Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Fall 2018
Exam 1
100 points
Question 1 Response:
Question 2 Response:
If the bonus is given as salary than Michelle would pay an additional $27,750 (75,000 x 37%) in
taxes on top of whatever she made during the year. The corporation would be able to deduct the
$27,750 (75,000 x 37%) as a salary deduction. This is more beneficial for the corporation. If the
bonus were disbursed as a dividend than Michelle would only have to pay a dividend tax rate of
20%, which is $15,000. The corporation would not be able to deduct any of the $75,000.
By contrast, declaring $75,000 in dividends is more beneficial for Michelle. Michelle prefers
treating the payment as a dividend, as a preferential tax rate of 15% would apply to the $75,000
and result in only $11,250 of tax. If, instead, the payment was treated as a salary, Michelle
would incur tax of $27,750 [$75,000 (salary) * 37% (marginal tax rate)]. If the payment were
treated as a dividend, none of the $75,000 would deductible by Esther Corp. Thus, Michelle
would save $16,500 of tax if the payment were treated as a dividend instead of salary. Esther
Corporation prefers treating the payment as salary.
Question 3 Response:
Thrush-Dawn C-Corporation
Gross Income:
Income from operations $260,000
Dividends 115,000
Total gross income: 375,000
Less:
Expenses from operations: ($305,000)
Taxable income before dividends received deduction: 70,000
Dividends received deduction ($115,000 * 70%): (80,500)
Total expense: 385,500
Net operating loss: ($10,500)
Gross Income:
Income from operations $260,000
Dividends 115,000
Total gross income: 375,000
Less:
Expenses from operations: ($305,000)
Taxable income before dividends received deduction: 70,000
Dividends received deduction ($115,000 * 50%): 57,500
Taxable Income: $12,500
Yes, the answer would change because here, Coyote owns more than 20% of Roadrunner
Corporation. Therefore, Coyote would either be eligible for 80 percent dividends received
deduction for its tax year that began after 2017, or 65 percent dividends received deduction
for its tax year that began after 2018.
For Year Ended December 31, 2017
Gross Income:
Income from operations $260,000
Dividends 115,000
Total gross income: 375,000
Less:
Expenses from operations: ($305,000)
Taxable income before dividends received deduction: 70,000
Dividends received deduction ($115,000 * 80%): (92,000)
Net operating loss: ($22,000)
Gross Income:
Income from operations $260,000
Dividends + 115,000
Total gross income: 375,000
Less:
Expenses from operations: ($305,000)
Taxable income before dividends received: 70,000
Dividends received deduction ($115,000 * 65%): (74,750)
Net operating loss: ($4,750)
Question 5 Response:
During the current year, Quartz Corporation (a calendar year C corporation) has the following
transactions:
Quartz owns 25% of ABC Corporation’s stock. How much is Quartz Corporation’s taxable
income (loss) for the year?
Gross Income:
Income from operations $350,000
Dividends 50,000
Total gross income: 400,000
Less:
Expenses from operations: ($370,000)
Taxable income before dividends received deduction: 30,000
Dividends received deduction ($50,000 * 80%): ($40,000)
Net operating loss: ($10,000)
Gross Income:
Income from operations $350,000
Dividends 50,000
Total gross income: 400,000
Less:
Expenses from operations: ($370,000)
Taxable income before dividends received deduction: 30,000
Dividends received deduction ($50,000 * 65%): ($32,500)
Net operating loss: ($2,500)
Question 6 Response:
Orange Corporation exchanges a warehouse located in Michigan (adjusted basis of $560,000) for
a warehouse located in Ohio (adjusted basis of $450,000; fair market value of $525,000).
Indicate the amount of gain or loss that is recognized by Orange Corporation on the exchange,
and the basis of the warehouse acquired.
The new basis in the warehouse is $525,000, which is the fair-market value and carry-
over basis of the asset (Ohio warehouse) received.
The new basis in the warehouse is $525,000, which is the fair-market value and carry-
over basis of the asset (Ohio warehouse) received.
c. How would your answer in b. change if instead of receiving $100,000 in cash, the
other party assumed Orange’s $100,000 mortgage on the Michigan warehouse?
Nothing would change, and this transaction results in same answer as part (b). On these
facts nothing would change from part (b) because the other party discharged the
indebtedness of Orange Corporation by assuming $100,000 of its mortgage debt. This
discharge of indebtedness is boot. Hence, the same tax treatment results as in part (b)
when Orange Corporation received $100,000 in cash.
Question 7 Response:
Part a
Merle
Ned
Amount realized on sale $26,000
Basis in stock 25,000
Loss realized on sale (1,000)
Loss recognized 0 [Ned must sell his stock interest for over $41,000]
Part b