UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA

Centre of Diploma Studies

________________________________________________________________

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY
LAPORAN MAKMAL
LABORATORY REPORT

Kod & Nama Kursus

Course Name & Code
Tajuk Ujikaji
Title of Experiment
Seksyen
Section
Kumpulan
Group
Nama Pensyarah/Pengajar
Lecturer/Instructor’s Name
Nama Ketua Kumpulan No. Matrik
Name of Group Leader Matric No.

Ahli Kumpulan No. Matrik Penilaian (%)

Group Members Matric No. Assessment (%)
1. Teori, Objektif & Prosedur 10
Theory, Objectives & Procedures
2. Data 25
Data

3. Analisis & Keputusan 25

Analysis & Result

4. Perbincangan 15
Discussion

5. Kesimpulan & Cadangan 15

Conclusion & Recommendation

6. Penyertaan 5
Participation
Tarikh Ujikaji Rujukan 5
Date of Experiment References
Tarikh Hantar JUMLAH 100
Date of Submission TOTAL

ULASAN PEMERIKSA/COMMENTS COP DITERIMA/RECEIVED STAMP

 DAB 20402 – TECHNOLOGY OF
Lab Report Rubric (Assessment Form) Test Title:
GEOTECHNIC

Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 SCR WT TSCR (%)

Theory,  Theory and other information  Theory and other information  Theory and other information  Theory and other information  Theory and other information
objective, regarding the laboratory is not regarding the laboratory is regarding the laboratory is partly regarding the laboratory is regarding the laboratory is well
2 0
procedure presented presented minimally presented presented with some mistakes presented
(10%)
Data  Data is not represented or is not  Data lacks precision  Good representation of the  Accurate representation of the  Accurate representation of the data
(25%) accurate  Greater than 20% difference data using tables and/or graphs data using tables and/or graphs using tables and/or graphs
with accepted values  Less than 15% difference with  Data is fairly precise  Graphs and tables are labeled and
5 0
accepted values  Less than 10% difference with titled
 Precision is acceptable accepted values  Data is precise with less than 5%
difference with accepted values
Analysis / Result  Trends / patterns are not  Trends / patterns are not  Trends / patterns are logically  Trends / patterns are logically  Trends / patterns are logically
(25%) analyzed analyzed analyzed for the most part analyzed analyzed
 Analysis is not relevant  Analysis is inconsistent  Questions are answered in  Questions are answered in  Questions are answered thoroughly 5 0
complete sentences complete sentences and in complete sentences
 Analysis is general  Analysis is thoughtful  Analysis is insightful
Discussion  No discussion was included or  A statement of the results is A statement of the results of  Accurate statement of the  Accurate statement of the results of
(15%) shows little effort and reflection incomplete with little reflection the lab indicates whether results results of the lab indicates lab indicates whether results support
on the lab on the lab support the hypothesis whether results support the hypothesis
3 0
 hypothesis  Possible sources of error and what
 Possible sources of error was learned from the lab discussed
identified
Conclusion &  Conclusion & recommendation  Conclusion & recommendation  Conclusion & recommendation  Conclusion & recommendation  Conclusion & recommendation was
Recommendation was not presented  was minimally presented  was presented somewhat was presented accurately and presented accurately and relevant to
(15%) accurate and relevant to result relevant to result obtain from the result obtain from the laboratory work  3 0
obtain from the laboratory work  laboratory work with minor
mistakes
Participation Student was hostile about  Participation was minimal  Did the job but did not appear  Used time pretty well. Stayed  Showed interest, used time very well,
(during participating to be very interested. Focus lost focused on the experiment most guide other students and very focused
experiment) on several occasion of the time on experiment 1 0
(5%)
Reference  Reference was not presented in  Reference was minimally  Reference was partly  Reference was presented in  Reference was presented in proper
(5%) the report  presented in the report  presented in somewhat proper proper format and relevant to format and relevant to the laboratory
format and relevant to the the laboratory work with some work 
laboratory work  minor mistakes 1 0

NAME OF LECTURER : SIGNATURE : DATE : TOTAL SCORE : / 100

Note : SCR = SCORE, WT = WEIGHTAGE, TSCR = TOTAL SCORE

 STUDENT CODE OF ETHIC
(SCE)
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
CENTRE OF DIPLOMA STUDIES

We, hereby confess that we have prepared this report on our own effort. We also admit not to
receive any help from any third party during the preparation of this report and pledge that
everything mentioned in the report is true.

_________________
Student Signature (Group Representative)

Name : …………………………………………

Matric No. : …………………………………………

Date : …………………………………………