Controlling stamping processes with statistical logic

thefabricator.com/article/stamping/controlling-stamping-processes-with-statistical-logic

The output from a load monitor can be expressed using statistical language, such
as X-bar, sigma, and Pareto charts, and histograms, to help stampers make
decisions regarding their stamping processes.

Figure 1Object

Analyzing signals seems to be a bigger part of our lives these days. We watch for interest rate
changes, new-home start-ups, the jobless rate, Dow Jones activity, auto sales, steel prices, tax
cuts, and more.

These signals help us to make decisions to keep our business open and, it is hoped, profitable.
Ignoring the signals can result in missed opportunities to plan ahead and stay ahead of the
game.

Overseeing a stamping operation requires the same attention to signals so that we can see
what's ahead and make smart decisions to avoid problems and improve operations.
Manufacturing statistics—information collected in samples—provide clear and powerful signals
about what's going on and what we should do next.

Examining an operation using statistical signals, most notably statistical process control (SPC)
charts, is one way to determine how much the process varies throughout the production run.
Reducing this variation generally improves the quality of the stamping process.

One important signal available from every stamping operation is the load required to produce
the part. Whether the process involves blanking, forming, drawing, or coining, a certain amount
of force, or load, is generated to produce a quality part.
Load changes that result, for example, from material variation or tool wear affect the
dimensional characteristics of the part. Therefore, load measurement is statistically relevant, and
certain decisions can be made for a stamping operation based on the load variations for each
part produced.

In a stamping operation, a certain amount of load variation from hit to hit is typical. Material,
lubricant, tooling, and press conditions cause some of the variation. Press load monitors are
effective tools for measuring how much the load varies during each machine cycle. These
monitors are even more effective when their upper and lower control limits are set to stop the
press if the limits are exceeded.

Converting Load Data to Statistical Format

Load monitors on straight-side presses typically have five digital readouts to indicate the load
on each of the four corners—or connections, depending on sensor location—plus the total load
(see Figure 1).

Some monitors use a bar graph or trend display to indicate load variation from hit to hit based
on sample loads taken during setup. Like a traffic light, the trend colors change from green to
amber to red as the load changes above or below the original sample's limits. If the load varies
from the trend control limits, the machine will shut down.

While effective, these bar graph displays offer only a snapshot of the process because they
normally indicate load variation from the sample based only on the last part produced.

Figure 2Object

Through the use of embedded personal computer technology, load monitors now can store the
load values for each part produced in the entire production run. This can be accomplished even
at press speeds higher than 1,000 strokes per minute (SPM). Using a menu-driven color
touchscreen display, the monitor shows the total load variation from hit to hit on a broken-line
graph. The graph indicates how the load behaves at a point in the process or over the entire
production run.
This load data then can be expressed in a statistical format using average X-bar and sigma
charts. The top chart in Figure 2is the X-bar, or the average load measured for each part
produced during the run. The pattern of these measurements on the chart is called a
distribution.

The bottom sigma, or s, chart measures load variability in the process. This chart uses standard
deviation to show the difference between the smallest and largest load values measured during
the production run. Because standard deviation measures the amount of variability, it can be
used as the basis for determining the load monitor's upper control limit (UCL) and lower control
limit (LCL).

The initial sample size can be selected from a setup screen (see Figure 3). The overall peak load
measured for each part in the sample is shown in a bar graph format. The individual corner load
values are shown in a table above the bar graph along with the corresponding minimum and
maximum values, mean, and standard deviation. This table indicates which load monitor channel
is experiencing the most load variation from hit to hit. This could show that the tool has not
been properly set.

In almost all distributions, all the measurements fall within three standard deviations of the
mean. For this reason, almost all control charts' limits are set at ±3 standard deviations above
and below the mean value.

Applying this concept to load measurements suggests that all measured load values also should
fall within ±3 standard deviations. Depressing the Six Sigma selection key on the sample screen
sets both the UCL and LCL based on ±3 standard deviations of mean. If the load exceeds any
limit, the instrument will initiate a machine shutdown because the process will be considered
out of control.

Using statistical methodology to establish control limits in the load monitor puts the same
process capability expectations on the stamping operations as on all the other processes in the
plant. Plus, setting control limits based on SPC logic eliminates trial and error.

