Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1480
PETROLEUM TRANSACTIONS
G. 1. CHIERICI
G. PIZZI AGIP-DIREZIONE MINERARIA
G. M, CIUCCI MlLANO, ITALY
MEMBERS AIME
61.4001 — 11.9256 —
24.8734 1,643 31.4206 33.4714
64.3613 12.4467 25.8446 34.1037 36.6410
67.3282 2,;34 12.9793 26.s29S — 35.34S6 2;4 39.7014 1Es
70.2294 I 3,4397 27.S009 41.01 I 2
35.6304 2,108
72.8696 2,o14 13.8768 1;80 28.7756 35.7354 2,108 44.6297
122 70,9737
124 71.9099
126 72.8644 1 ,iol
FERRfJA21Y, 11967
.
TABLE 2-BAStC DATA FOR GASES OF RESERVOIRS EXAMINED TABLE 3-SUMMARY OF RESULTS OBTAI NED
Dr,viatlen Bntwe.en
Resewolr Parameters -—
A-1 _— BM.A c-c R-A
——. S-F Percent.
Actuai & Calc.
ReferenCe tem!worure
A;;f;d Prnsmre History in. res.
WI
(“F) 59 59 59 59 59 Aqulfw Characteristics —~[.k!. -
Rmwve$, —- Invaded
Referance immure at end of
(Psi’a) 14.69 14.69 14.69 14.69 14.69 Reservoir cam —-(~<f)
— (bb~/P$i)
—-
hw~~th-f)
— —
rr), [J&t)
..— —
[jsll
-—- POSt hkt.
R.xemak temperature A.I 1 141,26 14,339.0 0.532 :$ 0.358 9.2 71. I
(“F) 109.B 100.6 9B,B 130.8 123.3 176,57 1~lx&. : 0.723 8<9 51,1
211.88 1.277 12:0 ::% 37.2
Com!xewlbility factors at reservoir tem!xmaturm fi;.;y 5:018:7 1,065 m 0.473 1::! 26.6
3,584.8 1,420 WJ 0,650 17,1 19.9
( .=++ 317:83 5,2S2.7 0.639 w 0.872 22.5 !;.;
Pressure (Ma] 2,334.? al
—-. . .— 353.14 1.277 1.082 27,2
— 264.86 1,115.2 6.388 m 0.461 12.5 23:2
2702 0.S827 - m
264.86 1,672.S 3.823 0.479 12.7 22.9
2560 0.B475 — - 0.8812 — 264.86 4,1B2. I 1.277 m 0.517 14,0 23.3
0.B454 — - 0.8802 - 264.B6 5,904.0 0.766 ,a 0.562 14.8 22.5
241 B 10,037.5
26A.86 0.3B3 (n 0.574 14,7 22.5
2276 0.8478 - - 0.8S11 0.B760 264.S6 16,729.0 0.191 m 0.582 15.2 22.5
2134 0.B504 — - 0.8816 0.8775
BM.A 24.72 9,121.3 0.3968 4.46 0.327
I 991 0.8517 0.8544 - 0.8830 0.8797 ; 31.78 8,181.7 0.3968 4.46 0.4d6 Ii:: ti:
1849 0.8562 0.8598 0.8474 0.8859 0.8828 3 38.85 6,776.9 0.3968 4.46 0.588 12.9 32.5
1707 0.E612 0.8635 0.85?4 0.8914 0.SS76 4 45.91 6,236.1 o.39t 8 4.46 0.397 10.1 24.8
5 52.97 5,647.5 0.3968 4,46 0.371 9.5 19.3
1565 0.8680 0.B695 0.B594 0.8967 0.S928
1422 0.8764 0,8782 0.8676 0.9020 0.8990 C.c 88.29 4,844.1 2.129 14.0 1.053 20.8 77.9
i 105.94 4,285.2 2.129 14.0 0.607 12.0 59.5
1280 0.8B40 0.8864 0.S771 o .?093 0.9065 3 123.60 6,190.1 0.423 8.3
0.958 03 46.2
1138 0.8916 0.8940 0.8861 0.9166 0.9144 4 141,26 5,571.0 0.958 n 0.308 6.5 36.0
996 0.9023 0.9065 0.8956 0.9246 0,9235 5 158.91 5,064.3 0.958 02 0.384 28.5
6 176.57 4,204.2 0.958 w 0.356 9:! 21.5
853 0.9136 0.9162 0.9073 0!9334 0.9327
R-A 105.94 49,135,0 0.0107 :8.: ::3:~ 19,2 48.7
; 123.64 37,289.0 0,0113 13.3 ~;.g
is no doubt that, in these cases, the Hubbard et al.: method :
141.26
158.91
3,692.2
5,319.4
0.2680
0,3570
5:0
2.5
0.32B
0.441
8.2
11.6 8:9
has a resolving power higher than that shown for reservoirs S-F 123,60 1,326.S 3.690 14,0 0.819 17.9 64.5
under primary depletion, where the production rate is ; 141.26 1,580,4 3,690 9.0 1.273 28.4 39.9
158,91 1,510.5 3,690 6.0 0.507 12.0 17,2
fairly constant. : 176.57 1,s10.5 3.690 4,0 0.664 15.2 6,8
CC 123,60 1,909.3 0,533 ‘zJ 0.531 31.5 14.0
