LAMPIRAN SPSS

Karakteristik Responden
Statistics
Indeks Massa
Umur Berat Badan Tinggi Badan Tubuh
N Valid 30 30 30 30
Missing 0 0 0 0
Mean 47.9333 53.0667 154.7667 22.1180
Median 48.0000 54.5000 155.0000 22.4000
Std. Deviation 9.53734 5.90110 2.50080 2.02862
Minimum 32.00 39.00 150.00 16.03
Maximum 72.00 62.00 160.00 24.84

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic Df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
*
Umur .107 30 .200 .968 30 .491
*
Berat Badan .128 30 .200 .950 30 .165
Tinggi Badan .146 30 .101 .954 30 .210
*
Indeks Massa Tubuh .126 30 .200 .923 30 .031
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

Indeks Massa Tubuh

Report
Indeks Massa Tubuh
Respon Mean N Std. Deviation Median Minimum Maximum
Respon (+) 22.4904 28 1.48547 22.8300 19.72 24.84
Respon (-) 16.9050 2 1.23744 16.9050 16.03 17.78
Total 22.1180 30 2.02862 22.4000 16.03 24.84

Test Statisticsb

Indeks Massa Tubuh

Mann-Whitney U .000
Wilcoxon W 3.000
Z -2.333
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .020
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] .005a
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Grouping Variable: Respon
Umur, Berat Badan, Tinggi Badan
Group Statistics
Respon N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Umur Respon (+) 28 47.5357 9.48091 1.79172
Respon (-) 2 53.5000 12.02082 8.50000
Berat Badan Respon (+) 28 54.0357 4.77247 .90191
Respon (-) 2 39.5000 .70711 .50000
Tinggi Badan Respon (+) 28 1.5489E2 2.40892 .45524
Respon (-) 2 1.5300E2 4.24264 3.00000

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for

Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Sig. (2- Mean Std. Error
F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper
Umur Equal variances
.065 .801 -.850 28 .402 -5.96429 7.01420 -20.33221 8.40364
assumed
Equal variances
-.687 1.091 .609 -5.96429 8.68679 -96.83661 84.90804
not assumed
Berat Equal variances
3.142 .087 4.236 28 .000 14.53571 3.43154 7.50652 21.56490
Badan assumed
Equal variances
14.095 12.998 .000 14.53571 1.03123 12.30783 16.76360
not assumed
Tinggi Equal variances
1.146 .294 1.035 28 .309 1.89286 1.82813 -1.85190 5.63761
Badan assumed
Equal variances
.624 1.047 .641 1.89286 3.03434 -32.83559 36.62130
not assumed

Umur
Umur Responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid >50 tahun 10 33.3 33.3 33.3
<=50 tahun 20 66.7 66.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
 Crosstab
Respon
Respon (+) Respon (-) Total
Umur Responden >50 tahun Count 9 1 10
% within Umur
90.0% 10.0% 100.0%
Responden
% within Respon 32.1% 50.0% 33.3%
% of Total 30.0% 3.3% 33.3%
<=50 tahun Count 19 1 20
% within Umur
95.0% 5.0% 100.0%
Responden
% within Respon 67.9% 50.0% 66.7%
% of Total 63.3% 3.3% 66.7%
Total Count 28 2 30
% within Umur
93.3% 6.7% 100.0%
Responden
% within Respon 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .268a 1 .605
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .254 1 .615
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .563
Linear-by-Linear
.259 1 .611
Association
N of Valid Casesb 30
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Alamat
Alamat
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Luar Kota 20 66.7 66.7 66.7
Dalam Kota 10 33.3 33.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
 Crosstab
Respon
Respon (+) Respon (-) Total
Alamat Luar Kota Count 19 1 20
% within Alamat 95.0% 5.0% 100.0%
% within Respon 67.9% 50.0% 66.7%
% of Total 63.3% 3.3% 66.7%
Dalam Kota Count 9 1 10
% within Alamat 90.0% 10.0% 100.0%
% within Respon 32.1% 50.0% 33.3%
% of Total 30.0% 3.3% 33.3%
Total Count 28 2 30
% within Alamat 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%
% within Respon 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .268 1 .605
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .254 1 .615
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .563
b
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Stadium
Stadium
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 2B 8 26.7 26.7 26.7
3A 3 10.0 10.0 36.7
3B 19 63.3 63.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
 Crosstab
Respon
Respon (+) Respon (-) Total
Stadium 2B Count 7 1 8
% within Stadium 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%
% within Respon 25.0% 50.0% 26.7%
% of Total 23.3% 3.3% 26.7%
3A Count 3 0 3
% within Stadium 100.0% .0% 100.0%
% within Respon 10.7% .0% 10.0%
% of Total 10.0% .0% 10.0%
3B Count 18 1 19
% within Stadium 94.7% 5.3% 100.0%
% within Respon 64.3% 50.0% 63.3%
% of Total 60.0% 3.3% 63.3%
Total Count 28 2 30
% within Stadium 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%
% within Respon 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .712 2 .700
Likelihood Ratio .832 2 .660
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 4 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,20.