All other SPC tools can be applied too. The data collected in the X-bar and standard deviation
charts can be displayed using a histogram, which shows the comparative frequency of the load
values. Load values are shown on one axis, and the number of parts produced is Cpk level of 1.3.
With this as a goal, operators, tool engineers, and maintenance personnel can work as a team to
identify and reduce the process variations that cause lower Cpk values. This is why the high and
low load values taken during the sample are used as specification limits, even though they don't
correlate to specific part dimensions.

To establish true specification limits, in-die dimensional measurements on the part are required.
Multiple analog inputs are available in the load monitor to accept an array of in-die sensors,
such as eddy current probes, lasers, photocells, thermocouples, and resistance temperature
detectors (RTDs). These sensors can measure part dimension as well as surface finish.

Of course, the most valuable in-die sensor options are strain gauge load cells or die plugs. The
latter easily can be installed in progressive dies and transfer tools. In fact, these in-die force
sensors could replace the bolt-on transducers located on the press structure.
Figure 3Object

Getting to the Root Cause

Documenting the reasons that a process exceeded a control limit is important. The details of
each occurrence can be entered in the load monitor on the downtime history screen.

The most probable causes are listed for the operator to select. An alarm history screen
summarizes the out-of-tolerance occurrences along with the reasons for them. At the end, or at
any time during the production run, a Pareto chart can be graphed. This bar graph ranks
problems in decreasing order of frequency.

When a tonnage alarm history is done for a Pareto chart (see Figure 4), the number of tonnage
alarms is displayed on the left vertical scale; the accumulated percentage of alarms is shown on
the right vertical scale. The different categories are shown on the horizontal scale.

These Pareto charts based on the entire production run are significant because they separate
the important alarm reasons from the many insignificant ones. Plus, the Pareto charts look at the
overall occurrences over the run. Too often the most recent cause for machine downtime gets
all the attention. Used effectively, Pareto charts can identify root cause variation.

Proof of Quality
More and more companies are demanding proof of quality, or validation that a process was
under control. This proof can be provided through hard copy printouts of the control charts
from the stamping presses. They show the mean, standard deviation, and capability information
of the load measurements.

Printouts of histograms, which depict the load measurement distribution, can be generated too.
Charts can be generated on a network printer based on the lot, batch, total, or any combination
of parts that comprise the shipment to a customer. Their inclusion with the shipment will be
well-received by the customer.
The transfer of SPC data from the load monitor does not stop here. An Ethernet port enables
the monitor to export data in the industry-standard extensible markup language (XML) format.
With this provision, information can be viewed on a Web browser or written to a database. With
the Ethernet connection, various charts, capability studies, and database information can be sent
to either an intranet or Internet location.

The Tools of Statistics

The charts and studies described here are just a few of the many statistical measurements that
can be taken from a stamping process. Their use does not guarantee that zero-defect status can
be achieved.

Instead, control charts, capability studies, histograms, and Pareto charts should be considered
analytical tools that provide a better understanding of what happens during a stamping process.
More important, they're tools that can measure and track performance against a standard or a
benchmark.

Since their introduction about 40 years ago, load monitors have protected presses and tooling,
helped reduce setup time, detected scrap and material variation, and identified abnormal press
and tool conditions. As the demands for achieving zero defects force stampers to apply more
statistical measurements to their processes, one more benefit of measuring load can be added
to the list.

When load is used as a statistical signal, the capability of a stamping operation can be measured
and tracked throughout the run. More important, the output from a load monitor can be
expressed using the same statistical language used by other processes in the plant. Load should
be considered as one more signal used as a statistical measurement on which decisions can be
based.

Figure 4Object

You May Also Like

Taking an integrated build approach to stamping tool tryout
Electronic sensors augment error-proofing, quality control programs

Measure it, graph it, control it

Using Monitoring Systems to Improve Stamping 'Batting Average'

Richard Wilhelm
Contributing Writer
Helm Instrument Co. Inc.
361 Dussel Drive
Maumee, OH 43537
Phone: 419-893-4356
Fax: 419-893-1371
http://www.helminstrument.com
Contact via email

More Content by Richard Wilhelm

Helm Instrument designs and supplies specialized process control monitors and sensors for the
manufacturing industry.

Published In...

STAMPING Journal
STAMPING Journal is the only industrial publication dedicated solely to serving
the needs of the metal stamping market.

Preview the Digital Edition

Subscribe to STAMPING Journal

Read more from this issue

Related Companies
Helm Instrument Co. Inc.