Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
15 Determine a direct variation relationship - Individually, students are given graphs and they have to - Worksheet
from a straight-line graph passing determine if it is a direct variation relationship.
through the origin and a linear function in - In groups, they will have to find the constant of variation from a
the form 𝑦 = 𝑚𝑥. graph. Consequently, they will find that the gradient is the
Recognise the gradient of a direct constant of variation.
variation graph as the constant of - They come up with the equation of a direct variation
variation. relationship since they know the gradient-intercept form.
16 Model, analyse and solve problems - Exercises to practise the skills they learnt about direct variation - Textbook
involving direct linear relationships. relationship. - Quiz
- Laptops and internet access
17 Construct straight-line graphs with the - Use Desmos to graph direct variation relationships. - Laptops and internet access
aid of technology. - Informal quiz: multiple choice questions projected, each answer - Coloured cards or Post It notes
has a different colour (example: A is red). Students are given of different colours.
coloured cards, they raise the red card if they think A is the
answer.
18 Analyse a linear model, graphically or - Students solve problems related to cost of fuel to fill a car and - Laptop and internet access
algebraically, to solve practical direct currency conversion. They use the internet to research some of - Worksheet
variation problems, including the cost of the actual prices and rates. Groups make a presentation (so that
filling a car with fuel or a currency the teacher is able to provide a feedback and adjust the
conversion graph following lesson)
-identify and evaluate the limitations of a
linear model in a practical context.
19 Analyse a linear model, graphically or - Students solve a variety of real-life problems other than cost of - Worksheet
algebraically, to solve practical direct fuel and currency conversion. Differentiation opportunity.
variation problems, including the cost of
filling a car with fuel or a currency
conversion graph
-identify and evaluate the limitations of a
linear model in a practical context.
20 All the syllabus content for direct - Assessment task: investigation related to direct variation Assessment task
variation relationship. relationships. Groups of mixed abilities students solve a problem
during the first 25 min (12/20). The following 10 min are spared
for students to write individual reflection about the task (8/20).
Assessment Details Outcomes
Exam: multiple choice questions carefully designed. MS11-1: Exam and task
Extended response questions with additional MS11-2: Exam and task
questions for more capable students. EAL/D students MS11-9: task
will be provided with a glossary. MS11-10: Exam and task
Assessment task: students solve the first part in
groups then write a reflection related to the task
individually. It involves an investigation related to
direct variation relationship.
Scenario:
Your company decided to introduce a new package for the food containers they provide. He requested that the
company will be packaging the food containers separately from their covers. Additionally, the package of the food
containers should be a rectangular prism. Your department decided to study actual stacks of food containers to see
which features of the food container affect the height of the stack.
3. Graph the data from question 1. Include a title to your graph and don’t forget to label the axes.
11. Use your equation to find the height of the stack of 16 and 50 food containers. Do your values agree with your estimation and prediction
in questions 1 and 4?
12. What is the height of the stack of 0 food container? Does it make sense? Explain.
Extension: using the opposite of the gradient and y-intercept as in this activity, describe a real-life situation and graph it as well as explain
its limitations. (for example: if the gradient is 3, use -3).
Resource 3: Scavenger hunt
Solution: 𝑚 = 1110 −1
Solution: 𝑦 = 𝑥+3
3
Solution: 𝑦 = 5𝑥 + 10 Solution:
𝑦 = 3𝑥 + 35
Solution: Jamie draws caricatures. She pays $35 Solution: Suppose a town has a population of 2 000
for space to set up a table and $3 for each drawing residents but that the population is decreasing by 300
she sells. people each year.
Find the situation that this graph represents.
Solution: 𝑚 = 10 Solution: 𝑦 = 14 − 3𝑥
Suppose you have $70 to buy shrimp and chicken Given the table below, find the rate of change.
A vendor learned that, by pricing caramel apples The average value of a certain type of automobile was
at $1.75 sales will reach 105 caramel apples per $14,220 in 1993 and depreciated to $9780 in 1997.
day. Raising the price to $2.75 will cause that sale Find the slope.
situation.
The unit outline is designed for stage 6 ‘Algebra’ unit, in particular ‘Linear Relationships’ from the Mathematics Standard course and
based on the New South Wales syllabus. The unit is stretched over 4 weeks as it considers that students have very limited knowledge about the
topic. Various learning and pedagogical theories were implemented to address motivation and engagement issues that high school students face
This unit was designed using the Understanding by Design (UbD) framework which consists of three stages namely, identify desired results,
determine assessment evidence and plan learning experiences and instruction (Mctighe & Wiggins, 2012). According to Mctighe and Wiggins
(2012), the key concept of this framework is the alignment of these three stages. Therefore, the unit was designed by setting firstly the goals
desired, most importantly, acquiring a conceptual understanding of the topic. Students will know not only the ‘how’ but also the ‘why’ (Skemp,
1976). This benefits students as it enables them to create a web of knowledge that lasts for a long-term (Skemp, 1976). As a result, the
curriculum expectations were examined as well as the syllabus content to make linear relationships meaningful for students, a crucial element in
the Quality Teaching Model (NSW Department of Education and Training [DET], 2003). The goals set in stage 1 were then considered to
determine the assessment evidence needed to ensure that the learning outcomes have been met. In other words, students acquire a deep
understanding when they are able to explain, interpret and apply what they learnt. Therefore, assessments, formal (exam and assessment task)
and informal (such as quizzes, observations and presentations), were considered as assessment evidence of the objectives in stage 1. Finally, the
last stage in the backward design was to plan for the most appropriate lessons to address the goals in stage 1. Hence, the UbD planning process
has been implemented to design this unit so that students understand linear relationships and be able to apply it to solve real-life problems.
