Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
net
Kimmel, Weygandt, Kieso, Trenholm, Irvine Financial Accounting, Sixth Canadian Edition
CHAPTER 9
3. Account for the 10, 11, 12 10, 11 5, 6, 7 6A, 7A, 8A 6B, 7B, 8B 7
derecognition of
property, plant, and
equipment.
4. Identify the basic 13, 14, 12, 13 8, 9, 10 9A, 10A, 9B, 10B, 1, 4
accounting issues 15, 16, 17 11A 11B
for intangible assets
and goodwill.
5. Illustrate how long- 18, 19, 20 12, 14, 15 10, 11 8A, 10A, 8B, 10B 1
lived assets are
reported in the
financial statements.
6. Describe the 21, 22, 23 16, 17 12, 13 11A, 12A, 11B, 12B 2, 3, 4,
methods for 5
evaluating the use of
assets.
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS
1. (a) The cost principle requires that property, plant, and equipment be recorded at cost,
which consists of the purchase price, less any discounts or rebates and any other
expenditures necessary to acquire the asset and make it ready for its intended use.
Two examples of capital expenditures include the shipping cost of equipment to its
location of use and testing it to ensure it is ready for its intended use. Capital
expenditures are included as part of the cost of the new equipment. They are incurred
to make an asset ready for use (or to enhance its productivity or extend its life).
3. Land improvements are structural additions made to the land such as parking lots and
fences. Clearing and grading the land are not land improvements but are part of the
land cost as they are required to get the land ready for its intended use. They would
therefore be capitalized (recorded) in the Land account.
4. An operating lease allows the lessee to account for the leasing transaction as a rental
and so the lease payments are recorded to Rent Expense, an income statement
account. As a result, neither the asset nor the liability related to the asset is recorded
on the company’s books.
For a finance lease, both the asset and the liability related to the leased asset are
recorded on the company’s books even though the asset is not legally owned by the
party leasing the asset. The asset account involved would be Assets under Finance
Leases and the related liability account would be Finance Lease Liability.
Straight-line, All three result All three result All three result All three result in
units-of- in the same total in the same total in the same the same ending
production, depreciation impact on profit total carrying amount
diminishing- expense accumulated
balance depreciation
6. If the residual value was deducted for the diminishing balance method, the carrying
value would never reach the residual value. Applying a fixed percentage rate to a
diminishing balance will always result in an undepreciated balance because a portion of
the depreciable amount will always remain at the end of the period. Residual value is
considered in the diminishing-balance method by ensuring that the asset is never
depreciated below its residual value. In this way we always make sure that the
undepreciated balance (carrying amount) is adjusted to equal residual value at the end
of its useful life. Residual value is subtracted from the cost when using the other
methods because the resulting depreciable cost is needed to determine the annual
depreciation expense.
For example, if an asset was purchased July 1 and produced 10,000 units for the
period July through December, it can only produce a result for that six month period
(the company could not have produced units before it purchased the asset) and
therefore does not need to be adjusted for the half year ownership period.
8. (a) A company should choose the depreciation method it believes will best reflect the
pattern over which the asset’s future economic benefits are expected to be
consumed. The depreciation method must be revised if the expected pattern of
consumption of the future economic benefits has changed.
(b) Private companies using ASPE would not be allowed to use the revaluation model
and therefore must use the cost model. Publicly traded companies, which must
follow IFRS, can choose to use the cost model or the revaluation model. Factors to
consider when choosing the revaluation model over the cost model are whether fair
values are more relevant than cost (such as in the real estate industry), whether
reliable measures of fair value can be obtained, and whether the benefits from the
revaluation model exceed the additional costs involved in determining the value of
the assets each year.
9. (a) Companies need to calculate an impairment loss when an asset becomes obsolete
or when a competitive market causes a decline in sales of products produced by
that asset. The impairment loss is the amount by which the carrying amount of the
asset exceeds its recoverable amount. The loss is recorded with debit to
Impairment Loss and a credit to the Accumulated Depreciation account of the asset
or the asset itself if a contra account is not used.
(b) Some companies attempt to record asset impairments in fiscal years where the
company is experiencing poor results and the additional charge for the impairment
will not be noticed or will be received in a better light by the financial statement
users. Once the carrying amounts of the assets are reduced from the recording of
the impairment loss, subsequent depreciation is correspondingly reduced. Since
management’s judgement is involved in arriving at the amount of impairment loss,
the timing of the recording of the loss may be the result of management’s objective
to manipulate current and future years’ financial results. This approach becomes
problematic to the financial statement users who are looking to compare results
over several fiscal years to properly identify and assess financial trends.
11. In a sale of property, plant, and equipment, the carrying amount of the asset is
compared to the proceeds received from the sale. If the proceeds of the sale exceed
the carrying amount of the asset, a gain on disposal occurs. If the proceeds of the sale
are less than the carrying amount of the asset sold, a loss on disposal occurs. The
calculation is the same for an asset that is retired if proceeds, such as a residual value,
are received. Often there are no proceeds received when an asset is retired. If no
proceeds are received, a gain will never occur.
12. The machine and related accumulated depreciation should continue to be reported on
the statement of financial position without further depreciation or adjustment until the
asset is retired. Reporting the asset and related accumulated depreciation on the
statement of financial position informs the reader of the financial statements that the
company is still using the asset. Once an asset is fully depreciated, even if it is still
being used, no additional depreciation should be taken on this asset. In no situation can
the accumulated depreciation on the asset exceed the cost of the asset.
13. Tangible and intangible assets have similar characteristics, in that they are purchased
for use in the operations and not for resale, have usefulness beyond one fiscal year
and are depreciated or amortized, with the exception of land and indefinite life
intangible assets. Tangible and intangible assets are also similar in that their cost
includes all of the necessary outlays that are made to get the asset ready for its
intended use. They differ in their physical substance in that intangible assets have no
physical substance.
14. Since finite intangible assets have limited usefulness to the business, each period of
benefit should be charged with the allocation of the amortizable cost of the intangible
asset used to generate revenue. Indefinite life intangible assets cannot have a
systematic allocation of their amortizable cost allocated against revenues as the period
of benefit is indeterminable. Rather, these assets are tested for impairment more
frequently to ensure that their recoverable amount continues to exceed their carrying
amount.
(b) If the useful life is shorter than legal life, amortizing the asset over its legal life
would be inappropriate because the amortization each year would be too low and
the asset would have a carrying amount shown on the statement of financial
position after its useful life had passed.
16. The legal fees should be added to the cost of the patent and amortized over the
patent’s remaining useful life as they prove the patent’s validity and add to, or ensure
the continuation of, the future economic benefits to be generated by the patent.
17. Goodwill is the value of many favourable attributes that are intertwined in the business
enterprise. Goodwill can be identified only with the business as a whole and, unlike
other assets, cannot be sold separately. Goodwill can only be sold if the entire business
is sold.
18. (a) Long-lived assets are normally reported on the statement of financial position
under the headings “property, plant, and equipment”, “intangible assets” and
“goodwill.” The balances of the major classes of assets should be disclosed, as
well as the accumulated depreciation and accumulated amortization, either on the
statement of financial position or in the notes to the financial statements.
(b) The income statement reports, in the operating expenses section, depreciation
expense, amortization expense, any gain or loss on disposal of property, plant and
equipment, and any impairment losses.
(c) The statement of cash flows reports, in the investing activities section, any cash
paid to purchase long-lived assets and any cash received on their disposal.
For companies using ASPE, the disclosure requirements are substantially reduced
because the revaluation model cannot be used.
20. Gains and losses recorded on the disposal of property, plant, and equipment are
classified in the operating section of the income statement because they are basically
an adjustment to deprecation, which is classified as an operating expense.
21. (a) Grocery stores usually have a high asset turnover and a low profit margin. This is
typical in industries that have high sales relative to assets and are in an industry
where there are many competitors.
(b) Railway companies normally have a low asset turnover because they are so
capital intensive. To compensate for this, companies such as these need to have
a high profit margin which is typical in an industry that is hard to enter due to high
capital barriers.
22. The return on assets ratio measures the return being generated by each dollar invested
in the business (profit ÷ average total assets). The return on assets can also be
calculated by multiplying the profit margin by the asset turnover ratio. The profit margin
measures how effective the business is at generating profit from its sales and the asset
turnover measures how well the company can generate sales from a given level of
assets. Together, the two ratios can be combined to measure how effective a company
is at generating profit from a given level of assets (return on assets). Therefore, if a
company wants to improve its return on assets, it can do so either by increasing the
margin it generates from each dollar of sales (profit margin) or by increasing the volume
of goods that is sells (asset turnover).
Return on assets
$403 $383
= 18.0% = 16.3%
$2,244 $2,343
Asset turnover
$2,226 $2,012
= 1.0 times = 0.9 times
$2,244 $2,343
Tim Hortons’ return on assets and asset turnover ratios improved in 2012 compared to
2011.
All of the expenditures, except the fence, should be included in the cost of the land.
Therefore, the cost of the land is $61,000 (cash price of $50,000 + legal fees of $2,500 +
removal of old building $5,000 + cleaning and grading costs of $3,500). The fence would be
included in the cost of land improvements.
The cost of the truck is $43,750 (invoice price $42,000 + installation of trailer hitch $1,000 +
painting and lettering $750). The expenditures for insurance and motor vehicle licence are
annual costs that do not benefit future periods and should be expensed and not added to the
cost of the truck.
(a) The depreciable amount is $80,000 ($86,000 – $6,000). With a 4-year useful life, annual
depreciation is $20,000 ($80,000 ÷ 4). Under the straight-line method, depreciation
expense is the same each year.
(b) Total depreciation over the truck’s life will be $20,000 per year × 4 years = $80,000
As explained in the chapter, the diminishing-balance method can require an adjustment in the
final year of depreciating an asset in order to equate the carrying amount to equal the
residual value. In the scenario illustrated in the question, the company stopped depreciating
the asset at the end of Year 4. This relatively short life was chosen for the purposes of this
comparative problem and resulted in a very large amount of depreciation expense in Year 4.
This can occur when the diminishing-balance method is used to depreciate an asset with a
short life. Because of this effect, the diminishing-balance method is often used on assets with
longer lives. In situations like this in real life, a company would revise the useful life of the
asset if it anticipated continuing to use the asset beyond Year 4.
The depreciable amount per unit is $0.10 per km. calculated as follows:
(a)
Carrying amount ($200,000 – $20,000) ÷ 5 = $36,000 × 2 = $72,000;
$200,000 – $72,000 = $128,000
(b)
Carrying amount $128,000
Recoverable amount 100,000
Impairment loss $ 28,000
(b) The trademarks do not need to be amortized as these normally have an indefinite life.
(b) Based on the two ratios given, I would expect Coke to have a better profit margin.
(a)
($ in U.S. millions) 2012 2011
$1,948 $1,726
$1,896 + $1,858 $1,858 + $1,335
(1) Asset turnover � � � �
2 2
= 1.0 times = 1.1 times
$148 $234
(2) Profit margin = 7.6 % = 13.6 %
$1,948 $1,726
$148 $234
$1,896 + $1,858 $1,858 + $1,335
(3) Return on assets � � � �
2 2
= 7.9% = 14.7%
(b) The return on assets changed primarily due to a change in profit margin.
SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES
EXERCISE 9-1
(a) Under the cost principle, the acquisition cost for property, plant, and equipment
includes all expenditures necessary to acquire the asset and make it ready for its
intended use. For example, the cost of factory equipment includes the purchase price,
freight costs paid by the purchaser, insurance costs during transit, and expenditures
required in assembling, installing, and testing the equipment.
