Bridge No. - 236 Report 11 June

DESIGN REPORT FOR B.
No:236
NAME OF WORK: DESIGN CHECK FOR RAISING OF ABUTMENT HEIGHT FOR

BRIDGE NO.236 BETWEEN STATIONS BILASIPURA AND CHAPAR OF GAURIPUR
- ABHAYAPURI SECTION
Date: 11nth June 2018
SUBMITTED TO:
CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTION) – II
NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
(CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION)
BRIDGE NO.- 236

DESIGN SUMMARY OF MAIN COMPONENTS IN BRIDGE STRUCTURE
Design Consultant
DESIGN REPORT FOR BRIDGE.NO:236
Statement of Confidentiality
This document is confidential and proprietary
BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt. Ltd

‘Anagha’, Plot no.1, Road No.2, Sector 11,
New Panvel (E), Navi Mumbai – 410 206.
Maharashtra, INDIA. Tel.: +91 22 27469921
Email: beavermumbai@gmail.com
Web site: www.beaverinfra.com
BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 2

Project Name NAME OF WORK: Design check for raising of abutment height for Bridge
No.236 between stations Bilasipura and Chapar of Gauripur - Abhayapuri
section
Doc No. BICPL/18/NFR/B-C /BR/236 Date of Issue 04-06-2018
Doc Title Design Summary Of Main Components In Bridge Structure
Rev Date of
Description Changes made Prepared Reviewed Approved
No Issue/Revision
R0 11-06-2018 First Issue NIL Anil C Vikram G Ashok Nair
Prepared by Name: Anil kumar C Signature
Reviewed by Name: Vikram G Signature
Approved by Name: Ashok Nair Signature

Table of Contents
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 6
1.1. Objective and Scope: ............................................................................................................................... 6
1.2. Summary: ................................................................................................................................................ 6
1.3. Design Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 6
1.3.1. Pile: ...................................................................................................................................................... 6
1.3.2. Pile Cap: .............................................................................................................................................. 7
1.3.3. Abutment Shaft/Wall ........................................................................................................................... 7
1.3.4. Bed Block: ........................................................................................................................................... 8
1.3.5. Ballast Wall: ........................................................................................................................................ 8
2. CODES AND STANDARD...................................................................................................................... 10
2.1. Standards ............................................................................................................................................... 10
2.2. Structural Materials ............................................................................................................................... 11
3. PILE........................................................................................................................................................... 13
3.1. Design of Pile: ....................................................................................................................................... 13
3.2. Reinforcement Summary: ...................................................................................................................... 13
4. PILE CAP .................................................................................................................................................. 16
4.1. Design of Pile cap:................................................................................................................................. 16
5. ABUTMENT ............................................................................................................................................. 19
5.1. Design of Abutment: ............................................................................................................................. 19
6. BED BLOCK............................................................................................................................................. 22
6.1. Design of Bed Block: ........................................................................................................................... 22
6.1.1. Reinforcement Summary: .................................................................................................................. 22
7. BALLAST WALL..................................................................................................................................... 24
7.1. Design of Ballast: .................................................................................................................................. 24
7.1.1. Reinforcement Summary: .................................................................................................................. 24
ANNEXURE-1 Design calculation ................................................................................................................... 26
DRAWINGS ..................................................................................................................................................... 56

SECTION - I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1. Objective and Scope:
The scope of this report is limited to design of Abutment for newly proposed Formation Level
from original Formation Level (FL:36.328 to FL:39.428) for Bridge No.236 . Due to change in
formation level, the height of the abutment is increased by 3.1m. The already provided section
suitability and design is checked for increase in the height of the abutment.
1.2. Summary:
a) "In this report the designing and analysis of Abutment is done for altered/New Formation Level i.e.,
FL: 39.428 for Bridge No. 236 "
b) For calculation purpose we considered the sections as per provided drawing no:CE/CON/N-
J/B/119/2007
c) Part-1 is an Inclined Portion from top of Pile Cap to RL: 34.893 i.e., 2.28m.
d) Part-2 is a Straight portion from RL:34.893 to top of Bed block i.e., 0.42m and the height will be
3.405m
e) For designing the abutment as per new F.L we considered same height of Part-1 as per given drawing.
f) But for Part-2 we raised the height to 3.405m upto top of Bearing Beam so that it will meet the
altered/proposed Formation level (FL: 39.428).
g) In this report concrete mix is considered as M30 and steel grade is considered as Fe 500
h) The allowable pile capacity under normal loading at founding level is considered from given drawing
report i.e., 220T & 33T and it is checked with pile reactions in all load combinations and it is found
safe.
i) Pile reinforcement is cross checked and found that the rebar provided is insufficient under seismic
condition.
1.3. Design Summary
1.3.1. Pile:
Reinforcement as per our
Reinforcement as per Drawing
Sl. Calculation Check /
Description
No opp. to earth opp. to earth Remark
Earth face face Earth face face
1 Main Bar 20 No's. of 32 φ @ 120 mm c/c 24 No's of 32 φ @ 120 mm c/c unsafe
Circular
2 12 φ link bars @ 250 mm c/c 12 φ link bars @ 250 mm c/c Safe
Bars
Remark: In Main reinforcement provided No. of Bars/reinforcement is insufficient. Therefore,
required at least 28 No. of bars as per calculation.

Pile provided is insufficient for increase in height of 3.1m. Hence provide two number of
additional piles with same dimensions and reinforcement.

Reinforcement as per Drawing
Sl. Calculation Check /
Description
Earth face face Earth face face
1 Main Bar 20 No's. of 32 φ @ 120 mm c/c 24 No's of 32 φ @ 120 mm c/c Safe
Circular
2 12 φ link bars @ 250 mm c/c 12 φ link bars @ 250 mm c/c Safe
Bars
1.3.2. Pile Cap:

Sl. Reinforcement as per Drawing Check /
Description Calculation
No Remark
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Main Bar 25 φ @ 150 32 φ @ 150 25 φ @ 170 32 φ @ 250
1 Safe
mm c/c mm c/c mm c/c mm c/c
Distribution 32 φ @ 250 32 φ @ 250 25 φ @ 250 25 φ @ 250
2 Safe
Bar mm c/c mm c/c mm c/c mm c/c
Stirrups 12 φ 12 Legged/m @ 250 mm 12 φ 6 Legged/m @ 250 mm c/c
3 Safe
c/c
Remark: In 1 m length 6 legged stirrups has to be provided for spacing 250 mm c/c. If we
provide 12-Legged stirrup in 1 m then spacing should be 150 mm c/c
1.3.3. Abutment Shaft/Wall

Reinforcement as per Reinforcement as per our
Sl. Drawing Calculation Check /
Description
Earth face Earth face
face face
25 φ @ 120 25 φ @ 120 mm 25 φ @ 120 mm 25 φ @ 120 mm
1 Main Bar Safe
mm c/c c/c c/c c/c
2 Hoop Bars 10 φ @ 250 mm c/c 10 φ @ 250 mm c/c Safe

1.3.4. Bed Block:

No Remark
Main Bar 25 φ @ 250 25 φ @ 250 25 φ @ 250 20 φ @ 250
1
mm c/c mm c/c mm c/c mm c/c Safe
2
Bar mm c/c mm c/c mm c/c mm c/c Safe
1.3.5. Ballast Wall:

No Remark
Main Bar 10 φ @ 130 10 φ @ 130 10 φ @ 150 10 φ @ 150
1
mm c/c mm c/c mm c/c mm c/c Safe
2
Bar mm c/c mm c/c mm c/c mm c/c Safe
Stirrups 10 φ 12 Legged/m @ 260 mm 10 φ 12 Legged/m @ 260 mm
3
c/c c/c Safe
Note: Design calculation is attached in Annexure -1

SECTION - II
CODES AND STANDARD

2. CODES AND STANDARD

2.1. Standards
All structural elements will be designed in accordance with the applicable requirements and
recommendations of the reference codes and standards, to meet or exceed the specified performance.
The requirements and recommendations of the reference codes and standards are regarded as
minimum criteria and the values specified in this document are adopted where these prove more
generous. Latest editions of following reference codes and standards along with amendments
wherever applicable will be used.
Loading
 IRS Bridge Rules
 IS 875 Part - 1
Design of concrete elements
 IRS Code of practice for Plain, Reinforced and Prestressed concrete for general construction
of Bridges
 IRS Code of Practice for Design of Substructures and Foundations of Bridges.
Design of foundations
 IRS Code of Practice for Design of Substructures and Foundations of Bridges.
 IS: 2911 - Indian Standard code of practice for design and construction of pile foundations.
Design for Earthquake Resistance
 RDSO guidelines on Seismic Design of Railway Bridges.
 IIT-Kanpur- RDSO guidelines on Seismic Design of Railway Bridges.

Design of concrete elements
 IS: 456:2000 - Code of Practice for plain and reinforced concrete
 IS: 1786 - Specification for high strength deformed steel bars and wires
Concrete reinforcement
 IS: 1566 - Specification for Hard-Drawn Steel Wire Fabric for Concrete reinforcement
 SP- 16 - Design aids for reinforced concrete
 SP- 34 - Handbook on concrete reinforcement and detailing.

