Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Optimization of inulinase production by solid-state

fermentation using sugarcane


bagasse as substrate
Marcio Mazutti, João Paulo Bender, Helen Treichel, Marco Di Luccio ∗
Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões Campus de Erechim,
Departamento de Engenharia de Alimentos, Av. Sete de Setembro 1621,
Erechim 99700-000, Brazil

Abstract
The production of enzymes by bioprocesses is a good alternative to add value to agroindustry residues. Sugarcane bagasse is an abundant
by-product of sugar industry and was tested as support and carbon source for production of inulinase (2,1-␤-d-fructanohydrolase, E.C. 3.2.1.7)
from Kluyveromyces marxianus NRRL Y-7571 by solid-state fermentation. Corn steep liquor was used as nitrogen supplement. Factorial design
and response surface analysis were carried out to evaluate the effects of temperature (30.4–41.6 ◦ C) and corn steep liquor (13–27.1%, w/v) on the
production of inulinase. Optimum fermentation conditions were found to be: 36 ◦ C and 20 wt.% of corn steep liquor. Under optimized conditions,
the extra-cellular enzyme concentration reached 391.9 U/g of dry fermented bagasse.

Keywords: Inulinase; Optimization; Solid-state fermentation; Sugarcane; Bagasse

1. Introduction duction, extended stability of products and low production costs


are some of the main advantages of SSF [3,11]. The selection
Solid-state fermentation (SSF) may be defined as a fermenta- of a suitable microorganism is an important aspect of SSF for
tion process where the microorganisms grow in solid substrates production of enzymes [3]. The microorganism should be able
with low water concentration [1–3]. Many studies about the to grow at low water activity, to be GRAS (“Generally Rec-
application of SSF are focused in adding value to agroindustry ognized as Safe”) and be accepted by FDA (“Food and Drug
residues, which have been extensively used as physical support Administration”) [12].
or source of nutrients in SSF [2,4–7]. Inulinase production by Kluyveromyces marxianus NRRL Y-
Brazil is known as one of the greatest producers of sugar 7571 is then of great interest, since it attends the requirements
from sugarcane in the world [8]. Sugarcane production in 2004 of GRAS and just a few studies of the production of inulinase
was 410 million t per month. The crop is mainly directed for by SSF using this yeast are reported [2].
production of ethyl alcohol, sugar and spirits [9]. Sugarcane Inulinases are potentially useful enzymes for production of
bagasse is a by-product resulting from juice extraction. This high fructose syrups (HFS) from inulin [13]. Fructose produc-
waste basically consists of 50% of cellulose, 30% sugars and tion by inulin hydrolysis is more advantageous than conventional
2.4% of ashes [7]. process based on starch, which includes the action of ␣-amylase,
The production of enzymes by SSF has gained much attention amyloglucosidase and glucose isomerase, yielding only 45% of
in biotechnology studies for production of lipases [5], inulinases fructose in the final product due to the thermodynamical equi-
[2], proteases [10], etc. The use of low cost residues, higher librium of the reaction. Inulinase based hydrolysis of inulin can
productivities, low energy requirements, lower wastewater pro- yield products with 95% of fructose [14].
This work aimed to optimize inulinase production by SSF
using sugarcane bagasse and corn steep liquor as substrates.
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +55 54 520 9000; fax: +55 54 520 9090. The optimization was carried out by experimental design and
E-mail address: diluccio@uricer.edu.br (M.D. Luccio). surface analysis methodology.
2. Materials and methods 50 ◦ C. After reaction, the reducing sugar concentration is determined by DNS
method [15]. One unit of inulinase activity is defined as the amount of enzyme
2.1. Microorganism and media necessary to hydrolyze 1 ␮mol of sucrose per minute at reaction conditions.
Inulinase has different hydrolytic activity on sucrose when compared to inulin.
The strain of K. marxianus NRRL Y-7571 was maintained at 4 ◦ C on YM This behavior may be represented by the ratio of activity on sucrose/activity on
agar medium containing (g L−1 ): yeast extract 3.0, malt extract 3.0, peptone 5.0, inulin (S/I). Value of S/I lower than 50 is characteristic of inulinase behavior
glucose 10.0, agar 20.0 and subcultured every 3 weeks. [16]. The optimization was carried out determining only the hydrolytic activity
Cell production for pre-inoculum was carried out in 50 mL test tubes with on sucrose. The activity on inulin was determined only in the optimum condition
10 mL of liquid YM medium. The medium was inoculated with a loopful of (central point).
stock culture and incubated at 30 ◦ C for 24 h. This suspension was used for
inoculation without any further treatment. 2.6. Microbial growth
Medium for inoculum contained (g L−1 ): sucrose 20.0, yeast extract 5.0,
K2 HPO4 5.0, NH4 Cl 1.5, KCl 1.15 and MgSO4 ·7H2 O 0.65. Each test tube with As an indirect way to quantify microbial growth, glucosamine was assayed
YM medium was transferred to a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask with 100 mL of in the solid according to Aidoo et al. [17].
medium and incubated at 30 ◦ C and 150 rpm for 24 h.
3. Results and discussion
2.2. Solid-state fermentation