(b) 1. Land
2. Land
3. Land
4. Land Improvements
5. Buildings
6. Buildings
7. Vehicles
8. Vehicles
9. Vehicles Expense
10. Prepaid Insurance
EXERCISE 9-2
(a) Cost of equipment = $75,000 + $500 delivery + $200 insurance in transit
+ $2,800 testing and installation
= $78,500
The one-year insurance payment is for an annual expense and unlike the insurance for
the equipment in transit, was not incurred to get the asset ready for use. Training costs
are also expensed as they were incurred to get staff ready to use the machinery.
These costs were not incurred on the machinery itself.
(b) April 1, 2015 because that is the date when the asset was ready for use.
(c) The company should use the straight-line method since the economic benefits are
expected to be consumed evenly over the machinery’s useful life.
EXERCISE 9-3
(a)
Depreciation ceases in 2015 as the carrying amount cannot fall below residual value.
($172,000 – $16,000)
= $15.60
10,000 hours
(b) All three methods result in the same amount depreciation expense over the life of the
asset and so the same profit will be experienced as well. The choice of depreciation
method will have no impact on cash flow.
EXERCISE 9-4
(a)
Machine 1 Machine 2
Cost $800,000 Cost $120,000
Less: Residual value 40,000 Less: Residual value 5,000
Depreciable cost $760,000 Depreciable cost $115,000
(c) If the company accepts Lindy’s proposed changes in useful life and residual value, the
2015 depreciation expense for Machine 1 will be lower and the depreciation expense
for Machine 2 will be higher than for 2014. The depreciation expense for Machine 1
will be lower due to the estimated longer useful life and higher residual value. The
depreciation expense for Machine 2 will be higher due to the shorter estimated useful
life and lower residual value.
EXERCISE 9-5
(a) The amount paid for the equipment is $1,100.
(c) The amount of the gain on disposal is $50 and is derived from the disposal entry that
follows.
(d) The amount of the impairment loss on the remaining equipment is $55.
EXERCISE 9-6
(a)
(1) Straight-line method
$5,000 − $500
= $1,125 each year
4
Note: There is no difference in the total expense over the life of the asset.
EXERCISE 9-7
30 Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment
[($150,000 ÷ 10) × 10] ................................................... 150,000
Equipment ............................................................. 150,000
EXERCISE 9-8
1. Depreciation is the process of allocating the cost of a long-lived asset to expense over
the asset’s useful life. Because the value of land generally does not decline with time
and usage, its usefulness and economic benefits do not decline. In addition, the useful
life of land is indefinite. Therefore it would be incorrect for the student to depreciate the
land.
EXERCISE 9-9
(a)
EXERCISE 9-10
(a)
31 Given that recoverable amount exceeded carrying amount for intangible assets,
no impairment loss is recognized.
(b)
COLLINS LTD.
Statement of Financial Position (Partial)
December 31, 2015
Intangible assets
Patents ................................................................. $40,000
Less: Accumulated amortization .......................... 8,000 $ 32,000
Franchise ............................................................. 250,000
Development costs ............................................... 50,000
Total intangible assets................................................. 332,000
Goodwill ...................................................................... 270,000
EXERCISE 9-11
(a) Account Financial Statement Section
Intangible assets
Software ................................................................................... $28,916
Less: Accumulated amortization............................................... 10,191 18,725
Trademarks .............................................................................. 499
Total intangible assets ..................................................... 19,224
EXERCISE 9-12
Company A: Costco (retail)
Company B: Suncor (oil and gas)
The company most likely operating in the retail industry is Company A (Costco) because it
has the higher asset turnover and lower profit margin. It is reasonable to expect retail
companies like Costco to sell goods at a higher rate (volume) at a lower profit margin than a
company in the oil and gas industry.
The oil and gas industry requires a higher investment in long-lived assets and can be
expected to have a lower asset turnover ratio and a higher profit margin.
EXERCISE 9-13
(a) ($ in millions)
$550
(1) Return on assets = = 7.9%
($7,200 + $6,800)
2
$14,000
(2) Asset turnover = = 2.0 times
($7,200 + $6,800)
2
$550
(3) Profit margin = = 3.9%
$14,000
[(profit ÷ net sales) × (net sales ÷ average total assets)] = profit ÷ average total assets
(c) Ajax’s ratios are better than the industry averages in every respect. Ajax can generate a
higher return on assets through higher volume of sales or greater efficiencies in using
its asset base to generate those sales. Overall Ajax is performing better than industry.
SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS
PROBLEM 9-1A
4. Repair and maintenance Does not extend the life of the building or make it more
expense productive or efficient.
6. Repair and maintenance Does not extend the life of the machinery or make it more
expense productive or efficient.
If the damage was covered by insurance, a receivable (from
the insurance company) account would be debited.
If the loss was considered to be significant, it would be
recorded separately as a loss due to damages, rather than as
repair and maintenance expense.
7. Repair and maintenance Does not extend the life of the truck or make it more
expense productive or efficient.
8. Repair and maintenance Does not extend the life of the factory or make it more
expense productive or efficient. Painting is a recurring expense over
time.
10. Repair and maintenance Light bulbs are expected to be replaced frequently.
expense
PROBLEM 9-2A
(a)
(b)
Land
Date Land Improvements Buildings
Feb. 7 $550,000
9 11,000
15 30,000
17 (8,000)
28 2,000
Mar. 2 $ 36,000
July 2 1,300,000
Aug. 29 $24,000 000000000
$585,000 $24,000 $1,336,000
The building and land improvements would be depreciated once the asset is available
for use. In the case of the building, it appears that its construction is completed on July 2
and the land improvements are available for use on August 29. If depreciation is
calculated to the nearest month, then the building would be depreciated effective July 1
and the land improvements September 1.
PROBLEM 9-3A
(a)
Invoice price $360,000
Delivery cost 2,000
Installation and testing 8,000
Total cost $370,000
The one-year insurance policy is not included as it benefits only the current period. It
would be recorded as Prepaid Insurance and allocated to Insurance Expense throughout
the period.
