ol AMES OF GODS
PCR Cy
ele Nceolgc yd
David Frawley
(Vamadeva Shastri)There are two opposing views about
language, both advanced by distinguished
thinkers. One view holds that a language is
external to objects and thoughts; the other
» view regards it as fundamental to them. In
what sense or senses are these views true?
Can they be reconciled?
Language has not merely expressed
man’s fears; it has also expressed his sense
of mystery. Again and again, man has sung
of Gods and Divine Life and his idea of the
Good and the Beautiful in sublime speech.
This sublime speech, these inspired words,
he has treasured as his veritable heritage, his
Vedas. But in the passage of time, man’s
thought-habits and speech-mores change
and the inspired words become difficult to
understand. Can a study of language help us
to recapture the meanings of older
scriptures? Can this study help us to
understand the deeper life of man, his vision
of Gods and the Good? Can this study throw
some light on religious consciousness in
general and the cherished old scriptures in
particular? For example, can we understand
the mentality of the seers of the Vedas—
humanity's oldest extant scripture—by
studying their language? Or can we
understand the import of their language by
entering into the state of their mind?
The book studies human speech in its
relation to man’s deeper psyche and
religious consciousness. It adds a new
dimension to the science of Semantics by
showing how physical meanings of a word
become sensuous meanings, become
concepts and ideas, become names of the
powers of the psyche, become Names of
Gods, depending upon the organ of mind—
continued on back flap
Rs.120a
THE WORD AS REVELATION
_ NAMES OF GODS