Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Basic Score 4.4 3.8 2.8 3.0 3.2 2.8 2.0 2.5 2.8 1.8 2.8 2.4 2.8 2.8 1.8
Mid Rise (4 to 7 stories) N/A N/A 0.2 0.4 N/A 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 N/A 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.0
High Rise (> 7 stories) N/A N/A 0.6 0.8 N/A 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.3 N/A 0.4 N/A 0.6 N/A
Vertical Irregularity -2.5 -2.0 -1.0 -1.5 N/A -1.0 -1.0 -1.5 -1.0 -1.0 N/A -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Plan Irregularity -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5
Pre-Code (1972) 0.0 -1.0 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.8 -0.2 -1.2 -1.0 -0.2 -0.8 -0.8 -1.0 -0.8 -0.2
Post Benchmark (1992) 2.4 2.4 1.4 1.4 N/A 1.6 N/A 1.4 2.4 N/A 2.4 N/A 2.8 2.6 N/A
Soil Type C 0.0 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4
Soil Type D 0.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.4 -0.6 -0.6 -0.4 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6
0.0 -0.8 -1.2 -1.2 -1.0 -1.2 -0.8 -1.2 -0.8 -0.8 -0.4 -1.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8
Soil Type E
FINAL SCORE,S 2.8
COMMENTS
DETAILED
FALLING HAZARDS STRUCTURAL DEFFECTS NOTE: BUILDING WAS RENOVATED ON 2012
Evaluation
1. BROKEN WINDOW GLASS 1. EXPOSED RSB (2ND FLR) FOR THE SECOND FLOOR LEVEL Required
2. DAMAGED CEILING (2ND FLR) 2. HONEYCOMB (2ND FLR)
3. HANGING ELECTRICAL WIRINGS
AND WIRINGS (2ND FLR)
YES NO
*=Estimated, subjective, unreliable data BR Braced Frame MRF Moment Resisting Frame SW Shear Wall
DNK=Do Not Know FD Flexible Diaphragm RC Reinforced Concrete TU Tilt Up
* Use 1972 and 1992 for Pre-Code and LM Light Metal RD Rigid Diaphragm URM INF
Post Benchmark year basis
Department of Public Works and Highways Issue Date:
Bureau of Design Doc. Code: DPWH-BOD-BD-QMSF-11
NOTE: 1. ) The higher the total seismic rating, the higher prioritization/ranking
for inspection of the building
2.) For buildings located on known fault lines shall be recommended for demolition
PRIORITIZATION RANKING
NOTES / REMARKS: