Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Manual
Link full:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1m2Bo4USJF4AU8Z9_Y
QMKslONLQHbQsgj/view?usp=sharing
News:
An Arbitration Committee is a binding dispute resolution panel of
editors, used on several projects of the Wikimedia Foundation. The first
project to use an arbitration committee, and the most widely covered of
these, is the English Wikipedia, the first project where such a structure
was used, and this is the committee mainly covered in this article. Each
of Wikimedia's projects are editorially autonomous and independent.
Therefore, over time some other Wikimedia projects have established
arbitration committees, while others have not. Arbitration committees,
where they exist, are established by a project's editors, and are usually
elected by their community in annual elections. As well as serious
disputes, they often address misconduct by administrators, access to
various advanced tools, and a range of "real world" issues related to
harmful conduct, when these arise in the context of a Wikipedia project.
Contents
1 History
2 Attention and controversies
3 Arbitration Committees on sister projects
4 References
History
In October 2003, as part of an etiquette discussion on Wikipedia, Alex
T. Roshuk, then legal adviser to the Wikimedia Foundation, drafted a
1,300 word outline of mediation and arbitration. This outline evolved
into the twin Mediation Committee and Arbitration Committee, formally
announced by Jimmy Wales on December 4, 2003.[2][7] Over time the
concept of an "Arbitration Committee" was adopted by other
communities within the Wikimedia Foundation's hosted projects.
When founded, the Committee consisted of 12 arbitrators divided into
three groups of four members each.[1][8] As of 2008, it had decided
around 371 conduct cases, with remedies varying from warnings to
bans.[9][10][not in citation given]