Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Leadership Theories
Behavioral Theories
The in ability to strike “gold” in the
trait mines led researches to book at
the behavioral that specific leaders.
Behavioral theories propose that
specific behaviors differential
leaders from non-leaders. It the
behavioral approved to leadership
were successful, it would have
implications, it quite different from
those of the trait approach. If trait
approved had been successful, it
would have provided a basis for
selecting the “sight” persons to
assume for mal positions in-group
and organization requiring
leadership. In contrast behavioral
studies were to run up critical
behavioral determinist, of
leadership, we can train people to
be leaders.
Summary of Behavioral Theories
In general they had modest success
in identifying consistent relation
ships between patterns of leadership
between behavior and group
performance what seems to be
missing in consideration of
situational factors that influence
success or failure situations change
and leadership styles need to
change with them. Unfortunately,
the behavioral approaches do not
recognize changes in the situation.
Contingency Theories
It become increasingly clear to these
who were studying the leadership
phenomenon that predicating
leadership success was more
complex than isolating a few trait or
preferable behaviors. The failure to
obtain an situational influences. The
relation ship styles and
effectiveness suggestion that under
condition a style would be
appropriate, while style would be
more suitable for condition C. But
what were the conditions a, b, c, and
so further? It was nothing to say that
leadership effectiveness was
dependent on the situation and
another to be able to isolate those
situational conditions. Moderation
that effect leadership effectiveness
and are used in the development of
contingency theories include the
degree of structure in the task being
performed, the quality of leadership,
the leader’s position power, sub-
ordinates, role clarity, group norms
and sub-ordinates maturity these
are 5 situational variables.
Fiedler Contingency Model
It sap that effective groups depend
upon a proper match between a
leader’s style of inter acting with
sub-ordinates and the degree to
which the situation gives contract
and influence to the leader. Fiedler
developed an instrument which be
called the least preferred co-under
(LDC) question that property to
ensure whether a person is task or
relation ship oriented. He isolated
these situational criteria i.e. leader
member relations, task structure
and position power.
Leader Member Relations
a. Fiedler Model
Our assumption of Fiedler is that
an in all leadership style is
friend. This is visible in the
leadership of NADRA.
b. Cognitive Resource Theory
This is found in the leadership to
the extent that it makes
effective strategies and then
communicates them through
directive behavior.
c. Hersey And Blanchard
Situational
Theory
It focuses on follower’s
readiness. This is almost absent
in the leadership style of the
leadership of NADRA.
d. Leader-Member Exchange
Theory
Not applied
f. Leader-Participation Model
Totally absent in leadership
style.
The most recent approaches to
leadership and NADRA
a. Attribution Theory
Leadership is fully committed
stead fast- through not
consistent in the decision-
making.
b. Charismatic Theory
Not seen
c. Transactional Vs
Transformational
Leadership
The leadership is transactional
is it guides (though not
motivates) followers in the
direction of established goals by
clarifying roll and task
requirements. The leadership is
however, not transformational.
d. Visionary Leadership