Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Advanced Vibrations
Hello:
Sign In
Sylabus
Homework, Projects, Exams, Grading
Office Hours
Facilities
http://me.unm.edu/~djsegal/
Calibration
Calendar
Core Elements
Spring: F = kx
k
c Damper: F = cẋ
m Mass: F = mẋ˙
k F
m
mẋ˙ + cẋ + kx = F ( t )
Dividing through by the mass (we shall do this again later with multi-dof
systems):
2
ẋ˙ + 2ζω n ẋ + ω n x = f ( t )
where
c k 2 F (t)
---- = 2ζ , ---- = ω n , and ---------- = f ( t )
m m m
2
d d 2
Note that the operator L = 2
( ) + 2ζω ndt ( ) + ω n ( ) has the
dt
properties:
L is Linear: L ( f + g ) = L ( f ) + L ( g )
This means that transform methods work for this sort of problem. We
shall discuss this more next time.
f ( τ ⁄ ωn ) F ( τ ⁄ ωn )
and y'' ( τ ) + 2ζy' ( τ ) + y ( τ ) = --------------------- = ----------------------
2 k
ωn
ω
y'' ( τ ) + 2ζy' ( τ ) + y ( τ ) = A sin τ -
-----
ω n
y ( τ ) = H̃ ( α ) sin ( τα – ψ̃ ( α ) )
2. Plot H̃ ( α ) versus α
3. plot ψ̃ ( α ) versus α
4. Do this for the three values of ζ : 0.01, 0.1, 1.0
Advanced Vibrations
Today’s Class
• Homework
2. Plot H̃ ( α ) versus α
3. plot ψ̃ ( α ) versus α
4. Do this for the three values of ζ : 0.01, 0.1, 1.0
1
The transfer function H̃ is H̃ = --------------------------------
2
-
1 – α – i2ζα
= H̃ H̃ ∗ = ----------------------------------------------
2 1
H̃
2 2 2
( 1 – α ) + ( 2ζα )
and the phase is determined from
Im ( H̃ ) ( H̃ – H̃ ∗ ) 2αζ
ψ̃ ( α ) = atan ---------------- = atan ------------------------- = atan --------------2-
Re ( H̃ ) i ( H̃ + H̃ ∗ ) 1–α
These are plotted as follows:
H̃
ζ=0.01
ζ=0.1
ζ=1.0
α=ω/ωο
ζ=0.01
ζ=0.1
ζ=1.0
arg ( H̃ )
α=ω/ωο
M
K1 K2
M
K1 K2
F1 , F2 F2 , FM M
u1 u2
M
K1 K2
F1 , F2 F2 , FM M
K2 K 1K 2
From F 1 = F 2 , u 1 = -------------------- u 2 and F 1 = F 2 = -------------------- u 2
K1 + K2 K1 + K2
K 1K 2
From F M = – F 2, Mu̇˙2 = – -------------------- u 2 which is our desired single
K1 + K2
degree-of-freedom system.
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
9 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture2.frm
Synthesis of Systems
Stating the Obvious
Advanced Vibrations
C F1
F2 F2
C F1
F2 F2
cu̇ 1 = K ( u 2 – u 1 ) and C K
M M
K ( u 2 – u 1 ) = – Mu̇˙2 . C F1
F2 F2
2 cs cu 1 ( 0 )
s M + K ---------------- U 2 ( s ) = K ---------------- + M [ su̇ 2 ( 0 ) + u 2 ( 0 ) ] .
K + cs K + cs
It is good practice to normalize:
2 2 λs 2 λs
s + ω n --------------- U 2 ( s ) = ω n --------------- + [ su̇ 2 ( 0 ) + u 2 ( 0 ) ]
1 + λs 1 + λs
System 1 u System 2 u1 u2
M M
System 1 System 2 u1 u2
K K
M c M
c K2
F = K 2 ( u2 – u1 )
t
u(t ) = ∫ h ( t – τ )F ( τ ) dτ .
0
1 –1 1
where h ( t ) = ----- ---------------------------------------
-
M s + 2ζω n s + ω n
2 2
Note: h solves L ( h ) ( t ) = δ ( t )
Part A. Resolve out the degree of freedom u1 associated with the mass
in System B to in favor of u2. Obtain a governing equation in a single
degree of freedom u2. You may leave this in Laplace transform space.
General Notions
Complex number z = x + iy
Real and Imaginary operators: Re { x + iy } = x , Im { x + iy } = y
Complex Conjugate: ( x + iy )∗ = x – iy
1 1
Observe: Re { z } = ( z + z ) and Im { z } = - ( z – z∗ )
--
- ∗ ----
2 2i
Complex Function of a Complex Variable: f ( z ) = u ( z ) + iv ( z )
An Analytic Function has a Unique Derivative:
∂f ∂f ∂u ∂v ∂v ∂u
= ⇒ = and = –
∂x ∂ ( iy ) ∂ x ∂y ∂x ∂y
z = x + iy is analytic
n
z is analytic if n is an integer
αz
e is analytic
α f 1, f 1 + f 2, f 1 f 2 , f 1 ⁄ f 2
Advanced Vibrations
Today’s Class
• Homework
System A
K
M
c
t
u(t ) = ∫ h ( t – τ )F ( τ ) dτ .
0
1 –1 1
By Laplace Transforms, h ( t ) = -
---- ---------------------------------------
-
M s + 2ζω n s + ω n
2 2
2 2
We begin by noting that s + 2ζω n s + ω n = ( s – r 1 ) ( s – r 2 )
2 2
where r 1 = – ζω n + iω n 1 – ζ and r 2 = – ζω n – i ω n 1 – ζ
Note further that these are complex conjugates. This is no surprise
since the roots of a polynomial of real coefficients are combinations of
real numbers and complex conjugate pairs.
We now expand as partial fractions
1 1 A B
---------------------------------------
- = --------------------------------------
- = -----------------
- + --------------------
-
2
s + 2ζω n s + ω n
2 ( s – r 1 ) ( s – r 1∗ ) ( s – r 1 ) ( s – r 1∗ )
1 –1 1
h ( t ) = ----- ---------------------------------------
-
M s + 2ζω n s + ω n
2 2
1 –1 1 1
= ---------------------------
M2iIm ( r 1 ) ------------
- – ----------------
î s – r 1 s – r 1∗
1 r 1 t r 1∗ t
= --------------------------- e – e
M2iIm ( r 1 ) î
Re { r 1 }t
e iIm { r 1 }t iIm { r 1∗ }t
= --------------------------- e –e
M2iIm ( r 1 ) î
– ω n ζt
e 2
= ------------------------------- sin ( ω n 1 – ζ t )
2
Mω n 1 – ζ
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
12/7/98
5 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture3.frm
Partial Solution to Homework 2
Part B
Advanced Vibrations
{ u } = { g } ( s { F } – F ( 0 ) ) + { g }F ( 0 )
= s {g} {F }
1 1 1 1 ⁄ r 1 1 ⁄ r 1 1 ⁄ r 1∗ 1 ⁄ r 1∗
--- ------------- – ---------------- = – ----------- + ------------- + -------------- – ----------------
s î s – r 1 s – r 1∗ s s – r1 s s – r 1∗
Part A. Resolve out the degree of freedom u1 associated with the mass
in System B to in favor of u2. Obtain a governing equation in a single
degree of freedom u2. You may leave this in Laplace transform space.
c M
K2
Mu̇˙1 + cu̇ 1 + K u 1 = K 2 ( u 2 – u 1 )
System B u1 u2
K
M
c K2 F = K 2 ( u2 – u1 )
{F }
{ u 1 } = -----------------------------------------------
2 2
- so u 1 = h 1 *F
M ( s + 2ζω n + ω n )
– ω n ζt
e 2
where h 1 ( t ) = ------------------------------- sin ( ω n 1 – ζ t )
2
Mω n 1 – ζ
System B u1 u2
K
Mu̇˙1 + cu̇ 1 + K u 1 = F
M
c K2 F = K 2 ( u2 – u1 )
F
u 2 = ------ + u 1
K2
F 1
= ------ + h 1 *F ⇒ h 2 = h 1 + ------ δ
K2 K2
= h 1 + ------ δ *F
1
K2
General Notions
Complex number z = x + iy
Real and Imaginary operators: Re { x + iy } = x , Im { x + iy } = y
Complex Conjugate: ( x + iy )∗ = x – iy
1 1
Observe: Re { z } = ( z + z ) and Im { z } = - ( z – z∗ )
--
- ∗ ----
2 2i
Complex Function of a Complex Variable: f ( z ) = u ( z ) + iv ( z )
An Analytic Function has a Unique Derivative:
∂f ∂f ∂u ∂v ∂v ∂u
= ⇒ = and = –
∂x ∂ ( iy ) ∂ x ∂y ∂x ∂y
z = x + iy is analytic
n
z is analytic if n is an integer
αz
e , sin ( αz ) and cos ( αz ) are analytic
α f 1, f 1 + f 2, f 1 f 2 , f 1 ⁄ f 2
d d f
Re { f ( α ) } = Re
dα î dα
ω
ω ------
1
------ ∫ Re { Ae }Re { Be } dt = --- Re { AB∗ }
2π iωt iωt
2π 0 2
1
= --- [ Re { A }Re { B } + Im { A }Im { B } ]
2
When you have the trick to prove the above, you can show the
following:
ω ∞ ∞
ω 0 2π-
----- iω 0 pt iω 0 qt
------ ∫ Re ∑ A p e Re ∑ B q e dt
2π 0 î p=0 î q=0
∞
1
∗
= Re { A 0 B 0 } + ---
2 ∑ Re { Aq Bq∗ }
q=1
iωt
f ( t ) = Fe in NOT a force
iωt iωt – i ωt – i ωt
Re { Fe } , Im { Fe } , Re { Fe } , Im { Fe }
– i ωt
+ F∗ e
iωt
or Fe
This last form will be especially useful when we deal with complex
modes.
m Pcos(ωt+θ)
k
x(t)
iωt
P cos ( ωt + θ ) = Re { Fe }
where Re { F 1 } = P cos ( θ ) and Im { F 1 } = P sin ( θ ) .
Lets postulate that the steady state displacement has the same form:
iωt
u ( t ) = Re { X e }
In order to evaluate the time derivatives of x , we must observe that the
Re{ } and derivative operators commute:
2 iωt iωt
mRe { – ω X e } + cRe { iωX e }
iωt iωt
+ kRe { X e } – R e { Fe } = 0
There are several easy ways to prove that the complex argument of the
iωt
Re operator in the above equation is zero. Then the coefficient of e
is also zero:
2
[ ( – ω m + iωc + k )X – F ] = 0
F
X = --------------------------------------------
2
-
( – ω m + iωc + k )
F⁄k F
- = --- H ( ω )
= ----------------------------------------------------------------
2
1 – ( ω ⁄ ω n ) + 2iζ ( ω ⁄ ω n ) k
2
where ω n = k ⁄ m and ζ = c ⁄ ( 2m ) . H ( ω ) is the magnification
factor.
The text discusses the magnification factor, its magnitude, where the
magnitude is largest, and the role of damping - ζ - in calculating Q
2
ω ⁄ ω n → ∞ ⇒ F = – x mω : mass loading is opposite to
displacement
2
1 1–ζ
ω = ω n ⇒ x = --- 1 – i ------------------ F :
2 ζ
1 T
D = --- ∫ ẋ ( τ ) f ( τ ) dτ
T 0
1 T F iωτ
= --- ∫ Re iω --- H e Re { Fe } dτ
iωτ
T 0 î k
ω 2
= – ------ Im ( H ) F
2k
where T = 2π ⁄ ω .
2π ⁄ ω 0 2π ⁄ ω 0
ω0 ω0 – iω 0 q
C 0 = ------
2π ∫ F ( t ) dt ,and C q = ------
π ∫ F ( t )e dt for 0<q
0 0
Please verify this yourselves!
∞
ipω 0 t
x ( t ) = Re ∑ ( C p ⁄ k )H ( ω p )e
î p=0
1
where H ( ω ) = ---------------------------------------------------------------------
2
-
[ 1 – ( ω ⁄ ω n ) ] + i2ζ ( ω ⁄ ω n )
This is the key result of Fourier Analysis.
∞
2 1
= C 0 + ---
2 ∑ C q C q∗
q=0
∞
1
∑
2 2
= C0 + --- Cq
2
q=0
2 ∞
C
= ------ + -------2-
1
∑ C q C q∗ H ( ωq )H ( ωq )∗
0
k
2k q=0
2 ∞
C 1
∑
0 2 2
= ------ + -------2- C q H ( ωq )
k
2k q=0
F ẋ =
ω ∞ ∞
ω 0 2π-
----- iω 0 pt Cq iω 0 qt
------ ∫ Re
2π 0 ∑ C pe Re ∑ iω 0 q -----
k
- H ( ω q )e dt
î p=0 î q=1
∑ C q C q∗ Im { H ( ωq ) }
1
= – ------
2k
q=0
Advanced Vibrations
• Lagrange Equations
• Hamilton’s Principle
There are two energy methods we shall cover in this class. Together
they can form the basis of deriving governing equations and discretized
governing equations for almost any system we encounter
In this class and next, we shall derive the Lagrange equations and
practice applying them. After that we shall examine Hamilton’s
principle.
• displacement continuity
• perspicacity
We had to be smart.
∂
F = p
∂t
3
∂ ∂
F =
∂t
p = mv = m
∂t ∑ ẋ˙n bn =
n=1
where b n are unit basis vector that are constant in time and space. This
permits us to write a simple expression involving the components:
F n = mẋ˙n
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
3 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture5.frm
Lagrange Equations: Derivation Outline for
Systems of Particles
Advanced Vibrations
∂ ∂
e r ( θ ) = θ̇e θ ( θ ) and that e θ ( θ ) = – θ̇e r ( θ )
∂t ∂t
2
F r = ṙ˙ – rθ̇ and F θ = 2ṙθ̇
2
What do we observe from F r = ṙ˙ – rθ̇ and F θ = 2ṙθ̇ ?
• Because this is not an orthogonal Cartesian coordinate system:
F r ≠ ṙ˙ and F θ ≠ θ̇˙
• The form of the scalar equations of motion depends on the
coordinate system used
Lets find a method that does not require us to be so smart. One such
method is the use of Lagrange Equations.
• The derivation shown here is not that of the text, but it is the more
standard approach.
x k ( t ) = f k ( q 1, q 2, …q n, t )
∂
• are independent, i.e. Rank f k = n
î ∂ ql
• are appropriately differentiable
∂x k ∂
(We sometimes simplify the notation: = f k. )
∂ qr ∂ qr
˙
∂ f q̇ + ∂ f
xk ( t ) = ∑ ∂ qr k r ∂ t k
r
∂ ˙ ∂ ∂ ˙ ∂
xk = f k , so we conclude that xk ( t ) = x k . We shall
∂ q̇ r ∂ qr ∂ q̇ r ∂ qr
use this later.
With our expression for particle velocity we can construct kinetic
energy in terms of the generalized degrees of freedom.
1
T = --- ∑ m k ∂ x q̇ + ∂ x ⋅ ∂ x q̇ + ∂ x
2 k ∑ ∂ qr k r ∂ t k ∑ ∂ qs k s ∂ t k
r s
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
10 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture5.frm
Lagrange Equations: Derivation Outline
for Systems of Particles
Advanced Vibrations
∂T ˙ ∂ ˙
pr =
∂ q̇ r
= ∑ mk xk ⋅ ∂ q̇r xk .
k
Because Newton’s equations involve the rate of change of momentum,
we are motivated to take the following time derivative:
dp r d ∂T ˙˙ ∂x˙k
˙ d ∂x k
˙
= = ∑ k k ∂ q̇r ∑ k k ⋅ d t ∂ q̇r
m x ⋅ + m x .
dt d t ∂ q̇ r k k
We shall simplify each of the summations on the right hand side of the
above equation.
˙˙ ∂x˙k
Simplifying ∑ m k x k ⋅
k ∂ q̇ r
˙
∂x k ∂x k
Recalling that = ,
∂ q̇ r ∂ qr
˙˙ ∂x˙k ˙˙ ∂x k ∂x k
∑ mk xk ⋅ ∂ q̇r = ∑ mk xk ⋅ ∂ qr = ∑ F k ⋅ ∂ qr = F r
k k k
˙
˙ d ∂x k ˙ d ∂x k
Simplifying ∑ m k x k ⋅ = ∑ mk xk ⋅ ,
d t ∂ q̇ r
d t ∂ qr
k k
˙ d ∂x k ˙ ∂ ˙
∑ mk xk ⋅ d t ∂ qr = ∑ mk xk ⋅
∂ qr
xk
k k
∂ mk ˙ ˙ ∂T
= ∑
∂ qr k
-----
2
- [ xk ⋅ xk ] =
∂ qr
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
13 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture5.frm
Lagrange Equations: Derivation Outline for
Systems of Particles
Advanced Vibrations
dp r ∂T
We combine all the above to find that = Fr + .
dt ∂ qr
d ∂T ∂T
The more common form of this is – = Fr
d t ∂ q̇ r ∂ q r
The above are Lagrange’s equations.
• They hold in any system of coordinates.
d ∂T 2
6. Plug and Chug = mR θ̇˙ = – mgR sin θ
d t ∂ θ̇
Observe
• We did not have to make any smart observations to evaluate the
governing equation
• The tension on the rod did not play any role in the equation for θ̇˙ .
This is because forces of constraint do not act in the directions of
motion, so they do no work. We shall see this some more later.
∂
F = –∇ V = – V
∂x
Note the nice feature of the chain rule for conservative forces:
∂ ∂V ∂ ∂V
Fr = F ⋅ x = – ⋅ x = –
∂ qr ∂ x ∂ qr ∂ qr
This facilitates the formulation of the equations.
d ∂T 2
5. Plug and Chug = mR θ̇˙ = – mgR sin θ
d t ∂ θ̇
Another Example
Consider the following system involving both
spring tension and gravity. y
1. Again, the location of the mass is expressed in O x
terms of the generalized coordinate θ ,
R
x = R sin ( θ )i – R cos θ j k
2. Evaluate the Jacobian
m
3. The generalized forces are calculated. This
time we only need to consider potential
2
energies: V = mgy + k y ⁄ 2 .
2 2
4. Again, the kinetic energy is T = m ( R θ̇ ) ⁄ 2
2 2
5. Plug and chug: mR θ̇˙ = – mgR sin θ + kR sin ( 2θ ) ⁄ 2
2 2
4. Again, the kinetic energy is T = m ( R θ̇ ) ⁄ 2
2
5. Plug and chug: mR θ̇˙ = – mgR sin θ – K θ
C ∂V ∂
Fθ = – = – [ – m gR cos θ ]
∂θ ∂θ
= – mgR sin ( θ ) .
The force due to damping must be calculated in the brute force manner:
D D ∂ ∂
F θ = F ⋅ x = – µẋi ⋅ x
∂θ ∂θ
= – ( µθ̇R [ cos θi ] ⋅ R [ cos θi + sin θ j ] )
2 2
= – µθ̇R cos θ
2 2
4. Again, the kinetic energy is T = m ( R θ̇ ) ⁄ 2
2 2 2
5. Plug and chug: mR θ̇˙ = – mgR sin θ – µθ̇R cos θ
That was not so difficult. Lets do another just slightly more difficult.
k1 m1 k m2
2
u1 u2
1 2 1 2
The potential energy is easily found: V = --- k 1 u 1 + --- k 2 ( u 2 – u 1 ) .
2 2
The generalized forces are
∂V
F u1 = – = –k 1 u1 –k 2 ( u1 – u2 ) and
∂ u1
∂V
F u2 = – = –k 2 ( u2 – u1 ) .
∂ u2
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
31 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture5.frm
Advanced Vibrations
m1 2 m2 2
The kinetic energy is just as easily found: T = ------ u̇ 1 + ------ u̇ 2 , so
2 2
d ∂T ∂T
– = m 1 u̇˙1 = – k 1 u 1 – k 2 ( u 1 – u 2 ) and
d t ∂ u̇ 1 ∂ u 1
d ∂T ∂T
– = m 2 u̇˙2 = – k 2 ( u 2 – u 1 )
d t ∂ u̇ 2 ∂ u 2
m1 u̇˙1 k 1 + k 2 –k 2 u1
In matrix form, + = 0
m 2 u̇˙2 –k 2 k2 u2 0
Thus are developed mass and stiffness matrices
Lets do it again.
k1 m1 k m2
2
u1 u2
k3
m1 2 m2 2
The kinetic energy is just as still: T = ------ u̇ 1 + ------ u̇ 2 , so
2 2
d ∂T ∂T
– = m 1 u̇˙1 = – k 1 u 1 – k 2 ( u 1 – u 2 ) and
d t ∂ u̇ 1 ∂ u 1
d ∂T ∂T
– = m 2 u̇˙2 = – k 2 ( u 2 – u 1 ) – k 3 u 2
d t ∂ u̇ 2 ∂ u 2
m1 u̇˙1 k1 + k2 –k 2 u1
In matrix form, + = 0
m 2 u̇˙2 –k 2 k 2 + k 3 u2 0
This is still easy.
m1 k m2 m3
1 k2
1 2 1 2
V = --- k 1 ( u 2 – u 1 ) + --- k 2 ( u 3 – u 2 ) . The generalized forces are:
2 2
∂V
F u1 = – = –k 1 ( u1 – u2 )
∂ u1
∂V
F u2 = – = –k 1 ( u2 – u1 ) – k 2 ( u2 – u3 )
∂ u2
∂V
F u3 = – = –k 2 ( u3 – u2 )
∂ u3
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
35 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture5.frm
Advanced Vibrations
m1 2 m2 2 m3 2
The kinetic energy is: T = ------ u̇ 1 + ------ u̇ 2 + ------ u̇ 3 .
2 2 2
The Lagrange equations now give the matrix form
m1 u̇˙1 k1 –k 1 u1 0
m2 u̇˙2 + – k 1 k 1 + k 2 – k 2 u 2 = 0
m3 –k 2 k2 u3 0
• the mass matrix is nonsingular (so long as each d.o.f. has mass)
d ∂T ∂T
6. Substitute into the famous – = Fr
d t ∂ q̇ r ∂ q r
k
R
The disk shown has radius R, mass m, and mass moment of inertia J.
The disk rolls without slipping and is restrained by a spring of stiffness
k. Use the method of Lagarange’s equations to derive an equation of
motion for the displacment, u, of the center of gravity of the disk.
Hint: Rθ̇ = u̇ .
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
39 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture5.frm
Lecture 5, Homework 2
Advanced Vibrations
m1
u
θ
L
m2
Advanced Vibrations
Today’s Class:
• Short Quiz
k
R
The disk shown has radius R, mass m, and mass moment of inertia J.
The disk rolls without slipping and is restrained by a spring of stiffness
k. Use the method of Lagrange’s equations to derive an equation of
motion for the displacement, u, of the center of gravity of the disk.
Hint: Rθ̇ = u̇ .
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
2 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture6.frm
Lecture 5, Homework 1: Solution
Advanced Vibrations
1 2 1 2
Kinetic Energy: T = --- mu̇ + --- J θ̇
2 2
d ∂T 2
= ( m + J ⁄ R )u̇˙
d t ∂ u
1 2 ∂V
Potential Energy: V = --- ku yields force: F u = – = – ku
2 ∂u
∂V
The potential energy yields a force Fu = – = – ku
∂u
2
Putting it all together: ( m + J ⁄ R )u̇˙ + ku = 0
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
3 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture6.frm
Short Quiz:
Advanced Vibrations
1 –1 1
h ( t ) = ----- ---------------------------------------
-
M s + 2ζω n s + ω n
2 2
– ω n ζt
e 2
= ------------------------------- sin ( ω n 1 – ζ t )
2
Mω n 1 – ζ
t – ω n ζτ
e
∫
2
g(t ) = ------------------------------
- sin ( ω n 1 – ζ τ ) dτ
2
0 Mω n 1 – ζ
g(t ) =
– ω n ζt 2 ζ 2
1–e cos ( ω n 1 – ζ )t + ------------------ sin ( ω n 1 – ζ )t
1–ζ
2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
K
Simplifications have included the observations that
2 2 2 2 2
( ω n ζ ) + ( ω n 1 – ζ ) = ω n and that Mω n = K
m1
u
θ
L
m2
• Dissipation Potential
Advanced Vibrations
Today’s Class:
Conservation of Energy
Small Displacements and Linearization
Dissipation Potential
d
mk vk = F k .
dt
We contract each side with the particle velocity and sum over particles:
dv k
∑ mk vk ⋅ d t = ∑ F k ⋅ vk
k k
dv k d mk
Note that ∑ m k v k ⋅ ∑ d t 2 ( vk ⋅ vk ) = d t
dT
= -----
- and that
dt
k k
Always,
dT d
= ( Work Done to System )
dt dt
∂V dx k
∑ k k ∑
dT dV
= F ⋅ v = – ⋅ = –
dt k k ∂x
dt dt
k
from which we conclude that
d
(T + V ) = 0
dt
R
T 0 = 0 and V 0 = – mgR cos θ 0 , so
Initially
θ
T 0 + V 0 = – mgR cos θ 0
m
The potential energy is minimized when the pendulum is at
the bottom of its swing. At that point, the kinetic energy
must be at its maximum.
m1
u
θ
L
m2
∂V ∂V
Fu = – = 0 and F θ = – = – m 2 gL sin θ .
∂u ∂θ
∂T
= 0 , and
∂u
d ∂T d
= [ ( m 1 + m 2 )u̇ + m 2 Lθ̇ cos θ ]
dt ∂ u̇ dt
2
= ( m 1 + m 2 )u̇˙ – m 2 Lθ̇ sin θ + m 2 Lθ̇˙ cos θ
∂T
= – m 2 Lθ̇u̇ sin θ and
∂θ
d ∂T d 2
= [ m 2 ( Lu̇ cos θ + L θ̇ ) ]
d t ∂ θ̇ dt
= m 2 L ( u̇˙cos θ + Lθ̇˙ – u̇θ̇ sin θ )
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
7 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture7.frm
Adding all the Ingredients
Advanced Vibrations
2
( m 1 + m 2 )u̇˙ – m 2 Lθ̇ sin θ + m 2 Lθ̇˙ cos θ = 0
2
and m 2 Lu̇˙cos θ + m 2 L θ̇˙ = – m 2 gL sin θ
These are two messy equations to solve.
0
2
( m 1 + m 2 )u̇˙ – m 2 Lθ̇ sin θ + m 2 Lθ̇˙ cos θ = 0
2
and m 2 Lu̇˙cos θ + m 2 L θ̇˙ = – m 2 gL sin θ
Lets introduce the assumption that θ and θ̇ are each so small that we
can ignore powers and products of them. From this we get the small-
angle formulae:
3 5 2 4
θ θ θ θ
sin θ = θ – ----- + ----- … ≈ θ and cos θ = 1 – ----- + ----- … ≈ 1
3! 5! 2! 4!
m1 + m2 m2 L
u̇˙ + 0 0 u = 0
m2 L m2 L
2
θ̇˙ 0 m 2 gL θ 0
Which is our canonical form for linear the undamped vibration problem
2 2
–ω ( m1 + m2 ) –ω m2 L û iωt
Re e = 0
2
–ω m2 L – ω m 2 L + m 2 gL θ̂
2 2 0
î
from which we deduce that
2 2
–ω ( m1 + m2 ) –ω m2 L û
= 0
– ω m 2 L + m 2 gL θ̂
2 2 2 0
–ω m2 L
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
11 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture7.frm
Steady State Solution
Advanced Vibrations
2 2
–ω ( m1 + m2 ) –ω m2 L û
The equation = 0 has a
– ω m 2 L + m 2 gL θ̂
2 2 2 0
–ω m2 L
non-trivial solution only if
2 2
– ω ( m 1 + m 2 ) – ω m2 L
det = 0
2
–ω m2 L
2 2
– ω m 2 L + m 2 gL
î
2 2
m 2 ω L [ m 1 Lω + ( m 1 + m 2 )g ] = 0
which has two solutions.
2
• Solution 1: ω = 0 . Substituting this into the matrix equation
û
we see = 1 . This is translation at constant speed.
θ̂ 0
( m 1 + m 2 )g
2
• Solution 2. ω = – ---------------------------- . Substituting this into the
m1 L
1
û
matrix equation, we find = ( m 1 + m 2 )g . Lets discuss
θ̂ – ----------------------------
m2 L
the significance of this.
d ∂T ∂T ∂V e ∂x k
∑
e
– + = Fk(t) ⋅ = F r ( { q }, t ) .
d t ∂ q̇ r ∂ q r ∂ q r ∂ qr
k
We linearize in the following steps:
s
1. Solve for a stable equilibrium configuration { q } . The system will
be in equilibium if ∂V = 0 for each r and will be in
∂ qr {q} = {q }
s
s
2. express { q } = { q } + { ∆q } , and substitute into the governing
equation. In this substitution, we use the Taylor series expansion:
∂f
f ( { q } + { ∆q } ) = f ( { q } ) + ∑
s s
∆q r
∂ q r
{q }
s
r
3.8
1.4
8 3.6
3.4
3.2
V/mgR
3 1.2
V/mgR
V/mgR
6 2.8
2.6
2.4 1
2.2
4
2
1.8
0.8
1.6
2 1.4
1.2
1 0.6
–3 –2 –1 0 1 t 2 3 –3 –2 –1 0 1 t 2 3 –3 –2 –1 0 1 t 2 3
θ θ θ
κ =2mgR κ =mgR κ =mgR/2
s s
1. We now solve for static equilibrium: κθ – mgR sin θ = 0
This may be done numerically:
sin(θ)/θ
κ
-----------
mgR
s
sin θ κ
Solving ------------
s
- = ----------
-
θ mgR
θ
s
From the above plot we may pick off the value of θ that satisfies
the equilibrium equation.
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
18 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture7.frm
Formulation of Linearized Equations
Advanced Vibrations
s
2. substitute { q } = { q } + { ∆q } into governing equation
2 ˙ s s
mR ∆θ̇ + κ ( θ + ∆θ ) – mgR sin ( θ + ∆θ ) = 0 , and expand
with Taylor series
2 s s s
mR ∆θ̇ + κ ( θ + ∆θ ) – mgR ( sin ( θ ) + cos ( θ )∆θ )
˙
2 ˙ s 0 s s
= mR ∆θ̇ + [ κθ – mgR sin ( θ ) ] + κ∆θ – mgR ( cos ( θ )∆θ )
2 ˙ s
= mR ∆θ̇ + ( κ – mgR cos ( θ ) )∆θ = 0
Note that the equation for static equilibrium appears and is identically
zero.
˙
Velocities: x 1 = R 1 θ̇ 1 ( cos θ 1 i + sin θ 1 j ) m1
R2
˙
x 2 = R 1 θ̇ 1 ( cos θ 1 i + sin θ 1 j ) θ2
and
+ R 2 θ̇ 2 ( cos θ 2 i + sin θ 2 j )
m2
m1 2 m2 2 2
T = ------ ( R 1 θ̇ 1 ) + ------ [ ( R 1 θ̇ 1 ) + ( R 2 θ̇ 2 ) ]
Kinetic Energy: 2 2
+ m 2 ( R 1 θ̇ 1 ) ( R 2 θ̇ 2 ) cos ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
∂T 2
= ( m 1 + m 2 )R 1 θ̇ 1 + m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 2 cos ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
∂ θ̇ 1
d ∂T 2
= ( m 1 + m 2 )R 1 θ̇˙1 + m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇˙2 cos ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
d t ∂ θ̇ 1 2
+ m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 2 θ̇ 1 sin ( θ 2 – θ 1 ) – m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 2 sin ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
∂T
= m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 2 θ̇ 1 sin ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
∂ θ1
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
21 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture7.frm
Compound Pendulum
Advanced Vibrations
∂T 2
= m 2 R 2 θ̇ 2 + m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 1 cos ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
∂ θ̇ 2
d ∂T 2
= m 2 R 2 θ̇˙2 + m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇˙1 cos ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
d t ∂ θ̇ 2 2
– m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 2 θ̇ 1 sin ( θ 2 – θ 1 ) + m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 1 sin ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
∂T
= – m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 2 θ̇ 1 sin ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
∂ θ2
Potential Energy:
V = m 1 gy 1 + m 2 gy 2 =
∂V ∂V
= g ( m 1 + m 2 )R 1 sin θ 1 and = gm 2 R 2 sin θ 2
∂ θ1 ∂ θ2
Put them all together:
2
( m 1 + m 2 )R 1 θ̇˙1 + m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇˙2 cos ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
2
– m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 2 sin ( θ 2 – θ 1 ) + g ( m 1 + m 2 )R 1 sin θ 1 = 0
2
m 2 R 2 θ̇˙2 + m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇˙1 cos ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
2
+ m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 1 sin ( θ 2 – θ 1 ) + gm 2 R 2 sin θ 2 = 0
and
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
23 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture7.frm
Homework
Advanced Vibrations
m2
D D ∂ 2 2
µ
m F θ = F ⋅ x = – µR θ̇ ( cos θ )
∂θ
The governing equation is found to be
2˙ 2
mR θ̇ + Rmg sin θ = – µ ( R cos θ ) θ̇
˙D 2
The rate of dissipation in the dashpot is D = F ⋅ x = µẋ 1 . We now
˜D ∂ ∂ µ 2 2
F θ = – (D ⁄ 2) = – (--- ( R cos θ ) θ̇ )
∂ θ̇ ∂ θ̇ 2
2
evaluate = – µ ( R cos θ ) θ̇
˜D D
Notice that F θ = F θ .
Lets discuss why this should not surprise us. Consider virtual work.
Though the Rayleigh dissipation function is easy to use, its uses are
limited.
• Only in a minority of circumstances is the damping associated
with discrete dashpots.
Advanced Vibrations
Today’s Class:
2
( m 1 + m 2 )R 1 θ̇˙1 + m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇˙2 cos ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
2
– m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 2 sin ( θ 2 – θ 1 ) + g ( m 1 + m 2 )R 1 sin θ 1 = 0
2
m 2 R 2 θ̇˙2 + m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇˙1 cos ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
2
+ m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 1 sin ( θ 2 – θ 1 ) + gm 2 R 2 sin θ 2 = 0
and
1
2˙
( m1 + m 2 )R 1 θ̇ 1 + m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇˙2 cos ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
θ2-θ1 θ1
2
– m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 2 sin ( θ 2 – θ 1 ) + g ( m 1 + m 2 )R 1 sin θ 1 = 0
1
2˙
m 2 R 2 θ̇ 2 + m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇˙1 cos ( θ 2 – θ 1 )
θ2-θ1 θ2
and 2
+ m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 1 sin ( θ 2 – θ 1 ) + gm 2 R 2 sin θ 2 = 0
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
3 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture8.frm
Homework from Lecture 7
Advanced Vibrations
2˙
( m1 + m 2 )R 1 θ̇ 1 + m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇˙2
2 0
– m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 2 ( θ 2 – θ 1 ) + g ( m 1 + m 2 )R 1 θ 1 = 0
and
2˙
m 2 R 2 θ̇ 2 + m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇˙1
2 0
+ m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇ 1 ( θ 2 – θ 1 ) + gm 2 R 2 θ 2 = 0
2
( m1 + m 2 )R 1 m 2 R 1 R 2 θ̇˙1 g ( m 1 + m 2 )R 1 0 θ1
+ = 0
m2 R1 R2
2
m2 R2 θ̇˙2 0 gm 2 R 2 θ 2 0
Note that both the mass and stiffness matrices are symmetric and
positive-definite.
The mass equation will be positive so long as we avoid massless
degrees of freedom, that is we always want to choose our degrees of
∂T
freedom so that ≠ 0.
∂ q̇ r
The stiffness matrix will always be non-negative definite. If there are no
rigid-body modes, it will be positive definite. We shall discuss this more
later.
N t2
d ∂T ∂T ∂V
∑∫
A
– + – F r η r ( t ) dt = 0
d t ∂ q̇ r ∂ q r ∂ q r
r = 1 t1
N t2
d ∂T ∂T
+ ∑∫
d t ∂ q̇ r
ηr –
∂ q̇ r
η̇ r dt = 0
r = 1 t1
N t2
∂T ∂V ∂T
∑ ∫ – ∂ qr + ∂ qr – F r ηr ( t ) –∂ q̇r η̇r dt = 0
A
r = 1t î 1
η r ( t ) = q̃ r ( t ) – q r ( t ) q3
Let
= δq r ( t ) q(t2)
where { q̃ ( t ) } is another path {q(t)}
from { q ( t 1 ) } to { q ( t 2 ) } “near” ~
{q(t)} q2
the path taken by { q ( t ) } . q(t1)
q1
Our integrals can now be written:
N t2
∂T ∂T ∂V
∑ ∫ – ∂ qr δqr + ∂ q̇r δq̇r + ∂ qr – F r δqr dt = 0
A
r = 1t î 1
Observe that the terms involving potential energy are a complete
differential.
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
9 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture8.frm
Hamilton’s Principle
Advanced Vibrations
= ∫ ( δT – δV + δW ) dt = 0
t1
A
Where δW ( t ) = F r ( t ) ( q̃ r ( t ) – q r ( t ) ).
This form of Hamilton’s principle asserts that the actual path is one
t2
about which
∫ ( δT – δV + δW ) dt = 0
t1
A
For the special case where the generalized forces Fr are prescribed
loads, we can define the “Potential Energy of Loading”
∑
A
A = – F r qr
r=1
T
and the “Total Potential Energy” is V = V + A.
∫
T
J = ( T – V ) dt stationary.
t1
L
A = M 0 ∂y – M L ∂y – Q 0 y ( 0 ) + Q L y ( L ) – ∫ p ( x )y ( x ) dx
∂x 0 ∂x L
0
L
1 ∂y 2
2 ∫
And the Kinetic Energy is T = --- m
∂t
dx where m is the mass
0
per unit length of the beam.
t2 t2 L
∂y ∂
∫ δT dt = ∫ ∫ m ∂ t ∂ t δy dx dt
t1 t 0 2
L t2
∂ ∂y
= ∫ m ∫ δy – ẏ˙δy dt dx
∂t ∂t
0 t1
t2 L 0 t2 L 2
t2 ∂y
∫ δT dt = ∫ m [ ẏδy ] t1 dx – ∫ ∫ m
∂t
2
δy dx dt
t1 0 t1 0
Strain Energy:
L 2 L 2 2
1 ∂ 2
1 ∂ y
δV = --- ∫ EI 2 ( y + δy ) dx – --- ∫ EI 2 dx
2 ∂x 0
2 ∂x 0
L
∂2
≅ ∫ EI y'' 2 δy dx
0
∂x
L
∂ L
= EI y'' δy + ∫ EI y δy dx
L IV
– EI ( y'''δy )
∂x 0
0
0
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
14 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture8.frm
Hamilton’s Principle: Example
Beam Bending Equation
Advanced Vibrations
t2
∫ δV dt =
t1 t2 L
∂ L
∫ EI y'' δy + ∫ EI y δy dx dt
L IV
– EI ( y'''δy )
∂x 0
0
t1 0
∫ δA dt
t1 t2
∂ ∂
= ∫ M0
∂x
δy
0
– ML
∂x
δy
L
– Q 0 δy ( 0 ) + Q L δy ( L ) dt
t1
t2 L
–∫ ∫ p ( x )δy dx dt
t1 0
t2
∂ ∂
∫ M0
∂x
δy 0 – ML ∂x
δy L – Q 0 δy ( 0 ) + Q L δy ( L ) dt
t1
t2
∂ L
+∫ EI y'' δy
L
– EI ( y'''δy ) dt = 0
∂x 0
0
t1
∂ ∂
[ M 0 – E I y'' ( 0 ) ] δy = 0 and [ M L – E I y'' ( L ) ] δy = 0,
∂x 0 ∂x L
t2 L
∫ ∫ [ mẏ˙ + EI y
IV
– p ]δy ( x, t ) dx dt = 0
t1 0
IV
mẏ˙ + EI y = p ( x, t )
Also, we saw how to define the potential energy of loading and to use
that with Hamilton’s principle. We will see that we can also use it in with
Lagrange’s equations.
Change of Subject.
Kinetic Energy:
L L
1 1 2
T = ∫ mẏ dx = ∫ m [ Ȧ 1 ( t ) f 1 ( x ) + Ȧ 2 ( t ) f 2 ( x ) ] dx
2
--
- --
-
2 2
0 0
1 2 2
= --- [ ( Ȧ 1 ) I 1 + 2 Ȧ 1 Ȧ 2 I 2 + ( Ȧ 2 ) I 3 ]
2
L L
mL mL
∫ 1 ∫ 1 2
2
where I 1 = m f ( x ) d x = -------- , I 2 = m f ( x ) f x d x = -------
-
30 60
0 0
L
mL
∫ 2
2
and I 3 = m f ( x ) d x = --------
-
105
0
Strain Energy:
L L
1 1
V = --- ∫ EI ( y'' ) dx = --- ∫ EI [ A 1 ( t ) f 1'' ( x ) + A 2 ( t ) f 2'' ( x ) ] dx
2 2
2 2
0 0
1 2 2
= --- [ ( A 1 ) I 4 + 2 A 1 A 2 I 5 + ( A 2 ) I 6 ]
2
where
L L
EI 4 EI 4
I 4 = ∫ EI f 1'' ( x ) dx = -------- ∫ EI f 2'' ( x ) dx = --------
2 2
3
-, I6 = 3
- and
0 L 0 L
L
EI 2
I5 = ∫ 1
EI f '' ( x ) f 2 '' ( x ) d x = --------
L
3
-
0
Lagrange Equations:
d ∂T ∂T ∂V
– + = Ȧ˙1 I 1 + Ȧ˙2 I 2 + A 1 I 4 + A 2 I 5 = 0
d t ∂ Ȧ 1 ∂ A 1 ∂ A 1
and
d ∂T ∂T ∂V
– + = Ȧ˙1 I 2 + Ȧ˙2 I 3 + A 1 I 5 + A 2 I 6 = 0
d t ∂ Ȧ 2 ∂ A 2 ∂ A 2
1 1
--- --- ˙
mL 2 EI 4 2 A 1
4 Ȧ 1 + -----
In matrix form: -------- -3 = 0 .
15 1 1 Ȧ˙2 L 2 4 A 2 0
--- ---
4 7
Note that both matrices are symmetric, positive definite.
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
25 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture8.frm
Generalized Forces, Calculated by
Method of Virtual Work
Advanced Vibrations
∂x n
δW = F r δq r = ∑ F n ⋅ δq r = ∑ F n ⋅ δxn
n
∂ q r n
δW
F r = --------
δq r
2 2 2
dφ dθ 1 dφ
Then
2
= ------
2 2
and
2
+ [ ( 1 – α )φ + α sin φ ] = 0
dτ d t ωL dτ
1. Solve numerically the dimensionless governing equation for the
Next Time
Advanced Vibrations
y2 – y1
Define the angle θ so that sin θ = ---------------- . This is the rotation of the
2L
car about its c.g. Also, define the vertical displacement
y = ( y 1 + y 2 ) ⁄ 2 of the c.g.
m 2 m 2 J 2
Express the kinetic energy: T = ---- ẋ + ---- ẏ + --- θ̇
2 2 2
k 2 k 2
The potential energy is V = mgy + --- y 1 + --- y 2
2 2
Derive the governing equation for each of x , y 1 , and y 2 :
d ∂T ∂V
+ = mẋ˙ = 0
d t ∂ ẋ ∂x
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
3 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture9.frm
More Linearization
Solution
Advanced Vibrations
∂T ∂T ∂y ∂T ∂θ ∂T ∂x
= + +
∂ ẏ 1 ∂ ẏ ∂ y 1 ∂ θ̇ ∂ y 1 ∂ ẋ ∂ y 1
mẏ J θ̇ 1
= ------
- – ------ -------------------------------------
2 2L y – y 2
1 – ----------------
2 1
2L
m ( ẏ 1 + ẏ 2 ) J ( ẏ 2 – ẏ 1 )
= -------------------------- – ------ --------------------------------2-
2 2L y 2 – y 1
1 – ----------------
2L
∂V
= 0
∂x
∂V ∂V ∂y ∂V
= +
∂ y1 ∂ y ∂ y 1 ∂ y 1
mg
= ------- + k y 1
2
∂V ∂V ∂y ∂V
= +
∂ y2 ∂ y ∂ y 2 ∂ y 2
mg
= ------- + k y 2
2
m ( ẏ˙1 + ẏ˙2 ) J mg
-------------------------- – ------ ( ẏ˙2 – ẏ˙1 ) = – ------- – k y 1
2 2L 2
and
m ( ẏ˙1 + ẏ˙2 ) J mg
-------------------------- + ------ ( ẏ˙2 – ẏ˙1 ) = – ------- – k y 2
2 2L 2
2 2
x x (L – x)
y ( x, t ) = A 1 ( t ) -----2 + A 2 ( t ) ---------------------
3
-
L L
= A1 ( t ) f 1 ( x ) + A2 ( t ) f 2 ( x )
Lets finally calculate the generalized forces due to the applied pressure.
L
=> F 1 ( t ) = δW 1 ⁄ δ A 1 = ∫ p ( x, t ) f 1 ( x ) d x
0
Similarly
L
F 2 ( t ) = δW 2 ⁄ δ A 2 = ∫ p ( x, t ) f 2 ( x ) d x
0
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98
12 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture9.frm
More Lagrange Equations
With Distributed Displacement
Advanced Vibrations
I 1 I 2 Ȧ˙1 I 4 I 5 A1 F1(t )
+ =
I 2 I 3 Ȧ˙2 I 5 I 6 A2 F2(t )
1 1 3
--- ------ F1(t )
EI 4 + --------- – 2 A 1
30 Ȧ˙1 + ----- kL
mL 5 3
- EI =
1 1 ˙ A2 F2(t )
------ --------- Ȧ 2 L –2 4
30 105
Today’s Class:
2 2 2
dφ dθ 1 dφ
Then
2
= ------
2 2
and
2
+ [ ( 1 – α )φ + α sin φ ] = 0
dτ d t ωL dτ
1. Solve numerically the dimensionless governing equation for the
– α sin ( x 2 ) – ( 1 – α )x 2
x = φ̇ , then ẋ =
φ x1
3
m
2
1
R
0
−1
κ
−2
−3
θ
−4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.6
0.4
κ
0.2
R
0
When the
pendulum starts θ
−0.2 only a little
distance from the m
−0.4 static equilibrium,
the ‘small angle’
−0.6
approximation is very good.
−0.8
0 5 10 15 20In that case, the linearity of
25 30
mn ˙ ˙ mn ∂x˙n ∂x˙n
T = ∑ ------ x n ⋅ x n = ∑ ------ ∑ ∑ ⋅ q̇ r q̇ s
2 2 r s ∂ q̇ r ∂ q̇ s
n n
Again, we make use of one of the core observations in the derivation of
˙
∂x n ∂x n
the Lagrange equations: =
∂ q̇ r ∂ qr
mn ∂x n ∂x n 1
T = ∑ ------ ∑ ∑ ⋅ q̇ r q̇ s = ∑ ∑ --2- q̇r q̇s M̂ rs ( { q } )
2 r s ∂ qr ∂ qs
n r s
m n ∂x n ∂x n
= M̂ rs ( { q } ) = ∑ ------
s
M rs ⋅ .
2 ∂ q r {q }
s ∂ q s
{ q }
s
n
s
Note that M rs = M̂ rs ( { q } ) is still symmetric.
2
1 ∂T
T = ∑ ∑ 2 r s rs rs ∂ q̇r ∂q̇s
--
- q̇ q̇ M & M =
r s
m n ˙t ˙t ˙t
= ∑ ------ y n ⋅ y n ≥ 0 where y n = ∂x n
∑ ∂ qr
t
q̇ r
2 r {q }
s
n
Lets consider a
L1 L2 L3 L4 structure similar to
the disk-shaft
system in
E, Js Meirovitch.
Ignoring the
kinetic energy of
the shaft, the
J1, θ1 J2, θ2 J3, θ3 kinetic energy of
the systems is
1 2 1 2 1 2
T = --- J 1 θ̇ 1 + --- J 2 θ̇ 2 + --- J 3 θ̇ 3 .
2 2 2
2 J1 0 0
∂T
Our mass matrix is [ M ij ] = = 0 J2 0
∂ θ̇ i ∂θ̇ j
0 0 J3
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 13
/home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture10.frm
Another
Example of Mass Matrix
Advanced Vibrations
Consider a
cantilevered beam for
which we postulate a
displacement field EI, m
with two free
generalized L
coordinates:
y ( x, t ) = A 1 ( t ) f 1 ( x ) + A 2 ( t ) f 2 ( x )
The kinetic energy in the beam will be
L
m 2
T ( A 1, A 2 ) = ∫ ---- ( ẏ ) dx
2
0
1 2
= --- [ Ȧ ( t ) I 1 + 2 Ȧ 1 ( t ) Ȧ 2 ( t )I 2 + ( 2 Ȧ 2 ( t ) )I 3 ]
2 1
L L
∫ m( f 1( x)) ∫ m( f 2( x))
2 2
where I 1 = dx , I 3 = dx
0 0
L
and I 2 = ∫ m f 1 ( x ) f 2 ( x ) dx
0
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 14 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/
Another Example of Mass Matrix
Continued
Advanced Vibrations
2
∂T I1 I2
Our mass matrix is [ M ij ] = = m
∂ Ȧ i ∂ Ȧ j I2 I3
2
We define the stiffness matrix to be K rs = ∂ V .
∂ q r ∂q s {q }
s
Lets consider a
L1 L2 L3 L4 structure similar to
the disk-shaft
system in
G, Js Meirovitch.
1 1 1
----- + ----- – ----- 0
L1 L2 L2
2
∂V 1 1 1 1
[ K ij ] = = GJ s – ----- ----- + ----- – -----
∂ θ i ∂θ j L2 L2 L3 L3
1 1 1
0 – ----- ----- + -----
L3 L3 L4
2
∂V I4 I5
Our stiffness matrix is [ K ij ] = = EI
∂ Ai ∂ A j I5 I6
T T
Say a and b are column vectors of length N , then b a = a b are
N
defined to be ∑ ar br . This is the inner product of algebraic vectors.
r=1
∑
T T T
found to be ( ( AB ) ) rs = ( AB ) sr = A st B tr = ( B A ) rs . In
t=1
T T T
matrix notion: ( AB ) = B A
In those cases where there are no rigid body motions, the stiffness
matrix is nonsingular, and we can define a flexibility matrix
–1
a = K .
1 T 1 T 1 T
V = --- q Kq = --- ( – aF ) K ( – aF ) = --- F aF
2 2 2
Sometimes vibration problems are formulated in terms of the flexibility
matrix, though the use of displacement-based finite elements makes
flexibility formulations decreasingly popular.
Discussion of the flexibility matrix is presented here for completeness.
We shall do little more with it in this class.
T T T T
A = – q F = – ( Tβ ) F = – β ( T F )
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 26
/home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture10.frm
Matrix Transformation
Lagrange Equation in New System
Advanced Vibrations
d ∂T ∂T ∂V
0
∂A
– + = –
d t ∂ β̇ r ∂ β r ∂ β r ∂ βr
becomes M̃β̇˙ + K̃ β = F̃
T T T
where M̃ = T MT , K̃ = T KT , and F̃ = T F
Note that the mass and stiffness matrices remain symmetric and at
least positive semi-definite.
T
If T is a nonsingular, square matrix, the transformation T AT is called
a congruence transformation of A.
2
m1 R1 0 θ̇˙1 mgR 1 0 θ1 F 1 R1
+ =
0
2
m2 R2 θ̇˙2 0 mgR 2 θ 2 F 2 R2
θ1 1
= θ1 . R1
θ2 R1 ⁄ R2 R2
F1 F2
m1
1 m2
Define T = . Then
R1 ⁄ R2
2
m1 R1 0 1
M̃ = 1 R 1 ⁄ R 2 = ( m 1 + m2 )R 12
0
2
m2 R2 R1 ⁄ R2
m 1 gR 1 0 1
K̃ = 1 R 1 ⁄ R 2
0 m 2 gR 2 R1 ⁄ R2
2
R1
= m gR + m g -----
1 1 2 R-
2
The stiffness matrix is
and the applied force is
F 1 R1
F̃ = 1 R 1 ⁄ R 2 = R1 ( F 1 + F 2 )
F 2 R2
2
R 1
[ ( m1 + m2 )R 12 ]θ̇˙1 + m 1 gR 1 + m 2 g ------ θ 1 = R 1 ( F 1 + F 2 )
R 2
Short Orientation
LAB TOUR
Today’s Class:
Eigen Analysis
k1 2 k2 2 k3 2 k4 2
V = ----- x 1 + ----- ( x 2 – x 1 ) + ----- ( x 3 – x 2 ) + ----- x 3 .
2 2 2 2
Equilibrium of the node at x 2 requires that
∂V
0 = = – k 1 x 1 + ( k 1 + k 2 )x 2 – k 3 x 3
∂ x2
k1 k3
from which we can solve for x 2 : x 2 = ---------------- x 1 + ---------------- x 3 .
k1 + k2 k2 + k3
(Compare the above to the second row of the stiffness matrix.)
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 5
/home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture11.frm
Why Do We Not REALLY Worry
About The Singularity Of M?
Advanced Vibrations
x1 1 0
x1 k1 k3
x2 = T where T = ---------------- ---------------- .
x3 k1 + k2 k2 + k3
x3
0 1
˙˙
T x1 T x1 T
Our new governing equations are T MT + T KT = T F
x3 x3
where M , K , and F are the mass matrix, stiffness matrix, and applied
force of the original problem.
In the rest of this development, we shall assume that the mass matrix is
positive definite.
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 6
/home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture11.frm
Eigen Analysis
Finding a de-coupled model for the system
Advanced Vibrations
From among all column vectors X that are not identically zero, find the
T
X1 K X1
column vector X 1 such that R 1 ( X 1 ) = ---------------------- is at a minimum.
T
X1 M X1
T
Let λ 1 = R 1 ( X 1 ) then for any y such that y M y > 0 ,
T
d ( X 1 + αy ) K ( X 1 + αy )
---------------------------------------------------------
- = 0.
d α ( X + αy ) M ( X + αy ) T
1 1 α=0
T
X 1 MX = 0
• and that λa ≠ λb
Then λ a M x a – K x a = 0 and λ b M x b – K x b = 0 .
λ a M x a – K x a = 0 and λ b M x b – K x b = 0 .
Observe that:
T T
1. λa xb M xa – xb K xa = 0
T T
2. λb xa M xb – xa K xb = 0
T
From either 1.) or 2.), we see also that xa K xb = 0 .
Say:
Then λ a M x a – K x a = 0 and λ b M x b – K x b = 0 .
T T
Define x a = x a – cx b where c = ( x a M x b ) ⁄ ( x b M x b ) .
T
Note that ( λ, x a ) is still an eigen-solution, that x a M x b = 0 , and that
T
xa K xb = 0.
We have a new, equivalent, but orthogonal pair of eigen vectors.
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 12
/home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture11.frm
Eigen Analysis
Orthogonality and Normalization
Advanced Vibrations
T
We normalize the eigenvectors so that x k M x k = 1 for each eigen
vector x k . This is Mass Normalization. These vectors are orthonormal
with respect to the mass matrix.
T
Note that because λk M xk – K xk = 0 , xk K xk = λk
T T
P MP = I and P KP = Λ
The β k are called MODAL COORDINATES. We shall use them quite a lot
as generalized coordinates.
T
β̇˙ + Λβ = P F = F̃
We can solve for these modal coordinates, β k , individually. We can
solve for them numerically, and sometimes we can achieve analytic
solutions.
The solution in physical coordinates can be recovered from
x ( t ) = P β( t )
N
Given M ẋ˙ + Kx = 0 , postulate a solution x ( t ) = ∑ βk ( t )xk
k=1
N
From which ∑ β̇˙k ( t )M xk + βk ( t )K xk . Consider the case where
k=1
β m ( 0 ) = 0 for all m ≠ k , then β̇˙k ( t )M x k + β k ( t )K x k = 0 .
iω k t
We expect a solution β k ( t ) = Re A k e , which yields
î
2
– ω k M x k + K x k = 0 : the algebraic eigenvalue problem.
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 18
/home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture11.frm
Example Problem
Advanced Vibrations
mR
2
0 θ̇˙1 mgR +
2
kR – k R θ1
2
to find + = 0
θ̇˙2 mgR + kR θ 2
2 2 2
0 mR –k R
2 θ1
Lets look for solutions ω , to the eigen-problem:
θ2
mR
2
2
0 θ1 mgR + kR
2
– k R
2 θ1
–ω + = 0
2 θ 2 2 θ
0 mR 2 –k R mgR + kR 2
1
2 0 θ1 1 + γ – γ θ1
–α + = 0
0 1 θ2 –γ 1 + γ θ2
2 2
where α = ω R⁄g and γ = Rk ⁄ mg
1+γ–α
2
–γ θ1
= 0
–γ 1+γ–α
2 θ2
2
This yields solutions α = 1 + γ ± γ = 1, 1 + 2γ .
We substitute these back into the matrix equation to solve for θ1 & θ2 :
1
-------
1 0 1 = 2 => we must scale this mode: x = 2
11 1
01 1 1
-------
2
1
-------
1 0 1 = 2 => we must scale this mode: x = 2
1 –1 2
0 1 –1 1
– -------
2
1 1+γ–α
2
–γ θ1
Given x 1 ∼ , and = 0 , we find
1 –γ 1+γ–α
2 θ2
2
1–α = 0 =>
2
α1 = 1 .
2 0
1–α
2
Similarly, given x 2 ∼
1 , we find
1 + 2γ – α = 0 =>
–1 2 0
– 1 – 2γ + α
2
α 2 = 1 + 2γ .
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 24
/home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture11.frm
Homework
Due Monday
Advanced Vibrations
Today’s Class:
Review of Eigen-Analysis
Solution to Homework of Lecture 11
More Eigen-Analysis
T
P MP = I
2
In that case,
T
P KP = ωn
1 1 1
----- + ----- – ----- 0
L1 L2 L2
2
∂V 1 1 1 1
[ K ij ] = = GJ s – ----- ----- + ----- – -----
∂ θ i ∂θ j L2 L2 L3 L3
1 1 1
0 – ----- ----- + -----
L3 L3 L4
4
Note that J s is a polar moment of inertia of the area ( πR ⁄ 2 ). The
units of polar moment of inertia are Length4.
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 4
/home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture12.frm
Homework
Solution
Advanced Vibrations
1 2 1 2 1 2
T = --- J 1 θ̇ 1 + --- J 2 θ̇ 2 + --- J 3 θ̇ 3 .
2 2 2
2 J1 0 0
∂T
[ M ij ] = = 0 J2 0
∂ θ̇ i ∂θ̇ j
0 0 J3
1 1 1
----- + ----- – ----- 0
L1 L2 L2
J1 0 0 θ̇˙1 θ1
1 1 1 1
0 J2 0 θ̇˙2 + GJ s – ----- ----- + ----- – ----- θ2 = 0
L2 L2 L3 L3
0 0 J 3 θ̇˙3 θ3
1 1 1
0 – ----- ----- + -----
L3 L3 L4
L 1 = L 2 = L 3 = L 4 = L and that
Assuming that
J1 = J2 = J3 = JM ,
1 0 0 θ̇ 1 GJ 2 – 1 0 θ 1
˙
s
JM 0 1 0 θ̇ 2
˙ + --------
- – 1 2 – 1 θ2 = 0
L
0 0 1 θ̇˙ 0 –1 2 θ3
3
1 0 0 θ 1 GJ 2 – 1 0 θ 1
2 s
–ω J M 0 1 0 θ2 + --------
- – 1 2 – 1 θ2 = 0
L
0 0 1 θ3 0 –1 2 θ3
2 2JML
There is only one dimensionless group to form: Let α = ω ---------- .
GJ s
Our algebraic equation is now
1 0 0 2 – 1 0 θ1
2
– α 0 1 0 + –1 2 –1 θ2 = 0
001 0 –1 2 θ3
1⁄2 1⁄ 2 1⁄2
2 – 2, 1 ⁄ 2 , 2, 0 , 2 + 2, – 1 ⁄ 2
1⁄2 –1 ⁄ 2 1⁄2
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 8
/home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture12.frm
Homework
Solution
Advanced Vibrations
1⁄2 1⁄ 2 1⁄2
The MODAL MATRIX is P = 1⁄ 2 0 ( –1 ⁄ 2 )
1 ⁄ 2 –1 ⁄ 2 1⁄2
T T
Test diagonalization: P MP = P IP = I
2– 2 0 0
T
and P KP = 0 2 0
0 0 2+ 2
Mode Shapes
Mode 1
Lowest Energy
Mode 2
Mode 3
Highest Energy
Because we know that the modes are orthogonal with respect to the
mass matrix, we may use known eigenvectors to reduce the size of the
remaining eigen-problem. This is particularly useful for systems with
easily recognized rigid body modes.
Consider the system shown. The
k k
m m m m
mass matrix is M = m
m
k –k
and the stiffness matrix is K = – k 2k – k . We see right away that a
–k k
T
rigid body mode is v 1 = 11 1 . (Observe K v 1 = 0 .)
We know that there are two remaining eigen modes and that they are
orthogonal to the rigid body mode:
v 1T Mx = m 1 1 1 x = m ( x 1 + x 2 + x 3 ) = 0 . This provides a
constraint that can be used to reduce the order of the system.
x1 1 0 x
x2 = – 1 – 1 1 = Tx .
x3
x3 0 1
M = T MT = m 2 1 = T KT = k 5 4
T T
Resulting in and K
12 4 5
The eigenvectors of this reduced system are
1⁄ 2
v2 = 1 ⁄ 2 => v2 = T v2 = – 2 and
1⁄ 2
1⁄ 2
–1 ⁄ 2
v 3 = – 1 ⁄ 2 => v 3 = T v 3 = 0
1⁄ 2
1⁄ 2
T
= ( mL ) Ȧ M Ȧ
2
where M ij = --------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i + j + 1)(i + j + 2)(i + j + 3)
and K 11 = 4
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 16
/home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture12.frm
Eigen Example
Lagrange Equation
Advanced Vibrations
( mL )M Ȧ˙ + -----3- K A = 0
EI
L
The corresponding algebraic eigenvalue is achieved by postulating that
iωt
A ( t ) = Re { A 0 e } problem is
– ( ω 2 mL ) M + -----
EI
- K A0 = 0
3
L
2 3
2 ω ( mL )L
We nondimensionalize this by setting α = -------------------------- and the
EI
2
eigen problem is now ( –α M + K ) A0 = 0
1 1
M = 0.0333 , K = 4.000 .
2
Eigen solution α 1 = 120 and P 1 = [ 5.4772 ]
2
This asserts that the frequency α 1 = 120 is associated with the
y ( x ) = --- 1 – --- .
x x
postulated shape
L L
From Lecture 11, we know that this is an upper bound for the square of
the first natural frequency.
2
α 1 = 97.47 4.4458 -14.4914 28.6397
3
Solution: α 2 = 2520 , P = 4.7965 28.9828 -132.7290
2
2
α3 = 17375 -4.7965 -0.0000 132.7290
2
This asserts that ω 1 = 97.47 is associated with the shape
2 3
x x x
y ( x ) = 4.45 --- + 4.80 --- – 4.80 --- x
1 – --- and is still an
L L L L
upper bound for the square of the first natural frequency.
x
y ( x ) = sin π -
--
0.8
L 0.6
0.4
0.2
N=1
N=3
N=5
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 21
/home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture12.frm
An Important Distinction
About Eigenmodes and Eigenvectors
Advanced Vibrations
4.4458
In the above, X = 4.7965 is an exact eigenvector of the above
-4.7965
BUT
2 3
x x x
y ( x ) = 4.45 --- + 4.80 --- – 4.80 --- x
1 – --- is very much
L L L L
NOT the exact first mode of the simply supported beam, even though it
is the best approximation that can be achieved with a quartic
polynomial.
For any elastic system, the lowest natural frequency is achieved by that
displacement field that minimizes the ratio of potential to kinetic energy,
V ( y )
λ = min ------------
T ( y )
T (( y) > 0)
In the above, the field y is used as both the displacement and the
velocity field.
The above relation was already proven for cases of point masses, but
holds true for continuous systems. The minimization is over all
displacement fields which are square integrable and sufficiently
differentiable.
Restriction to a smaller set of displacement fields will yield an upper-
bound for the first eigen value.
We shall explore this more as we focus on continuous systems later on.
Next Time
Post-Mortem on MidTerm
Modal Damping
Modal Strain Energy
Transfer Functions
TODAY
Solutions To Midterm
for A1 ( t ) .
• Assuming that P is harmonic, calculate the complex
magnification factor for the tip displacement as a function of the
frequency.
2
y ( x, t ) = A 1 ( t ) -
x
-- .
P(t)
L
L
m 2 x 4 Lm 2 EI, m µ dy
T = ∫ ---- Ȧ --- dx = ---------- Ȧ F = µ
2 L 2⋅5 dt
0 L/2
L
EI 2 2 2 4EI 2
V = ∫ ------ A -----2 dx = --------3- A L
2 L 2L
0
Lm ˙ µ Ȧ 4EI
The Lagrange equation is -------- Ȧ + ------- + --------- A = P ( t )
5 16 3
L
iωt
Assume that P ( t ) = Re { P 0 e } , then we expect the resulting
iωt
displacement will be A ( t ) = Re { A 0 e } . Substitution into the
governing equation yields
2 iωt
Re { ( [ – ω M + iωC + K ] A 0 – P 0 )e } = 0
2
from which we conclude that [ – ω M + iωC + K ] A 0 = P 0
ω 2 ω P0
which is re-arranged to 1 – ------ + 2iζ ------ A 0 = ------
ω 0 ω0 K
2 K 20EI C µL 5
where ω 0 = ----- = -----------4- and ζ = --------------- = ------- -----------
M mL 2Mω 0 64 mEI
P0
A 0 = ------ H ( ω )
K
1
where H ( ω ) = ------------------------------------------------ is the Magnification Factor.
ω 2 ω
1– ------ + 2iζ - -----
ω 0 ω0
2π ⁄ ω
ω
D = ------
2π ∫ P ( t )ẏ ( L, t ) dt
0
2π ⁄ ω
ω
∫
iωt iωt
= -
----- Re { P 0 e }Re { iωA 0 e } dt
2π
0
1 1
--
- ∗
= Re { ( P 0 ) ( iω A 0 ) } = --- Re { ( P 0∗ ) ( iωP 0 H ( ω ) ⁄ K ) }
2 2
3 2 3 2
L P0 L P0
= ω ----------------- Re { iH ( ω } = – ω ----------------- Im { H ( ω }
8EI 8EI
2 k R 2
V = --- --- sin θ 2 – R sin θ 1 + --- --- sin θ 2 – R sin θ 3
k R
2 2 2 2
R
– mgR cos θ 1 – mg - cos θ 2 – mgR cos θ 3
-- .
2
∂V 2 θ 2
= mgRθ 1 + kR θ 1 – -----
∂ θ1 2
2
∂V R kR
= mg --- θ 2 + --------- ( θ 2 – θ 1 – θ 3 ) and
∂ θ2 2 2
∂V 2 θ 2
= mgRθ 3 + kR θ 3 – ----- after linearization.
∂ θ3 2
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 9 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture13.frm
Solution
Advanced Vibrations
m 2 2 m R 2 2 m 2 2
T = ---- R θ̇ 1 + ---- --- θ̇ 2 + ---- R θ̇ 3
2 2 2 2
Yielding the governing equations
1 0 0 θ̇ 1
˙
( 1 + γ ) –γ ⁄ 2 0 θ1
R
--- 0 1 ⁄ 4 0 θ̇˙2 + – γ ⁄ 2 ( 1 + γ ) ⁄ 2 – γ ⁄ 2 θ 2 = 0
g
0 1 θ̇˙ 0 –γ ⁄ 2 ( 1 + γ ) θ3
3
where γ = ( kR ) ⁄ ( mg )
T iωt T
Setting θ1 θ2 θ3 = Re e A1 A2 A3
î
The resulting algebraic eigen problem becomes
1 0 0 A1 ( 1 + γ ) –γ ⁄ 2 0 A1
2
–α 0 1 ⁄ 4 0 A2 + –γ ⁄ 2 ( 1 + γ ) ⁄ 2 –γ ⁄ 2 A2 = 0
0 1 A3 0 –γ ⁄ 2 ( 1 + γ ) A3
2 2
where α = Rω ⁄ g
A1 10
A1
A2 = T where T = 0 1 . The new matrices are
A2
A3 10
2(1 + γ ) –γ
T
K = T KT = 1 and
–γ --- ( 1 + γ )
2
M = T MT = 2 0
T
0 1⁄4
A1 2(1 + γ ) –γ A1
–α 2 0
2
+ 1 = 0.
0 1 ⁄ 4 A2 –γ --- ( 1 + γ ) A 2
2
2
2 ( 1 + γ ) – 2α –γ
det 2 = 0
1 α
–γ --- ( 1 + γ ) – ------
2 4
4
α 3 2
This has a characteristic equation ------ – --- ( 1 + γ )α + ( 1 + 2γ ) = 0
2 2
3 2 1 2
The solutions are α = --- ( 1 + γ ) ± --- 1 + 2γ + 9γ . Substituting
2 2
this back into the algebraic eigen value problem
– (1 + γ ) −
2 1
+ 1 + 2γ + 9γ –γ
A2
1
--- [ ( 1 + γ ) −
2
–γ + 1 + 2γ + 9γ ] -----
A1
-
8
= 0
0
2
A2 1 + γ − 1 + 2γ + 9γ
yields ------ = – ------------ + ----------------------------------
A1 γ γ
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 14 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture13.frm
Solution
Map these modes back to original space
Advanced Vibrations
A1 10
A1
A2 = T where T = 0 1 , so our solutions are
A2
A3 10
1
α 2 = 3--- ( 1 + γ ) ± 1--- 1 + 2γ + 9γ 2 , 1 + γ 1 + 2γ + 9γ
2
2 2 – -----------
- −
+ ----------------------------------
γ γ
1
A1
= 1
2
α = 1 corresponds to and
A2 0
A1
= 0
2
α = 2 corresponds to
A2 1
as expected.
A1
= 1
2
α = 0 corresponds to (rigid body motion), and
A2 2
2 A1 1
α = 3γ corresponds to =
A2 –4
as expected.
T T
This yields the system β̇˙ + Dβ = P F = where D = P KP is
the diagonal matrix of eigen values.
–1 –1
where the vector β̇ ( 0 ) = P ẋ ( 0 ) and β ( 0 ) = P x ( 0 )
There is a class of damping matrices for which the elastic eigen modes
are preserved. These problems are much more tractable. Because
T T
P MP = I and P KP = D we may conclude that
–T –1 –T –1
M = P I P and K = P DP .
–T –1
This suggests looking for damping matrices C = P χP where χ
is also a diagonal matrix consisting of terms 2ζ k ω k on the diagonal.
M ẋ˙ + C ẋ + Kx = F .
We diagonalize with the modal matrix to find
T
β̇ + χβ̇ + Dβ = P F =
˙
–1 1 – ζωt sin ( ω 1 – ζ 2 t )
Exploit that -----------------------------------------
- = e --------------------------------------
s + 2ζ k ω k s + ω k
2 2
ω 1 – ζ2
–1 s d –ζωt sin ( ω 1 – ζ 2 t )
and that - = e
----------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
s + 2ζ k ω k s + ω k
2 2 dt ω 1 – ζ2
to solve for βk ( t ) .
d T
( x ) = P ( β ) = PG P (F )
d
where G (s) is a diagonal matrix, whose diagonal terms are
d 1
G kk = -----------------------------------------
2
-
2
s + 2ζ k ω k s + ω k
we have assumed homogeneous initial conditions.
Say we want to find the transfer function from force DOF n to
displacement DOF m. Then
modes
∑
d
G mn ( s ) = P mk G kk P nk
k=1
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 23 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture13.frm
Modal Damping
Advanced Vibrations
M ẋ˙ + ( aM + bK )ẋ + Kx = F ( t )
is diagonalized by the modal matrix. x = Pβ as
β + ( aI + bD )β̇ + Dβ = .
T
2. Where a real damping matrix is known, compute P CP and
discard the off-diagonal terms
TODAY
T
2. Where a real damping matrix is known, compute P CP and
discard the off-diagonal terms
2 1 ẋ˙1 + 2 0 ẋ 1 + 2 – 1 x 1 = 0
1 2 ẋ˙2 0 3 ẋ 2 –1 2 x2 0
In Matlab,
[P,D] = eig(k,m) :Find the generalized eigen solution:
PP =P/sqrt(P’*m*P) :Normalize the modal matrix
Cm = PP’*c*PP ;map the damping matrix to modal coordinates
2.5000 -0.2887
-0.2887 0.8333
C = 2.500 0
d
The diagonal of this matrix is
0 0.833
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
12/8/98 4 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture14.frm
Modal Damping Terms
from Full Damping Matrix
Advanced Vibrations
1 0 β̇˙1 + 2.500 0 β̇ 1 3 0 β1
+ = 0
0 1 β̇˙2 0 0.833 β̇ 2 0 0.333 β 2 0
m 10 2 – 1 x1
– ω ----
2 + = 0 , having eigen solutions
k 01 –1 2 x2
---- = 1 , 1 ⁄ 2
ω2 m and ω ---- = 3 ,
1⁄ 2
2 m
k k
1⁄ 2 –1 ⁄ 2
2π ⁄ ω
∫
2
D = µ ( ẋ 2 – ẋ 1 ) dt
0
x1 iω1 t 1 ⁄ 2
For the first mode, = Re Ae ,
x2 1⁄ 2
î
iω 1 t
ẋ 2 – ẋ 1 = Re iω 1 Ae ( 1 ⁄ 2 – 1 ⁄ 2 ) = 0 => ζ 1 = 0
î
The second mode will be more interesting.
2π ⁄ ω
∫
2
D = µ ( ẋ 2 – ẋ 1 ) dt
0
x1 iω2 t 1 ⁄ 2
For the second mode, = Re Ae ,
x2 –1 ⁄ 2
î
iω 2 t iω 2 t
ẋ 2 – ẋ 1 = Re iω 2 Ae ( 1 ⁄ 2 + 1 ⁄ 2 ) = 2ω 2 Re { iAe }
î
The dissipation is D = 2µω 2 π ( A∗ A ) .
3k iω 2 t 2
= ------ ( Re { Ae } )
2
3k
and the max storage is V max = ------ A∗ A .
2
D 2µω 2 π ( A∗ A ) 4 µω 2
The dissipation ratio is ------------ = --------------------------------- = --- ----------
V max 3k 3 k
------ A∗ A
2
2
β̇˙2 + 2ζω 2 β̇ 2 + ω 2 β 2 = 2
iω 2 t
Here, we assume that β 2 = Re { Be }.
The energy dissipation per cycle is
2π ⁄ ω 2
2 π
∫ 2ζω 2 ( β̇ 2 ) dt = ------ ( 2ζω 2 )ω 2 ( B∗ B ) =2πζω 2 ( B∗ B )
2 2
D =
ω2
0
2
ω2
The max energy stored per cycle is V max = ------ ( B∗ B ) so the
2
dissipation ratio is 4πζ .
4 µω 2 µω 2
--- ---------- = 4πζ 2 => ζ 2 = ----------
3 k 3πk
2 2
β̇ 1 + ω 1 β 1 =
˙
1 and β̇ 2 + 2ζ 2 ω 2 β̇ 2 + ω 2 β 2 =
˙
2
t
σ(t ) = ∫ G ( t – τ )γ̇ ( τ ) dτ
–∞
+ ∑ A k G'' ( ω k ) cos ( ω k t + ψ k )
k
2π ⁄ ω
ED = ∫ τ ( t )γ̇ ( t ) dt
0
2π ⁄ ω
= A2 ∫ [ G' ( ω ) sin ωt + G'' ( ω ) cos ωt ]ω cos ( ωt ) dt
0
2
= πA G'' ( ω )
modulus are G’
illustrated in the
figure
Loss modulus is
maximum where
storage modulus is G”
steepest
log ω
t
M ẋ˙ + Kx + ∫ Γ ( t – τ )ẋ ( τ ) dτ = F (t)
–∞
– ω M X ( ω ) + K X ( ω ) + Γ∗ ( ω )X ( ω ) = F ( ω )
2
x ( t ) = X sin ( ωt + φ ) . Fv(t)
Fv(t)
In complex notation,
iωt
F ( t ) = F 0 Im { e } and
i ( ωt + φ ) iωt iφ
x ( t ) = X Im { e } = Im { X 0 e } where X 0 = X e
2 A
– ω mX 0 = F 0 – k X 0 – X 0 --- ( G' + iG'' )
h
Note the similarity to the elasto-dynamics problem.
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
12/8/98 22 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture14.frm
Introduction to Linear Viscoelasticity
Vibration of Linearly Viscoelastic Structures
Advanced Vibrations
2 A
– ω mX 0 = F 0 – k X 0 – X 0 --- ( G' + iG'' )
h
From which we can solve for the complex frequency response function
for normalized displacement as a function of frequency:
X0 1
------ ( ω ) = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F0 [ k + ( A ⁄ h )G' ( ω ) – mω ] + i ( A ⁄ h )G'' ( ω )
2
X0 1
Note that ------ ( ω → ∞ ) = -------------- , as it should. This is mass loading.
F0 –ω m
2
X0 1
Also note that ------ ( 0 ) = -------------------------------------- , as it should. This is the
F0 k + ( A ⁄ h )G' ( 0 )
static response.
Lets examine the response of a real system. The following plot for
polyisobutylene is taken from “Vibration Damping” by Nashif et. al.
E’=3G’
tan(δ)
ω 5
We can fit the above plots reasonably well in 0.1 < ------ < 10 by
2π
ω 3.3
Log ( 3G' ( ω ) ) = Log ( E' ( ω ) ) = 6.2 + 0.0112 Log ------ or
2π
ω 3.3
5.72 + 0.0112 Log ------
2π
G' ( ω ) = 10 and
ω ω 2
Log ( tan δ ( ω ) ) = – 1 + 0.56Log ------ – 0.069 Log ------ so
2π 2π
The above
7
approximations 10
show the correct
behavior at low
frequencies
6
10 G’
5
10
G”
4
10
3
10
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
10 10 10 10 10 10 10
f=ω/2π
1.5
0.5
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
f (Hz)
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
12/8/98 28 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture14.frm
Fraction of Critical Damping in
Viscoelastic Structure
Advanced Vibrations
Lets consider
x 10 another case:
−5
2.5
2
Case h=0.10 so A/h=0.1
ζ=0.0084
X0/F0
1.5
0.5
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
f (Hz)
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
12/8/98 29 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture14.frm
Introduction to Linear Viscoelasticity
Advanced Vibrations
Lets see what damping model we get from the modal strain energy
method applied to our earlier problem.
1⁄2
For the elastic system, ωn = ( k ⁄ m ) = 624 /sec =>
f n = 100 Hz. Lets look at the energy dissipation per cycle of this
single degree of freedom system when oscillating at its resonant
frequency at amplitude B:
2 2 5
E D = πB ( A ⁄ h )G'' ( ω n ) = πB ( 4.74 ×10 N ⁄ m )
The energy stored per cycle is
1 2 1 2 6
E S = --- B ( k + G' ( ω ) ( A ⁄ h ) ) = --- B 3.07 ×10 N ⁄ m
2 2
ED
2ζ = η = ------------- = 0.134 => ζ = 0.067
2πE S
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
12/8/98 32 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture14.frm
Introduction to Linear Viscoelasticity
Approximation with 2nd Order System
Advanced Vibrations
2
β̇˙ + 2ζω n β̇ + ω n β = F ⁄ M
We convert back to spacial coordinates:
M ẋ˙ + 2ζ KM ẋ + Kx = F ( t )
Lets compare this approximation to the actual system for the case of
iωt
steady state harmonic excitation: F = Im { F 0 e } and
iωt
x = Im { X 0 e } yielding
1
X 0 ⁄ F 0 = ----------------------------------------------------------------
2
-
[ ( K – Mω ) + i2ζω KM ]
−6
x 10
2.5
viscoelastic system
second order
2
approximation
X0/F0
1.5
0.5
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
f (Hz)
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
12/8/98 35 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture14.frm
Introduction to Linear Viscoelasticity
Vibration of Linearly Viscoelastic Structures
Advanced Vibrations
COMPLEX MODES
M ẋ˙ + C ẋ + Kx = F ( t ) ,
Put this into a state space formulation:
˙
M 0 ẋ + C K ẋ = F ( t )
0 M x –M 0 x 0
Each of the if the original problem has N degrees of freedom, the new
system has 2N degrees of freedom.
ẏ – Ay = F̃ where A = –
–1 C K and F̃ =
–1 F (t)
–M 0 0
We shall use modal analysis and orthogonality to solve the above first
order system.
Though the right eigen vectors are not mutually orthogonal, the left
eigenvectors are also not mutually orthogonal, there is an
orthogonallity between members of the two sets.
For the sake of simplicity, for the moment, we assume that there are no
repeated eigenvalues.
H
Subtracting these two, we have 0 = ( λ n – λ m )W m V n
Since we had assumed that there are no repeated eigenvalues, we
H H
conclude that W m V n = 0 and W m AV n for n ≠ m .
H H
We normalize the V n so that W n V n = 1 and W n AV n = λ n .
2n
We postulate solutions y = ∑ ak ( t )Y k to the governing equation
k=1
H
ẏ – Ay = F̃ and contract by W m to obtain
H
ȧ m ( t ) – λ m a m ( t ) = W m F̃ ( t )
In principle this could be solved by Laplace transforms:
H
W m { F̃ } a m ( 0 )
{ a m } = ------------------------ + --------------- .
s – λm s – λm
Note that the initial values are found from orthogonality
H
am ( 0 ) = W m y(0) .
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
2/10/99 8 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture14_5.frm
Solution of Governing Equations
Advanced Vibrations
λ m′ = λ m∗ and V m′ = V m∗
H H
W m′ { F̃ } W m′ y ( 0 )
{ a m′ } = ------------------------- + ---------------------
s – λ m′ s – λ m′
H ∗ H ∗
(W m ) { F̃ } (W m ) y(0)
= -------------------------------- + ----------------------------
s – λ m∗ s – λ m∗
{ a m V m + a m′ V m′ } =
H H ∗
m m
V W V m W m
= ----------------- + ----------------- ( { F̃ } + y ( 0 ) )
s – λ m s – λ m′
Note that the right hand side of the above equation is real. The complex
modes contribute to the solution pair-wise as real values.
TODAY
M < modes
x(t ) = ∑ βk ( t ) { Pk }
k=1
where { P k } is the k’th column of the modal matrix simplifies the
problem further and permits larger time steps in the integration.
iωt
f ( t ) = Re { F 0 e }.
In what follows, we will admit cases where the load is a continuous sum
of harmonic inputs:
∫ Re { F ( ω )e
iωt
f (t) = } dω
0
∫
iωt
f (t) = F ( ω )e dω
–∞
∞ ∞
1 – i ωt
∫ ∫
iωt
f ( t ) = ------ F ( ω )e dω & F (ω) = f ( t )e dt
2π
–∞ –∞
∞ ∞
– i ωt
∫ ∫ [ f ( t )e
iωt iωt
F (ω) = f ( t )e dt = + f ( – t )e ] dt
–∞ 0
= (f) s = iω + (– f ) s = –i ω
This is interesting, but not used very often. The primary reason is that
one usually does not deal with analytic Fourier transforms.
2
( – ω M + iωC + K )X ( ω ) = F ( ω )
Say we are interested in the displacement x I ( t ) of degree of freedom I
due to forces at degree of freedom J . At first look this would appear to
be a difficult relationship to find, but it turns out to be reasonably do-
able.
We diagonalize the governing equation via modal decomposition:
x ( t ) = Pβ ( t ) which is X ( ω ) = PB ( ω ) in frequency space.
T 2 T
P ( – ω M + iωC + K )PX ( ω ) = P F ( ω )
T 2 T
P ( – ω M + iωC + K )PB ( ω ) = P F ( ω ) becomes
2 T
( – ω I + i2ωχ + D )B ( ω ) = P F ( ω )
The terms of B can be solved individually:
DOFs
∑
2 2
Bk = P Jk F J ( ω ) ⁄ ( ω k – ω + 2iωζ k )
J=1
∑ ∑
2 2
= P Ik P Jk F J ( ω ) ⁄ ( ω k – ω + 2iωζ k )
k=1 J=1
DOFs
= ∑ H IJ ( ω )F J ( ω )
J=1
Above,
Modes
∑
2 2
H IJ ( ω ) = P Ik P Jk ⁄ ( ω k – ω + 2iωζ k )
k=1
2 2
H IJ ( ω ) ≅ P Ik [ P Jk ⁄ ( ω k – ω + 2iωζ k ) ]
We see that at resonance, the receptance at locations is proportional to
the mode shape of that frequency. It is possible to assess the mode
shapes experimentally.
• impulse
• random
Stinger or Stringer
Force Transducer
Leads to a myriad
accelerometers
Shaker
Charge Amplifier &
Signal Processor
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 14 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture15.frm
Experimental Determination of H IJ ( ω )
By Stepped Sine
Advanced Vibrations
iω 0 t – iω 0 t
e –e
f ( t ) = sin ω 0 t = ----------------------------- .
2i
∞
1 – i ωt
Since f ( t ) = ------
2π ∫ F ( ω )e dω ,
–∞
F ( ω ) = πi [ δ ( ω – ω 0 ) – δ ( ω + ω 0 ) ]
H IJ ( ω 0 ) = X ( ω 0 ) ⁄ ( πi ) and H IJ ( – ω 0 ) = X ( ω 0 )∗ ⁄ ( – π i ) .
Swept sine input is much more quickly implemented than is the stepped
sine input.
This sort of experiment is most often used to search for resonances.
Unless the sweep is very slow, the results are hard to post process for
detailed information.
H IJ ( ω ) = X I ( ω ) ⁄ F J ( ω )
Signals are reinforced by doing several experiments and averaging the
frequency response functions obtained from each.
Note that the magnitude information on the frequency response
function can be calculated from power spectra of the input and output:
[ H IJ ( ω )F J ( ω ) ] [ H IJ ( ω )F J ( ω ) ]∗ = X I ( ω )X I ( ω )∗ yielding
H IJ ( ω ) = S XX ( ω ) ⁄ S FF ( ω )
ρ( f J )
fJ
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 20 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture15.frm
Experimental Determination of H IJ ( ω )
Via Random Input
Advanced Vibrations
∞
The cross-correlation integral is u xf ( τ ) = ∫ x I ( t ) f J ( t + τ ) dt .
–∞
Note that these infinite integrals should average away much of the
noise in the system. Further, if the excitation is also ergodic, we can
average the correlation integrals for multiple experiments.
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 21 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture15.frm
Experimental Determination of H IJ ( ω )
Via Random Input
Advanced Vibrations
∞ ∞ ∞ iωτ
∫ ∫ ∫e
iωτ
U xf ( ω ) = e u xf ( τ ) dτ = x I ( t ) f J ( t + τ ) dt dτ
–∞ –∞ –∞
∞ ∞ iωτ
= ∫ xI ( t ) ∫ e f J ( t + τ ) dτ dt
–∞ –∞
∞
– i ωτ
= ∫e x I ( τ ) dτ F J ( ω ) = X I ( ω )∗ F J ( ω )
–∞
Because our integrals are actually over finite time, we use the expected
value of the right hand side.
S XF ( ω ) = E { U xf ( ω ) } = E { X I ( ω )∗ F J ( ω ) } .
where the expected value is obtained by averaging over a number of
tests. The uncertainty in the expected value is a function of the number
of averages. S XF ( ω ) is the cross-spectral density of X I and F J .
Note that S XF = S FX ∗ .
Similarly,
S XX ( ω ) = E { X I ( ω )∗ X I ( ω ) } & S FF ( ω ) = E { F J ( ω )∗ F J ( ω ) }
X I ( ω ) = H IJ ( ω )F J ( ω )
on both sides by the appropriate quantity Fourier transformed quantity,
we see that we could as easily evaluate
H IJ ( ω ) = S FX ( ω ) ⁄ S FF ( ω ) and H IJ ( ω ) = S XX ( ω ) ⁄ S XF ( ω )
2 2
γ ( ω ) = S FX ( ω ) ⁄ ( S FF ( ω )S XX ( ω ) )
2
Unless γ is nearly 1.0, the estimate for H IJ ( ω ) is considered
unreliable.
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 24 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture15.frm
Next Time
Advanced Vibrations
Clay Fulcher will demonstrate how modal and frequency response are
uses to assess reliability of critical structures.
Over the next few weeks, we shall address the vibration of continuous
structure.
• We shall begin deriving the governing equations for idealized
structures such as strings, rods, Euler-Bernoulli beams,
Timoshenko beams, and plates. We shall do this exploiting
D’Alembert’s principle and Hamilton’s principle.
ρ ( x )ẏ˙( x ) = ( F ( x )y′ ( x ) )′ F( x) p( x) F ( x + dx )
+ p ( x, t ) .
y' ( x ) ρ( x) y' ( x + dx )
In what follows, we shall assume
that F ( x ) = F = Constant
& that ρ ( x ) = ρ = Constant .
We choose easy boundary conditions: y ( 0, t ) = y ( L, t ) = 0 .
Lets now solve the unforced initial value problem:
ρẏ˙( x ) = ( Fy′ ( x ) )′
subject to y ( x, 0 ) = y 0 ( x ) and ẏ ( x, 0 ) = v 0 ( x )
Ṫ˙n F X n ′′ 2
This yields ------ = --- ---------- = – λ n for each n .
Tn ρ Xn
2ρ
Solving X n ′′ + λ n --- X n = 0 , subject to X n ( 0 ) = X n ( L ) = 0 , we
F
find that
2ρ
2
nπx
X n = sin --------- nπ
and ------ = λ n ---
L L F
nπ
2
2ρ nπ F 1 ⁄ 2
------ = λ n --- => λ n = ± ------ --- .
L F L ρ
2
The temporal part of the solution is the solution to T n + λ n T n = 0
˙˙
which has solutions T n ( t ) = A n cos ( λ n t ) + B n sin ( λ n t )
∑ n
nπx
y ( x, t ) = ( A cos ( λ n t ) + B n sin ( λ n t ) ) sin ---------
n
L
The velocity of the string is
∑ n n
nπx
ẏ ( x, t ) = λ ( – A sin ( λ n t ) + B n cos ( λ n t ) ) sin ---------
n
L
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 5 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture16.frm
Strings
Advanced Vibrations
∑ n --------
nπx
From prescribed initial position, y0 ( x ) = A sin -
n
L
∑ n n --------
nπx
From prescribed initial velocity, v 0 ( x ) = λ B sin -.
n
L
L L
2 nπx 2 nπx
A n = --- ∫ y 0 ( x ) sin --------- dx & B n = --------- ∫ v 0 ( x ) sin --------- dx
L L λn L L
0 0
Please confirm these. Which is the fundamental tone?