Sugarcane bagasse from a local industry (Cooperativa Tritı́cola Erechim


Table 2 presents the matrix of the complete factorial design
Ltd.) was used as substrate for inulinase production. Fermentations were car- with the correspondent responses in terms of enzyme activ-
ried out in conical flasks (500 mL) with 5 g of dry bagasse, supplemented with ity. The results show that the highest enzyme production
corn steep liquor (CSL, Corn Products, Brazil) in concentrations defined by the (391.9 U g−1 ) was obtained at central point conditions (36 ◦ C
experimental design. Moisture was adjusted to 65%, each flask was covered and 20 wt.% of CSL). This production is higher than the reported
with hydrophobic cotton and autoclaved at 121 ◦ C for 20 min. Preliminary stud-
ies showed that no changes in moisture content of the substrate after autoclaving
in literature for production of inulinase by solid-state fermenta-
were detected. After cooling, each flask was inoculated with 3 mL of the suspen- tion using wheat bran (122.9 U g−1 ) [2]. Production of inulinase
sion previously prepared and incubated for 72 h in a chamber with temperature as high as 176 U mL−1 in submerged fermentations have been
and humidity control. reported [18].
A 22 full factorial design was performed to assess the effect of supplement The optimum incubation temperature for inulinase produc-
concentration and incubation temperature on inulinase production. A central
point was carried out in triplicate plus two axial points (star configuration,
tion found in our work was 36 ◦ C, similar to that suggested
α = ± 21/2 ) for each independent factor for experimental error evaluation and by Selvakumar et al. (37 ◦ C), when cultivating K. marxianus
second-order effects estimation, respectively. Table 1 shows the range of the CDBB-L-278 in solid-state fermentations [2]. Other studies also
studied factors and the correspondent coded levels. found similar results in submerged fermentations with yeast of
the genus Kluyveromyces [15].
2.3. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis of the results in Table 2 was performed
yielding an empirical coded model of inulinase activity in func-
Statistica (version 5.1) software was used for regression and graphical analy-
ses of the data obtained. The statistical significance of the regression coefficients tion of temperature and corn steep liquor concentration. Linear
was 95%. The optimum concentrations of the variables were obtained by the and quadratic parameters for the concentration of CSL were not
graphical analysis. statistically significant (p < 0.05) and were added to the lack of
fit.
2.4. Extraction of the enzyme The optimized coded model for inulinase activity was vali-
dated by analysis of variance (ANOVA), presented in Table 3.
After fermentation the whole sample of each flask was extracted by the addi-
tion of 50 mL of sodium acetate buffer 0.1 mol L−1 pH 4.8, following incubation
The ANOVA shows a high R (0.86, correlation coefficient) and a
at 30 ◦ C and 150 rpm for 30 min. Enzyme activity was assayed in the supernatant good performance of the F-test for regression (calculated values
after vacuum filtration (Whatman qualitative filter paper, grade 1) and the solid
matter was assayed for glucosamine and total reducing sugar (TRS) by DNS Table 2
method [15]. Glucosamine, inulinase activity and TRS were expressed based Matrix of the experimental design (coded and values) with responses in terms
on the mass of dry substrate. All analyses were carried out in triplicates and of inulinase activity (after 72 h of fermentation)
standard deviation was lower than 5%.
Run Corn steep liquor Temperature (◦ C) Activity (U gds−1 )
(% w/w)
2.5. Enzyme activity assay
1 −1 (15%) −1 (32 ◦ C) 238.97
Enzyme activity was determined by initial reaction rate of reducing sugar 2 +1 (25%) −1 (32 ◦ C) 246.13
production under controlled conditions. The method consists in adding 0.5 mL 3 −1 (15%) +1 (40 ◦ C) 194.41
of enzyme extract to 4.5 mL of sucrose solution (2% w/w) in 0.1 mol L−1 pH 4 +1 (25%) +1 (40 ◦ C) 220.87
4.8 sodium acetate buffer and incubating the reaction medium for 10 min at 5 −1.41(13%) 0 (36 ◦ C) 239.47
6 +1.41(27.1%) 0 (36 ◦ C) 224.46
Table 1 7 0 (20%) −1.41(30.4 ◦ C) 19.01
Range of the factors investigated in the experimental design 8 0 (20%) +1.41(41.6 ◦ C) 26.08
9 0 (20%) 0 (36 ◦ C) 327.54
Level −1.41 −1 0 +1 +1.41 10 0 (20%) 0 (36 ◦ C) 315.72
Temperature (◦ C) 30.4 32 36 40 41.6 11 0 (20%) 0 (36 ◦ C) 391.94
Corn steep liquor (% w/w) 13 15 20 25 27.1
gds = grams of dry substrate.
Table 3
ANOVA for inulinase activity as response
Source of Sum of Degrees of Mean square F-test
variation squares freedom

