Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Jacob C. Langer
History
The condition of “congenital megacolon” has been recognized for centuries. The first
description of this condition was in the seventeenth century by Frederick Ruysch, who
described a 5-year-old child dying from an intestinal obstruction, followed by another
account of a child with congenital megacolon by Battini in 1800.1 It was not until 1887 that
Harald Hirschsprung, a pathologist at Queen Louise Children’s Hospital in Copenhagen,
described two cases of the condition that
ultimately bore his name.2 Until the beginning of the twentieth century, most children with
congenital megacolon died, presumably from malnutrition and enterocolitis. Because the
underlying pathologic abnormality was not recognized, surgeons who operated on these
children usually resected the dilated proximal bowel with or without primary anastomosis,
with mixed results.3 The absence of ganglion cells in the distal colon of a child with
Hirschsprung disease was first noted by Tittel in 1901. Over the following decades numerous
papers were published to document abnormalities of innervation within the colon and
recognize the absence of ganglion cells that is now pathognomonic of Hirschsprung disease.
The first surgical recognition of aganglionosis as the cause of congenital megacolon was by
Ehrenpreis in 1946. In a landmark paper, Whitehouse and Kernohan summarized the
literature and presented a series of cases of their own, which documented that the
aganglionosis within the distal colon or rectum was the cause of the functional obstruction.4
In 1949 Swenson published a paper in the New England Journal of Medicine recommending
rectosigmoidectomy with preservation of the sphincters as the optimal treatment of this
disease.5 This operation was originally performed without a decompressing colostomy.6
However, technical difficulties in small infants and the debilitated and malnourished state in
which mostchildrenpresentedcaused mostsurgeonstoadopt a multistaged approach with
colostomy as the initial step,6 an approach that became the standard of care for decades. In
recent years, improvements in surgical technique and earlier suspicion and diagnosis of the
disease have resulted in an evolution toward one-stage and minimal access procedures.
These advances have resulted in significantly improved morbidity and mortality in infants
with Hirschsprung disease.