Sie sind auf Seite 1von 13

MSc Pol

Dynamics of International Organisation 261017 (6444HDIO)


No. of responses = 26

Survey Results

Legend Relative Frequencies of answers Std. Dev. Mean

25% 0% 50% 0% 25%


Question text Left pole Right pole n=No. of responses
av.=Mean
dev.=Std. Dev.
ab.=Abstention

1 2 3 4 5
Scale Histogram

General

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 17,6% 47,1% 5,9% 29,4%


How would you rate the overall quality of this course on n=17
av.=8,5
a scale from 1 to 10? (1=low, 10=high) dev.=1,1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 35,3% 29,4% 11,8% 23,5%


How would you evaluate the course material on a scale n=17
av.=8,2
from 1 to 10? (1=low, 10=high) dev.=1,2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

5,9% 0% 17,6% 23,5% 52,9%


The provision of course information (e.g. e-prospectus, disagree agree n=17
av.=4,2
blackboard) is good dev.=1,1

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 83,3% 16,7% 0%
In the light of the number of ECs awarded for this course too light too heavy n=18
av.=3,2
(1 EC = 28 hours), the actual study load of this course is dev.=0,4

1 2 3 4 5

Organization
0% 0% 0% 70,6% 29,4%
The course is well designed disagree agree n=17
av.=4,3
dev.=0,5

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0% 44,4% 55,6%
The course is well organized disagree agree n=18
av.=4,6
dev.=0,5

1 2 3 4 5

Classes
0% 0% 0% 16,7% 83,3%
How many classes did you attend? (1= less than 25%, 1 5 n=18
av.=4,8
2= 25-50%, 3= 51-75%, 4= more than 75%, 5= all) dev.=0,4

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 16,7% 33,3% 50%


How much did you learn from the classes? very little very much n=18
av.=4,3
dev.=0,8

1 2 3 4 5

30.10.2017 EvaSys evaluation Page 1


Assignments
0% 0% 11,1% 33,3% 55,6%
The assignments in this course were instructive disagree agree n=18
av.=4,4
dev.=0,7

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 11,1% 44,4% 44,4%


The assignments in this course covered the assigned disagree agree n=18
av.=4,3
reading and the lectures dev.=0,7

1 2 3 4 5

0% 17,6% 23,5% 17,6% 41,2%


The feedback on my assignments was instructive disagree agree n=17
av.=3,8
dev.=1,2

1 2 3 4 5

Instructor(s) FR

0% 0% 0% 44,4% 55,6%
The instructor explained the course material clearly disagree agree n=18
av.=4,6
dev.=0,5

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 5,6% 38,9% 55,6%


The instructor stimulated my thinking disagree agree n=18
av.=4,5
dev.=0,6

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0% 50% 50%
The instructor stimulated active involvement in the disagree agree n=18
av.=4,5
course dev.=0,5

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 5,6% 33,3% 61,1%


How would you evaluate Francesco Ragazzi very poor very good n=18
av.=4,6
dev.=0,6

1 2 3 4 5

Knowledge and understanding gained

0% 0% 5,6% 38,9% 55,6%


The course deepened my knowledge and understanding disagree agree n=18
av.=4,5
of the subject of the course dev.=0,6

1 2 3 4 5

30.10.2017 EvaSys evaluation Page 2


Profile
Subunit: FSW Politicologie
Name of the instructor: MSc Pol
Name of the course: Dynamics of International Organisation 261017
(Name of the survey)

Values used in the profile line: Mean

General

How would you rate the overall quality of this course


on a scale from 1 to 10? (1=low, 10=high) n=17 av.=8,5 md=8,0 dev.=1,1

How would you evaluate the course material on a


scale from 1 to 10? (1=low, 10=high) n=17 av.=8,2 md=8,0 dev.=1,2

The provision of course information (e.g. e- disagree agree


prospectus, blackboard) is good n=17 av.=4,2 md=5,0 dev.=1,1

In the light of the number of ECs awarded for this too light too heavy
course (1 EC = 28 hours), the actual study load of n=18 av.=3,2 md=3,0 dev.=0,4
this course is

Organization

The course is well designed disagree agree


n=17 av.=4,3 md=4,0 dev.=0,5

The course is well organized disagree agree


n=18 av.=4,6 md=5,0 dev.=0,5

Classes

How many classes did you attend? (1= less than 1 5


25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 51-75%, 4= more than 75%, n=18 av.=4,8 md=5,0 dev.=0,4
5= all)
How much did you learn from the classes? very little very much
n=18 av.=4,3 md=4,5 dev.=0,8

Assignments

The assignments in this course were instructive disagree agree


n=18 av.=4,4 md=5,0 dev.=0,7

The assignments in this course covered the disagree agree


assigned reading and the lectures n=18 av.=4,3 md=4,0 dev.=0,7

The feedback on my assignments was instructive disagree agree


n=17 av.=3,8 md=4,0 dev.=1,2

Instructor(s) FR

The instructor explained the course material clearly disagree agree


n=18 av.=4,6 md=5,0 dev.=0,5

The instructor stimulated my thinking disagree agree


n=18 av.=4,5 md=5,0 dev.=0,6

The instructor stimulated active involvement in the disagree agree


course n=18 av.=4,5 md=4,5 dev.=0,5

How would you evaluate Francesco Ragazzi very poor very good
n=18 av.=4,6 md=5,0 dev.=0,6

30.10.2017 EvaSys evaluation Page 3


Knowledge and understanding gained

The course deepened my knowledge and disagree agree


understanding of the subject of the course n=18 av.=4,5 md=5,0 dev.=0,6

30.10.2017 EvaSys evaluation Page 4


Comments Report

Open Comments

Comments:

30.10.2017 EvaSys evaluation Page 5


30.10.2017 EvaSys evaluation Page 6
30.10.2017 EvaSys evaluation Page 7
30.10.2017 EvaSys evaluation Page 8
30.10.2017 EvaSys evaluation Page 9
30.10.2017 EvaSys evaluation Page 10
30.10.2017 EvaSys evaluation Page 11
30.10.2017 EvaSys evaluation Page 12
30.10.2017 EvaSys evaluation Page 13

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen