Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Finals Reviewer
When the law does not distinguish the court should not
Chapter I
distinguish. UBI LEX DISTINGUIT NEC NOS
When the law is clear and unequivocal, the court need not to DISTINGUERE DEBEMOS.
interpret the law but only to apply it. Ejusdem Generis – resorted to when legislative intent is
uncertain; when the general words follow an enumeration of
Chapter II persons or things, by words of a particular and specific
One-title-one-subject meaning, such general words are not to be construed in their
Third reading no amendment rule widest extent but are held as applying only to persons or
Judicial Doctrine – judicial interpretation of a statute which things of the same kind or class as those specifically
constitutes part of law as of the date it was originally passed mentioned.
Due Process of Law – a process which hears before it Negative Words – negative words and phrases regarded as
condemns; proceeds only upon inquiry before giving mandatory while those in the affirmative are mere directory
judgment “may” connotes a permissible thing while the word “shall” is
Express repeal – repeal clause imperative
Implied repeal – later statue contains provisions so contrary “must” may be consistent with an exercise of discretion
or irreconcilable with that of the earlier law; there is “and” is a conjunction used to denote a joinder or union
intention of the part of the legislative to abrogate a prior act; “or” indicates an alternative between different or unlike
intention must be clear and manifested things
Circular cannot repeal a law “only” means exclusive
Doctrine of Processual Presumptions – where foreign law is Computation of Time
not pleaded, or even if pleaded, if not proved, the o In computing period, the first shall be excluded and
presumption is that foreign law is the same as ours the last day included
Verba Legis – if the statute is plain and clear and free from Presumption against unconstitutionality – laws are presumed
ambiguity, it must be given its literal meaning and applied constitutional
without interpretation Presumption against injustice – law should not be interpreted
Between two statutory interpretations, that which better so as to cause an injustice
serves the purpose of the law should prevail Presumption against implied repeals – repeals by implication
Cassus Omissus – can operate and apply only if and when is not favored; in the absence of an express repeal, a
the omission has been clearly established subsequent law cannot be construed as repealing a prior law
Stare Decisis
unless an irreconcilable inconsistency and repugnancy exists
in the terms of the new and old laws
Presumption against ineffectiveness – the legislature intends
to impart to its enactments such a meaning as will render
them operative and effective
Presumption against absurdity – statutes must receive a
sensible construction such as will give effect to the
legislative intention so as to avoid an unjust or absurd
conclusion
Chapter VI