Design of steel structural elements

 IS: 800: 2000 - Use of steel in construction – Code of practice.
 IS: 2062 - Steel for general structural purposes.
2.2. Structural Materials
Following structural materials are considered:
 Cement As per cl.No-4.1of IRS CBC
 Concrete
1. Density of Concrete-RCC= 25 KN/m3, PCC = 24 KN/m3
2. Minimum grade of concrete As per cl.No- 5.4.4 of IRS CBC
 Reinforcement- As per cl.No- 4.5 of IRS CBC

SECTION - III
PILE

3. PILE
Piles are driven in to soil to improve the load bearing capacity of the soil through which it passes to
such an extent that it can take on the superimposed load of structure safely.
3.1. Design of Pile:

Pile is designed as Circular column
a) Determination of Pile Capacity:
 Load carrying capacity of piles as per static formula ( Appendix B, clause 5.3.1.1, IS
2911 part 1/sec 2-1979).
b) Calculation of Depth of fixity:
 From Appendix of ammendement - 3 to IS : 2911 part 1 / sec 2 -1979
c) Calculation of Maximum moment and Deflection
d) Calculation of forces and moments

 Under Normal condition
 Under Seismic condition
e) Check for Reinforcement
 Calculation of percentage of Reinforcement using SP:16
3.2. Reinforcement Summary:
Sl. Reinforcement as per our Check /

Description Reinforcement as per Drawing
No Calculation Remark
1 Main Bar 20 No's. of 32 φ @ 120 mm c/c 28 No's of 32 φ @ 120 mm c/c Unsafe
2 Lateral ties 12 φ link bars @ 250 mm c/c 12 φ link bars @ 250 mm c/c Safe
Remark: In Main reinforcement provided No. of Bars/reinforcement is insufficient. Therefore, required

at least 24 No. of bars as per calculation.
Sl. Area of Rein. as per Area of Rein. As per Area of Rein. Check /
Description
No Drawing Calculation required Remark
1 Main Bar 13404 mm² 22518 mm² 21210 mm² Unsafe
2 Lateral ties 452 mm² 452 mm² 452mm2 Safe
Conclusion:
Provided area of Main reinforcement is less than that of calculated area of reinforcement.
Hence it is Unsafe.

Pile provided is insufficient for increase in height of 3.1m. Hence provide two number of additional
piles with same dimensions and reinforcement.
Reinforcement summary (for revised Pile reinforcement):
Description
1 Main Bar 13404 mm² 16084 mm² 15320 mm² Safe
2 Lateral ties 452 mm² 452 mm² 452mm2 Safe
Note: Design calculation Please check Annexure-1 for revised pile design

SECTION - IV
PILE CAP

4. PILE CAP
A bridge sub structure requires several piles to support the loads. In such cases, groups of piles are
used and they are combined by a pile cap which supports the substructure.
4.1. Design of Pile cap:
The Pile Cap shall be designed under seismic condition as it is critical for design.
a) Dimensions:
Dimensions details of Abutment are taken from drawing no. CE/CON/N-J/B/119/2007.
b) Load combinations under ULS condition:
1. Dead load+ live load+ Horizontal force+ Restraining forces+ Earth Pressure+ Live load
Surcharge(under HFL).
Surcharge(under LWL).
3. Dead load +Live load + 0.5* Horizontal force + Restraining forces + Seismic (under
HFL)
LWL)
5. Dead load + Restraining forces + Seismic (under HFL no span).
6. Dead load + Restraining forces + Seismic (under LWL no span).
c) Calculation of Sectional modulus of Pile.
d) Calculation of Maximum Pile reaction in ULS case
e) Calculation of Minimum Pile reaction in ULS case
f) Calculation of Moment along longitudinal direction of Pile cap
g) Check for reinforcement:
1. Main Reinforcement:
i. Required area of reinforcement is as per cl.No.15.4.2.2.1 of IRS CBC.
ii. Min area of reinforcement required is as per cl.No.15.9.4.1 of IRS CBC.
2. Distribution Reinforcement:
i. Min area of secondary reinforcement is as per cl.No.15.9.4.2 of IRS CBC
3. Check for Shear:
i. Shear stress calculation is as per cl.No.15.4.3.1 of IRS CBC
ii. Allowable shear stress as per cl.No.15.8.3.2 of IRS CBC
iii. Shear reinforcement as per table no. 14 of IRS CBC


No Remark
Main Bar 25 φ @ 150 mm 32 φ @ 150 mm 25 φ @ 170 mm 32 φ @ 250 mm
1 Safe
c/c c/c c/c c/c
Distribution 32 φ @ 250 mm 32 φ @ 250 mm 25 φ @ 250 mm 25 φ @ 250 mm
2 Safe
Bar c/c c/c c/c c/c
3 Stirrups 12 φ 12 Legged/m @ 250 mm c/c 12 φ 6 Legged/m @ 250 mm c/c Safe
Remark: In 1 m length 6 legged stirrups has to be provided for spacing 250 mm c/c. If we provide 12-
Legged stirrup in 1 m then spacing should be 150 mm c/c
Description
1 Main Bar 3273 mm² 3216 mm² 2888 mm² 3217 mm² 2820 mm² 2820 mm² Safe
Distribution
2 Bar 3217 mm² 3217 mm² 1964 mm² 1964 mm² 1690 mm² 1690 mm² Safe
3 Stirrups 5424 mm² 2712 mm² 1197 mm² Safe
Conclusion:
Provided area of reinforcement is more than calculated area of reinforcement. Hence it is safe in
design.

SECTION - V
ABUTMENT

5. ABUTMENT
Abutments are end supports to the superstructure of a bridge and they retain earth on their back side
which serves as an approach to the bridge.
5.1. Design of Abutment:

a) Dimensions:
Dimensions details of Abutment are taken from drawing no. CE/CON/N-J/B/119/2007.
b) Forces acting on Abutments:
1. Dead Load due to Superstructure.
2. SIDL due to Rail, Sleepers and Ballast.
3. Live Load due to Superstructure with CDA effect.
4. Self weight of the abutment.
5. Selft weight of ballst wall.
6. Self weight of bearing beam.
7. Restraing forces.
8. Longitudinal forces due to tractive effort and braking.
9. Earth pressure due backfill.
10. Surcharge Load due to dead load and live load.
11. Effect of earth quake.
c) Moments acting on Abutment:
1. Moments at the C.G of base in width direction.
2. Moments at the C.G of base with SIDL and without SIDL.
3. Moment at C.G of base for Live Load due to Superstructure with CDA effect.
4. Moment in Longitudinal directions due to restraing forces.
5. Moment in Longitudinal directions due to tractive effort and braking forces.
6. Moment at top due to Earth pressure.
7. Moments at base due to Surcharge Load with dead load and live load.
d) Load combinations under ULS condition:
Surcharge(under HFL).
Surcharge(under LWL).
HFL)
LWL)

5. Dead load + Restraining forces + Seismic (under HFL no span).

6. Dead load + Restraining forces + Seismic (under LWL no span).
e) Check for reinforcement:
1. Main Reinforcement:
Required area of reinforcement is as per cl.No.15.4.2.2.1 of IRS CBC.
Min area of reinforcement required is as per cl.No.15.9.4.1 of IRS CBC.
2. Distribution Reinforcement for hoop bars:
Min area of secondary reinforcement is as per cl.No.15.9.4.2 of IRS CBC.
Rein. as per Drawing Rein. as per our Calculation

Sl. Check /
Description
No opp to earth opp to earth Remark
Earth face Earth face
face face
55 No's. of 25 φ 55 No's. of 25 φ 55 No's. of 25 φ 55 No's. of 25 φ
1 Main Bar @ 120 mm c/c @ 120 mm c/c @ 120 mm c/c @ 120 mm c/c Safe
2 Hoop Bars 10 φ @ 250 mm c/c 10 φ @ 250 mm c/c Safe
Rein. as per Drawing Rein. as per Calculation Rein. Required Check

Sl. /
Description opp to opp to earth opp to earth Rema
No Earth face Earth face Earth face
earth face face face rk
1 Main Bar 26998 mm² 26998 mm² 26998 mm² 26998 mm² 22950 mm² 22950 mm² Safe
2 Hoop Bars 314.15 mm² 314.15 mm² 280 mm² Safe
Conclusion:
Provided area of reinforcement is same as calculated area of reinforcement. Hence it is safe in
design.

SECTION - VI
BED BLOCK

6. BED BLOCK
A reinforced Concrete bed block resting over top of the abutments and piers is generally provided to
evenly distribute the dead and live loads on the pier.
6.1. Design of Bed Block:
a) Dimensions:
Dimensions details of Abutment are taken from drawing no. CE/CON/N-
J/B/119/2007.
b) Check for Reinforcement
6.1.1. Reinforcement Summary:

No Remark
Main Bar 25 φ @ 250 mm 25 φ @ 250 mm 25 φ @ 250 mm 20 φ @ 250 mm
1
c/c c/c c/c c/c Safe
Distribution 25 φ @ 250 mm 25 φ @ 250 mm 25 φ @ 250 mm 20 φ @ 250 mm
2
Bar c/c c/c c/c c/c Safe
Sl. Rein. as per Drawing Rein. as per Calculation Check /

Description
No Top Bottom Top Bottom Remark
2
1 Main Bar 1963mm 1963mm2 1963mm 2
1963mm2 Safe
2 Distribution Bar 1963mm2 1963mm2 1963mm2 1963mm2 Safe
Conclusion:
Provided area of reinforcement is more than calculated area of reinforcement. Hence it is safe in
design.