l~ll%fl 13M-A ; 141.26 1,771.4 0.533 ~m 0,421 24.6 11.5
The range of initial reserves values explored for Field 3 180.00 1,468,0 04533 m 0,248 17.3 7.5
4 211.88 1,218,2 0,533 ccl 0.271 20.2 5.3
BM-A were from 24.7 to 53.0 Bscf (Table 3, Fig. 3). The 5 247.20 941.8 0,533 PA 0.410 27.3 3.5
6 lB0,00 1,468.0 0.566 T 0,264 }9.1 7.7
results show that, for this example also, the correct value
for the initial reserves cannot be determined from the past
history: the range of indetermination is at least from 24,7
to 53.0 Bscf. Moreover, Fig. 3 shows-that infinite G values
in the range stu(iied, coupled with aquifers having the .
/
60
I , I , , 1 , , I ,
I
40 ●
“~ -
,-
$ 20
.ASSUMEQ ~~LC.UL.ATED_
! 1 II 1 , I n
.
Y Kt= 0.532 months-’ G = 170.4 9scf
C = 13,0L5 bbl/psi
r-=7
erz I
: 80 I I
6 =265 Bscf mm CJ /
a “
=m a 4
‘erz
U 60 - ASaM&D.
“
K!= 1,277 months-l
r =0-
@o
40 -
-CALC.U LA.IEQ
G =2L5.8 Bscf
20 -
C =5,218 bbl/psi
o I I
o 1 2 3
0.1 0,5 1 5 10
‘9-B9i
-1 I psi”’,10-6
‘t ‘ ‘onths
~*pQtD
FIC. 1—RESERVOIR A-1: RELATIONSHIP BErwr-mN C AXD K, PAR- FIG, 2—RESERVOIR A-1: RESULTS OBTAINED BY HUBrtARO
AfirETERS OFEQUIVAJ.ENT AQUIFERS. et aL’ METIIOD.
u 100 -
CALCULATE
:
.
Kt=2.f29 months-f G= 72.4 Sscf
m :5
m reo=14 c =5,174 bbl/psi
400 1 , , , , I
.
a = :W
300 -
200
100
Y .
Kt=0,958
ASSUMED
months-i
CALCULATE
G=160.7 Bscf
r =m C =.$,953 bbl/psi
eo
t
?0 30 Lo 50 80 01 23 II 5678
G, Bscf
ZAP%O ,p~, .,.6
l~I[;. :+ ftI{sKftvIMrt tt!d.A: REI.ATIO>SIIIP ~KY\Vl;l:X ~ AND (: Efg-Bgi
\’AIJTES KESL:KVOIK.AQIJIFI;M
IIF Sysr[.xs REPRODLX:IM
Acruiu. RSSHN’OIR PAST PI;RFORMAXIX WITHIX TIiIi I%. 4-Rw~avom C-C: RESULTS OBTAINED BY HAVLFSA e’ al!
STANDARD ACCURACYIN paEssuREi$IEASUREIIEN’TS. AND PmsoN METHODS,
To obtain an evaluation on the resolving power of the for the initial reserves cannot be determined on the basis
line-fitting method described by McEwen~ this method has of the past history (range of indetermination is from 123.6
been applied to the reservoir in question. Two sets of tt} 176,6 Bscf). The case for G = 141,3 Bscf shows a high-
values for K,, C/G and r.~ were chosen among those er value of PAD; it was ascertained by the simulator that
found by the analog simulator, The results obtained are this PAD value can be reduced, assuming a heterogeneous
presented in Fig. 6, which shows the experimented points aquifer with kh decreasing along the radhrs.
lying on a straight line as is required by the method. More- Information available on the volume of water which
over, SSD, values are very small, confirming the validity actually entered the reservoir does not help in defining the
of the values taken for Ktt C/G and r.~, SSD. values ob- range of indetermination. Two additional wells drilled in
tained for the other cases not shown in Fig, 6 are of the
the central part of the reservoir established that the ad-
same order of magnitude; in any case, they do not allow vance of the water table is very irregular i~nd does not
specification by statistical methods of which reservoir- allow en accurate evaluation of W=.