The lessons were also designed with an inquiry-based learning approach (IBL) as the framework. This approach requires teachers to use a
student-centred approach (Von Renesse & Ecke, 2015). This is demonstrated through the inclusion of investigation and research tasks in all
lessons where a new concept has to be learnt. For instance, instead of just giving the students the rise over run formula to find the gradient, they
are encouraged to interpret different lines, investigate and explain which one they think is steeper. In addition, they are given at the beginning of
the lesson road signs, that they see in their everyday life, to explore the meaning of gradient. One of the key features of the IBL framework is
collaborative learning. According to Sofeme (2012), the collaborative learning approach enhances student academic performance and
engagement. Therefore, group and pair activities are implemented in most of the lessons, which allows students to share their opinions and
develop their interpersonal and intercultural skills (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA], n.d.). Additionally,
Keleher (2016) argues that English as an additional language or dialect (EAL/D) students benefit from group works as they can improve their
English language skills when having frequent interactions with native speakers.
Another important factor in promoting student academic achievement is student engagement and motivation (Allen, Pianta, Gregory, Mikami
and Lun (2011). It is important to note the difference between motivation and engagement as they often overlap in some literature. According to
Gettinger and Walter (2012), students are motivated when they are willing to do something whereas they are engaged when they are actually
involved in the activity. To reach this goal, three dimensions are considered: emotional support, classroom organisation and instructional support
(Durksen, Bobis, Anderson, Skilling, & Martin, 2017), and have to be aligned. Therefore, in all lessons, at least three of the following elements
were implemented: whole class discussion, activities related to students’ life, group or pair work activities, hands-on activities, web-based
research tasks, clear and high expectations, challenging activities for gifted and talented students, differentiation, ICT resources (technology as a
partner (Goos, Galbraith, Renshaw and Geiger, 2003)), and scaffolding so that students move beyond their ‘zone of proximal development’ as
argued by Vygotsky (Goos, Stillman & Vale, 2007, p.29). All of these align also with Attard’s (201) pedagogical repertoires to ensure an
engaging mathematics classroom. Hence, motivation and engagement were considered when planning this unit to promote student academic
performance.
The last aspect taken into consideration when planning this unit is differentiation. Without the differentiation, students are not able to engage in
their learning (Fitzgerald, 2016). Differentiation is to understand that students have different needs and learning styles and to accommodate for
these differences so that students’ learning and achievement are maximised. This can be achieved by grouping, task and support as reported by
Barlett (2016). For instance, collaborative work is encouraged in almost all the lessons and this is done by grouping students according to their
abilities sometimes and mixed abilities other times. Differentiation by task is justified with the use of extended activities and/or challenging
questions for more capable students. In addition, the questions at the beginning of each lesson are carefully designed from the simplest to the
more complex. Support is, for instance, given for EAL/D students by providing them with a glossary, PowerPoint presentations are beneficial for
students with hearing impairments and visual learners, assisting less capable students and hands-on activities for kinaesthetic learners.
In conclusion, classrooms are becoming more diverse and filled with students with different learning needs. Therefore, multiple learning
and pedagogical theories have to be considered when planning a unit and the lessons in order to maximise the learning outcome for every
student.
References:
Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and
Attard, C. (2012). Engagement with mathematics: What does it mean and what does it look like? Australian Primary Mathematics
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (n.d). General Capabilities. Retrieved from
https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities/personal-and-social-capability/
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2014). Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-
standards-for-teachers/standards/development/purpose-of-the-standards
Bartlett, J. (2016). Outstanding differentiation for learning in the classroom (pp. 5-11). New York, NY: Routledge.
Callow, J., & Orlando, J. (2015). Enabling exemplary teaching: framework of student engagement for students from low socio-economic
backgrounds with implications for technology and literacy practices. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10(4), 349-371. doi:
10.1080/1554480X.2015.1066678
Durksen, T.L., Bobis, J., Anderson, J., Skilling, K., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Motivation and engagement in mathematics: A qualitative
framework for teacher-student interactions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(2), 163–181. doi: 10.1007/s13394-017-
0199-1
Gettinger, M., & Walter, M. (2012). Classroom strategies to enhance academic engaged time. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschl y, & C. Wylie
(Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 653–673). New York, NY: Springer.
Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2003). Perspectives on technology mediated learning in secondary school mathematics
Goos, M., Stillman, G., & Vale, C. (2007). Teaching secondary school mathematics: Research and practice for the 21st century. Crows Nest,
Fitzgerald, P. (2016). Differentiation for all literacy levels in mainstream classrooms. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 24 (2), 17-25.
Keleher, D. M. (2016). Mixed classes, mixed methods: Writing students' attitudes about collaborative and intercultural learning. Networks: An
Mctighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Understanding by design framework. Retrieved March 27, 2018, from
https://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/UbD_WhitePaper0312.pdf
NSW Department of Education and Training (2003). Quality teaching in NSW public schools: A classroom practice guide. Retrieved March 27,
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26. Retrieved from
https://vuws.westernsydney.edu.au/
Von Renesse, C., & Ecke, V. (2015). Inquiry-based learning and the art of mathematical discourse. PRIMUS, 25(3), 221-237. doi:
10.1080/10511970.2014.921799