SECTION - VII
BALLAST WALL

7. BALLAST WALL
Ballast Wall is provided to retain ballast. Ballast is material used to provide stability to a vehicle or
structure.
7.1. Design of Ballast:
a) Dimensions:
Dimensions details of Abutment are taken from drawing no. CE/CON/N-
J/B/119/2007.
b) Forces acting on Abutments:
1. Earth pressure
2. Surcharge
c) Calculation of Moments from Earth pressure and surcharge
d) Check for Reinforcement
7.1.1. Reinforcement Summary:

No Remark
Main Bar 10 φ @ 130 10 φ @ 130 mm 10 φ @ 150 mm 10 φ @ 150 mm
1
mm c/c c/c c/c c/c Safe
Distribution 16 φ @ 150 16 φ @ 150 mm 10 φ @ 150 mm 10 φ @ 150 mm
2
Bar mm c/c c/c c/c c/c Safe
3 Stirrups 10 φ 12 Legged/m @ 260 mm c/c 10 φ 12 Legged/m @ 260 mm c/c
Safe
Sl. Rein. as per Drawing Rein. as per Calculation Rein. Required

Description Check /
No Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Remark
Vertical
1 Bars 604 mm² 604 mm² 524 mm² 524 mm² 660 mm² Safe
2 Hori. Bars 1340 mm² 1340 mm² 1340 mm² 1340 mm² 1340 mm² Safe
3 Stirrups 302 mm² 302 mm² 302 mm² Safe
Conclusion:
Provided area of reinforcement is more than calculated area of reinforcement. Hence it is safe
in design.

ANNEXURE-1
DESIGN CALCULATIONS

ANNEXURE-1
ANNEXURE-1 Design calculation

ABUTMENT
1 GENERAL
* Type of deck: Pre Tensioned P.S.C slab as per Drg No
* Span arrangement simply supported.
Overall length = 13.380 m

Clear span = 12.200 m
* Dimension details of substructure, foundation are shown on page no. and dimension detail
on drawing no. CE/CON/N-J/B/119/2007 also, refer GAD on drawings no.
* Type of foundation pile foundation.
* Type of substructure cantilever type front wall with side wall supported by front wall and pile cap.
* Grade of concrete for pile cap, abutment, bearing beam, & returns shall be M - 30 and M-30 for pile
and Pile Cap
* The grade of rein. shall be Fe - 415
* Permissible stresses in concrete and reinforcement shall be as per IS codal provision.
* Min clear cover to rein. is as per IRS : CBC.
* The allowable pile capacity under normal loading at founding level shall be = 224.44 T
* If the wind or seismic effect is also considered the allowable pile capacity
will be increased by factor as per cl. 6.9 of IRS substructures & foundations = 280.6 T
* Rail top level = 40.153 m

* Formation level = 39.428 m
* Bearing top level = 38.609 m
* Bearing beam top lvl = 39.428 - 1.130 = 38.298 m
* Top Level of Pile Cap = 32.613
* Bottom Level of Pile Cap = 31.113
* H.F.L = 34.600 m
* L.W.L = 31.450 m
* Design scour depth = 1.53 m
* 1.0 DSL = 39.43 - 0.00 = 39.428 m
* 1.25 DSL = 34.60 - 0.00 = 34.600 m
* 0.9 x 1.25 DSL = 34.60 - 0.00 = 34.600 m
* Seismic - Zone V
* Hor. seismic coeff. α h = 0.12
* Vertical seismic coeff,α v = 0.06
* Buoyancy on the foundation considered in the design shall be 100%.
* Design Load =25 T of 2008

40.153m Rail level

0.7750 1.840 1.00
39.428m Formation lvl
0.385
0.7750
38.609m Top of Bearing(if it is provided)
38.298m Top of Bed block 1.000
0.42 37.878m Bottom of Bed block
Bearing beam 1.000
1.00 HFL 34.600m
0.225
0.6
35.313 m
Front wall
2.28 m LWL 31.450m
GL 32.613m
1.70 1.76
32.613m pile cap top lvl
Y 1.50
X Pile cap 31.113m pile cap bottom lvl 1.00
Side wall
8.113m founding lvl
0.00 0.00
0.65 2.00 2.00 0.65
5.300 m
ELEVATION OF ABUTMENT
Transverse Direction
5.30
0.65 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.65
0.650
Longitudinal 7.30
Direction
6.00
3.00
0.65
PLAN OF PILE CAP

Dead load of Superstructure

A) Total wt of P.S.C slab + Ballast retainer =
= 2 x 12.200 x 0.85 x 1.80 x 2.50
+ 2 x 0.85 x 0.437 x 12.20 x 2.50
+ 1 x 0.15 x 1.18 x 12.20 x 2.50
+ 2 x 0.20 x 1.18 x 12.20 x 2.50
+ 1 x 0.69 x 0.85 x 12.20 x 2.50
= 153.54 T
Weight on each abutment = 153.5 / 2 = 76.77 T Say 90.00 T
B) SIDL
a) Total wt of sleepers =
= 1.6 x 12.20 x 0.28 = 5.47 T
b) Total wt of Rail =
= 1 x 2 x 12.20 x 0.052 = 1.27 T
c) Total wt of ballast =
= 12.20 x 4.52 x 0.40 x 2.30 = 50.73 T
Total = 57.47
Total Load = 6.00 x 12.20 = 73.20 T
(load per RM)
Weight on each abutment = 73.2 / 2 = 36.60 T Say 40.00 T
Total weight on each abutment = 90.00 + 40.00 = 130.0 T
2 DEAD LOAD - The dead load from various part acting on the foundation and their moment
about point X are calculated as under.
Pa L H W density Weight LA @ X Moment

rt m m m T/m3 T m T-m
a) Dead load of superstructure 90.00 x 2.573 = -231.53

b) SIDL
40.00 x 2.573 = -102.90
c) Ballast wall
x 1.86 x 0.385 x 2.5 1.79 x 3.27 = -5.83
d) Bed block
1.00 x 0.42 x 6.65 x 2.5 = 6.98 x 2.96 = -20.67
e) Front wall
1.00 x 5.26 x 6.65 x 2.5 = 87.53 x 2.960 = -259.09
1/2 x 0.76 x 2.7 x 6.65 x 2.5 = 17.06 x 2.207 = -37.64
f) Wt of Ballast, Rail etc. on approaches & L.L surcharge
19.70 x 1.84 = 36.25 x 4.380 = -158.77
g) Side walls
1 x 6.82 x 0.45 x 2.5 = 7.67 x 2.960 = -22.69
2.4 x 0.60 x 0.23 x 2.50 = 0.83 x 4.660 = -3.86
1/2 x 2.4 x 3.15 x 0.23 x 2.50 = 2.17 x 4.260 = -9.25
1 x 6.82 x 0.45 x 2.5 = 7.67 x 2.960 = -22.69

2.40 x 0.60 x 0.23 x 2.50 = 0.83 x 4.660 = -3.86
1/2 x 2.40 x 3.15 x 0.23 x 2.50 = 2.17 x 4.260 = -9.25
h) Pile cap
5.30 x 1.50 x 7.30 x 2.5 = 145.09 x 2.650 = -384.48
i) Footpath live load on approaches
0.1 x 0.75 x 0.45 x 2.5 = 0.08 x 2.960 = -0.25
j) Boulders filling on earth side of abutment
0.6 x 2.28 x 6.19 x 2.5 = 21.17 x 3.760 = -79.60
k) Protective boulders pitching on river side
4.103 x 0.60 x 6.19 x 2.5 = 38.10 x 1.230 = 46.86
l) Earth fill on approach side
1 1/2 x 6.82 x 6.82 x 6.19 x 1.8 = 258.74 x 6.292 = -1627.91
2 0.00 x 0.00 x 0.00 x 0.0 = 0.00 x 0.000 = 0.00
m) Earth load on footing on river side
0.00 x 0.000 x 6.65 x 1.8 = 0.00 x 0.000 = 0.00
Total (with span intact) 764.12 -2933.4

Total (without span) 674.12 -2701.9
(-ve) signs indicates relieving moment
Moment at CG of base = 764.12 x 5.30 / 2 + -2933.42 = -908.51 T-m

Moment at CG of base without SIDL = 724.12 x 5.30 /2 + -2830.52 = -911.61 T-m
Moment at CG of base for SIDL = 40.00 x 5.30 /2 + -102.90 = 3.10 T-m
Moment at CG under no span = 674.12 x 2.65 + -2701.89 = -915.48 T-m
* Wt OF PILES
Under LWL condition
5x π/4 x 1.002 x 23.00 x 1.40 = 126.45 T
Under HFL condition
2
5x π/4 x 1.00 x 23.00 x 1.40 = 126.45 T
A LWL Condition
wt of water column on front wall / footing (downward loads and moments)

3
rt (m) (m) (m) (T/m ) (T) (m) (T-m)
x
1/2 1.70 x 0.000 x 6.65 x 1.00 = 0.00 x 0.850 = 0.00
above GL 0.00 0.00
Moment at CG of base = 0.00 x 5.30 / 2 + 0.00 = 0.000 T-m
Upward reaction at base of abutment 100.00 % Buoyancy considered

V = 5.30 x 6.65 x ( 31.45 - 31.11 ) x 1.000 = -11.88 T
Net load V = 764.12 + 126.45 + 0.00 + -11.8776 = 878.69 T

ML = -908.508 + + 0.000 = -908.51 T
B HFL Condition
Wt of water column on front wall / footing (downward loads and moments)

rt m m m T/m3 ton m t-m
x
1/2 1.70 x 1.987 x 6.65 x 1.00 = 22.46 x 0.850 = -19.09
above GL 22.46 -19.09
Moment at CG of base = 22.46 x 5.30 / 2 + -19.09 = 40.433 T-m
Upward reaction at base of abutment 100 % Buoyancy considered

V = 5.30 x 6.65 x ( 34.60 - 31.11 ) x 1.000 = -122.9 T
Net load V = 764.12 + 126.45 + 22.46 + -122.90 = 790.13 T

