Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

1. Atty noe-lacsama v atty busmente AC no.

Study: Canons 2, 3 and 8 of CPR


7269 Topic: Solicitation of Legal Services
2. Query of atty silverio-buffet AM no. 08-6-352-
rtc GROUP 5
1. Atty. Khan Jr. v. Atty. Simbillo, AC No. 5299,
3. Aguirre v rana BM No. 1036 june 10 2003
8/13/03
4. Re: elmo abad AM no. 139
2. Linsangan v. Atty. Tolentino, AC No. 6672,
5. Letter of atty cecilio arevalo BM 1370 may 9 9/4/09
2005 3. Geffen v. Moss, 53 Cal. App. 3d 221-
6. Petition to sign in the roll of attys medado,
GROUP 6
BM 2540
4. In Re Krasner, 204 N.E.2d, 1965
7. Norma tan & pagayokan v. Balajadia GR no.
5. In Re Primus, 436 US 412, 1978
1695172006 6. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn., 436 US 447,
8. Rule 138 sec 6 1978
9. In re: juan publico, petition for reinstatement
in the roll of attys feb 20 1981 Group 1
7. Fabillo v. IAC, GR No. L-68838, 3/11/91
10. Figueroa v barranco jr. SBC case no. 519
8. Yu v. Bondal, AC No. 5534, 1/17/05
1997
9. People v. Gonzales Jr., GR No. 138542,
11. In re: james joseph hamm 123 p. 3d 652 6/21/01
(2005) 10. In Re R.M.J., 455 US 191, 1982
12. Zeta v. Malinao AM no. P-220 Dec 20 1978 11. Samonte v. Atty. Gatdula, AM No. P-99-
13. Pp. v hon. Maceda and javellana GR no. 1292, 2/26/99
89591-96 jan 24 2000 12. Dacanay v. Baker & Mckenzie, AC No. 2131,
14. Santos v atty llamas AC no. 4749 5/10/85
15. Petition for leave to resume practice of law, 13. Dir. Of Religious Affairs v. Bayot, AC No. L-
dacanay BM no. 1678 dec 17 2007 117, 1944
16. Petition to reacquire the privilege to practice 14. In Re Tagorda, 53 Phil 37, 1929
law in the Phils, Muneses, BM 2112 Group 2
17. Section 2, rule 138 15. Ulep v. Legal Clinic, 223 SCRA 378, 1993
18. Pp. V de luna, et al GR nos. L-10236-48 Jan 16. US v. Ney & Bosque, 8 Phil Reports 146,
31 1958 1907
19. Rule 138 sec 20
20. Rule 138 sec 18
21. Landbank GR no. 167886
22. Petition to sign in the roll of attys, Medado
BM no 2540
23. Re: elmo abad, AM no. 139
24. Rule 138 sec 16
25. Rule 138 sec 21
26. Alawi vs. Alauya, AM SDC-97-2-P feb 24
1997
27. Rule 138 sec 12, 13
28. In re: purisima, BM nos 979 and 986
29. Paguia v office of the president GR 176278
30. Rule 138-A secs 1, 2, 3, 4
31. Rule 138 sec 34
32. Bulacan vs. Torcino GR L-4438 jan 30 1985
33. Cruz v mina GR no. 154207 april 27 2007
34. Maderada v judge mediodea AM no. Mtj- 02-
1459 oct 14 2003
35. Canon 9 rule 9.01, Bar Matter no. 730 june
13 1997
36. Cantimbuhan v hon. Cruz GR no. L-51813-
14 nov 29 1983
37. Secs 4 and 15 rule 110, rules of court

PALE 2nd Round of Cases:

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen