Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2 Microeconomics
Discussion Class
October 11, 2018
UP School of Economics
Glacer Vasquez
glacervasquez@gmail.com
10/11/18 Econ 100.2 Discussion Class
3
Recap
Ø Externality
Ø Nega&ve
Externality
Ø Posi&ve
Externality
Ø Public
Policies
Ø Correc&ve
Tax
vs
Regula&on
Ø Regula&on
vs
Tradable
Pollu&on
Permits
Ø Correc&ve
Tax
vs
Tradable
Pollu&on
Permits
Ø Private
Solu&ons
Ø Introduc&on
Ø Different
Kinds
of
Goods
Ø Public
Goods
Ø Common
Resources
Ø Tragedy
of
the
Commons
Ø Summary
• Public
goods
are
goods
that
are
neither
rival
nor
excludable
in
consump&on.
• What
are
examples
of
public
goods?
• A
good
is
excludable
if
a
person
can
be
prevented
from
using
it.
• A
good
is
rival
in
consump&on
if
one
person’s
use
of
it
diminishes
others’
use.
Rival Non-rival
Club goods
Private goods
(natural
Excludable (e.g food, slot
monopoly)
in UP)
(e.g. cable TV)
Common Public goods
resources (e.g. national
Non-excludable
(e.g. fish in the defense, street
ocean) lights)
Ø A
road
is
which
of
the
four
kinds
of
goods?
• Rival
in
consump&on?
Excludable?
• Rival
in
consump&on?
Only
if
congested.
• Excludable?
Only
if
a
toll
road.
Ø Four
possibili&es:
• Uncongested
non-‐toll
road:
public
good
• Uncongested
toll
road:
natural
monopoly
• Congested
non-‐toll
road:
common
resource
• Congested
toll
road:
private
good
• Recall:
Public
goods
are
goods
that
are
neither
rival
nor
excludable
in
consump&on.
Ø What
do
you
think
is
the
problem
associated
with
providing
public
goods
privately?
• Public
goods
are
difficult
for
private
markets
to
provide
because
of
the
free-‐rider
problem.
• Free
rider:
a
person
who
receives
the
benefit
of
a
good
but
avoids
paying
for
it
Ø Why
are
there
free-‐riders?
• If
a
good
is
not
excludable,
then
people
have
incen&ve
to
be
free
riders,
because
firms
cannot
prevent
non-‐payers
from
consuming
the
good.
• Result:
The
good
is
not
produced,
even
if
buyers
collec&vely
value
the
good
higher
than
the
cost
of
providing
it.
10/11/18 Econ 100.2 Discussion Class
11
Public Goods
Ø Suppose
that
the
benefit
of
a
public
good
exceeds
the
cost
of
providing
it,
should
the
good
be
provided?
Who
should
provide
the
good?
• If
the
benefit
of
a
public
good
exceeds
the
cost
of
providing
it,
then
government
should
provide
the
good
and
pay
for
it
with
a
tax
on
people
who
benefit.
Ø Is
it
easy
to
measure
the
benefit?
• Problem:
Measuring
the
benefit
is
usually
difficult.
• Cost-‐benefit
analyses
are
imprecise,
so
the
efficient
provision
of
public
goods
is
more
difficult
than
that
of
private
goods.
Thinking
Time
Ø Why
is
it
difficult
for
private
industry
to
provide
public
goods?
• Because
public
goods
are
not
excludable,
the
free-‐rider
problem
makes
it
unprofitable
for
private
industry
to
produce
public
goods.
Ø How
is
a
streetlight
(a
public
good)
related
to
a
posi&ve
externality?
• When
people
consider
buying
a
streetlight,
they
fail
to
consider
the
external
benefit
it
would
provide
to
others
and
only
consider
their
personal
benefit.
• Thus,
there
is
an
underproduc&on
and
consump&on
of
both
public
goods
and
goods
that
generate
posi&ve
externali&es.
• Common
resources
are
goods
that
are
not
excludable
but
rival
in
consump&on.
• Non
excludability:
Role
for
government
-‐
seeing
that
they
are
provided
• Rival:
Role
for
government
-‐
ensuring
they
are
not
overused
• The
villager
who
adds
the
extra
cow
takes
no
account
of
the
cost
inflicted
upon
the
rest
of
the
village.
• The
tragedy
is
due
to
an
externality.
• Allowing
one’s
flock
to
graze
on
the
common
land
reduces
its
quality
for
other
families.
• People
neglect
this
external
cost,
resul&ng
in
overuse
of
the
land.
Ø What
could
the
villagers
have
done
to
prevent
the
tragedy?
• The
villager
who
adds
the
extra
cow
takes
no
account
of
the
cost
inflicted
upon
the
rest
of
the
village.
• The
tragedy
is
due
to
an
externality.
• Allowing
one’s
cow
to
graze
on
the
common
land
reduces
its
quality
for
other
families.
• People
neglect
this
external
cost,
resul&ng
in
overuse
of
the
land.
Ø What
could
the
villagers
have
done
to
prevent
the
tragedy?
Thinking
Time
Ø How
are
fish
in
the
ocean
(a
common
resource)
related
to
a
nega&ve
externality?
• A
common
resource
is
free
so
it
is
overconsumed.
Each
consumer
of
fish
fails
to
take
into
account
the
nega&ve
impact
on
others
of
their
consump&on
causing
overuse
of
the
resource
from
a
social
perspec&ve.
Ø Why
did
buffalo
almost
become
ex&nct
while
cows
(a
similar
animal)
are
unlikely
to
ever
become
ex&nct?
• Buffalo
were
a
common
resource
and
over-‐consumed.
Cows
are
private
goods
and
are
produced
and
sold
at
the
socially
efficient
price
and
quan&ty.
Ø Introduc&on
Ø Different
Kinds
of
Goods
Ø Public
Goods
Ø Common
Resources
Ø Tragedy
of
the
Commons
Ø Summary
1. Market Efficiency
2. Taxation and Efficiency
1. Externalities
2. Public goods
SECOND EXAMINATION
10/11/18 Econ 100.2 Discussion Class
32
What’s next?