(with span) ML = -908.51 + + 40.43 = -868.07 T-m
Net load V = 674.12 + 126.45 + 22.46 + -122.90 = 700.13 T
(without span) ML = -915.48 + + 40.43 = -875.05 T-m
3 Live load on superstructure (with CDA effect)

Total load for Shear for 1 x 12.2 m span = 260.151 T CDA = 0.58956
Load on Abutment = 260.15 / 2 = 130.08 x 2.573 = -334.62 T-m
Moment at CG of base = 130.08 x 5.30 / 2 + -334.62 = 10.08084 T-m

4 HORIZONTAL FORCES (TRACTIVE FORCES / BRAKING)

One span fully loaded will produce max braking forces / tractive forces on foundation as live load.
reaction considered above.
Total Tractive forces (12.2 m) = 54.60 T (1 xTractive ) (Ref Appendix-24 of Bridge rules))
Friction coeff
Total Braking forces (12.2 m) = 33.80 T will be zero if
i.e.Tractive forces on abutment = 27.30 T restraing force
i.e.Braking forces on abutment = 16.90 T given.
Max of tractive or braking force Fh = 27.3 ton DL + SIDL LL

Max force = Fh/2 + m . R= 27.3 / 2 + 0.05 x( 130.00 + 130.08 )= 13.65
or, = Fh - m . R = 27.3 - 0.05 x( 130.00 + 130.08 )= 13.65
Hor forces on abutment allow max (under normal) = 27.30 T

(if neoprene bearing used, friction coeff m will be 0 and braking will consider as Fh / 2.)
Moment in long direction ML 27.30 x ( 38.61 - 32.61 ) = 163.7 T-m
Tractive forces on abutment allow max (under seismic) = 27.30 T-m

As per cl no. 2.5.3(b) of Bridge rules centrifugal force shall be calculated for max velocity
and this force will act at a height of 1.83m for MUG (ref cl no. 2.5.3.b)
Centrifugal force C = (W . V 2) / (127 x R)

W = reaction on pier = As shown in above table
V = max velocity in Km / hr = 80 Km/Hr. for curved portion
Alignment = 0 deg i.e. R = radius = 1750 / 0 deg. = 0.0 m
Loading Reaction incl. Centrifugal acting at RS L.A. @ Trans moment

CDA (ton) Wforce (ton) (Rail top + 1.83)RL31.11 (T-m)
Both span loaded 130.08 0.000 41.98 10.870 0.00
(12.2 m)
Sample calculation for above

Centrifugal force 130.075 * 80 ^2 / (127 * 0 ) =0T
Trans moment 0.000 x 10.870 =0T
6 RESTRAINING FORCES
Frictional forces on abutment = 0.00 T
Moment in long direction ML 0.00 x ( 38.61 - 31.11 ) = 0 tm
5 EARTH PRESSURE
Following are the soil properties for soil below scour level.
Angle of internal friction φ 32.5 degree
Angle of wall friction δ 10.83 degree
Cohesion c 0
Submerged density of soilW 1.0 T/m3
Saturated density of soil W 2.0 T/m3
Assuming α 0 degree angle from vertical plane
i 0 degree angle from horizontal plane of earth surcharge

The coefficient of active pressure (Ka) and passive pressure (Kip) shall
be calculated as under. Ref clause no 5.7 of IRS SUBSTRUCTURE AND FOUNDATION
cos2(φ-α) 2
2
Ka(hor.) =cos α.cos(α +δ). 1 + sin(φ + δ).sin(φ - i) = 0.279
cos(α - i).cos(α + δ)
Similarly,
cos2(φ + α)
2
2
Kp(hor.) =cos α.cos(α -δ). 1 - sin(φ + δ).sin(φ + i) = 4.828
cos(α - i).cos(α - δ)
A LWL condition 39.428m Formation lvl
1 7.978 m
31.450m LWL
2 0.337 m
3 31.113m
Pile cap bottom
01 02
Active Earth pressure calculations :
Ordinates of earth pressure

Ka g h Pa
3
(T/m ) (m) (T/m2)
O1 = 0.279 x 2.00 x 7.978 = 4.444
O2 = 0.279 x 1.00 x 0.337 = 0.094
Earth pressure force :
Part Pa Length Height Force
(T/m2) (m) (m) (T)

A1 = 0.5 x 4.444 x 6.650 x 7.978 = 117.88
A2 = 1.0 x 4.444 x 6.650 x 0.337 = 9.959
A3 = 0.5 x 0.094 x 6.650 x 0.337 = 0.105
127.94
Calculation of C.G. of earth pressure forces :
Part multi height Bottom Point of LA @ Earth press Moment @

plier level application 31.113m force Base
(m) (RL in m) (RL in m) (T) (T-m)
A1 = 0.333 x 7.978 + 31.450 = 34.11 2.994 x 117.88 = 353
A2 = 0.500 x 0.337 + 31.113 = 31.28 0.169 x 9.959 = 1.678
A3 = 0.333 x 0.337 + 31.113 = 31.23 0.112 x 0.105 = 0.012
354.58

B HFL condition 39.428m Formation lvl
1 4.828m
34.600m (HFL)
2 3 3.49
31.113m Pile cap bottom
01 02
Active Earth pressure calculations :
Ordinates of earth pressure
Ka g h Pa
3
(T/m ) (m) (T/m2)
O1 = 0.279 x 2.00 x 4.828 = 2.689
O2 = 0.279 x 1.00 x 3.487 = 0.971
Earth pressure force :

Part Pa Length Height Force
(T/m2) (m) (m) (T)

A1 = 0.5 x 2.689 x 6.650 x 4.828 = 43.170
A2 = 1.0 x 2.689 x 6.650 x 3.487 = 62.359
A3 = 0.5 x 0.971 x 6.650 x 3.487 = 11.260
116.788
Calculation of C.G. of earth pressure forces :
Part multi height Bottom Point of LA @ Earth press Moment @
plier level application 31.113m force Base
(m) (RL in m) (RL in m) (T) (T-m)
A1 = 0.333 x 4.828 + 34.600 = 36.21 5.096 x 43.170 = 220.008
A2 = 0.500 x 3.487 + 31.113 = 32.86 1.744 x 62.359 = 108.722
A3 = 0.333 x 3.487 + 31.113 = 32.28 1.162 x 11.260 = 13.087
341.82
8 SURCHARGE (due to dead load & live load)
Dead load surcharge (V)= 6.00 T/m per track
Live load surcharge (S) = 13.70 T/m per track
Width (B) = 5.30 m
Length of abutment (L) = 6.65 m
Height of abutment (h) = 8.32 m
Ref clause no 5.8.1 of IRS code for substructure & foundation
CASE 1 if h <= (L - B) THIS CASE IS NOT APPLICABLE

(S + V) Ka = 1.04
(B) 39.428m
8.32 8.32
b
a 31.113m
(S + V) Ka = 0.40
(B + H)

Part Intensity height Length multiplying force eccentricity Moment @
of abutm factor Base
(T/m2) (m) (m) (T) (m) (T-m)
a = 0.403 x 8.32 x 6.650 x 1.00 = 22.282 x 4.158 = 92.638
b = 0.632 x 8.32 x 6.650 x 0.50 = 17.479 x 5.543 = 96.891
c = 0.403 x 0.00 x 6.650 x 1.00 = 0.000 x 0.000 = 0.000
39.76 189.53
CASE 2 if h > (L - B) THIS CASE IS APPLICABLE

(S + V) Ka = 1.04
(B) 39.428m
(L-B) = b
1.35 a
8.32
8.32
c
6.97 31.113m
(S + V) Ka = 0.825
(L)

(t/m2) (m) (m) (ton) (m) (t-m)
a = 0.825 x 1.35 x 6.650 x 1.00 = 7.407 x 7.640 = 56.587
b = 0.210 x 1.35 x 6.650 x 0.50 = 0.943 x 7.865 = 7.419
c = 0.825 x 6.97 x 6.650 x 1.00 = 38.213 x 3.483 = 133.077
d = 0.825 x 0.00 x 6.650 x 1.00 = 0.000 x 0.000 = 0.000
46.56 197.08
9 SEISMIC FORCES
We shall consider the effect due to seismic on earth press as per the provision of IRS Foundation & Substructure.
Seismic on dead load of deck slab shall be considered and seismic in long direction on live load will be limited to
braking only.
* Seismic force due to live load not considered with long. seismic ref cl no. 2.12.6 of bridge rule.
αh = 0.12 αv = 0.12 x 0.50 = 0.060
αh 0.12
λ = Atan ------------- = Atan ----------
= 0.113 or 0.127 rad
1 +- α v 0.060
φ = 33 0.567 rad δ = 11 0.189 rad

α = 0 0.00 rad i = 0 0.000 rad
2
(1 +- α v) x cos (φ - λ - α).cosδ
2
Ka(hor.) =cosλ.cos α.cos(δ + λ + α). x 1 + sin(φ + δ).sin(φ - i -λ)
cos(α - i).cos(δ + α + λ)
= 0.370 & 0.338 ,

allow max = 0.370
0.370 - 0.279 x 100 = 32.78 %
Therefore dynamic increment percentage = 0.279