aquifer system best reproduces the behavior of the actual
system. Resulting G values are very different (105,9 and To obtain an evaluation of the resolving power of the
159.4 Bscf, respectively). It is concluded that the applied line-fitting methods described in the literature, the one by
method is not valuable, in this case, to uniquely determine Hubbard et al.’ has been applied to this reservoir, assum-
ing for KI and rc~ the extreme values found by trial-and-
the G value.
error with the help of the simulator. While in one case
FIELD S.F (Fig. 7) the experimental points lie on a straight line as
The range of initial reservm values explored for Fie[d required by the method, in the other case the fitting of
S-F was from 123.6 to 176.6 Bscfi higher values were the experimental points by means of a straight line is un-
not considered because they would correspond to a reser- certain. In both cases the value of PAD is less than the
voir with an insignificant water drive, in contrast with the experiment al error affecting the measurements of the aver-
water invasion observed in some peripheral wells (Table age reservoir pressure. The reserves values so determined
3). Also in this case it can be realized that an exact value arc almost equal (143 and 165 Bscf, respective y); it can
be concluded that, in this case, the line-titting method
used has a good resoIving power,
7
FIELD CC
This study was extended to a Gulf Coast (GC) gas field
whose data are avaiIabIe from the Iitcrat ure,” together with
the results obtained by the application of a particularly
z’ accurate statistical method. In the reference the most
2 75 -
probable G and K, values were determined by a line-fitting
Z
1.2 I I
o I I
a
n
50 -
Id 1,0
-
>
-.,
i=
a
3= 25 - —FORECAST .4 .8 -
3 PAST HISTORY-
0 ASSUMED
Kt=0.0107 months-’
.6 -
I
300: i
!40 80 to 160
:m ,4 - 50
1
2500
‘\.\ CALCULATED
s .2 –
\ . G = 105.9 Bscf
‘\\ 0
ssDn=50 .10-4
2000 d- I I I
2 1.!
M
>
+ ASSUMEO
,91500 .8 -
w + Kt = 0.357 months”
.- .
a cas.e 1
mm -Q- = 1.879 .10-7 psi-1
w’
e cas 4 m
‘m .6 - G
re o = 2.5
i? 1000
w
w %- /
CE
Q
500
I
I I
-1
“o 25 50 75 100 125
TIME, months
Gp Bg, bbl .106
FIG. S-PAST PERFORMANCE AND PREDICTED BEHAVIOR
OF RESERVOIR R.A. ~Ic. f&RESERVOIIt R-A: RMULTS OSTAINEOBY MCEWEN’ METHOD.
~ # :
10
ASSUMED CALCULATED. w
K,=3.690 months-f G=143 Bscf I 1 0
2 30
reo=u C ’852 bbl/psi
<
\
_..---=-
----
/ ?----”
/~-.--
1 20
,
. 2s .5 .75 . 1 1.25
‘/’ .-
ul
~ *
D
n
‘9
-.
.n- c
/ (3 2
20
J
-. (n
v
. ./. 10
..
f5
fo
ASSUMED CALCULATE Kt = 0.533 months-i
Kt=3,690 months’1 G=f65 9scf
reD= m
5
~o.k C = 2,W bbl/~s!
.,
V“ 0
01 foo 150 200 250
0 2.5 5 75 10 125 –15
G, Bscf
B9- B91 , psi-110-7
zAPQt~ J?IG.8--RESERVOIR CC: RELATIONSHIPBETWEENG AND C
VALUES OF RESERVOIR.AQUIFERSYSTEMS MATCHING ACTUt.L
FIG. i’-RESERVOIR S-F: RESULTS OSTAINMI NY RESERVOIRPAST PERFORMANCE (CORRESPONDINGVALUES
HUBBARO et aL’ METHOD, OF SSD07PAD AND v ARE SROWN ) .
jetted to a rather smooth production history, which is l% rtial \Vaicr.Dtive I{eselvoir”, ?’runs., AIMIJ (1953) 198,
quite normal in depleting a gas field, The larger are the ‘51.60,
fluctuations in the field production rate, the narrower are 2, Pir,+on, S, J.: Od Reservoir Engineering, 2nd hi., McGritw-
the ranges of indetermination in the initial reserves. In Hill Book Co,, Inc., New York (1958),
the extreme case of a gas reservoir being converted to gas 3. .%mley, L, T,: “A Rapid Method of Calculating RCSCIvcs of
storage, the indetermination in the initial gas reserves \Vi.rter Drive Rcsmvoirs by Material Balance”, Paper 1659*G;
see ?’rans,, AIME (1961) Part II, 308.
value usually becomes very small, Moreover, the range of
indetermination could be further narrowed if the reservoir 4. Mcliwen, C. R,: “Material Balance Calculations with Water
Influx in the Presence of Uncertainty in Pressures”, SUC. Pet. ,
past histmy is defined by accurate average pressure values. Eng. j, (June, 1962) 120-128,
Of course, the initial reserves are no longer undeter- 5. Havlenn, D. and Odeh, A. S.: “The Material Balance us an
mined when information is available on the cumulative Itquation of a Straight I.ine”, J, Pe/, Tech. (Aug,, IW;J)
volume of encroached water in the reservoir. Unfortun- 896-900,
ately, such information is usually only available (with the fJ. Hnvlena, D. and Odeh, A. S.: ‘W]e Matcrinl Ihdimcc as tilt
accuracy required by the reservoir engineer) late in the liquotion of u Straight J,in(.: l’:tr[ 11. f;irl,l (k,.”, .I. I’cl,
producing life of the reservoir when knowing the initial Tech. (Jll]y, 1964) 815.822.
reserves value is of little interest. 7. Hal, bard, R. M, OIIJ l;lenbaas, J. R.: “l)rlcrtniniI1g (jiw.i’illml
I’orr \Tolan,(. i,, a \Valer.l)rirt: (;as.. $tnrugr l{rw,rvoir”’. ./,
\ L_fl- Pet.Tech. (April, 1964) 383-3ttff.
NOMENCLATURE tt. Ohl, R. E., Jr.: “Analysis of Reservoir I>crfornmnre”, I’r(i)fs,,
AIME (1943) 151,86.98,
K, = proportionality constant between dimensionless
9. Ilrownscomhe, E. R. and CoIlills, h’,: “ltstinlatiorr of Rr+crvcs
and real time (fti = K,t) and \Vater Drive from Prwsurc and Prodnclion Ilistory”,
7’rrrns., AIMIj (1949) 186, 92.99.
+ I~.s. - p(.”m,,]
PAD = percentage average deviation = 10, Katz, D, L., ’f’ck, hf. R., Coats, K. H., Katz, M. l,,, Jmms, S. (;
x Pm. and Miller, M. C.: Moucmcnt o~ Llnderground water ill (,”mt.
.100 fuctwitki Va//[ral &Is, AGA, ?&w York (1963).
SSD. = normalized value of the sum of the squares of 11. Woods, R, W, and Muskat, M.: “An Analysis of M~teriul.
Bolance Calculations”, Trmrs.,AIME (1945) 160,124-139.
deviations from the best straight line’
12. Stewart, F. M., Calhiway, F’. H, and Gladfclter, R. E.: “CrMl-
u= root mean-square deviation in pressure values parison of Methods for Analyzingn ‘iVater Drive Field, Torch-
light Tensleep Reservoir, ‘Wyoming”, Trans., AIME (1954)
201, 197-202,
sUBS[;RWTS
13. SinIons, f,, H. nnd Spain, H. H.: “1.incitations on Pressure
comp. =computed value t’orthesinluhtted reservoir+tquifer Predictiol,s for~ater.Drive Reservoirs”, Y’runs.,AIMK L1958)
system 213, 427-429.
14. Ashby, W. R,: Ars ~nzrod[~c~ion to Cybernetics, Chapnan and
j = jth well HalI, London (1956).
15. A:;hby, \V. R.: Design /or a Brain, 2nd Ed, John Wiley &
res. = actual reservoir value Sons, Inc., New York (1960),
16. ROwTan, G. and Clrgg, M. \V.: “1’he Cybernetic Approach to
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Reservoir I@ineering”, Paper SP13 727 presented at SPE
381h Annunl Full Meeting, New Orleans (Oct. 6-9, 1963).
The authors thank the management of AtilP-Direzione 17. hfesarovic, M. D.: The Control o/ M/[ltit,ariable Syste/r/s, Jo}ltt
Mineraria for permission to publish this paper, and espe- \vi[eY& Sons, Inc., New York (1960).
cially G. Long. head of Servizio Geochimico e L.aboratori,
who sponsored this research, They also wish to express 18. Chicrici, G. L., Cincci, G. M. rmd l’iz~i, (L: Was Stortige ill
Gas Fields Communicating with au Aquifer, P1-c5sure Trend
their appreciation to C. Bortoloni who carried out the ex- Forecast by Means of an Analog Simulator”, Paper ST/1~C12/
perimental work on the simulator. CAS/11, Symposium wt. Comparative Economics 01 Modern
Gus Storage Methods, Paris (Stq]t. ,21-26, 1964).