Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The United States has completed a review of the Florence County School District 1 (the
“District”). Based on a review of the information and data provided by the District, and other
information obtained by the United States, and the record in this case, the United States has
advised the District that, in its view, the District has fulfilled its affirmative desegregation
obligations under the Fourteenth Amendment and applicable Federal law. The parties agree that
a declaration of unitary status by the Court would be appropriate in this case at this time. As
indicated by the signatures of counsel below, the parties respectfully request that the Court
approve this Agreed Order of Unitary Status and Dismissal and terminate jurisdiction over this
case.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On March 4, 1970, the District submitted a desegregation plan to the United States
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (“HEW”) for approval. The United States
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) became involved in this matter in July 1970 after the Florence
County Public School Board (the “Board”) and HEW had reached an impasse over the Board’s
proposed plan to desegregate its schools. On July 15, 1970, the District filed a revised plan,
4:70-cv-00609-PMD Date Filed 09/26/18
09/25/18 Entry Number 17
16 Page 2 of 10
modifying its original plan to conform to the suggestions made by officials from HEW and the
DOJ. On August 20, 1970, District Judge Donald Russell ordered that the filed revised plan,
dated July 15, 1970, take effect in the 1970-1971 school year. On July 23, 1971, District Judge
Robert Hemphill authorized a revised desegregation plan that focused on student attendance
zones, transfer policies, and faculty desegregation, to take effect in the 1971-1972 school year.
In February 1993, the United States received complaints about the District, including
allegations that the District was engaging in discriminatory behavior and violating the terms of
the 1971 desegregation plan. On May 12, 1993, the National Association for the Advancement
of Colored People (NAACP) brought a separate suit alleging that the District was engaging in
discriminatory activities against African American citizens and violating the terms of the 1971
Desegregation Plan. On June 10, 1993, the United States moved to transfer the NAACP
complaint to the Florence Division so that the court could consolidate it with the case brought by
the United States against the District. On July 19, 1993, the United States moved to consolidate
both cases.
On June 26, 1995, a Consent Order was signed and issued by the Court. Pursuant to the
Consent Order, the District agreed, among other things, to (i) implement “Attendance Zone Plan
4a” for its elementary schools, (ii) implement a fully funded and accredited International
Baccalaureate Program at the historically and predominantly African American Williams Middle
and Wilson High Schools, (iii) continue efforts to actively recruit minority personnel, (iv)
continue steps to establish and maintain hiring practices to retain African American faculty and
staff at each school in ratios that approximate the district-wide averages of African American
faculty and staff, (v) continue to insure that white and African American experienced personnel
were retained in numbers comparable to the district-wide averages at each school, and (vi) to
provide a detailed annual report to the United States, which includes enrollment, transfer and
Page 2 of 10
4:70-cv-00609-PMD Date Filed 09/26/18
09/25/18 Entry Number 17
16 Page 3 of 10
On November 29, 1995, the District submitted a proposed Consent Order and request to
schedule a fairness hearing to determine unitary status. On March 8, 1996, the Court held a
fairness hearing related to the proposed Consent Order. Following the fairness hearing, Judge
Three years later, on July 6, 1999, the parties entered an informal agreement resolving
five remaining areas of concern: racial composition of the IB Program, faculty hiring, student
discipline as an element of quality of education, and racial composition of the Gifted Program.
Since 1999, the United States has actively monitored the District, completed several site visits to
evaluate compliance with the existing Order, and issued formal and informal requests for
information to the District. As a result of the extensive review, the parties to this Agreed Order
hereby request approval of this Agreed Order of Unitary Status and Dismissal.
a. STUDENT ASSIGNMENT
The 1971 Revised Desegregation Plan modified the attendance zone lines of the District’s
22 schools. 1 These changes were implemented to bring about racial balance and eliminate the
For the 2017-2018 school year, the District enrolled approximately 16,250 students in 21
schools. Across the District, 8,643 black students were enrolled (approximately 53.2%), 6,261
white students were enrolled (approximately 38.5%), and 1,346 students of other racial or ethnic
minorities were enrolled (approximately 8.3%). No individual school enrollment by race varied
1
July 22, 1971 Revised Desegregation Plan at 1-2.
Page 3 of 10
4:70-cv-00609-PMD Date Filed 09/26/18
09/25/18 Entry Number 17
16 Page 4 of 10
by more than 20% from the district-wide average. 2 Enrollment at each school for the 2017-18
2
North Vista’s student enrollment does vary from the district-wide average requirement;
however, the parties agreed in 1995 that North Vista would operate as a racially identifiable
African American school. Palmetto Youth Academy (Charter School), Beck Learning Center
(Alternative School) and Alfred Rush Academy (Pre-K School) are not considered in the district-
wide average analysis due to the unique nature and operation of each of these schools.
Page 4 of 10
4:70-cv-00609-PMD Date Filed 09/26/18
09/25/18 Entry Number 17
16 Page 5 of 10
Based upon the United States’ review, the District is not making classroom assignments
on the basis of race. In addition, the District does not appear to enroll a significant number of
out-of-district students nor are out-of-district transfer students creating a significant impact on
The 1971 Revised Desegregation Plan stated, “Faculty members will be assigned to each
elementary, junior high and high school in approximately the same ratio to the extent that
qualification and subject matter experience permits such assignments.” 3 Based upon review by
the United States, it appears that the District is complying with this mandate.