Seismic forces on structure

Pa Description Weight Seismic Seismic acting @ Moment @
rt (Ton) Coefficient force (Ton) RL 32.61 m
a) Dead load of superstructure 130.00 x 0.12 = 15.60 38.61 = 93.54

b) Ballast wall 1.79 x 0.12 = 0.21 39.23 = 1.42
c) Bed block 6.98 x 0.12 = 0.84 38.09 = 4.59
d) front wall 87.53 x 0.12 = 10.50 35.25 = 27.65
17.06 x 0.12 = 2.05 36.98 = 8.93
e) Side walls 21.33 x 0.12 = 2.56 34.47 = 4.76
f) Boulders filling on earth side 21.17 x 0.12 = 2.54 33.75 = 2.90
g) Protective boulders pitching 38.10 x 0.12 = 4.57 33.75 = 5.21
h) Pile cap 145.09 x 0.12 = 17.41 31.86 = -13.06
56.29 135.93
Vertical load increase or decrease due to seismic on S/S and substructure.
a) Span in position = 56.29 x 0.060 = 3.38 ton
b) Span not in position = 40.69 x 0.060 = 2.44 ton
EARTH PRESSURE
A LWL condition
Horizontal force & moment (static component) as tabulated below
Part multi height Bottom C.G. LA @ Earth press Moment @

plier level Level 31.113m force Base
(m) (m RL) (m RL) (ton) (ton - m)
A1 = 0.333 x 7.978 + 31.450 = 34.11 2.994 x 117.88 = 352.9
A2 = 0.500 x 0.337 + 31.113 = 31.28 0.169 x 9.959 = 1.678
A3 = 0.333 x 0.337 + 31.113 = 31.23 0.112 x 0.105 = 0.012
127.94 354.6
Horizontal force (dynamic component) = 127.942 x 0.328 = 41.944 ton
Moment (dynamic component) = 41.944 x ( 8.315 /2 + 0.00 ) = 174.4 t-m
B HFL condition
Horizontal force & moment (static component) as tabulated below
Part multi height Bottom C.G. LA @ Earth press Moment @

plier level Level 31.113m force Base
(m) (m RL) (m RL) (ton) (ton - m)
A1 = 0.333 x 4.828 + 34.600 = 36.21 5.096 x 43.2 = 220.0
A2 = 0.500 x 3.487 + 31.113 = 32.86 1.744 x 62.359 = 108.722
A3 = 0.333 x 3.487 + 31.113 = 32.28 1.162 x 11.260 = 13.087
116.79 341.8
Horizontal force (dynamic component) = 116.788 x 0.328 = 38.29 ton
Moment (dynamic component) = 38.287 x ( 8.315 /2 + 0.00 ) = 159.2 t-m
SURCHARGE
CASE 1 THIS CASE IS NOT APPLICABLE
Part static dyn. incr. dynamic eccentricity D. Moment S. Moment
force factor force @ Base @ Base
(ton) (m) (ton) (m) (t-m) (t-m)
a = 22.282 x 0.328 = 7.30 x 5.5433 = 40.494 92.64
b = 17.479 x 0.328 = 5.73 x 6.236 = 35.735 96.89
c = 0.000 x 0.328 = 0.00 x 0.000 = 0.000 0.000
39.761 13.035 76.229 189.53
Net horizontal forces = 39.761 + 13.035 = 52.80 ton

Net moment = 189.530 + 76.229 = 265.76 tm

CASE 2 THIS CASE IS APPLICABLE

(ton) (m) (ton) (m) (t-m) (t-m)
a = 7.407 x 0.328 = 2.43 x 7.87 = 19.098 56.587
b = 0.943 x 0.328 = 0.31 x 7.64 = 2.363 7.419
c = 38.213 x 0.328 = 12.53 x 4.64 = 58.170 133.077
d = 0.000 x 0.328 = 0.00 x 0.00 = 0.000 0.000
46.56 15.27 79.63 197.08
static com dynamic com
Net horizontal forces = 46.563 + 15.265 = 61.828 ton
Net moment = 197.084 + 79.631 = 276.714 tm
LWL condition s/s & sub/s EPDy comp of EP surcharge

Net horizontal forces = 56.29 + 127.942 + 41.944 + 61.828 = 288.00 ton
Net moment = 135.9 + 354.6 + 174.4 + 276.71 = 941.6 t-m
HFL condition s/s & sub/s EPDy comp of EP surcharge

Net horizontal forces = 56.29 + 116.788 + 38.287 + 61.828 = 273.19 ton
Net moment = 135.93 + 341.8 + 159.18 + 276.7141 = 913.6 t-m
10 SUMMARY OF LOADS
S. Details of loading Vertical longitudinal longitudinal transverse transverse
No load force moment force moment
(ton) (ton) (ton-m) (ton) (ton-m)
1 Dead load
LWL condition 878.69 -908.51
HFL condition 790.13 -868.07
2 Live load 130.08 10.08
2 Hori forces & centrifugal forces(normal) 27.30 163.70 0.000 0.00

Hori forces & centrifugal forces(seismic) 27.30 163.70 0.000 0.00
3 Restraining forces 0.00 0.00
4 Earth Pressure
LWL condition 127.942 354.6
HFL condition 116.788 341.8
5 Surcharge 46.56 197.08
6 Seismic forces (span on position)

LWL condition 3.38 288.000 941.61
HFL condition 3.38 273.189 913.64
7 Seismic forces (no span) ie subtracting seismic force due to S/S and SIDL.
LWL condition 2.44 231.715 805.7
HFL condition 2.44 216.904 777.7
10) CHECK FOR CAPACITY OF PILES :

We shall check the pile capacity for the following load cases.
We shall calculate vertical load in the extreme pile as per rivet group analysis.
Max. / Min. Force on Pile = P / n + / - M L / ZL + / - M T / ZT

n= 5
2
IL = 2.00 * 4 = 16.0 m2
2
0.00 * 4 = 0.0 m2
2
0.00 * 4 = 0.0 m2
16.0 m2
YL = 2.00 m ZL = 16.0 = 8.0 m

2.00
2
IT = 3.00 * 4 = 36.0 m2
2
0.00 * 4 = 0.0 m2
2
0.00 * 0 = 0.0 m2
36.0 m2
YT = 3.00 m ZT =
36.0 = 12.0 m
3.00
Max Moment in pile considering semi fix head =
3.22 . Q m (refer Appendix)
=
3.09 . Q m (Under Seismic case)
(ref cal of depth of fixity)
L.C 1 Dead load+ live load+ Hori. force+ Restraining forces+ Earth Press+ Live load Surcharge(under HFL)
dl ll Hf Rest Ep LLS
V = 790.13 + 130.08 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + = 920.20 t
ML = -868.07 + 10.08 + 163.70 + 0.00 + 341.82 + 197.08 + = -155.4 tm
MT = 0.00 + 0+ 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + = 0.00 tm
HL = 0.00 + 0+ 27.30 + 0.00 + 116.79 + 46.56 + = 190.65 t
HT = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + = 0.00 t
ML due to hori force at top of pile per pile = 190.65 x 3.22 / 5.00 = 122.75 tm
MT due to hori force at top of pile per pile = 0.00 x 3.22 / 5.00 = 0.00 tm
Max. / Min. on Pile = P / n + / - ML / ZL + / - MT / ZT
Pmax / Pmin = 920.20 +/- -155.4 +/- 0.00

5 8.0 12.0
= 184.04 +/- -19.42 +/- 0.00
Pmax = 164.62 ton < 224.44 tonHence OK
Pmin = 203.47 ton > 0.00 tonHence OK
L.C 2 Dead load+ live load+ Hori. force+ Restraining forces+ Earth Press+ Live load Surcharge(under LWL)
dl ll Hf Rest Ep LLS
V = 878.69 + 130.08 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + = 1008.76 t
ML = -908.5 + 10.1 + 163.70 + 0.00 + 354.58 + 197.08 + = -183.06 tm
MT = 0.00 + 0+ 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + = 0.00 tm
HL = 0.00 + 0+ 0.00 + 0.00 + 127.94 + 46.56 + = 174.51 t
HT = 0.00 + 0.000 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + = 0.00 t

Pmax / Pmin = 1008.76 +/- -183.1 +/- 0.00

5 8.0 12.0
= 201.75 +/- -22.88 +/- 0.00
L.C 3 Dead load +Live load + 0.5* Hori. Force + Restraining forces + Seismic (under HFL)
dl ll 0.5*Hf Rest Ep LLS Seis
V 790.13 + 130.08 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 3.38 = 923.58 t
ML -868.07 + 10.08 + 81.85 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 913.64 = 137.50 tm
MT 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 tm
HL 0.00 + 0.00 + 13.65 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 273.19 = 286.84 t
HT 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 t
Pmax / Pmin = 923.58 +/- 137.5 +/- 0.00

5 8.0 12.0
= 184.72 +/- 17.19 +/- 0.00
Pmin= = 167.53 ton > 0.00 tonHence OK
L.C 4 Dead load + live load + 0.5*Hori. force + Restraining forces + Seismic (under LWL)
dl ll .5*Hf Rest Seis
V 878.69 + 130.08 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 3.38 = 1012.14 t
ML -908.5 + 10.1 + 81.85 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 941.61 = 125.03 tm
MT 0.00 + 0+ 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0= 0.00 tm
HL 0.00 + 0+ 13.65 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 288.00 = 301.65 t
HT 0.00 + 0.000 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 t
Pmax / Pmin = 1012.14 +/- 125.0 +/- 0.00

5 8.0 12.0
= 202.43 +/- 15.63 +/- 0.00

L.C 5 Dead load + Restraining forces + Seismic (under HFL no span)
dl ll Hf Rest Seis
V 570.05 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 2.44 = 572.50 t
ML -875.05 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 777.71 = -97.34 tm
MT 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 tm
HL 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 216.90 = 216.90 t
HT 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 t
Pmax / Pmin = 572.50 +/- -97.3 +/- 0.00

5 8.0 12.0
= 114.50 +/- -12.17 +/- 0.00
L.C 6 Dead load + Restraining forces + Seismic (under LWL no span)

dl ll Hf Rest Seis
V 658.61 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 2.44 = 661.05 t
ML -875.05 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 805.68 = -69.37 tm
MT 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 tm
HL 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 231.71 = 231.71 t
HT 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 t
Pmax / Pmin = 661.05 +/- -69.4 +/- 0.00