Regression 100046.1 1 100046.1 29.7


Residual 30288.6 9 3365.4
Lack of fit 26923.1 7
Pure error 3365.5 2
Total 130334.7 10

Regression coefficient: R = 0.86; F0.95;1;9 = 5.12.

about 5.8 times the listed one). Therefore, Eq. (1) is predictive
of inulinase production in the investigated range of factors, and Fig. 2. Kinetics of inulinase production at optimum conditions (36 ◦ C, 20% w/w
of corn steep liquor). TRS = total reducing sugars, gds = grams of dry substrate.
consists in a second-order function for temperature. This model
is represented in Fig. 1:
TRS quantification, and it was not available to the yeast during
activity = 314.9 − 127.8T 2 (1) fermentation.
The response surface in Fig. 1 shows that the maximum inuli- Maximum inulinase activity occurred after 96 h of fermen-
nase activity is obtained in the region of central point. It is also tation. Selvakumar et al. [2] report that the maximum produc-
clear that the concentration of CSL does not influence inulinase tion of the enzyme by SSF occurs after 72 h for K. marxianus
production in the investigated range. When incubation temper- CDBB-L-278 (122.8 U g−1 ) and after 48 h for Staphylococcus
ature was set at the extremes of the studied interval low values sp. (107.6 U g−1 ) [2].
of inulinase activity were obtained, since low temperature may Fig. 2 also shows the kinetics of glucosamine production as
lead to reduction in metabolism of the microorganism and high an indirect means to quantify the growth of microorganism. An
temperature may induce enzyme inactivation. increase in glucosamine content is observed during fermenta-
After optimization, fermentation kinetics was determined at tion, what is a possible indication of cell growth. Glucosamine
the optimized conditions, as observed in Fig. 2. The results show results also suggest that production of inulinase is associated
a decrease of 40% in total reducing sugars (TRS) in the first to growth, which agrees with the results for production of
6 h of fermentation, following stabilization. The production of inulin by submerged fermentation reported by other studies
enzyme is not detected before 12 h of fermentation and total con- [20].
sumption of sugars during fermentation was not observed. This Inulinase productivity obtained in our work was 3.34 U g−1
latter fact may be related to the occurrence of partial hydroly- h−1 , almost two times the highest productivity reported in liter-
sis of cellulose during the step of hydrolysis of sucrose in the ature, 1.71 U g−1 h−1 [2].
determination of total reducing sugar. Cellulose is a polymer of
glucose bound by ␤(1 → 4) glycosidic bonds, which might not 4. Conclusions
be readily accessible to the yeast but still quantified by the ana-
lytical method [19]. Thus, the residual TRS observed in Fig. 2 In this study optimization of inulinase production by K. marx-
may be resultant of this partial hydrolysis of cellulose during ianus NRRL Y-7571 using sugarcane bagasse as substrate was
carried out. The best fermentation conditions found after opti-
mization was 36 ◦ C and 20% of corn steep liquor, which yielded
about 390 U g−1 . Maximum productivity was 3.34 U g−1 h−1 ,
the highest reported in literature to date.
Sugarcane bagasse seems to present a great nutritional poten-
tial for growth of K. marxianus NRRL Y-7571 and production
of inulinase.