The District employed 999 teachers during the 2016-17 school year. Of those,
approximately 742 teachers are white (74.3%) and 240 teachers are black, (24.0%). No school
could be considered a black school by virtue of faculty assignment, based upon the comparison
to District enrollment, as no school had more than 22% black faculty. The percentage of black
faculty increased by 2%, or 25 teachers, from the previous year. Faculty assignments are
provided below:
3
July 22, 1971 Revised Desegregation Plan at 3.
Page 5 of 10
4:70-cv-00609-PMD Date Filed 09/26/18
09/25/18 Entry Number 17
16 Page 6 of 10
In sum, the District appears to recruit, hire, and assign faculty and staff in a non-
discriminatory manner and teacher and staff assignments are not made on the basis of race.
c. TRANSPORTATION
The parties stipulate that the District has met its affirmative desegregation obligations
with regard to transportation and has eliminated the vestiges of prior de jure discrimination to the
extent practicable. The District (i) has implemented nondiscriminatory transportation policies
and practices, and (ii) routinely reviews its transportation system and bus routes to maintain
balance. Black, white, and other students are transported daily on the same buses, no students
are required to take disproportionately longer rides to school, and students are integrated within
each of the bus routes. Furthermore, the United States has not received any complaints about
d. EXTRA-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
The parties stipulate that the District has met its affirmative desegregation obligation with
Page 6 of 10
4:70-cv-00609-PMD Date Filed 09/26/18
09/25/18 Entry Number 17
16 Page 7 of 10
regard to extra-curricular activities and has eliminated the vestiges of prior de jure discrimination
to the extent practicable. The United States has not received any complaints about
were offered during the September 2017 community meeting. In addition, the United States has
reviewed yearbooks and other information, met with District personnel, conducted interviews
and outreach, and determined that the District provides equal opportunities for students to
Pursuant to the 1996 Consent Order, the District is required to “at least ninety (90) days
prior to expending any funds or entering into any binding obligations for the purchase of property
for prospective school sites or regarding the construction or expansion of school facilities, and
prior to abandoning any facility . . . consider the impact of any such decision on desegregation
The parties herein stipulate that the District satisfied prior court orders regarding
facilities. The District operates twenty-three schools (fourteen elementary schools, three middle
schools, three high schools, one alternative secondary school, one pre-kindergarten, and one
charter elementary school), using attendance zones based on residence to determine each
students’ assigned school. The United States conducted site visits of 7 schools (Wilson High,
West Florence High, North Vista Elementary, Theodore Lester Elementary, Royal Elementary,
William Middle and Sneed Middle), and the alternative school (Beck Learning Center) between
September 25-27, 2017. All of the school buildings appeared in good condition with adequate
space for the number of students, and the United States received no complaints about facilities.
4
June 26, 1995 Consent Order at 10.
Page 7 of 10
4:70-cv-00609-PMD Date Filed 09/26/18
09/25/18 Entry Number 17
16 Page 8 of 10
promptly from a de jure segregated school system to a system without “white” schools or
“black” schools, but just schools. Green v. Cty. Sch. Bd. of New Kent Cty., 391 U.S. 430, 442
(1968). As established by the Supreme Court, a school district seeking a declaration of unitary
status and termination of judicial supervision must show that its schools have: (1) fully and
satisfactorily complied with the Court’s decrees for a reasonable period of time; (2) eliminated
the vestiges of prior de jure discrimination to the extent practicable; and (3) demonstrated a
good-faith commitment to the whole of the Court’s decrees and to those provisions of the law
and the Constitution that were the predicate for judicial intervention in the first instance. See
Missouri v. Jenkins, 515 U.S. 70, 87-89 (1995); Freeman v. Pitts, 503 U.S. 467, 491-92, 498
(1992); Bd. of Educ. of Oklahoma City Pub. Sch. v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237, 248-50 (1991).
The Supreme Court has identified six areas, commonly known as the “Green factors,”
that must be addressed as part of the determination of whether a school district has fulfilled its
duties and eliminated vestiges of the prior dual system to the extent practicable: (1) student
assignment (including the administration of student discipline); (2) faculty; (3) staff; (4)
transportation; (5) extracurricular activities; and (6) facilities. See Dowell, 498 U.S. at 250
(discussing Green, 391 U.S. at 435). The Supreme Court also has approved consideration of
other indicia, such as “quality of education,” as important factors for determining whether the
school district has fulfilled its desegregation obligations. Freeman, 503 U.S. at 492-93.
Based on the information and data provided by the District, and on all the surrounding
facts, the parties agree that the District has complied with the Court’s desegregation orders for a
reasonable period of time. Furthermore, the parties agree that the District has eliminated the
vestiges of past de jure discrimination to the extent practicable in the areas of student
Page 8 of 10
4:70-cv-00609-PMD Date Filed 09/26/18
09/25/18 Entry Number 17
16 Page 9 of 10
assignment, faculty, staff, transportation, facilities, and extracurricular activities, which are
“among the most important indicia of a segregated system.” Dowell, 498 U.S. at 250 (citations
omitted).
IV. CONCLUSION
The Court concludes that the Florence County School District 1 has satisfied the legal
requirements for a declaration of unitary status, and that it is therefore entitled to dismissal of this
action. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that all prior injunctions in this case are
PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________
September 26, 2018 _______________________________
Date UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 9 of 10
4:70-cv-00609-PMD Date Filed 09/26/18
09/25/18 Entry Number 17
16 Page 10 of 10
AGREED:
Page 10 of 10