design SUMMARY
andrew.innes@spglobal.com
S&P Dow Jones Indices has been the de facto scorekeeper of the ongoing
Zack Bezuidenhoudt, CIPM
Head of Client Coverage
active versus passive debate since the first publication of the S&P Indices
South Africa and Versus Active (SPIVA) U.S. Scorecard in 2002. The SPIVA South Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa Scorecard measures the performance of actively managed, South African
zack.bezuidenhoudt@spglobal.com equity and fixed income funds denominated in South African rands (ZAR)
against their respective benchmark indices over one-, three-, and five-year
investment horizons.
In an attempt to tackle the country’s rising debt, value-added tax (VAT) was increased 1% in South
Africa earlier in 2018. Meanwhile, S&P Global Ratings affirmed South Africa’s sub-investment grade
credit rating and kept its outlook stable with ‘BB’ and ‘BB+’ on its foreign and local currency debt,
respectively. However, it was noted that the ratings could be lowered if the rule of law, property rights,
or enforcement of contracts were to weaken. Hence, the controversial, populist policy of land
expropriation without compensation has many concerned it will erode trust and dampen foreign
investment. The S&P South Africa Composite Property Index fell sharply at the start of the year; the
index was down 18.7% (in South African rands) over the first half of 2018.
The SPIVA South Africa Scorecard also covers the performance of actively managed fixed income
funds that manage short-term bonds or diversified and aggregate bonds. In the one-year period
ending in June 2018, short-term fixed income funds predominately outperformed the South
Africa Short Term Fixed Interest (STeFI) Composite, with just 13% underperforming. These
results are fairly typical for the group, since the benchmark does not reflect the opportunities available
to fixed income managers through the corporate bond markets. Over the same 12-month period,
70% of active funds in the Diversified/Aggregate Bond category were unable to beat the S&P
South Africa Sovereign Bond 1+ Year Index, which rose 10.1% (in local currency terms).
RESEARCH | SPIVA 2
SPIVA South Africa Scorecard Mid-Year 2018
Over the years, we have built on more than a decade of experience publishing the report by expanding
coverage into Canada, India, Japan, Australia, Latin America, and South Africa. While the report will
not end the debate on active versus passive investing, we hope to make a meaningful contribution by
examining market segments in which one strategy might work better than the other.
Beyond the SPIVA Scorecard’s widely cited headline numbers is a rich data set that addresses issues
related to measurement techniques, universe composition, and fund survivorship that are less
frequently discussed but are often more fascinating. These data sets are rooted in the fundamental
principles of the SPIVA Scorecard that regular readers will be familiar with, including the following.
Survivorship Bias Correction: Many funds might be liquidated or merged during a period of
study. However, for someone making an investment decision at the beginning of the period,
these funds are part of the opportunity set. Unlike other commonly available comparison reports,
SPIVA Scorecards account for the entire opportunity set—not just the survivors—thereby
eliminating survivorship bias.
Asset-Weighted Returns: Average returns for a fund group are often calculated using only
equal weighting, which means the returns of a ZAR 100 billion fund affect the average in the
same manner as the returns of a ZAR 100 million fund. An accurate representation of how
market participants fared in a particular period can be ascertained by calculating weighted
average returns in which each fund’s return is weighted by net assets. SPIVA Scorecards show
both equal- and asset-weighted averages.
Data Cleaning: SPIVA Scorecards avoid double counting multiple share classes in all count-
based calculations by using only the share class with greater assets. Index, leveraged, and
inverse funds, along with other index-linked products, are excluded because this is meant to be a
scorecard for active managers.
RESEARCH | SPIVA 3
SPIVA South Africa Scorecard Mid-Year 2018
REPORTS
RESEARCH | SPIVA 4
SPIVA South Africa Scorecard Mid-Year 2018
RESEARCH | SPIVA 5
SPIVA South Africa Scorecard Mid-Year 2018
RESEARCH | SPIVA 6
SPIVA South Africa Scorecard Mid-Year 2018
APPENDIX A
SPIVA Styles and Morningstar Fund Classifications
Data from Morningstar is obtained for all managed funds domiciled in South Africa for which month-end
data is available during the performance period. The data includes the most comprehensive South
African fund data on active and finalized (merged or liquidated) funds over the chosen period. Funds
are classified based on the Morningstar fund classification system, and the SPIVA South Africa
Scorecard covers South African and international equity and fixed income categories.