($370,000 – $80,000)
= $58,000
5
STRAIGHT-LINE DEPRECIATION
(2)
DOUBLE DIMINISHING–BALANCE DEPRECIATION
Profit is lower in the earlier years of the machine’s useful life if the double diminishing-
balance method is used.
(c) Yes, the cost to recycle the machine at the end of its useful life would need to be
estimated. The cost to recycle would be added to the cost of the machine and allocated
over its useful life, increasing the annual depreciation charge.
PROBLEM 9-4A
(a) (1)
STRAIGHT-LINE DEPRECIATION
$122,000
2
2015 $120,000 25% × 9/12 $22,500 $ 22,500 99,500
2016 ,,120,000 25% 30,000 52,500 69,500
2017 ,,120,000 25% 30,000 82,500 39,500
2018 ,,120,000 25% 30,000 112,500 9,500
2019 ,,120,000 25% × 3/12 7,500 120,000 2,000
1
1 ÷ 4 years = 25%
2
$122,000 – $2,000 = $120,000
(2)
DOUBLE DIMINISHING–BALANCE DEPRECIATION
$122,000
2015 $122,000 50% × 9/12 $45,750 $ 45,750 76,250
2016 ,, 76,250 50% 38,125 83,875 38,125
2017 ,, 38,125 50% 19,062 102,937 19,063
2018 ,, 19,063 50% 9,532 112,469 9,531
2019 9,531 50% × 3/122 7,5312 120,000 2,000
1
1 ÷ 4 years = 25% × 2 = 50%
2
Adjusted so that carrying amount would equal residual value of $2,000 ($9,531 × 50%
× 3/12 = $1,191; $9,531 – $2,000 = $7,531) at the end of the useful life.
(3)
UNITS-OF-PRODUCTION DEPRECIATION
$122,000
2015 7,400 $3 $22,200 $ 22,200 99,800
2016 10,200 3 30,600 52,800 69,200
2017 9,900 3 29,700 82,500 39,500
2018 10,000 3 30,000 112,500 9,500
2019 2,500 3 7,500 120,000 2,000
1
Depreciable cost per unit = ($122,000 – $2,000) ÷ 40,000 units = $3 per unit
(b) Double-
Straight- Units-of- Diminishing
Line Production Balance
Total depreciation expense $120,000 $120,000 $120,000
Accumulated depreciation 120,000 120,000 120,000
(c) Depreciation is a non-cash expense so the cash flows are not affected.
(d) I would recommend the units-of-production method as it best reflects the pattern of the
economic benefits produced by the equipment given the variability of usage each year.
PROBLEM 9-5A
(a) Equipment
Cost, January 1, 2013 $65,000
Less: Residual value 3,000
Depreciable cost 62,000
Useful life in years ÷ 8
Annual depreciation ($62,000 ÷ 8) $ 7,750
(b) You would expect the depreciation expense to increase in 2015 after the
change in useful life because the undepreciated cost will be expensed over a shorter
period of time.
(c) The change in the useful life should only affect current and future periods. The
rationale is that the original estimate was based on information known at the time the
asset was purchased and the revision is based on new information and should only
affect future periods. In addition, if prior periods were regularly restated, users would
have less confidence in the financial statements.
(d) If the company had not revised the remaining useful life, the total depreciation
expense over the equipment’s life would be the depreciable cost of $62,000. The
accumulated depreciation at the end of the equipment’s useful life would be $62,000
and the carrying amount would be $3,000.
(e) The total depreciation expense would not change after the useful life has been
revised. There would be no changes to the accumulated depreciation or the carrying
amount at the end of the equipment’s useful life. The undepreciated cost of the
equipment has not changed; only the length of time over which it will be depreciated
has been revised.
PROBLEM 9-6A
(a) 2013
Mar. 1 Equipment............................................................ 130,000
Cash ............................................................ 130,000
2013
Aug. 31 Depreciation Expense .......................................... 13,000
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment ...... 13,000
2014
Aug. 31 Depreciation Expense .......................................... 23,400
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment ...... 23,400
2015
Aug. 31 Depreciation Expense .......................................... 18,720
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment ...... 18,720
(c) 2015
(1, 2, 3)
Sept. 30 Depreciation Expense .......................................... 1,248
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment ..... 1,248
PROBLEM 9-7A
(a)
(1) Straight-line
Depreciation Expense =
($70,000 – $10,000)
= $20,000
3
2015
Mar. 1 Equipment ........................................................................... 70,000
Cash ......................................................................... 70,000
Depreciation Rate = 1 ÷ 3 years = 33% (note textbook convention to round rates to two
decimal spots 0.33 or 33%)
2015
Mar. 1 Equipment ........................................................................... 70,000
Cash ......................................................................... 70,000
2016
Nov. 30 Depreciation Expense ......................................................... 15,352
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment ................... 15,352
[($70,000 – $19,250) × 33% × 11/12 = $15,352]
(3) Units-of-Production
($70,000 – $10,000)
= $5.00
12,000
2016
Mar. 1 Equipment ........................................................................... 70,000
Cash ......................................................................... 70,000
2016
Nov. 30 Depreciation Expense ......................................................... 28,000
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment ................... 28,000
(5,600 × $5 = $28,000)
(b)
PROBLEM 9-8A
Cost $2,800,000
Accumulated depreciation—equipment
[($2,800,000 ÷ 10) × 8 + $93,333)] 2,333,333
Carrying amount 466,667
Cash proceeds 300,000
Loss on disposal $ (166,667)
$146,200,000* ÷ 10 $14,620,000
$2,200,000 ÷ 10 × 6/12 110,000
$14,730,000
(c)
YOUNGSTOWN LIMITED
Statement of Financial Position (Partial)
December 31, 2015
(c) (Continued)
Land
Buildings
Equipment
Accumulated Depreciation—Buildings
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment
PROBLEM 9-9A
PROBLEM 9-10A
(c)
GHANI CORPORATION
Statement of Financial Position (Partial)
December 31, 2015
Intangible Assets
PROBLEM 9-11A
$(9.4) $1,383.8
(1) Profit margin = (35.7)% = 10.4 %
$26.3 $13,299.5
$26.3 $13,299.5
(2) Asset turnover
$88.7 + $105.6 $8,219.2 + $7,360.4
� � � �
2 2
= 0.3 times = 1.7 times
$(9.4) $1,383.8
$88.7 + $105.6 $8,219.2 + $7,360.4
(3) Return on assets � � � �
2 2
= (9.7)% = 17.8%
(b)
$5.9
(1) Profit margin = 22.4%
$26.3
$26.3
(2) Asset turnover
$104.0 + $105.6
� �
2
= 0.3 times (unchanged)
$5.9
(3) Return on assets
$104.0 + $105.6
� �
2
= 5.6%
In spite of the use of revised ratios, Second Cup has a low asset turnover and poor
return on assets, when compared to Starbucks whose ratios exceed industry averages.