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 6 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture16.frm
Strings and Positive Operators
Advanced Vibrations
Note that we could have posed this in terms of kinetic energy and
potential energy operators.
∂ ∂
Let K be the differential operator K [ y ] = – F (y) and we
∂x ∂x
consider its operation only on the linear space of smooth functions that
satisfy the geometric boundary conditions ( y ( 0, t ) = y ( L, t ) = 0 ).
The governing equation now has the form M ẏ˙ + Ky = 0 . Except for a
sign difference, this looks similar to the matrix equations for discrete
systems.
2 ( X , KX )
We consider the functional λ ( X ) : λ ( X ) = --------------------- operating on
( X , MX )
functions in X ∈ U0,
2 2
Let λ = min λ ( X ) and let X 1 be the function that achieves that
1
X ∈ U0
minimum.
2 2
Let U 1 = { X ∈ U 0 : ( X , M X 1 ) = 0 } and let λ 2 = min λ ( X )
X ∈ U1
and let X 2 be the function that achieves that minimum.
d ( ( X 1 + αX̃ ), K ( X 1 + αX̃ ) )
Examine ----------------------------------------------------------------- = 0 where X̃ ( x ) is
d α ( ( X 1 + αX̃ ), M ( X 1 + αX̃ ) )
α=0
any function of x satisfying the boundary conditions.
2
Appropriate differentiation shows that ( X̃ , K X 1 – λ 1 M X 1 ) = 0 for
2
all X̃ . This implies that K X 1 – λ 1 M X 1 = 0 . ( λ 1, X 1 ) are and eigen
pair for the governing equation.
d ( ( X n + αX̃ ), K ( X n + αX̃ ) )
Similarly, Examine ----------------------------------------------------------------- = 0 where
d α ( ( X n + αX̃ ), M ( X n + αX̃ ) )
α=0
X̃ ( x ) is any function of x satisfying the boundary conditions and
orthogonal to the previous eigen functions.
2
Appropriate differentiation shows that ( X̃ , K X n – λn M X n ) = 0 for
all X̃
orthogonal to the previous eigen-functions. This implies that
2
K X n – λ n M X n = 0 . ( λ n, X n ) are and eigen pair for the governing
equation.
2
( X m, K X n ) – λ n ( X m, M X n ) = 0 and
2
( X n, K X m ) – λ m ( X n, M Xm) = 0.
2 2
Subtracting one from another, we find ( λ n – λ m ) ( X n, M X m ) = 0 .
2
( X m, K X n ) – λ n ( X m, M X n ) = 0 and
2
( X n, K X m ) – λ m ( X n, M X m ) = 0
nπx
By the way, we see that X n = sin --------- is the n’th eigen function of
L
2
( K – λ M )X = 0 , where KX = – ( FX′ ) ′ and MX = ρX and the
2 F nπ 2
corresponding eigen value is λ n = --- ------ .
ρ L
Note that frequency increases with tension, decreases with density, and
decreases with length.
Lets consider the experiment where the string is pulled through a pulley
at the boundary.
The distance that the string must be pulled through the pulleys in order
to stretch the string into its deformed shape is the arc length of the
curved string minus the distance between the boundaries
L L
1 2
∫ 1 + y′ dx – L ≅ --- ∫ y′ dx
2
d =
2
0 0
L
F 2
and the work involved is W = Fd = --- ∫ y′ dx .
2
0
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 19 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture16.frm
Strings and the Rayleigh Quotient
Advanced Vibrations
2 ( X , KX )
The quotient that we were examining before, λ ( X ) = ---------------------
( X , MX )
actually reflects the energy in periodic motion.
iωt
Say that the deformation is y ( x, t ) = Re { e }X ( x ) . Then
iωt
ẏ = Re { iωe }X ( x ) . The maximum kinetic energy in a cycle is
L
ρ iωt 2 1
∫
2
max --- ẏ ( x, t ) dx = max ( Re { iωe } ) --- ( X , MX )
2π 2 2π 2
0 < t < ------ 0 0 < t < ------
ω ω
1 2
= --- ω ( X , MX )
2
1
Similarly, the maximum strain energy in each cycle is --- ( X , KX ) .
2
2 2 ( X , KX )
We now see that λ n = ω n = --------------------- is the ratio of maximum
( X , MX )
strain energy in a mode to the maximum kinetic energy in that mode.
( X , KX )
2
The function λ ( X ) = --------------------- is called the Rayleigh quotient and
( X , MX )
is often used to obtain upper bounds for the first natural frequency.
∫ F ( f′ ( x ) ) dx
2
3
2 FL ⁄ 3 F
λ ( f ) = --------------------------------
0
L
- = ------------------
5
- = 10 --------
-
2
ρL ⁄ 30 ρL
∫ ρ ( f ( x ) ) dx
2
The Weak form of Hamilton’s Principle: asserts that the actual path is
t2
t2
0 = ∫ ( δT – δV ) dt
t 2t 1 L t2 L
ρ 2 F 2
= δ ∫ --- ∫ ( ẏ ( x, t ) ) dx dt – δ ∫ --- ∫ ( y′ ( x, t ) ) dx dt
2 2
t 1 0 t 10
L t2 t2 L
∂
= ∫∫ ∂t
( ρẏδy ) – ρẏ˙δy dt dx – ∫ ∫ F [ ( y′δy )′ – y′′δy ] dx dt
0 t1 t1 0
L 0 t2 0
t2 t2
= ∫ ( ρẏδy ) t dx – ∫ ( F ( y′δy ) t ) dt
1 1
L t2
0 t1
– ∫ ∫ [ ρẏ˙ – Fy′′ ]δy dt dx
0 t
1
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 24 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture16.frm
Next Time
Advanced Vibrations
y ( x, t ) = u ( x, t ) j + v ( x, t )k
Further, we consider a more complicated boundary condition.
j
k
We restrict the left hand end of the string to move within a track in the
y ( L, t ) = 0 (=> u ( L, t ) = v ( L, t ) = 0 ).
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 2 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture17.frm
A More Complicated String Problem
Deformations in Two Dimensions
Advanced Vibrations
in 0 = ∫ ( δT – δV + δW ) dt .
t1
L L
1 ˙ ˙ 1
T = --- ∫ ρy ( x, t ) • y ( x, t ) dt , V = --- ∫ F y′ ( x, t ) • y′ ( x, t ) dt , and
2 2
0 0
L
δW = ∫ p ( x, t ) • δy ( x, t ) dt
0
t2 t2 L
˙ ˙
∫ δT dt = ∫ ∫ ρy ( x, t ) • δy ( x, t ) dx dt
t1 t 0 1
L t2
∂ ˙ ˙˙
= ∫∫ ( ρy • δy ) – ρy • δy dt dx
∂t
0 t 1
L 0 L t2
˙ t2 ˙˙
= ∫ ( ρy • δy ) t 1 dx – ∫ ∫ ρy • δy dt dx
0
0 t
1
t2 t2 L
∫ δV dt = ∫ ∫ F y′ ( x, t ) • δy′ ( x, t ) dx dt
t1 t 0 1
t2 L
∂
= ∫ ∫ F ( y′ • δy ) – F y′′ • δy dt dx
∂x
t 0 1
t2 L t2
L
= ∫ ( F y′ • δy ) 0 dt – ∫ ∫ F y′′ • δy dt dx
t1 0 t1
L t2
˙˙
∫∫
We put this all together to find: [ F y′′ – ρy + p ] • δy dt d x = 0
0 t 1
˙˙
for all δy from which we deduce that ρy = F y′′ + p <=>
t2
L
Also,
∫ ( F y′ • δy ) 0 dt = 0 from which we conclude that
t1
t2
∫ F y′ ( 0, t ) • δy ( 0, t ) dt = 0 => y′ ( 0, t ) • ( δs j ) => u′ ( 0, t ) = 0
t1
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 6 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture17.frm
A More Complicated String Problem
Deformations in Two Dimensions
Advanced Vibrations
F0 FL
x
u ( x, t )
Recall: The Weak form of Hamilton’s Principle: asserts that the actual
t2
L L
∂u 2
∂u 2
, T = --- ρA d x ,
1 1
V = --- ∫ EA
2 ∫ ∂t
dx
2 ∂x
0 0
and
δW = – F 0 δu ( 0, t ) + F L δu ( L, t )
0 = ∫ ( δT – δV + δW ) dt
t1
t2 L t2 L
= ∫ ∫ ρAu̇δu̇ dx dt – ∫ ∫ EAu′δu′ dx dt
t 0
t 0
1 1
t2
+ ∫ ( – F 0 ( t )δu ( 0, t ) + F L ( t )δu ( L, t ) ) dt
L t2 t1 t2 L
∂ [ u̇δu ] – u̇˙δu dt dx – EA ∂ [ u′δu ] – u′′δu dx dt
= ∫ ∫ ∂t
ρA
t2
∫ ∫ ∂x
0 t1 t1 0
+ ∫ ( – F 0 ( t )δu ( 0, t ) + F L ( t )δu ( L, t ) ) dt
t1
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 10 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture17.frm
Governing Equations for Rods
By Hamilton’s Principle
Advanced Vibrations
L 0 L t2
t2
0 = ∫ ( ρAu̇δu ) t dx – ∫ ∫ ( ρAu̇˙ – EAu′′ )δu dt dx
1
0 0 t1
t2 t2
t1 t1
[ EAu′ ( 0, t ) – F 0 ( t ) ]δu ( 0, t ) = 0 .
Hamilton’s principle provides governing equations and form of B.C.
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 11 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture17.frm
Solutions for Rods
Advanced Vibrations
Say we have a specific problem. Our rod is fixed on one end and subject
to a prescribed load on the other.
F (t)
x
u ( x, t )
L
We shall try to solve this using a modal solution, but first, we must find
the modes.
iωt
We postulate solutions u ( x, t ) = Re ( Ce )X ( x ) . This yields the
2
2 2 ω ρ
equation for X : X′′ + λ X = 0 where λ = ---------- .
E
The only solutions to the above equation with the specified boundary
π ( 2n – 1 ) x
conditions are X n ( x ) = α n sin ----------------------- --- .
2 L
Lets choose the constants α n so that the modes are orthonormal with
respect to the mass matrix. ( X m, M X n ) = δ mn requires that
2 2 π ( 2n – 1 ) x
αn = ------- so that X n( x) = ------- sin ----------------------- --- .
Lρ Lρ 2 L
N
Assume that u ( x, t ) = ∑ f n ( t )X n ( x )
n=1
Let now derive our governing equations in terms of our new variables
f n ( t ) using Lagrange equations. (Lagrange has been a good friend to
us.)
L N N
1
T = --- ∫ ρA ∑ f m ( t )X m ( x ) ∑ f n ( t )X n ( x ) dx
˙ ˙
2
0
m = 1 n = 1
N N L N
1 1
= --- ∑ ∑ f m ( t ) f n ( t ) ∫ ρAX m ( x )X n ( x ) dx = --- ∑ f n ( t )
2
˙ ˙ ˙
2 2
m = 1n = 1 0 n=1
L N N
1
V = --- ∫ EA ∑ f m ( t )X m ′ ( x ) ∑ f n ( t )X n ′ ( x ) dx
2
0
m = 1 n = 1
N N L
1
= ---
2 ∑ ∑ f m ( t ) f n ( t ) ∫ EAX m ′ ( x )X n ′ ( x ) dx
m = 1n = 1 0
N
1 π EA
2
∑ n f n(t )
2 2
= --- -------------
2 ρL 2
n=1
The generalized force associated with each mode calculated from the
work done by the physical forces against each mode:
X X
δW n = δfn X n ( L )F ( t ) = δfn Q n ( t ) => Q n(t ) = X n ( L )F ( t )
d ∂T ∂T ∂V π 2 EA 2
– = f˙˙n , – = – -------------n fn
d t ∂ f˙n ∂ f n ∂fn ρL 2
π 2 EA 2 2 π ( 2n – 1 )
f n = – -------------
˙˙ n f n + F ( t ) ------- sin -----------------------
ρL 2 Lρ 2
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 17 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture17.frm
Modal Solutions for Rods
Advanced Vibrations
π 2 EA 2 2 n
f˙˙n = – ------------- n f n – F ( t ) ------
- ( – 1 )
ρL 2 Lρ
To re-cap:
• Having identified the potiential and kinetic energy, we can use
Hamilton’s principle to deduce the governing equations.
• Mode shapes are used to discretize the problem and can be used
to introduce generalized degrees of freedom in solving the forced
vibration problem.
Please think about how we could introduce damping into this analysis.
Say that we have a problem for which we cannot calculate closed form
eigen functions. One such problem is that pictured below where the
u ( x, t ) = ∑ an ( t )Pn ( x ) ,
n
and then employ this expansion in creating the Lagrange equations.
The only requirements that we place on P n ( x ) are that each satisfy
what ever geometric boundary conditions exist.
L
T ( t ) = --- ∫ ρA ( x ) ∑ ȧ m ( t )P m ( x ) ∑ ȧ n ( t )P n ( x ) dx
1
2
0 m n
L
V ( t ) = --- ∫ EA ( x ) ∑ a m ( t )P m ′ ( x ) ∑ a n ( t )P n ′ ( x ) dx
1
2
0 m n
and
d ∂T ∂V
d t ∂ ȧ m
+
∂ am
= ∑ M mn ȧ˙n + ∑ K mn an = Qm ( t )
n n
L
where K mn = ∫ EA ( x )Pm ′ ( x )Pn ′ ( x ) dx ,
0
L
M mn = ∫ ρA ( x )Pm ( x )Pn ( x ) dx , and
0
L
Qm ( t ) = ∫ Pm ( x )F ( x, t ) = P m ( L )F ( t )
0
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 4 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture18.frm
Governing Equations
How to choose the P m
Advanced Vibrations
A ( x ) = A 0 1 – ------
x
2L
n
Lets try the expansion defined by Pn ( x ) = ( x ⁄ L )
L
1 – -----
x
∫ 0 2L
m n
M nm = ρ A - ( x ⁄ L ) ( x ⁄ L ) dx
0
ρ A0 L (m + n + 3)
= ------------- --------------------------------------------------------
2 (m + n + 1)(m + n + 2)
L
m+n–2
K mn
mn x
= ------2- ∫ E A 0 1 – ------ ( x ⁄ L ) dx
2L
L 0
E A 0 ( mn ) ( m + n + 1 )
= ---------- ----------------------------------------------
2L ( m + n – 1 ) ( m + n )
n
k n x k x n – k
B n ( y ( x, 0 ) ) = ∑ y L ---, 0 --- 1 – -- → y ( x, 0 )
n k L k
0
n
k n x k x n – k
B n ( ẏ ( x, 0 ) ) = ∑ ẏ L ---, 0 --- 1 – -- → ẏ ( x, 0 )
n k L k
0
We have established here that polynomials could be used to solve rod
problems. This approach is correct, but not very appealing.
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7
y n ( 0 ) = y ( x n, 0 ) and ẏ n ( 0 ) = ẏ ( x n, 0 )
L
1 – -----
x
The integrals M nm = ∫ 0 2L- yn ( x )ym ( x ) dx and
ρ A
0
L
K nm x
= ∫ E A 0 1 – ------ y n ( x )y m ( x ) dx are calculated by numerical
2L
0
integration.
1
≈ ∫ ∫ τ 1 + --- ∇w • ∇w d A
A 2
δW = ∫ ∫A pδW d A
where w is the out-of-plane displacement of the membrane, F is the
surface tension in the membrane, ρ is the mass per unit area of the
membrane, and integration is over the area enclosed by the boundaries.
t2 ∂ t2 t2
0 = ∫ ∫ ∫ ρẇ δw d A – ∫ ∫ ∫ τ∇w • ∇δw d A + ∫ ∫ ∫ pδW d A
t1 A ∂t t1 t1 A
t2
–∫ ∫ ∫A
2
τ [ ∇ • ( ∇wδw ) – ∇ wδw ] d A
t1
t2
+∫ ∫ ∫ pδW d A
t 1 A
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
12/7/98 3 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture19.frm
Governing Equations
Hamilton’s Principle Again
Advanced Vibrations
t2
∫t ∫ ∫A [ ρẇ˙ – τ∇
2
0 = w – p ]δw d A for all δw on A subject to
1
2
δw = 0 on ∂A . From the above, ρẇ˙ – τ∇ w – p = 0 on the
interior of A .
t2
Also,
∫t ∫∂A τ [ ∇w • n ]δw dΓ
1
= 0 where
In rectangular coordinates,
y
∂2 ∂
2
L2 τ 2 + 2 w + p ( x, y, t ) = ρẇ˙
∂x ∂y
. Boundary conditions are
L1
w ( 0, y, t ) = w ( L 1, y, t ) = 0 and
x
w ( x, 0, t ) = w ( x, L 2, t ) = 0 .
Lets first try solving the homogeneous equation via separation of
variables (implying eigen analysis).
w ( x, y, t ) = ∑ f λ ( t )W λ ( x, y )
λ
2
∇ Wλ ρ fλ
˙˙
2
This leads to --------------- = --- ------ = – λ
Wλ τ fλ
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
12/7/98 5 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture19.frm
Rectangular Membrane Eigen Analysis
Advanced Vibrations
2 2 πmx πny
∇ W λ + λ W λ = 0 is satisfied by W λ = sin ----------- sin ---------
L1 L2
πm 2 πn 2
2
We see that this works if λ = ------- + ------ . (we could have
L1 L2
derived the above by doing another separtation of variables:
W λ ( x, y ) = ∑ X λ ( x )Y λ ( y ) .)
Substituting back into our governing equation, we see that our eigen
πmx πny τ
solutions, Wλ = sin ----------- sin --------- , have frequency ω λ = --- λ
L1 L2 ρ
2
The governing equation is ρẇ˙ – τ∇ w – p ( x, y ) = 0 . Just as we
have done in the past, we express w ( x, y, t ) = ∑ f λ ( t )W λ ( x, y ) ,
λ
and derive Lagrange equations using the f λ(t ) as generalized
coordinates. After exploitation of the orthonormality, we have
independent equations for the modal coefficients:
τ 2
f˙˙λ + --- λ f = ( p ( x, y, t ), W λ )
ρ
W = A 1 P 1 ( x, y ) + A 2 P 2 ( x, y ) + A 3 P 3 ( x, y )
Lets set up the formulation to estimate the eigen shapes:
2 2
2 ∂ 1∂ 1 ∂
In a circular domain, ∇ = + --- + ----2 2
∂r
2 r ∂r r ∂θ
We assume that there are no holes in the membrane, so the boundary
conditions are w ( R, θ, t ) = 0 .
Lets first try solving the homogeneous equation via separation of
variables (implying eigen analysis).
w ( r, θ, t ) = ∑ f λ ( t )W λ ( r, θ )
λ
2
∇ Wλ ρ fλ
˙˙
2
This leads to --------------- = --- ------ = – λ
Wλ τ fλ
(I hope that this looks very familiar to you.)
2 2
∇ W λ + λ W λ = 0 is itself solved via a separation of variables:
W λ = R λ ( r )Θ λ ( θ ) . On substitution back into the differential
2
∂
2
1 ∂R λ ∂ Θ
R + --- 2
2 λ r ∂r
∂r 1 ∂θ 2
equation, we find ----------------------------------- + ---- --------------- + λ = 0
r Θ
Rλ 2
2
∂ Θ
from which we conclude that ⁄Θ = C where C is a constant.
∂θ
2
∂2 1 ∂R λ C 2
We also conclude that R
2 λ
+ --
- + ---- R λ + λ Rλ = 0 .
∂r r ∂r r 2
∂2 1 ∂R λ m
2
2
2 R λ, m + --- – ------ R λ, m + λ R λ, m = 0 . This has solutions
∂r r ∂ r r 2
ω m, n = τ ⁄ ρ λ m, n
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
12/7/98 13 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/Lecture19.frm
Vibration of Circular Membranes
Advanced Vibrations
0.5
3.832
3.832 7.106
7.106
−0.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.5
−0.5
1
0.8
0.6
1
0.4
0.2
0.5
0
−0.2 0
−0.4
−0.6 −0.5
−0.8
−1 −1
0.5
−0.5
−1
1
0.8
0.6
1
0.4
0.2
0.5
0
−0.2 0
−0.4
−0.6 −0.5
−0.8
−1 −1
0.5
−0.5
1
0.8
0.6
1
0.4
0.2
0.5
0
−0.2 0
−0.4
−0.6 −0.5
−0.8
−1 −1
0.5
−0.5
1
0.8
0.6
1
0.4
0.2
0.5
0
−0.2 0
−0.4
−0.6 −0.5
−0.8
−1 −1
0.5
−0.5
1
0.8
0.6
1
0.4
0.2
0.5
0
−0.2 0
−0.4
−0.6 −0.5
−0.8
−1 −1
0.5
−0.5
−1
1
0.8
0.6
1
0.4
0.2
0.5
0
−0.2 0
−0.4
−0.6 −0.5
−0.8
−1 −1
0.4
0.2
−0.2
−0.4
1
0.8
0.6
1
0.4
0.2
0.5
0
−0.2 0
−0.4
−0.6 −0.5
−0.8
−1 −1
R R R
M1 M1 M1
I1 I1 I1
L θ2 L θ3 L
θ1
k k
M2 M2 M2
R R R
M1 M1 M1
I1 I1 I1
L θ2 L θ3 L
θ1
k
M2 M2 M2
The top linkage is has a length equal to the distance between the
centers of the disks.
Calculate A 0 ⁄ F 0 and B 0 ⁄ F 0
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
11/30/98 3 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/ProblemD.frm
Problem E
A Damping Homework
Advanced Vibrations
A, h
u2 u1
E’=3G’
tan(δ)
ω 5
We can fit the above plots reasonably well in 0.1 < ------ < 10 by
2π
ω 3.3
Log ( 3G' ( ω ) ) = Log ( E' ( ω ) ) = 6.2 + 0.0112 Log ------ or
2π
ω 3.3
5.72 + 0.0112 Log ------
2π
G' ( ω ) = 10 and
ω ω 2
Log ( tan δ ( ω ) ) = – 1 + 0.56Log ------ – 0.069 Log ------ so
2π 2π
= F (ω)
m 0
2 U1 K –K U1
–ω +
0 m U2 – K ( 2K + G∗ ( ω ) ( A ⁄ h ) ) U 2 0
where we are mimicking a driving force on mass 1.
1. We employ matlab to invert the above system to solve for the
driving point frequency response H 1(ω) = U 1(ω) ⁄ F (ω) .
∆ω
4. Determine fraction of critical damping for each mode via ζ = ---------
2ω n
A/h = 1
0.6
|H1|
0.4
0.2 |H2|
zeta = 0.098924
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Frequency Hz
6 A/h = 0.1
|H1|
5 zeta = 0.013697
|FRF| Mass 1
|H2|
1
zeta = 0.0085975
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Frequency Hz
A/h = 5
|H1|
0.6
0.4
0.2 |H2|
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Frequency Hz
0.12
Mode 2
0.1
0.08
ζ
0.06 Mode 1
0.04
0.02
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
A/h
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
12/8/98 8 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/ProblemE.frm
What do we observe from the above?
Advanced Vibrations
This would be only a marginally good candidate for the modal strain
energy method.
You may use any references, but do not ask anyone for help.
Please put you finished exams in an envelope and place that in my mail
slot no later than noon Wednesday 16 December 1998.
A, h
u2 u1
2. From the above, calculate the fraction of critical damping for each
mode using half-power points.
4. Find the elastic eigenmodes and frequencies. You may ignore the
slider for this, but you must tell me why.
E’=3G’
tan(δ)
ω 5
We can fit the above plots reasonably well in 0.1 < ------ < 10 by
2π
ω 3.3
Log ( 3G' ( ω ) ) = Log ( E' ( ω ) ) = 6.2 + 0.0112 Log ------ or
2π
ω 3.3
5.72 + 0.0112 Log ------
2π
G' ( ω ) = 10 and
ω ω 2
Log ( tan δ ( ω ) ) = – 1 + 0.56Log ------ – 0.069 Log ------ so
2π 2π
You may use any references, but do not ask anyone for help.
Please put you finished exams in an envelope and place that in my mail
slot no later than noon Wednesday 16 December 1998.
A, h
u2 u1
2. From the above, calculate the fraction of critical damping for each
mode using half-power points.
3. Find the elastic eigenmodes and frequencies. You may ignore the
slider for this, but you must tell me why.
E’=3G’
tan(δ)
ω 5
We can fit the above plots reasonably well in 0.1 < ------ < 10 by
2π
ω 3.3
Log ( 3G' ( ω ) ) = Log ( E' ( ω ) ) = 6.2 + 0.0112 Log ------ or
2π
ω 3.3
5.72 + 0.0112 Log ------
2π
G' ( ω ) = 10 and
ω ω 2
Log ( tan δ ( ω ) ) = – 1 + 0.56Log ------ – 0.069 Log ------ so
2π 2π
2. From the above, calculate the fraction of critical damping for each
mode using half-power points.
U1 k –k U1 F1(ω)
–ω M
2
+ A =
M U2 – k 2k + G∗ ( ω ) --- U 2 F2(ω)
h
U1 F1(ω)
We write this as A(ω) = . The frequency response
U2 F2(ω)
U1 –1 F1(ω) F1(ω)
= A(ω) = H (ω)
U2 F2(ω) F2(ω)
Say we apply we apply the driving force to mass 1, then the driving
point frequency response is H 11 ( ω ) . If we drive mass 2, the driving
point frequency response is H 22 ( ω ) .
Both driving point frequency response functions are plotted in the
following figure. The fractions of critical damping are calculated from
H 11 ( ω ) , but the damping numbers are identical when computed from
H 22 ( ω ) .
A very fine discretization in frequency space is necessary to converge
on the fractions of critical damping. Thirty intervals/Hz were used to
calculate the following.
6
A/h = 1
5 zeta = 0.0014567
|FRF| Mass 1
zeta = 0.00083563
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Frequency Hz
Computed damping is 0.15% and 0.084% for the first and second mode,
respectively.
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
12/21/98 7 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/
TakeHomeFinalSolution.frm
Solution Part 2
Advanced Vibrations
The reason why computed damping does not depend on which mass is
driven becomes clear when we examine the modal expression for nodal
displacement:
T
Pk ( Pk F ( ω ) )
X ( ω ) = ∑ ---------------------------------------------------
2 2
-
k ( ω k – ω ) + 2iζ k ωω k
U1 k –k U1
–ω M = 0
2
+ A
M U2 ∗
– k 2k + G ( ω ) --- U 2 0
h
In the frequency range of interest,
A A 5 8
--- G′′ ( ω ) < --- G′ ( ω ) < 8.0 ×10 N ⁄ m « k = 1.0 ×10 N ⁄ m
h h
and it is not anticipated that the damper will significantly affect the
natural frequencies or modes.
2
1–α –1 U1
= 0 where
2 2 M
α = ω ----- .
2 U2 0 K
–1 2–α
3 – 5 3 + 5
2
The eigen values are α = ----------------, ---------------- = ( 0.382, 2.62 )
2 2
In terms of angular frequency,
2 2 K 5 5
ω = α ----- = ( 1.27 ×10 , 8.73 ×10 ) .
M
1 1
1 1
5–1 , 5 + 1 = , .
---------------- – ---------------- 0.618 – 1.62
2 2
These have not been normalized. They do not have to be for this
application, but we shall normalize them later on.
A 2 6 2 6
E D = π --- G'' ( ω ) ( 0.618 ) = π0.365 ×10 ( 0.618 ) = 0.438 ×10
h
η ED
ζ = --- = ------------- = 0.0013
2 4πE S
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
12/21/98 12 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/
TakeHomeFinalSolution.frm
Solution: Part 4
Modal Strain Energy for Second Mode
Advanced Vibrations
A 2 5 2 6
E D = π --- G'' ( ω ) ( 1.62 ) = π ( 1 )5.7 ×10 ( 1.62 ) = 4.7 ×10 Nm
h
η ED
ζ = --- = ------------- = 0.00079
2 4πE S
Copyright Dan Segalman, 1998
12/21/98 13 /home/djsegal/UNM/VibCourse/slides/
TakeHomeFinalSolution.frm
Solution: Part 5
Solution with initial conditions
Advanced Vibrations
From this point on, we shall need to normalize the eigen modes.
Recall that the physical degrees of freedom and the modal coordinates
x1 ( t ) β1 ( t ) T
are related by = P where P MP = I and
x2 ( t ) β2 ( t )
2
T ω1 0
P KP = .
2
0 ω2
Normalizing the eigen solutions calculated earlier,
There are no forcing terms, so the modal equations are of the form
2
β̇˙n + 2ζω n β̇ n + ω n β n = 0 .
Since this is an “under damped” system, the solution is
–ζn ωn t 2 2
βn ( t ) = e [ C n cos ( tω n 1 – ζ n ) + D n sin ( tω n 1 – ζn ) ] .
β̇ n ( t ) =
–ζn ωn t 2 2
–ζn ωn e [ C n cos ( tω n 1 – ζn ) + D n sin ( tω n 1 – ζn ) ]
2 –ζn ωn t 2 2
+ ωn 1 – ζn ( e [ D n cos ( tω n 1 – ζ n ) – C n sin ( tω n 1 – ζ n ) ] )
x1 ( t )
= 0.0491 β 1 ( t ) + – 0.0304 β 2 ( t )
x2 ( t ) 0.0304 0.0491
x1 ( 0 ) ẋ 1 ( 0 )
Our initial conditions are = 0 and = 1 .
x2 ( 0 ) 0 ẋ 2 ( 0 ) 0
In terms of our modal coordinates,
x1 ( 0 )
= 0.0491 C 1 ( 0 ) + – 0.0304 C 2 ( 0 )
x2 ( 0 ) 0.0304 0.0491
ẋ 1 ( 0 ) 0.0491 2
= ω1 1 – ζ1 D1
ẋ 2 ( 0 ) 0.0304
+ – 0.0304 2
ω2 1 – ζ2 D2
0.0491
= 17.6 D 1 + – 28.4 D 2 = 1
10.9 46 0
x1 ( t ) 0.00202 – 0.52t
= e sin ( t358 )
x2 ( t ) 0.00125
+ 0.00030 e
– 0.78t
sin ( t935 )
– 0.00048
−3
x 10
2.5
Displacement 1
2
Displacement 2
1.5
0.5
−0.5
−1
−1.5
−2
−2.5
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12
1.5
Velocity 1
Velocity 2
1
0.5
−0.5
−1
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12