5 8.0 12.0
= 132.21 +/- -8.67 +/- 0.00
R.C Design of Pile

1) Under Normal-LWL case
Force and moments with SLS factor
(Total) (Pile) (SIDL) (SIDL) (L.L)
Direct load W=1 x ( 878.69 - 126.45 - 28.73 ) + 1.2 x 28.73 + 1.2 x130.08 = 914.08 T
(Tractive) (E.P) (LLS) (Restraining Force)
HL = 1.2 x 27.30 + 1 x 127.94 + 1 x 46.6 + 1 x 0.00 = 207.27 T
(DL) (SIDL) (H.F) (L.L) (E.P) (L.L.S) (Restraining Force)
ML = 1 x -911.61 + 1.2 x 3.10 + 1.2x 163.7 + 10.08 + 1 x 354.58 + 1 x 197.1 + 1 x 0
= -147.69 t-m

(H.F)
HT = 1.2 x 0.00 = 0.00 t
(H.F)
MT = 1.2 x 0.00 = 0.00 t-m
2) Under Seismic-LWL case
Direct load W=1 x ( 878.69 - 126.45 - 28.73 ) + 1.2 x 28.73 + 1 x 130.1 = 888.06 T
(Tractive) (E.P) (LLS) (Seis) (Dyn comp)

HL = 1 x 13.65 1 x 127.94 1 x 46.6 1 x 56.29 1 x 57.2 + 1 x 0.00 = 301.65 T
(DL) (SIDL) (H.F) (L.L) (E.P) (L.L.S)
ML = 1 x -908.5 1.2 x3.10 1.1 x81.85 1.1 x 10.08 1 x 354.58 1 x 197.1
(Seis) (Dyn comp)
1 x 135.9 1 x 254.0 + 1 x 0= 137.95 tm
(H.F)
HT = 1.40 x 0.00 = 0.00 t
(H.F)
MT = 1.4 x 0.00 = 0.00 t-m

Force and moments with ULS factor
Direct load W=1.4 x ( 878.69 - 126.45 - 28.73 ) + 2 x 28.73 + 2 x 130.08 = 1330.53 T
HL = 2 x 27.3 + 1.7 x 127.94 + 1.7 x 46.6 + 1.4 x 0.00 = 351.26 T
ML = 1.4 x -911.608 + 2 x 3.10 + 2 x 163.7 + 2 x 10.08 + 1.7 x 354.58 + 1.7 x 197.1 + 1.4x 0
= 15.34 t-m
(H.F)
HT = 2 x 0.00 = 0.00 t
(H.F)
MT = 2 x 0.00 = 0.00 t-m
ML due to hori force at top of pile per pile = 351.26 x 3.22 / 5 = 226.17 tm
MT due to hori force at top of pile per pile = 0.00 x 3.22 / 5 = 0.00 tm
Pmax / Pmin = 1330.53 +/- 15.34 +/- 0.00

5 8.0 12.0
= 266.11 +/- 1.92 +/- 0.00
Pmax = 268.02 ton
Pmin = 264.19 ton

*Design vertical load for pile = 264.19 T
Design Moment for pile MR = 226.17 + 0.00 = 226.17 t-m


Direct load W=1.4 x ( 878.69 - 126.45 - 28.73 )+ 28.73 + 130.1 = 1232.97 T

HL = 1.4 x 13.65 127.94 46.6 56.29 57.2 + 0.00 457.64 T
ML = 1.4 x -908.5 3.10 81.85 10.08 354.58 197.1
(Seis) (Dyn comp)
135.9 254.0 + 0= 320.43 tm
(H.F)
HT = 1.40 x 0.00 = 0.00 t
(H.F)
MT = 1.4 x 0.00 = 0.00 t-m
Pmax / Pmin = 1232.97 +/- 320.43 +/- 0.00

5 8.0 12.0
= 246.59 +/- 40.05 +/- 0.00

Pmax = 286.65 ton
Pmin = 206.54 ton

Design Moment for pile MR = 283.24 + 0.00 = 283.24 tm
Design under normal case

D = Pile diametre = 1000 mm
d = Effective cover
= 91 mm
d/D= 0.09
Also fck = 30 N/mm2 and fy = 415 N/mm2
PU = 264.19 T = 2641878 N
MU = 226.17 Tm =2.3E+09 N-mm d
2
P U / (fck * D ) = 0.09
MU / (fck * D3) = 0.08 D
From chart 60 of SP 16 of BIS

p / fck = 0.07
p = 30 x 0.07 = 2.10 %
Design under seismic case

PU = 206.54 T = 2065403 N
MU = 283.24 Tm =2.8E+09 N-mm
P U / (fck * D2) = 0.07

MU / (fck * D3) = 0.09

p / fck = 0.09
p = 30 x 0.09 = 2.70 %
Required steel = 0.027 x 0.785398 x 10000.0 = 212.1 cm2
2
Provided in drawing 20 nos of 32mm dia barsAt = 160.8 cm
Reinforcement Provided is less than reinforcement required-Check again
Therefore it is not safe
As per SP -16 of BIS :-
d' = 75 + 16 (Considering 32 mm bar)

= 91
D= 1000 mm
d'/D = 0.091
P u/fckD2 = 0.088
3
Mu/fckD = 0.075
Use Chart 60 for fy = 415 & d'/D = 0.10 of SP- 16 (For Circular Section)
p/fck = 0.024
p = 0.72 % (percentage steel)
2
As = 0.72 / 100 x p / 4 x 100
= 56.55 cm2
Provide 12 nos 32 dia as verticals and 12 dia @ 250 c/c binder.

Revised Pile Design:

R.C Design of Pile
Direct load W=1 x ( 929.27 - 177.03 - 28.73 ) + 1.2 x 28.73 + 1.2 x130.08 = 914.08 T
HL = 1.2 x 27.30 + 1 x 127.94 + 1 x 46.6 + 1 x 0.00 = 207.27 T
ML = 1 x -907.29 + 1.2 x 3.10 + 1.2x 163.7 + 10.08 + 1 x 354.58 + 1 x 197.1 + 1 x 0
= -143.37 t-m
(H.F)
HT = 1.2 x 0.00 = 0.00 t
(H.F)
MT = 1.2 x 0.00 = 0.00 t-m
Direct load W=1 x ( 929.27 - 177.03 - 28.73 ) + 1.2 x 28.73 + 1 x 130.1 = 888.06 T

HL = 1 x 13.65 1 x 127.94 1 x 46.6 1 x 56.29 1 x 57.2 + 1 x 0.00 = 301.65 T
ML = 1 x -904.2 1.2 x3.10 1.1 x81.85 1.1 x 10.08 1 x 354.58 1 x 197.1
(Seis) (Dyn comp)
1 x 135.9 1 x 254.0 + 1 x 0= 142.27 tm
(H.F)
HT = 1.40 x 0.00 = 0.00 t
(H.F)
MT = 1.4 x 0.00 = 0.00 t-m

Direct load W=1.4 x ( 929.27 - 177.03 - 28.73 ) + 2 x 28.73 + 2 x 130.08 = 1330.53 T
HL = 2 x 27.3 + 1.7 x 127.94 + 1.7 x 46.6 + 1.4 x 0.00 = 351.26 T
ML = 1.4 x -907.287 + 2 x 3.10 + 2 x 163.7 + 2 x 10.08 + 1.7 x 354.58 + 1.7 x 197.1 + 1.4x 0
= 21.39 t-m
(H.F)
HT = 2 x 0.00 = 0.00 t
(H.F)
MT = 2 x 0.00 = 0.00 t-m
Pmax / Pmin = 1330.53 +/- 21.39 +/- 0.00

7 8.0 12.0
= 190.08 +/- 2.67 +/- 0.00
Pmax = 192.75 ton
Pmin = 187.40 ton

Design Moment for pile MR = 161.55 + 0.00 = 161.55 t-m


Direct load W=1.4 x ( 929.27 - 177.03 - 28.73 )+ 28.73 + 130.1 = 1232.97 T
HL = 1.4 x 13.65 127.94 46.6 56.29 57.2 + 0.00 457.64 T
ML = 1.4 x -904.2 3.10 81.85 10.08 354.58 197.1
(Seis) (Dyn comp)
135.9 254.0 + 0= 326.48 tm
(H.F)
HT = 1.40 x 0.00 = 0.00 t
(H.F)
MT = 1.4 x 0.00 = 0.00 t-m
Pmax / Pmin = 1232.97 +/- 326.48 +/- 0.00

7 8.0 12.0
= 176.14 +/- 40.81 +/- 0.00

Pmax = 216.95 ton
Pmin = 135.33 ton

Design Moment for pile MR = 202.31 + 0.00 = 202.31 tm
Design under normal case

D = Pile diametre = 1000 mm
d = Effective cover
= 91 mm
d/D= 0.09
Also fck = 30 N/mm2 and fy = 415 N/mm2
PU = 187.40 T = 1874016 N
MU = 161.55 Tm =1.6E+09 N-mm d
2
P U / (fck * D ) = 0.06
MU / (fck * D3) = 0.05 D


p / fck = 0.03
p = 30 x 0.03 = 0.90 %
Design under seismic case

PU = 135.33 T = 1353287 N
MU = 202.31 Tm =2.0E+09 N-mm
2
P U / (fck * D ) = 0.05
MU / (fck * D3) = 0.07

p / fck = 0.07
p = 30 x 0.065 = 1.95 %
2
Provided in drawing 20 nos of 32mm dia barsAt = 160.8 cm
Hence OK
Hence Safe
As per SP -16 of BIS :-
d' = 75 + 16 (Considering 32 mm bar)

= 91
D= 1000 mm
d'/D = 0.091
P u/fckD2 = 0.062
Mu/fckD3 = 0.054
Use Chart 56 for fy = 415 & d'/D = 0.10 of SP- 16 (For Circular Section)
p/fck = 0.045
p = 1.35 % (percentage steel)
2
As = 1.35 / 100 x p / 4 x 100
= 106.03 cm2
Provide 12 nos 32 dia as verticals and 12 dia @ 250 c/c binder.