On the other hand, with the exclusion of the impairment loss, Second Cup shows a
much stronger profit margin compared to Starbucks and compared to the industry
average.
PROBLEM 9-12A
$350 $180
(1) Profit margin 2015 = 11.3% = 9.5%
$3,100 $1,900
$150 $200
Profit margin 2014 = 10.0% = 11.8%
$1,500 $1,700
$3,100 $1,900
$2,000 + $1,100 $800 + $900
(2) Asset turnover 2015 � � � �
2 2
= 2.0 times = 2.2 times
$1,500 $1,700
$1,100 + $1,000 $900 + $1,000
Asset turnover 2014 � � � �
2 2
= 1.4 times = 1.8 times
$350 $180
$2,000 + $1,100 $800 + $900
(3) Return on assets 2015 � � � �
2 2
= 22.6% = 21.2%
$150 $200
$1,100 + $1,000 $900 + $1,000
Return on assets 2014 � � � �
2 2
= 14.3% = 21.1%
(b) Delicious Limited increased its profit margin from 10.0% to 11.3% and its asset
turnover from 1.4 times to 2.0 times. The increases in these two ratios multiplied to
generate a substantial increase in Delicious’ return on assets (return on assets = profit
margin × asset turnover).
Conversely, Scrumptious Limited suffered a decrease in its profit margin from 11.8% to
9.5%. This decrease was offset by an increase in its asset turnover from 1.8 times to
2.2 times. The decrease in the profit margin was offset by the increase in the asset
turnover and resulted in no substantial change in the return on assets.
PROBLEM 9-1B
2. Repair and Maintenance Operating expenditure that does not make the equipment
Expense more productive nor extend its useful life. Likely benefits only
the current period.
4. Repair and Maintenance Operating expenditure that does not make the equipment
Expense more productive nor extend its useful life.
5. Training Expense Operating expenditure that does not increase the productivity
of the equipment and current accounting policies do not
recognize the cost of human capital.
6. Repair and Maintenance Operating expenditure that does not make the equipment
Expense more productive nor extend its useful life. Painting is a
recurring expense.
9. Equipment Capital expenditure: a one time cost which will benefit more
than one period of time, and likely allows the operator to use
the equipment longer and more productively.
10. Repair and Maintenance Operating expenditure that does not make the equipment
Expense more productive nor extend its useful life.
PROBLEM 9-2B
(a)
(b)
Date Land Land Improvements Buildings
Jan. 22 $440,000
24 9,000
31 50,000
Feb. 13 16,000
28 (15,000)
Mar. 14 $ 68,000
Apr. 22 34,000
June 15 600,000
Sept. 29 600,000
Oct. 1 0000 000 $84,000 000000000
$500,000 $84,000 $1,302,000
The building and land improvements would be depreciated once the asset is available
for use. The building would start being depreciated when construction is completed.
This may not necessarily correspond with the dates the bills are received. Both the
building and the land improvements would be depreciated starting on October 1, if
depreciation is calculated to the nearest month.
PROBLEM 9-3B
(a) Cost:
The one-year insurance policy is not included as it benefits only the current period. It
would be recorded as Prepaid Insurance and allocated to Insurance Expense throughout
the period.
STRAIGHT-LINE DEPRECIATION
$196,000
1
2015 $196,000 25% × 3/12 $12,250 $ 12,250 183,750
2016 0,196,000 25% 49,000 61,250 134,750
2017 0, 196,000 25% 49,000 110,250 85,750
2018 196,000 25% 49,000 159,250 36,750
2019 196,000 25% × 9/12 36,750 196,000 0
1
$196,000 cost – $0 residual value = $196,000
2
1 ÷ 4 years = 25%
(b) (Continued)
DOUBLE DIMINISHING–BALANCE DEPRECIATION
$196,000
2015 $196,000 50% × 3/12 $ 24,500 $ 24,500 171,500
2016 171,500 50% 85,750 110,250 85,750
2017 85,750 50% 42,875 153,125 42,875
2018 42,875 50% 21,438 174,563 21,437
2019 21,437 50% × 9/12 21,4372 196,000 0
1
Double diminishing-balance depreciation rate = 1 ÷ 4 = 25% × 2 = 50%
2
Depreciation expense in 2019 is calculated to equal $8,039 ($21,437 × 50% × 9/12).
However, this amount must be adjusted to $21,437 to make the carrying amount at the end
of 2019 nil, or equal to the residual value.
UNITS-OF-PRODUCTION DEPRECIATION
$196,000
2015 2,500 $4.90 $12,250 $ 12,250 183,750
2016 10,300 ……4.90 50,470 62,720 133,280
2017 9,900 ,,,,,,,,4.90 48,510 111,230 84,770
2018 8,800 ,,,,,,,,4.90 43,120 154,350 41,650
2019 8,500 4.90 41,650 196,000 0
1
Depreciation rate (per unit):
$196,000
= $4.90
40,000
The double diminishing-balance depreciation causes profit to be lower in the early years
of the asset’s life because the depreciation expense is higher in 2016 and 2017 than
under the other two methods.