Jenis Terapi
Jenis Terapi
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid NAC Cisplatin_Paclitaxel 12 40.0 40.0 40.0
NAC Carbo-Paclitaxel 18 60.0 60.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
 Crosstab
Respon
Respon (+) Respon (-) Total
Jenis Terapi NAC Cisplatin_Paclitaxel Count 12 0 12
% within Jenis Terapi 100.0% .0% 100.0%
% within Respon 42.9% .0% 40.0%
% of Total 40.0% .0% 40.0%
NAC Carbo-Paclitaxel Count 16 2 18
% within Jenis Terapi 88.9% 11.1% 100.0%
% within Respon 57.1% 100.0% 60.0%
% of Total 53.3% 6.7% 60.0%
Total Count 28 2 30
% within Jenis Terapi 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%
% within Respon 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.429 1 .232
b
Continuity Correction .201 1 .654
Likelihood Ratio 2.138 1 .144
Fisher's Exact Test .503 .352
Linear-by-Linear
1.381 1 .240
Association
N of Valid Casesb 30
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,80.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Respon Terapi
Respon Terapi
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Complete Response 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
Partial Response 26 86.7 86.7 93.3
Stable Disease 2 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0

Indeks Massa Tubuh

 Indeks Massa Tubuh
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Underweight 2 6.7 6.7 6.7
Normoweight 26 86.7 86.7 93.3
Overweight 2 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0

Crosstab
Respon
Respon (+) Respon (-) Total
Indeks Massa Tubuh Underweight Count 0 2 2
% within Indeks Massa
.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Tubuh
% within Respon .0% 100.0% 6.7%
% of Total .0% 6.7% 6.7%
Normoweight Count 26 0 26
% within Indeks Massa
100.0% .0% 100.0%
Tubuh
% within Respon 92.9% .0% 86.7%
% of Total 86.7% .0% 86.7%
Overweight Count 2 0 2
% within Indeks Massa
100.0% .0% 100.0%
Tubuh
% within Respon 7.1% .0% 6.7%
% of Total 6.7% .0% 6.7%
Total Count 28 2 30
% within Indeks Massa
93.3% 6.7% 100.0%
Tubuh
% within Respon 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 30.000 2 .000
Likelihood Ratio 14.696 2 .001
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 5 cells (83,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,13.
 Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
*
Panjang Massa Sebelum NAC .092 30 .200 .976 30 .698
Lebar Massa Sebelum NAC .145 30 .107 .955 30 .231
*
Panjang Massa Sesudah NAC .094 30 .200 .966 30 .447
Lebar Massa Sesudah NAC .168 30 .030 .944 30 .114
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