Design of abutment Wall

1 DEAD LOAD - The dead load from various part acting on the abutment and their moment
about point Y are calculated as under.
Pa L H W density Weight LA @ Y Moment

rt m m m t/m3 ton m t-m
a) Dead load of superstructure 90.0 x 0.87 = -78.53

b) Ballast wall 1.79 0.61 -1.09
c) SIDL
40.000 x 0.87 = -34.90
d) Bed block
1x 0.42 x 6.65 x 2.5 = 6.983 x 1.26 = -8.80
e) Front wall
1x 5.265 x 6.65 x 2.5 = 87.531 x 1.26 = -110.29
0.76 x 2.7 x 6.65 x 2.5 = 17.057 x 0.51 = -8.64
Total 243.36 -242.25
Moment at CG of base = 243.36 x 1.76 / 2 + -242.25 = -28.09 t-m
Moment at CG of base without SIDL = 241.57 x 1.76 /2+ -241.15 = -28.57 t-m
Moment at CG of base for SIDL = 1.79 x 1.76 /2+ -1.09 = 0.48 t-m
2 Live load on superstructure (with CDA effect) 130.1 x 0.87 = -113.49
Moment at CG of base = 130.08 x 1.76 / 2 + -113.49 = 0.98 t-m
3 HORIZONTAL FORCES (TRACTIVE FORCES / BRAKING)
Hor forces on abutment allow max (under normal) = 27.3 T

Tractive forces on abutment allow max (under seismic) 0 = 27.3 T-m

4 CENTRIFUGAL FORCES
Loading Reaction incl. Centrifugal acting at RL L.A. @ Trans moment

CDA (ton) Wforce (ton) (Rail top + 1.83)RL32.61 (t-m)
Both span loaded 130.075 0.000 41.983 9.370 0.00
(12.2 m)
6 RESTRAINING FORCES
Frictional forces on abutment = 0.00 ton
Moment in long direction ML 0.00 x ( 38.61 - 32.61 ) = 0 tm

5 EARTH PRESSURE Formation LVL 39.428
Pressure intensity at pile cap top

= 0.2785 x 6.815 x 2.00 = 3.796 T/m2
Earth pressure at top of pile cap
= 1/2 x 3.796 x 6.815 x 6.65
= 86.02 T
Moment at top of pile cap

= 86.02 x 0.33 x 6.815 Pile cap top 32.613
= 193.45 Tm

Refer stress diagram in earlier calculation


Refer stress diagram in earlier calculation

(t/m2) (m) (m) (ton) (m) (t-m)
a = 0.825 x 1.35 x 6.650 x 1.00 = 7.407 x 6.140 = 45.477
b = 0.210 x 1.35 x 6.650 x 0.50 = 0.943 x 6.365 = 6.004
c = 0.825 x 5.47 x 6.650 x 1.00 = 29.983 x 2.733 = 81.930
38.333 133.411
7 EQUIVALENT MOMENT DUE TO TORSION
39.428 (Formation level)

Due to earth pressure backfill
Considering 45 0 dispersion, max earth pressure occurs at A-A
(E.P at A-A)
P A-A = 6.48 / 8.315 x 2.771
= 2.158 T/m2
HL = 1/ 2 x 2.158 x 6.48 x 1.84
= 12.85 T
Due to L.L surcharge

A A P A-A = 0.83 T/m2
1.84 HL = 0.825 x 6.48 x 1.84

= 9.83 T
Total torsion on abutment
32.613 (Top of pile cap) =( 12.85 + 9.83 )x 0.92 = 20.87 T-m
As pert cl B-6.3 of IS 456:2000

1.84 Equivalent shear Vt = 1.6 x T/b
= 1.6 x 20.87 / 6.65 = 5.02 T
Equivalent moment Mt = T x ( 1 + D/b) / 1.7
=
20.87 x ( 1 + 1.76 / 6.65 ) / 1.7
= 15.52 tm
Design loads and moments
Load combination under ULS condition
Normal case
V= 1.4 x 241.57 + 2.0 x 1.79 + 2.0 x 130.08 = 601.92 T
(D.L ecc) (SIDL ecc) (EP) (LL Sur) (LL ecc)
ML = 1.4 x -28.57 + 2.0 x 0.48 + 1.7x 193.45+ 1.7x 133.41 + 2.0x 0.98
( 0.5 xHor force)
( Equv. torsion) (Restraining Force)
+ 2x 163.70 + 1.7 x 15.52 + 1.4 x 0.00 = 872.35 tm
MT = 1.75x 0.00 = 0.00 tm

Seismic case
V= 1.4 x 241.57 + 2.0 x 1.79 + 1.7x 130.08 + 1.7x 8.33 = 579.81 T
(D.L ecc) (SIDL ecc) (EP) (LL Sur) (LL ecc)

ML = 1.75x -28.6 + 0.48 1.25 x ( 193.45 133.41 1.0
( 0.5 xHor force) ( Equv. torsion) ( D.L seis) ( Dy inc of EP)
+ 1.7 x 81.85 15.52 + 99.54 + 96.09 +
(Restraining Force)
1.75x ( Dy inc of LLS)
+ 1.4 x 0.00 + 56.7 ) = = 1003.4 tm
MT = 0.00 = 0.00 tm
A) Under ULS condition design as bending member
d = 1760.00 - 75.0 - 10.0 - 0= 1675.00 mm 167.5 cm

Lever arm = 0.95 x 167.5 = 159.125 cm
Resisting moment Mr = 0.15*fck*b*d2 2

0.15 x 300 x 665.0 x 167.5 x 1.0E-05 = 8395.8 tm Hence OK
Rein reqd = 87235406 = 126.03 cm2

0.87 x 5000.0 x 159.125
`
Min rein reqrd 0.4 % of cross sectional area 0.004 x 665.0 x 167.5 = 445.6 cm2
(as per cl. 15.9.4.1 of CBC) Allow = 445.6 cm2
.'. provide 55 nos 25 dia bar on earth face and 55 nos 25 dia on other face
As provided = 981.7 cm2Hence OK
B) Under ULS Design as per SP: 16 of BIS
PU = 579.81 T = 5798088 N
MU = 1003.40 Tm = 1E+10 N-mm
Breadth of column, b = 6650.0 mm

Overall depth of column, D = 1760 mm
Effective cover d' = 85.0 mm

d' / D = 0.05
Also, fck = 30 Mpa and fy = 415 Mpa
P U / (fck * b * D) = 0.02
MU / (fck * b * D2) = 0.02

p / fck = 0.018
p= 30 x 0.018 = 0.54 % 6 7
.'. provide 55 nos 25 dia bar on earth face and 55 nos 25 dia on other face &
As provided = 981.7 cm2 OK
Shear forces
Critical section for shear forces at d from the face of front wall
Shear forces V = 1.4 x 27.3 + 1.7 x 86.02 + 1.7 x 38.33 + 1.25 x 16.65 + 1.25 x 15.27 = 289.51 t

S.F per metre width = 289.510 / 6.65 = 43.54 T

Shear stress tv =
43.54 / ( 1.00 x 1.675 ) = 25.99 t/m2 = 2.60 kg/cm2
100 As / b.d = 100 x 73.8 / ( 100 x 167.5 )= 0.44 %

From Table 15, Vc = 0.51 N /mm2
From Table 16, s = 0.75
Allowable shear stress = s x Vc = 0.38 N/mm2
Enhanced shear stress = s x vc x 2 d / ay = 0.38 x 2 = 0.76 N/mm2
(as per cl. 15.4.3.3 of IRS concrete bridge code) = 7.60 Kg/cm2
Hence as per cl. 15.5.4.1.1, no shear reinforcement is necessary.