(c) Yes, there would be an impact. The cost to recycle the machine at the end of its useful
life would need to be estimated. The estimated cost would then be added to the cost of
the machine and allocated over its useful life, increasing the depreciation charge.
PROBLEM 9-4B
(a) (1)
STRAIGHT-LINE DEPRECIATION
(2)
DOUBLE DIMINISHING-BALANCE DEPRECIATION
(a) (Continued)
(3)
UNITS-OF-PRODUCTION DEPRECIATION
(c) Depreciation is a non-cash expense so the cash flows are not affected over the three-
year period.
(d) I would recommend the units-of-production method as it best reflects the pattern of the
economic benefits produced by the bus given the variability of usage each year.
PROBLEM 9-5B
(a) Equipment
Cost, January 1, 2013 $60,000
Less: Residual value 4,500
Depreciable cost 55,500
Useful life in years ÷ 5
Annual depreciation ($55,500 ÷ 5) $11,100
(b) I would expect the depreciation expense to decrease in 2015 after the change in
useful life because the depreciable cost will be expensed over a longer period of time.
(c) The change in the useful life should only affect current and future periods. This is
because the original estimate was based on information known at the time the asset
was purchased. The revision is based on new information and should only affect future
periods. In addition, if prior periods where regularly restated, users would have less
confidence in the financial statements.
(d) If they had not revised the remaining useful life, the total depreciation expense over
the equipment’s life would be the depreciable cost of $55,500. The accumulated
depreciation at the end of the equipment’s useful life would be $55,500 and the
carrying amount would be $4,500.
(e) The total depreciation expense would not change after the useful life has been
revised. There would be no changes to the accumulated depreciation or the carrying
amount at the end of the equipment’s useful life.
PROBLEM 9-6B
(a) 2013
Jan. 1 Equipment............................................................ 170,000
Accounts Payable ........................................ 170,000
2013
Sept. 30 Depreciation Expense .......................................... 25,500
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment ...... 25,500
2014
Sept. 30 Depreciation Expense .......................................... 28,900
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment ...... 28,900
(c) 2015
(1, 2, 3)
June 1 Depreciation Expense .......................................... 15,413
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment ...... 15,413
PROBLEM 9-7B
(a)
(1) Straight-line
Depreciation Expense =
($50,000 – $10,000)
= $13,333
3
2015
Feb. 1 Equipment............................................................... 50,000
Cash ................................................................. 50,000
2016
Oct. 31 Depreciation Expense ............................................. 11,111
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment ........... 11,111
($13,333 × 10/12 = $11,111)
Depreciation rate = 1/3 × 1 = 33% (note textbook convention to round rates to two
decimal spots 0.33 or 33%)
2015
Feb. 1 Equipment............................................................... 50,000
Cash ................................................................. 50,000
(a) (Continued)
2016
Oct. 31 Depreciation Expense ............................................. 9,591
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment ........... 9,591
[($50,000 – $15,125) × 33% × 10/12 = $9,591]
(3) Units-of-Production
($50,000 – $10,000)
= $4.00
10,000
2015
Feb. 1 Equipment............................................................... 50,000
Cash ................................................................. 50,000
2016
Oct. 31 Depreciation Expense ............................................. 20,000
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment ........... 20,000
(5,000 × $4 = $20,000)
(b)
PROBLEM 9-8B
(a) April 1 Land .................................................................... 3,800,000
Cash ........................................................... 950,000
Mortgage Payable ....................................... 2,850,000
$93,560,000* ÷ 10 $9,356,000
$2,000,000 ÷ 10 × 6/12 100,000
$9,456,000
Buildings
Equipment
Accumulated Depreciation—Buildings
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment
PROBLEM 9-9B
PROBLEM 9-10B
(c)
IP CORP.
Statement of Financial Position (partial)
December 31, 2015
Intangible assets
PROBLEM 9-11B
$(2.4) $47.5
Profit margin = (0.8)% = 4.7%
$302.7 $1,019.4
$ 302.7 $ 1,019.4
$233.8 + $246.1 $633.9 + $659.4
Asset turnover � � � �
2 2
= 1.3 times = 1.6 times
$(2.4) $47.5
$233.8 + $246.1 $633.9 + $659.4
Return on assets � � � �
2 2
= (1.0)% = 7.3%
(b) Based on the profit margin we can see that Reitmans is more profitable than Le
Château. Both companies have profit margins that are lower than the average company
in the industry (6.0%).
The asset turnover measures how efficiently a company uses its assets to generate
sales. It shows the dollars of sales generated by each dollar invested in assets.
Reitmans’ asset turnover ratio is higher than Le Château’s and yet both are lower than
the average company in the industry (2 times).
The return on assets ratio indicates that Reitmans is generating a higher return than Le
Château based on the amount of assets invested in the business. Based on the industry
average of 12.0%, both companies are performing worse than the industry average.
(c) Some additional information about long-lived assets which would assist in the
comparisons would include: the accounting policies chosen concerning the calculation
of depreciation and amortization, the estimates arrived at for the useful lives and
residual values of the assets being depreciated and finally, details concerning the costs
and accumulated depreciation or amortization recorded to date. The latter information
would provide a give an idea of the age of the long-lived assets.
PROBLEM 9-12B
$220 $250
Profit margin 2015 = 8.8% = 13.9%
$2,500 $1,800
$150 $150
Profit margin 2014 = 10.0% = 10.0%
$1,500 $1,500
$2,500 $1,800
$2,500 + $1,100 $1,100 + $1,050
Asset turnover 2015 � � � �
2 2
= 1.4 times = 1.7 times
$1,500 $1,500
$1,100 + $1,000 $1,050 + $1,000
Asset turnover 2014 � � � �
2 2
= 1.4 times = 1.5 times
$220 $250
$2,500 + $1,100 $1,100 + $1,050
Return on assets 2015 � � � �
2 2
= 12.2% = 23.3%
$150 $150
$1,100 + $1,000 $1,050 + $1,000
Return on assets 2014 � � � �
2 2
= 14.3% = 14.6%
(b) Brew Right increased its profit margin from 10.0% to 13.9% and its asset turnover from
1.5 times to 1.7 times. The increases in these two ratios multiplied to generate a
substantial increase in Brew Right’s return on assets from 14.6% to 23.3% (return on
assets = profit margin × asset turnover).
Northern Ale suffered a decrease in its profit margin from 10.0% to 8.8%. The
company’s asset turnover remained the same during this time period at 1.4 times.
Combining the two ratios resulted in a decrease in the return on assets.
Northern Ale’s strategy of expansion has resulted in a larger asset base. While its sales
volume did increase from 2014 to 2015 the profit per dollar of sale decreased, as
evidenced by the decrease in profit margin. It appears to be accepting a higher volume
of sales to the detriment of profit margin. While the company maintained its asset
turnover due to the increase in sales volume, the decrease in profit margin resulted in a
decrease in the return on assets. Given the company’s lower return on assets ratio, this
strategy does not appear to be successful.
($ in thousands)
(a) From note 3 (l) (iii) to the financial statements, we find that Shoppers Drug Mart uses a
straight-line method of depreciating its property and equipment.
(b)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Accumulated Impairment Carrying
Cost Depreciation Losses Amount
December 29, 2012
Properties under Development $ 60,894 $ 60,894
Land 69,605 69,605
Buildings 233,535 $ 32,742 200,793
Equipment, Fixtures and
Computer Equipment 1,319,002 872,160 $12,310 434,532
Leasehold Improvements 1,355,590 504,057 10,890 840,643
Assets under Finance Leases 134,705 23,179 00 0000 111,526
$3,173,331 $1,432,138 $23,200 $1,717,993
(a)
(b)
Ratio Shoppers Jean Coutu Industry
Profit margin 5.6% 22.6% 2.6%
Return on assets 8.2% 45.3% 5.4%
Asset turnover 1.5 times 2.0 times 2.1 times
Based on profit margin we can see that Jean Coutu is more profitable than Shoppers.
Jean Coutu’s profit margin is significantly above the industry average of 2.6%, which
indicates that it is much more profitable than the average company in the industry.
The return on assets ratio indicates that Shoppers is generating a much lower return
than Jean Coutu based on the amount of assets invested in the business. However,
again, based on the industry average of 5.4% both Shoppers and Jean Coutu are
generating a significantly better return on their assets than most other companies in the
industry.
The asset turnover measures how efficiently a company uses its assets to generate
sales. It shows the dollars of sales generated by each dollar invested in assets. Jean
Coutu’s asset turnover was higher than Shoppers and is slightly lower than the industry
average.
(a) Rosewood follows IFRS, which allows companies to reverse impairment losses. This
means it would record the following entry and adjust the carrying amount of the
buildings from $5,000,000 to $5,800,000:
(b) Blaze Mountain Resort follows ASPE, which does not allow companies to reverse
impairment losses. Therefore, no adjustment is required for Blaze Mountain.
(c) Before considering any adjustments for impairment loss reversals, a preliminary
calculation of profit margin and return on assets is as follows:
If we take into consideration the adjustment Rosewood made above to reverse the
impairment loss, profit would now go up by $800,000 to $980,000 while average
assets would go up by $400,000 ($800,000 ÷ 2). We are dividing this last term by
two because the denominator pertains to average assets not assets at the end of the
year. The adjusted ratios for Rosewood are as follows:
(e) Examples of additional information that would help assess the nature and
performance of long-lived assets would include:
Note to instructors: All of the material supplementing this group activity, including a
suggested solution, can be found in the Collaborative Learning section of the Instructor
Resource site accompanying this textbook as well as in the Prepare and Present section of
WileyPLUS.
(a) Land – no depreciation is recorded on this asset because its useful life is infinite and
the cost cannot be allocated over the useful life.
Buildings – as usage of buildings is uniform over their useful life, the straight-line
method would be appropriate in this case.
Drilling rigs – since the use of these rigs is seasonal in nature, it would make sense to
use the units of production method for these assets so that depreciation would be
higher during periods of time when the rigs are being used the most and lower in
periods of time when the rigs are not used as much.
Furniture – as usage of these assets is uniform over useful life, the straight-line
method would be the most appropriate method for furniture.
(b) Intangible assets with definite lives should be amortized. Amortization is typically
recorded using the straight-line method and is recorded over the lesser of the
intangible’s legal life or useful life. In this case a patent has a 20 year legal life but the
useful life of the patent is likely to be five years given the length of the sales contract
with the drill bit manufacturer.
(c) If the company is planning to have its shares trade on a public stock exchange, it must
prepare its financial statements under IFRS.
(d) When a bank lends money to a company, the bank wants security or collateral for its
loan. The best collateral includes assets that can retain their value over time and are
not easily moved in order to prevent the possibility of seizure by the bank if the
company defaulted on its loan payments. Therefore the bank would want to use land
and buildings for collateral. The bank would be least likely to use an intangible asset
because it is difficult to determine its value and this value could fall rapidly over time.
Furniture is unlikely to serve as collateral because it can be moved and would be hard
for the bank to seize such an asset. In addition, furniture has little value on resale.
(e) If a 15 year lease was entered into, it would be considered a finance lease rather than
an operating lease because a significant portion of the asset’s benefits would be
controlled by the company due to the long term nature of the lease. Because of this,
the leased rig would meet the definition of an asset and would be recorded as such by
the company. An offsetting liability (lease obligation) would also be recorded. This
would be similar to buying a rig on credit.
(b) Profit before income tax in 2015 (the year of change) will increase by implementing the
president’s proposed changes because increasing the useful life and residual value
will decrease the depreciation expense. The change will not affect profit for 2014.
(c) The proposed changes in useful life and residual value, will increase the profit margin
because the depreciation expense has been reduced, causing the increased profit.
The proposed change will also cause an overstatement of the average assets without
changing net sales. An increase in average assets decreases the asset turnover.
(d) The intentional misstatement of the life and residual value of an asset is unethical for
whatever the reason and would represent an attempt at profit manipulation. There is
nothing unethical about changing the estimate either of the life of an asset or of an
asset’s residual value if the change is an attempt to better reflect the pattern of
consumption of economic benefits. In this case, it appears from the controller’s
reaction that the revisions in the life and residual value are intended only to improve
profit, which would be unethical.
(c) Option 2 (purchase): $21,903.48 (from (b) above) + $7,500 = $29,403.48 total costs
incurred. You would own the three year old truck after having purchased it for $7,500.
(d) Option 2 of leasing the truck with no purchase at the end of its useful life appears, at
least initially, to be the least expensive alternative. However at the end of three years,
you do not own a truck. Option 1, purchasing the truck rather than leasing it, would
appear to be a reasonable choice as you own the truck that you can continue to use
for a number of years without making any additional loan payments beyond the three
year loan period.
The additional insurance and painting of the walls should be expensed during the year.
(b)
Date Account Titles Debit Credit
Accounts Receivable
July 31, 2015 2,700,000 Aug. 2 100,000
Aug. 3 500,000 8 70,000
9 300,000
Aug. 31 Bal. 2,730,000
Interest Receivable
Aug. 31 667
Aug. 31 Bal. 667
Notes Receivable
Aug. 2 100,000
Aug. 31 Bal. 100,000
Merchandise Inventory
July 31, 2015 500,000 Aug. 3 270,000
31 35,000
Aug. 31 Bal. 195,000
Equipment
July 31, 2015 194,000 Aug. 10 44,000
Aug. 31 Bal. 150,000
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment
Aug. 10 36,169 July 31, 2015 73,669
31 3,125
Aug. 31 Bal. 40,625
Patents
Aug. 21, 2015 24,000
Aug. 31 Bal. 24,000
Accumulated Amortization—Patents
Aug. 31 400
Aug. 31 Bal. 400
Accounts Payable
July 31, 2015 1,009,000
Aug. 31 Bal. 1,009,000
July 31, 2012 260,000
Bank Loan Payable
July 31, 2015 350,000
Aug. 31 Bal. 350,000
Common Shares
July 31, 2015 300,000
Aug. 31 Bal. 300,000
Retained Earnings
July 31, 2015 1,531,331
Aug. 31 Bal. 1,531,331
Sales
Aug. 3 500,000
31 75,000
Aug. 31 Bal. 575,000
Interest Revenue
Aug. 31 667
Aug. 31 Bal. 667
Depreciation Expense
Aug. 31 3,125
Aug. 31 Bal. 3,125
Amortization Expense
Aug. 31 400
Aug. 31 Bal. 400
Salaries Expense
Aug. 31 100,000
Aug. 31 Bal. 100,000
Office Expense
Aug. 1 20,000
Aug. 31 Bal. 20,000
Rent Expense
Aug. 1 3,600
Aug. 31 Bal. 3,600
Interest Expense
Aug. 31 1,500
Aug. 31 Bal. 1,500
Loss on Disposal
Aug. 10 1,831
Aug. 31 Bal. 1,831
Debit Credit
Cash $ 384,770
Accounts receivable 2,730,000
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 320,000
Notes receivable 100,000
Interest receivable 667
Merchandise inventory 195,000
Equipment 150,000
Accumulated depreciation—equipment 40,625
Patents 24,000
Accumulated amortization—patents 400
Accounts payable 1,009,000
Bank loan payable 350,000
Common shares 300,000
Retained earnings 1,531,331
Sales 575,000
Sales discounts 6,000
Interest revenue 667
Cost of goods sold 305,000
Depreciation expense 3,125
Amortization expense 400
Salaries expense 100,000
Bad debts expense 90,000
Office expense 20,000
Rent expense 3,600
Bank charges expense 1,130
Interest expense 1,500
Loss on disposal 1,831
Income tax expense 10,000 000000000
$4,127,023 $4,127,023
Sales $575,000
Less: Sales discounts 6,000 $569,000
Cost of goods sold 305,000
Gross profit 264,000
Operating expenses
Salaries expense $100,000
Bad debts expense 90,000
Office expense 20,000
Rent expense 3,600
Bank charges expense 1,130
Depreciation expense 3,125
Amortization expense 400
Loss on disposal 1,831
Total operating expenses 220,086
Profit from operations 43,914
Other revenues and expenses
Interest revenue $ 667
Interest expense (1,500)
Total other revenues and expenses (833)
Profit before income tax 43,081
Income tax expense 10,000
Profit $ 33,081
(3)
CLEAR IMAGES LTD.
Statement of Financial Position
August 31, 2015
Assets
Current assets
Cash $ 384,770
Accounts receivable $2,730,000
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts 320,000 2,410,000
Interest receivable 667
Notes receivable 100,000
Merchandise inventory 195,000
Total current assets 3,090,437
Property, plant and equipment
Equipment $150,000
Less: Accumulated depreciation 40,625 109,375
Intangible assets
Patents $24,000
Less: Accumulated amortization 400 23,600
Total assets $3,223,412
Liabilities
Accounts payable $1,009,000
Bank loan payable 350,000
Total liabilities $1,359,000
Shareholders’ equity
Common shares $ 300,000
Retained earnings 1,564,412
Total shareholders’ equity 1,864,412
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $3,223,412
Legal Notice
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. or related companies. All rights
reserved.
The data contained in these files are protected by copyright. This manual is furnished under
licence and may be used only in accordance with the terms of such licence.
The material provided herein may not be downloaded, reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, modified, made available on a network, used to create derivative works, or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording,
scanning, or otherwise without the prior written permission of John Wiley & Sons Canada,
Ltd.
(MMXV iv F3)