Sie sind auf Seite 1von 5

CHI-SQUARE TEST

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Monthly income level 120 100.0% 0 0.0% 120 100.0%
* stress will affect your
psychological ability

Monthly income level * stress will affect your psychological ability Cross tabulation
Count
stress will affect your psychological ability Total
agree strongly disagree strongly
agree disagree
5000-10000 3 16 5 9 33
10000-15000 11 3 16 3 33
Monthly income
15000-20000 3 7 4 13 27
level
20000 and 14 3 7 3 27
above
Total 31 29 32 28 120

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 47.660a 9 .000
Likelihood Ratio 46.440 9 .000
Linear-by-Linear 1.713 1 .191
Association
N of Valid Cases 120
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is 6.30.

Symmetric Measures
Value Approx.
Sig.
Nominal by Contingency .533 .000
Nominal Coefficient
N of Valid Cases 120

Correlation method
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Satisfied with the shift 120 100.0% 0 0.0% 120 100.0%
timing * level of your
in an organization

Satisfied with the shift timing * level of your in an organization Crosstabulation


Count
level of your in an organization Total
Top Middle low
management management management
agree 11 11 9 31
strongly agree 8 13 10 31
Satisfied with the shift
disagree 8 17 6 31
timing
strongly 10 13 4 27
disagree
Total 37 54 29 120

Symmetric Measures
Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Approx.
Errora Tb Sig.
Nominal by Contingency .198 .557
Nominal Coefficient
Interval by -.086 .092 -.938 .350c
Pearson's R
Interval
Spearman -.081 .093 -.882 .380c
Ordinal by Ordinal
Correlation
N of Valid Cases 120
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
ONE WAY ANOVA TEST

ANOVA
Feel free minds set after your vacation
Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Between 2.325 3 .775 3.297 .023
Groups
Within Groups 27.267 116 .235
Total 29.592 119

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Feel free minds set after your vacation n
Tukey HSD
(I) feel about working (J) feel about working Mean Std. Error Sig. 95% Confidence Int
environment environment Difference (I- Lower Upp
J) Bound
highly satisfied .31283* .11848 .046 .0040 .621
satisfied dissatisfied -.07353 .14699 .959 -.4567 .309
highly dissatisfied .13593 .11518 .641 -.1643 .436
satisfied -.31283* .11848 .046 -.6217 -.004
highly satisfied dissatisfied -.38636* .14770 .049 -.7714 -.001
highly dissatisfied -.17690 .11609 .427 -.4795 .125
satisfied .07353 .14699 .959 -.3096 .456
dissatisfied highly satisfied .38636* .14770 .049 .0014 .771
highly dissatisfied .20946 .14507 .475 -.1687 .587
satisfied -.13593 .11518 .641 -.4362 .164
highly dissatisfied highly satisfied .17690 .11609 .427 -.1257 .479
dissatisfied -.20946 .14507 .475 -.5876 .168
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Feel free minds set after your vacation


Tukey HSDa,b
feel about working N Subset for alpha =
environment 0.05
1 2
highly satisfied 33 1.3636
highly dissatisfied 37 1.5405 1.5405
satisfied 34 1.6765 1.6765
dissatisfied 16 1.7500
Sig. .090 .393
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 26.802.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of
the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not
guaranteed.