Panjang dan Lebar Massa

Paired Samples Statistics
Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Pair 1 Panjang Massa Sebelum NAC 5.2493 30 2.01815 .36846
Panjang Massa Sesudah NAC 2.8930 30 1.50695 .27513
Pair 2 Lebar Massa Sebelum NAC 4.2327 30 1.84143 .33620
Lebar Massa Sesudah NAC 2.4237 30 1.11361 .20332

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence Interval

of the Difference
Std. Std. Error Sig. (2-
Mean Deviation Mean Lower Upper T df tailed)
Pair 1 Panjang Massa
Sebelum NAC -
2.35633 1.37951 .25186 1.84122 2.87145 9.356 29 .000
Panjang Massa
Sesudah NAC
Pair 2 Lebar Massa
Sebelum NAC - Lebar 1.80900 1.52335 .27812 1.24017 2.37783 6.504 29 .000
Massa Sesudah NAC
CD8
tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Respon_Kat Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
CD8_Pre Respon (+) .131 28 .200* .916 28 .028
Respon (-) .260 2 .
CD8_Persen_Pre Respon (+) .124 28 .200* .949 28 .192
Respon (-) .260 2 .
CD8_Post1 Respon (+) .138 28 .184 .942 28 .126
Respon (-) .260 2 .
CD8_Persen_Post1 Respon (+) .182 28 .018 .904 28 .014
Respon (-) .260 2 .
CD8_Post2 Respon (+) .126 28 .200* .945 28 .152
Respon (-) .260 2 .
CD8_Persen_Post2 Respon (+) .094 28 .200* .975 28 .723
Respon (-) .260 2 .
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

Frequencies
Statistics
CD8_Pre CD8_Post1 CD8_Post2
N Valid 30 30 30
Missing 0 0 0
Mean 572.1333 565.6667 688.4667
Std. Deviation 3.17213E2 227.18204 335.47041

Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test

Test Statisticsb
CD8_Post1 - CD8_Pre
Z -.154a
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .877
a. Based on negative ranks.
b. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test

Test Statisticsb
CD8_Post2 - CD8_Pre
Z -1.553a
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .120
a. Based on negative ranks.
b. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
T-Test
Paired Samples Statistics
Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Pair 1 CD8_Post1 5.6567E2 30 227.18204 41.47758
CD8_Post2 6.8847E2 30 335.47041 61.24824

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Std. Std. Error Sig. (2-
Mean Deviation Mean Lower Upper t df tailed)
Pair CD8_Post1 - - -
323.45041 59.05369 -2.02163 -2.079 29 .047
1 CD8_Post2 1.22800E2 243.57837

ROC Curve
Case Processing Summary
Respon_Kat Valid N (listwise)
a
Positive 28
Negative 2
Larger values of the test result variable(s) indicate stronger evidence for a positive actual state.
a. The positive actual state is Respon (+).
 Area Under the Curve
Asymptotic 95% Confidence Interval
Test Result
Variable(s) Area Std. Errora Asymptotic Sig.b Lower Bound Upper Bound
CD8_Pre .393 .213 .618 -.024 .810
CD8_Post1 .768 .132 .212 .509 1.026
CD8_Post2 .821 .099 .135 .627 1.016
a. Under the nonparametric assumption
b. Null hypothesis: true area = 0.5

Crosstabs
CutOff_Pre * Respon_Kat Crosstabulation
Respon_Kat
Respon (+) Respon (-) Total
CutOff_Pre >=405 Count 19 1 20
% within CutOff_Pre 95.0% 5.0% 100.0%
% within Respon_Kat 67.9% 50.0% 66.7%
% of Total 63.3% 3.3% 66.7%
<405 Count 9 1 10
% within CutOff_Pre 90.0% 10.0% 100.0%
% within Respon_Kat 32.1% 50.0% 33.3%
% of Total 30.0% 3.3% 33.3%
Total Count 28 2 30
% within CutOff_Pre 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%
% within Respon_Kat 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .268a 1 .605
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .254 1 .615
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .563
Linear-by-Linear
.259 1 .611
Association
N of Valid Casesb 30
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
 Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for CutOff_Pre (>=405 /
2.111 .118 37.722
<405)
For cohort Respon_Kat = Respon (+) 1.056 .839 1.328
For cohort Respon_Kat = Respon (-) .500 .035 7.190
N of Valid Cases 30

