Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
MARSHALL LEW*
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Los Angeles, California, USA
* Correspondence to: Marshall Lew, MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc., 5628 E. Slauson Ave., Los Angeles, CA
90040, USA. E-mail: tallbuildings@sbcglobal.net
Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build. 16, 537–541 (2007)
DOI: 10.1002/tal
DESIGN OF TALL BUILDINGS IN HIGH-SEISMIC REGIONS 539
Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build. 16, 537–541 (2007)
DOI: 10.1002/tal
540 M. LEW
It is very apparent that the specification of the earthquake ground motions is very important in the
process of designing a tall building. The development of the design criteria for performance-based
seismic design may include provisions to ensure that a tall building will not collapse under a very rare
event such as the maximum considered earthquake (MCE) ground motion (usually defined as those
ground motions having a 2% probability of being exceeded in 50 years, or having a return period of
about 2400 years).
The MCE ground motion is usually represented initially in the form of uniform hazard response
spectra that is the result of a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) that considers all of the
seismic sources in the surrounding region of the site, given the estimated activity of the sources and
the site characteristics for that given level of risk. As the performance-based seismic design will gen-
erally dictate that a nonlinear dynamic analysis should be performed for the tall building system, a
suite of acceleration-time histories is needed to represent the MCE ground motions.
As the MCE design spectra are estimated from the PSHA for a very long return period, the uncer-
tainty included in the analysis is large. First, there is an uncertainty coming from the reality that there
are very few recorded ground motions at close distances for large-magnitude events; thus, there is
little guidance to constrain ground motion attenuation relations that attempt to model ground motions
at these distances and magnitudes. Second, the long return period results in more uncertainty in the
events, and the dispersion of the results increases the ground motion estimates. Third, most current
ground motion attenuation relations do not extend to more than 2–5 s. As many of the new proposed
tall buildings are well over 30 storeys to over 70 storeys, the fundamental period may be as high as
8–10 s. Thus, there is even a greater uncertainty as to the characteristics of the spectral ordinates of
the ground motion spectra at these long periods. The PEER Next Generation Attenuation of Ground
Motions Project provides a promise in the development of attenuation relations that extend to longer
periods that are of most important interest in the design of tall buildings.
Current building codes have requirements that time histories must meet to be representative of the
ground motion design spectra. Generally, the response spectra of the time histories must match the
design spectra within a range of structural periods that may be from 0·2 T to 1·5 T, where T is
the fundamental period of the building. While many feel that it is best to use actual earthquake time
histories with minimal modification or scaling for the nonlinear dynamic structural analysis, it is
virtually impossible to find any set of time histories that can be matched to the design spectra by only
adjusting the amplitude uniformly at all time steps. There are several important reasons why this is
the case. First, a uniform hazard response spectra do not represent a single earthquake event; rather,
it represents a conglomeration of the contributions of every seismic source according to its activity
rates for the given seismic risk level. Thus, the design spectra are not likely to be representative of a
single earthquake with a given moment magnitude and distance. It is more likely to be representative
of several earthquakes with differing magnitudes and distances from the source to the site. In the Los
Angeles metropolitan area, it is possible that the shorter periods of the MCE design spectra are
dominated by a large local event with a moment magnitude in the range around 7, while the longer
periods could be dominated by a large earthquake event that are more distant. It is also possible that
the MCE design spectra are dominated by just local events, but may be due to multiple sources with
different characteristics, including the style of faulting. To try to capture all of these characteristics in
a single time history by just amplitude scaling is impossible. To further try to capture these charac-
teristics in a suite of at least seven time histories by just amplitude scaling is even more impossible.
There have been methodologies developed to modify actual time histories to match the design spectra
by either manipulation in the frequency domain or by adding packets of sine waves; however, ques-
Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build. 16, 537–541 (2007)
DOI: 10.1002/tal
DESIGN OF TALL BUILDINGS IN HIGH-SEISMIC REGIONS 541
tions arise as to the validity of these manipulated time histories, as the energy content is greatly
modified and in most cases does not match the real world.
Even in the development of the uniform hazard design spectra, there are additional considerations
in high-seismic areas. Tall building sites near active seismic sources that now dictate that near-source
and directivity effects should be taken into account as part of the evolution of the state of practice.
There are still some practical considerations on how these effects should be accounted for in the context
of the PSHA analysis. If these effects are to be accounted for in the uniform hazard design spectra,
finding appropriate actual acceleration-time histories with these effects embedded becomes a further
challenge.
There are some feelings among practicing professionals in the development of ground motions that
there must be changes in the code prescriptions regarding the design ground motions having to conform
to the design spectra across the wide range of structural periods. Rather than attempting to find or
manufacture time histories that meet the spectral requirements, it may be more realistic and perhaps
even more desirable to use a set of time histories that model the design spectra over different ranges
of period so that all of the periods are represented by the spectral envelope of multiple time histories.
In this manner, it may be possible to incorporate special effects such as near-source and directivity
without modifying the recordings in a manner that may compromise the integrity of the record. As
the design spectra may also have contributions from multiple seismic sources, time histories for record-
ings for events having different styles of faulting can be included. However, to be able to do this,
changes in the current building codes would be needed.
Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build. 16, 537–541 (2007)
DOI: 10.1002/tal