The SPIVA South Africa Scorecard covers both domestic and international funds that are denominated
in South African rands and they have been mapped to the relevant Morningstar fund categories as
indicated in this report. The Morningstar classification system produces narrow, style-based
classifications for funds, particularly in relation to international equities. S&P Dow Jones Indices has
consolidated the style-based categories in order to generate a larger sample size and develop a broad-
market comparison to market-based benchmarks. A narrow, style-based comparison would yield a
limited sample size, given that value and growth style segments are not consistently discernible over a
five-year period.
Morningstar categories have been mapped to SPIVA peer groups in the following manner.
Exhibit 1: South African and International Funds–SPIVA and Morningstar Categories and Their Respective Benchmarks
MORNINGSTAR CATEGORY SPIVA CATEGORY BENCHMARK INDEX
S&P South Africa DSW Capped Gross
EAA Fund South Africa & Namibia Equity South African Equity Total Return (ZAR) / S&P South Africa
DSW Gross Total Return (ZAR)
EAA Fund Global Large-Cap Blend Equity
EAA Fund Global Large-Cap Growth Equity S&P Global 1200 Gross Total Return
Global Equity
EAA Fund Global Large-Cap Value Equity (ZAR)
RESEARCH | SPIVA 7
SPIVA South Africa Scorecard Mid-Year 2018
APPENDIX B
Glossary–Reports
To correct for survivorship bias, we use the opportunity set available at the beginning of the period as
the denominator. We determine the count of funds that have survived and beat the index. We then
report the index outperformance percentage.
SURVIVORSHIP (%)
The survivorship measure represents the percentage of funds in existence at the beginning of the time
period that are still active at the end of the time period.
Equal-weighted returns for a particular style category are determined by calculating a simple average
return of all active funds in that category in a particular month.
Asset-weighted returns for a particular style category are determined by calculating a weighted average
return of all funds in that category in a particular month, with each fund's return weighted by its total net
assets. Asset-weighted returns are a better indicator of fund category performance because they
reflect the returns of the total money invested in that particular style category with more accuracy.
QUARTILE BREAKPOINTS
The pth percentile for a set of data is the value that is greater than or equal to p% of the data but is less
than or equal to (100-p)% of the data. In other words, it is a value that divides the data into two parts:
the lower p% of the values and the upper (100-p)% of the values. The first quartile is the 75th
percentile, which is the value separating the elements of a population into the lower 75% and the upper
25%. The second quartile is the 50th percentile, and the third quartile is the 25th percentile. For fund
category quartiles in a particular time horizon, the data used is the return of the largest surviving share
class of the fund net of fees, excluding loads.
SURVIVORSHIP BIAS
Many funds might liquidate or merge during a period of study. This usually occurs due to continued
poor performance by the fund. Therefore, if index returns were compared to fund returns using only
surviving funds, the comparison would be biased in favor of the fund category. The SPIVA reports
remove this bias in three ways. The first method to remove the bias is to use the entire investment
opportunity set, made up of all funds in that particular category at the outset of the period, as the
denominator for outperformance calculations. The second is explicitly to show the survivorship rate in
each category. The final way is to construct a peer average return series for each category based on
all available funds at the outset of the period.
RESEARCH | SPIVA 8
SPIVA South Africa Scorecard Mid-Year 2018
FEES
Indices
A benchmark index provides an investment vehicle against which fund performance can be measured.
The S&P South Africa Domestic Shareholder Weighted (DSW) Capped Index modifies the S&P South
Africa Domestic Shareholder Weighted (DSW) Index to ensure that no single stock weighs more than
10% of the index at each rebalancing. The S&P South Africa Domestic Shareholder Weighted (DSW)
Index adjusts the weights of companies in the S&P South Africa Composite in order to reflect the level
of ownership by South African investors. The S&P South Africa Composite is a float-adjusted, market-
cap-weighted index that measures the performance of large-, mid-, and small-cap companies listed on
the Johannesburg Stock Exchange.
Capturing approximately 70% of the world’s capital markets, the S&P Global 1200 is a composite of
seven headline indices, many of which are accepted leaders in their regions. It includes the S&P 500®
(U.S.), S&P Europe 350 (Europe), S&P/TOPIX 150 (Japan), S&P/TSX 60 (Canada), S&P/ASX All
Australian 50 (Australia), S&P Asia 50 (Asia Ex-Japan), and S&P Latin America 40 (Latin America).
The South Africa Short Term Fixed Interest (STeFI) Composite Index approximates the performance of
money market instruments in the market. Instruments such as call deposits and negotiable certificates
of deposits (BCD’s) represent common, liquid instruments and provide a good proxy of short-term
markets.
The S&P South Africa Sovereign Bond 1+ Year Index seeks to track the performance of local-currency-
denominated sovereign debt publicly issued by the government of South Africa in its domestic market,
with maturities of one year or more.
RESEARCH | SPIVA 9
SPIVA South Africa Scorecard Mid-Year 2018
RESEARCH | SPIVA 10
SPIVA South Africa Scorecard Mid-Year 2018
GENERAL DISCLAIMER
Copyright © 2018 by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. All rights reserved. Standard & Poor’s ®, S&P 500 ® and S&P ® are registered trademarks
of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”), a subsidiary of S&P Global. Dow Jones ® is a registered trademark of Dow Jones
Trademark Holdings LLC (“Dow Jones”). Trademarks have been licensed to S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. Redistribution, reproduction and/or
photocopying in whole or in part are prohibited without written permission. This document does not constitute an offer of services in
jurisdictions where S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones, S&P or their respective affiliates (collectively “S&P Dow Jones Indices”) do not
have the necessary licenses. All information provided by S&P Dow Jones Indices is impersonal and not tailored to the needs of any person,
entity or group of persons. S&P Dow Jones Indices receives compensation in connection with licensing its indices to third parties. Past
performance of an index is not a guarantee of future results.
It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments
based on that index. S&P Dow Jones Indices does not sponsor, endorse, sell, promote or manage any investment fund or other investment
vehicle that is offered by third parties and that seeks to provide an investment return based on the performance of any index. S&P Dow Jones
Indices makes no assurance that investment products based on the index will accurately track index performance or provide positive
investment returns. S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC is not an investment advisor, and S&P Dow Jones Indices makes no representation
regarding the advisability of investing in any such investment fund or other investment vehicle. A decision to invest in any such investment
fund or other investment vehicle should not be made in reliance on any of the statements set forth in this document. Prospective investors are
advised to make an investment in any such fund or other vehicle only after carefully considering the risks associated with investing in such
funds, as detailed in an offering memorandum or similar document that is prepared by or on behalf of the issuer of the investment fund or
other vehicle. Inclusion of a security within an index is not a recommendation by S&P Dow Jones Indices to buy, sell, or hold such security,
nor is it considered to be investment advice.
These materials have been prepared solely for informational purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from
sources believed to be reliable. No content contained in these materials (including index data, ratings, credit-related analyses and data,
research, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse-
engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written
permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices. The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P Dow Jones Indices and
its third-party data providers and licensors (collectively “S&P Dow Jones Indices Parties”) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness,
timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Dow Jones Indices Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions, regardless of the
cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content. THE CONTENT IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. S&P DOW JONES
INDICES PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE
ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE
WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Dow Jones Indices Parties be liable to any party for any
direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses
(including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the
possibility of such damages.
Credit-related information and other analyses, including ratings, research and valuations are generally provided by licensors and/or affiliates of
S&P Dow Jones Indices, including but not limited to S&P Global’s other divisions such as S&P Global Market Intelligence. Any credit-related
information and other related analyses and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not
statements of fact. Any opinion, analyses and rating acknowledgement decisions are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any
securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P Dow Jones Indices does not assume
any obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for
the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other
business decisions. S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While S&P Dow Jones Indices has
obtained information from sources they believe to be reliable, S&P Dow Jones Indices does not perform an audit or undertake any duty of due
diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for
certain regulatory purposes, S&P Global Ratings reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in
its sole discretion. S&P Dow Jones Indices, including S&P Global Ratings, disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment,
withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgement as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
Affiliates of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, including S&P Global Ratings, may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related
analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. Such affiliates of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, including S&P
Global Ratings, reserve the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. Public ratings and analyses from S&P Global Ratings are made
available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com
(subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P Global Ratings publications and third-party redistributors.
Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
S&P Dow Jones Indices keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and
objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P Dow Jones Indices may have information that is not available
to other business units. S&P Dow Jones Indices has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public
information received in connection with each analytical process.
In addition, S&P Dow Jones Indices provides a wide range of services to, or relating to, many organizations, including issuers of securities,
investment advisers, broker-dealers, investment banks, other financial institutions and financial intermediaries, and accordingly may receive
fees or other economic benefits from those organizations, including organizations whose securities or services they may recommend, rate,
include in model portfolios, evaluate or otherwise address.
RESEARCH | SPIVA 11