Crosstabs
CutOff_Post1 * Respon_Kat Crosstabulation
Respon_Kat
Respon (+) Respon (-) Total
CutOff_Post1 >= 558 Count 17 0 17
% within CutOff_Post1 100.0% .0% 100.0%
% within Respon_Kat 60.7% .0% 56.7%
% of Total 56.7% .0% 56.7%
<558 Count 11 2 13
% within CutOff_Post1 84.6% 15.4% 100.0%
% within Respon_Kat 39.3% 100.0% 43.3%
% of Total 36.7% 6.7% 43.3%
Total Count 28 2 30
% within CutOff_Post1 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%
% within Respon_Kat 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.802a 1 .094
b
Continuity Correction .875 1 .350
Likelihood Ratio 3.533 1 .060
Fisher's Exact Test .179 .179
Linear-by-Linear
2.709 1 .100
Association
N of Valid Casesb 30
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,87.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
 Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
For cohort Respon_Kat = Respon (+) 1.182 .937 1.490
N of Valid Cases 30

Crosstabs
CutOff_Post2 * Respon_Kat Crosstabulation
Respon_Kat
Respon (+) Respon (-) Total
CutOff_Post2 >=506,5 Count 20 0 20
% within CutOff_Post2 100.0% .0% 100.0%
% within Respon_Kat 71.4% .0% 66.7%
% of Total 66.7% .0% 66.7%
<506,5 Count 8 2 10
% within CutOff_Post2 80.0% 20.0% 100.0%
% within Respon_Kat 28.6% 100.0% 33.3%
% of Total 26.7% 6.7% 33.3%
Total Count 28 2 30
% within CutOff_Post2 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%
% within Respon_Kat 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.286a 1 .038
b
Continuity Correction 1.674 1 .196
Likelihood Ratio 4.688 1 .030
Fisher's Exact Test .103 .103
Linear-by-Linear
4.143 1 .042
Association
N of Valid Casesb 30
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
 Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
For cohort Respon_Kat = Respon (+) 1.250 .917 1.704
N of Valid Cases 30

Kanker Respon Total

Serviks (+) (-)
CD8 ≥ cut off (405) 19a 1b 20
< cut off (405) 9c 1d 10
Total 28 2 30

 Sensitifitas = a: (a+c) = 19: 28 = 67,86%

 Spesifitas = d: (b+d) = 1 : 2 = 50%
 Positive predictive value = a: (a+b) = 19 : 20 = 95%
 Negative predictive value = d: (c+d) = 1 : 10 = 10%
 Likelihood ratio positif = sensitivitas : (1-spesifitas)= 0,6786 : 0,5 = 1,3572
 Likelihood ratio negatif = (1-sensitivitas): spesifitas= 0,3214 : 0,5= 0,6428
 Akurasi = a+d/a+b+c+d = 20/ 30 = 66,67

Kanker Respon Total

Serviks (+) (-)
CD8 ≥ cut off (558) 17a 0b 17
< cut off (558) 11c 2d 13
Total 28 2 30

 Sensitifitas = a: (a+c) = 17: 28 = 60,71%

 Spesifitas = d: (b+d) = 2 : 2 = 100%
 Positive predictive value = a: (a+b) = 17 : 17 = 100%
 Negative predictive value = d: (c+d) = 2 : 13 = 15,38%
 Likelihood ratio positif = sensitivitas : (1-spesifitas)= 0,6071 : 0 =~
 Likelihood ratio negatif = (1-sensitivitas): spesifitas= 0,99 : 1 = 0,99
 Akurasi = a+d/a+b+c+d = 17/ 30 = 56,67

Kanker Respon Total

Serviks (+) (-)
CD8 ≥ cut off (506,5) 20a 0b 20
< cut off (506,5) 8c 2d 10
Total 28 2 30

 Sensitifitas = a: (a+c) = 20: 28 = 71,43%

 Spesifitas = d: (b+d) = 2 : 2 = 100%
 Positive predictive value = a: (a+b) = 20 : 20 = 100%
 Negative predictive value = d: (c+d) = 2 : 10 = 20%
 Likelihood ratio positif = sensitivitas : (1-spesifitas)= 0,7143 : 0 = ~
 Likelihood ratio negatif = (1-sensitivitas): spesifitas= 0,2857 : 1 = 0,2857
 Akurasi = a+d/a+b+c+d = 20/ 30 = 66,67
 Coordinates of the Curve
Positive if Greater Than or
Test Result Variable(s) Equal Toa Sensitivity 1 – Specificity
CD8_Pre 159.0000 1.000 1.000
161.0000 .964 1.000
183.5000 .929 1.000
216.0000 .893 1.000
232.0000 .857 1.000
266.0000 .821 1.000
306.5000 .786 1.000
341.0000 .750 1.000
372.5000 .714 1.000
384.0000 .679 1.000
405.0000 .679 .500
427.5000 .643 .500
442.5000 .607 .500
455.5000 .571 .500
458.5000 .536 .500
498.5000 .500 .500
544.0000 .464 .500
587.5000 .429 .500
626.5000 .393 .500
634.5000 .357 .500
652.5000 .321 .500
678.0000 .286 .500
695.5000 .250 .500
722.0000 .214 .500
822.5000 .179 .500
903.5000 .143 .500
912.5000 .107 .500
946.0000 .107 .000
1088.5000 .071 .000
1361.0000 .036 .000
1520.0000 .000 .000
CD8_Post1 194.0000 1.000 1.000
214.5000 .964 1.000
247.0000 .929 1.000
 265.5000 .929 .500
283.0000 .893 .500
302.0000 .857 .500
314.5000 .821 .500
356.0000 .786 .500
394.0000 .750 .500
397.0000 .714 .500
404.0000 .679 .500
420.5000 .643 .500
478.5000 .607 .500
558.0000 .607 .000
613.5000 .536 .000
643.5000 .500 .000
658.0000 .464 .000
682.5000 .429 .000
700.5000 .393 .000
707.5000 .357 .000
713.5000 .321 .000
721.0000 .286 .000
730.0000 .214 .000
742.0000 .179 .000
756.0000 .143 .000
801.0000 .107 .000
912.5000 .071 .000
1015.0000 .036 .000
1048.0000 .000 .000
CD8_Post2 103.0000 1.000 1.000
175.0000 .964 1.000
250.5000 .929 1.000
262.5000 .929 .500
279.0000 .893 .500
290.0000 .857 .500
316.0000 .821 .500
363.0000 .786 .500
407.5000 .750 .500
456.5000 .714 .500
506.5000 .714 .000
543.0000 .679 .000
590.5000 .643 .000
 660.5000 .607 .000
703.0000 .571 .000
710.0000 .536 .000
712.5000 .500 .000
720.0000 .464 .000
738.0000 .429 .000
759.5000 .393 .000
779.5000 .357 .000
882.5000 .321 .000
987.5000 .286 .000
1048.5000 .250 .000
1102.0000 .214 .000
1108.0000 .179 .000
1114.0000 .143 .000
1125.0000 .107 .000
1159.5000 .071 .000
1223.0000 .036 .000
1259.0000 .000 .000
a. The smallest cutoff value is the minimum observed test value minus 1, and the largest cutoff
value is the maximum observed test value plus 1. All the other cutoff values are the averages of
two consecutive ordered observed test values.