Design of Pile Cap

DESIGN OF PILE CAP
X Y
c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6 c7
1.70 1.76 1.84
5.30
0.65 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65
0.65
6.00
7.30
Longi.
Direction
0.65
PLAN OF PILE CAP

X Y
Pile cap shall be designed for under seismic condition as it is critical
Vertical load on pile with ULS factor

Normal case
Reaction on pile cap from pile on column
/ 2 C1 = 264.19 T
Reaction on pile cap from pile on column C2
Pmin = 1330.53 +/- 0.00 +/- 0.00
5 8.0 12.0
= 266.11 +/- 0.00 +/- 0.00 = 266.11 T

Reaction on pile cap from pile on column C3
Pmin = 1330.53 +/- 15.34 +/- 0.00
5 8.0 12.0
= 266.11 +/- 1.92 +/- 0.00 = 264.19 T

Overall depth of pile cap D = 1500 mm
Grade of concrete M- 30
Grade of steel Fe - 500
SECTION X - X
Downward vertical load due to soil & self weight
0x 1.8 + 1.5 x 2.5 = 3.75 t/m2
Moment about X - X
2x 264.19 x 1.05 + 2x 0.00 x 0.00 = 554.79
- 1.4 x 3.75 x 7.30 x 1.70 x 1.70 x 0.50 = 55.38
499.41 tm
B.M per metre = 499.41 / 7.30 = 68.41 Tm

d = 1500 - 75 - 16 = 1409 mm 140.9 cm
Lever arm = 0.95 x 140.9 = 133.855 cm
Resisting moment Mr = 0.15*fck*b*d 2

2
0.15 x 300 x 100.0 x 140.9 x 1.0E-05 = 893.4 tm
> 68.41 Hence OK

PILE CAPACITY

Considering free head piles in sand

Lf = 1.9 x 391.59 = 744.02 cm or 7.44 m
MF = Q x (L1 + Lf) /2 = Q x( 0.00 + 7.440 ) = 7.45 Q tm
Actual max moment; Mmax = m x MF = 0.400 x 7.45 Q = 2.98 Q tm
3
Deflection Y (cm) = Q . (L1 + Lf)3 / (3 . E . I ) = 1000 Q x( 0 + 744.017 )
3.0 x 2.74E+05 x 4.9E+06
= 0.10212 Q cm Q in ton
Therefore for semi fix head pile , average of fix and free head pile
Mmax =( 3.46 + 2.98 Q )/ 2 = 3.22Q tm
Deflection =( 0.0386 Q + 0.1021 Q )/ 2 = 0.0703 Q cm
In our design we shall consider semi fix head pile
Total lateral load on pile cap under normal case = SQRT ( 190.65 + 0.00 )
= 190.65 T
Load on each pile = 190.65 / 5 = 38.13 T
Therefore deflection = 0.0386 Q x 38.13 = 1.470 cm
Under 0.9 x 1.25 DSL case (seismic)

Scour level = 31.113
Depth of overburden = Scour level - Founding level of pile
= 31.11 - 8.1 = 23.0 m
i.e. 23.0 m <15 D = 15 x 1.0 = 15.0 m
Pd at founding level =( 1.8 - 1.0 ) x 23.0 = 18.40 t/m2
From cl. No. 3.6 of IS : 2131-1981, overburden factor = 0.95 for Pd above.
N' = 0.95 x 35 = 33.25
Diltancy correction ( N" ) = 15 + 0.5 x (N' - 15)
Consider f = ( 18 . N" )^0.5 + 15 =( 18 x 24.125 ) .5+ 15 = 35.84 degree
Ref page 163 Foundation analysis and design by Joseph E Bowles.
0
f = 32.5 ( Refer SSI Report)
NƔ = 38 (Table 1, IS 6403 -1981)
Nq = 38.0 (fig 1, ammendment no 1, IS 2911 part 1 / sec 2)
Qu = pi() / 4 x 1 2x ( 0.5 x 1 x 0.8 x 38
+ 18.40 x 38 )= 561.1 ton
Considering FOS = 2.5 for end bearing capacity.

Qsafe = 561.1 / 2.5 = 224.44 Normal case
= 1.25 x 224.44 = 280.55 Seismic case
DETERMINATION OF DEPTH OF FIXITY, EXPRESSION OF MAXIMUM MOMENT & DEFLECTION

Ref : Appendix of ammendement - 3 to IS : 2911 part 1 / sec 2 -1979
Dia of pile = 1m
Length of pile = 23.0 m
K1 = 0.1825 kg/cm2 (Table 1, for medium sand)

Ec = 2.80E+05 kg/cm2 (For M 30 concrete)

1/5 1/5
As per clause C-1.2 T = (E I / K 1) = ( 2.80E+05 x 4908738.5 / 0.1825 )
= 376.16 cm
Embedded length = 4x 376.16 / 100 = 15.05 m
< 23.00 m OK
From fig 2 appendix C, fixed head piles in sand
For L1 / T = 0.00 L1 = 0.000 m
Lf / T = 2.18 Reduction factor = 0.81 fig 3 B appendix C
Considering fixed head piles in sand
Lf = 2.18 x 376.16 = 820.0 cm or 8.20 m
MF = Q x (L1 + Lf) /2 = Q x( 0.00 + 8.200 ) / 2 = 4.11 Q tm
Actual max moment; Mmax = m x MF = 0.810 x 4.11 Q = 3.33 tm
From fig 2 appendix C, free head piles in sand

For L1 / R = 0.00 L1 = 0.000 m
Lf / R = 1.90 Reduction factor = 0.4 fig 3 B appendix C
Considering fixed head piles in sand
Lf = 1.9 x 376.16 = 714.70 cm or 7.15 m
MF = Q x (L1 + Lf) /2 = Q x( 0.00 + 7.147 ) = 7.15 Q tm
Actual max moment; Mmax = m x MF = 0.400 x 7.15 Q = 2.86 Q tm
Therefore for semi fix head pile , average of fix and free head pile
Mmax =( 3.33 + 2.86 Q )/ 2 = 3.09 tm

Design of Ballast wall
DESIGN OF BALLAST WALL
1.035
1.13 1.35
0.859
0.629 t/m2
0.825
6.965
0.825
EARTH PRESSURE SURCHARGE
NORMAL CONDITION
Part Intensity height multiplying force eccentricity Moment @
factor Base
(t/m2) (m) (ton) (m) (t-m)
Earth press = 0.629 x 1.13 x 0.50 = 0.356 x 0.475 = 0.169
Surcharge = 0.859 x 1.13 x 1.00 = 0.971 x 0.565 = 0.549
Surcharge = 0.176 x 1.13 x 0.50 = 0.099 x 0.753 = 0.075
1.426 0.792
SEISMIC CONDITION
(ton) (m) (ton) (m) (t-m) (t-m)
Earth press = 0.356 x 0.328 = 0.12 x 0.565 = 0.066 0.169
Surcharge = 0.971 x 0.328 = 0.32 x 0.753 = 0.240 0.549
Surcharge = 0.099 x 0.328 = 0.03 x 0.848 = 0.028 0.075
1.426 0.467 0.333 0.792
Net moment = 0.333 + 0.792 = 1.126 tm
Overall depth assumed = 385 mm
Effective depth, d = 385 - 50 - 6= 329 mm

2
As per clause no. 15.4.2.2.1 of IRS CBC Mu = 0.15 fck
2 bd
0.15 x 300 x 100.0 x 32.9 x 1.0E-05 = 48.7 tm Hence OK
Rein reqd = 112576.2 = 0.828 cm2

0.87 x 5000.0 x 0.95 x 32.9
Min rein reqrd 0.2 % of cross sectional area 0.002 x 100.0 x 32.9 = 6.6 cm2
Allow = 6.6 cm2
.'. provide 10 dia tor bar at 150 c/c in vertical direction on earth face. = 5.2 cm2
.'. provide 10 dia tor bar at 150 c/c in vertical direction opp to earth face. = 5.2 cm2
10.5 cm2s afe

DESIGN OF BED BLOCK
The Bed block/ Abutment Cap is a solid slab fully supported on abutment wall.
Mesh Reinforcement (25mm dia 250 c/c in Longitudinal Direction & 25 mm dia 250
c/c in transverse direction) has been provided under bearings.
The Block has been adequetely reinforced with 20mm dia bar @ 150 mm c/c
bothways to provide rigidity and strength against local loading
Dia of Bars provided = 20 mm

Spacing of bars provided = 150 mm
Area of Reinforcement = π/4 x 20^2 x 1000 / 150
provided = 2094 mm²

DRAWINGS

Bridge No. - 236 Report 11 June

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Bridge No. - 236 Report 11 June

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

DESIGN REPORT FOR B.

NAME OF WORK: DESIGN CHECK FOR RAISING OF ABUTMENT HEIGHT FOR

Date: 11nth June 2018

BRIDGE NO.- 236

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt. Ltd

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 2

Doc Title Design Summary Of Main Components In Bridge Structure

R0 11-06-2018 First Issue NIL Anil C Vikram G Ashok Nair

Prepared by Name: Anil kumar C Signature

Reviewed by Name: Vikram G Signature

Approved by Name: Ashok Nair Signature

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 3

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 4

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 5

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 6

Reinforcement as per our

1.3.2. Pile Cap:

1.3.3. Abutment Shaft/Wall

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 7

1.3.4. Bed Block:

1.3.5. Ballast Wall:

Note: Design calculation is attached in Annexure -1

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 8

CODES AND STANDARD

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 9

2. CODES AND STANDARD

 IRS Bridge Rules

Design of concrete elements

 IRS Code of Practice for Design of Substructures and Foundations of Bridges.

 IRS Code of Practice for Design of Substructures and Foundations of Bridges.

Design for Earthquake Resistance

 RDSO guidelines on Seismic Design of Railway Bridges.

 IIT-Kanpur- RDSO guidelines on Seismic Design of Railway Bridges.

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 10

Design of steel structural elements

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 11

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 12

3.1. Design of Pile:

d) Calculation of forces and moments

3.2. Reinforcement Summary:

Sl. Reinforcement as per our Check /

1 Main Bar 20 No's. of 32 φ @ 120 mm c/c 28 No's of 32 φ @ 120 mm c/c Unsafe

Remark: In Main reinforcement provided No. of Bars/reinforcement is insufficient. Therefore, required

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 13

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 14

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 15

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 16

4.2. Reinforcement Summary:

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 17

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 18

5.1. Design of Abutment:

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 19

5. Dead load + Restraining forces + Seismic (under HFL no span).

Rein. as per Drawing Rein. as per our Calculation

Rein. as per Drawing Rein. as per Calculation Rein. Required Check

2 Hoop Bars 314.15 mm² 314.15 mm² 280 mm² Safe

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 20

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 21

6.1. Design of Bed Block:

6.1.1. Reinforcement Summary:

Sl. Rein. as per Drawing Rein. as per Calculation Check /

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 22

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 23