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Laboratório de Engenharia de Bio-


processos/UNICAMP for supplying the microorganism used in
this work.

References

[1] Bellon-Maurel V, Orliac O, Christen P. Sensors and measurements in


Fig. 1. Response surface for inulinase activity. solid state fermentation: a review. Process Biochem 2003;38:881–96.
[2] Selvakumar P, Pandey A. Solid state fermentation for the syntesis of [12] Schneider, ALS. Estudo da produção de inulinase por Kluyveromyces
inulinase from Staphylococcus sp. and Kluyveromyces marxianus. Pro- marxianus ATCC 36907. D.Sc. Thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa
cess Biochem 1999;34:851–8. Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil, 1998.
[3] Pandey A. Solid state fermentation. Biochem Eng J 2003;13:81–4. [13] Ettalibi M, Barati JC. Purification, properties and comparison of inver-
[4] Soccol CR, Vandenberghe LPS. Overview of applied solid-state fermen- tase, exoinulinase and endoinulinase of Aspergillus ficuum. Appl Micro-
tation in Brazil. Biochem Eng J 2003;13:205–18. biol Biot 1987;26:13–20.
[5] Di Luccio M, Capra F, Ribeiro NP, Vargas GD, Freire D, Oliveira D. [14] Kim CH, Rhee SK. Fructose production from Jerusalem artichoke by
Effect of temperature, moisture, and carbon supplementation on lipase inulinase immobilized on chitin. Biotechnol Lett 1989;11:201–6.
production by solid-state fermentation of soy cake by Penicillium sim- [15] Kalil SJ, Suzan R, Maugeri F, Rodrigues MI. Optimization of inuli-
plicissimum. Appl Biochem Biotech 2004;113(1–3):173–80. nase production by Kluyveromyces marxianus using fatorial design. Appl
[6] Pandey A, Soccol CR, Nigam P, Brand D, Mohan R, Roussos S. Biotech- Biochem Biotechnol 2001;94(3):257–64.
nological potential of coffee pulp and coffee husk for bioprocesses. [16] Vandamme EJ, Derycked G. Microbial inulinases: fermentation process,
Biochem Eng J 2000;6:153–62. properties and applications. Adv Appl Microbiol 1983:139–76.
[7] Pandey A, Soccol CR, Nigam P, Soccol VT. Biotechnological poten- [17] Aidoo KE, Hendry R, Wood BJB. Estimation of fungal growth in
tial of agro-industrial residues: sugar-cane bagasse. Bioresour Technol a solid state fermentation system. Appl Microb Biotechnol 1981;12:
2000;74:69–80. 6–9.
[8] World Sugar: FAPRI 2002 Agricultural Outlook. Food and Agricultural [18] Silva-Santisteban BOY, Maugeri F. Agitation, aeration and shear stress
Policy Research Institute, Iowa, USA. Available in http://www.fapri. as key factors in inulinase production by Kluyveromyces marxianus.
org/Outlook2002/PageMker/05-OutlookPub%20SU.pdf. Enzyme Microb Tech 2005;36(5–6):17–724.
[9] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatı́stica (IBGE), BR: Available in [19] Gámez S, Ramı́rez JA, Garrote G, Vásquez M. Manufacture of fer-
www.sidra.ibge.gov.br. mentable sugar solutions from sugar cane bagasse hydrolyzed with
[10] Couri S, Terzi SC, Pinto GAS, Freitas SP, Costa ACA. Hydrolytic phosphoric acid at atmospheric pressure. J Agric Food Chem 2004;52:
enzyme production in solid state fermentation by Aspergillus niger 4172–7.
3T5B8. Process Biochem 2000;36:255–61. [20] Cazetta ML, Martins PMM, Monti R, Contiero J. Yacon (Polymnia
[11] Holker U, Lenz J. Solid-state fermentation: are there any biotechnolog- sanchifolia) extract as a substrate to produce inulinase by Kluyveromyces
ical advantages? Curr Opin Microbiol 2005;8:301–6. marxianus var. Bulgaricus. J Food Eng 2005;66:301–5.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen