A. The Constitution of the Philippines  3.

Shauf v CA
 1. De Leon v Esguerra  4. Republic b Hon. Edilberto Sandoval
 2. Angara v Electoral Commission Consent to be Sued: Express Consent
B. The Concept of the State  1. CA 327 as amended by PD 1445
 1. Bacani v Nacoco  2. Act No. 3083
 2. PCTA v CIR  3. Article IX, 1987 of the Constitution
 3. Govt. of the Philippine Islands v Monte de Piedad  4. Department of Agriculture v NLRC
 4. Co Kim Chan v Valdez Tan Keh  5. Meritt v Govt. of the Phil. Islands
 5. People v Gozo  6. Republic v Purisima
 6. Laurel v Misa Implied Consent
 7. Ruffy v Chief of Staff  1. US v Ruiz
People  2. Malong v PNR
 1. Moya Lim Yao v Comm. on Immigration  3. DOH v Phils. Pharma Wealth Inc.
 2. Po Xo Bi v Rep  4. JUSMAG Phil v NLRC
Territory  5. Santiago v Republic
 1. RA No, 3046  6. Froilan v Oriental Pan Shipping
 2. RA No. 5446 Scope of Consent
 3. PD No. 1599  1. Rizal Commercial Bank v De Castro
 4. RA No. 9522  2. Mun. od San Miguel, Bulacan v Fernandez
 5. Merlin M. Magalona et al v Eduardo Ermita  3. NIA v CA
Government D. Principles and State Policies
 1. Go Kim Chan v Valdez Tan Keh Section 1
 2. Lawyers League for a Better Phils. v Aquino  1. Villavicencio v Lukban
 3. Villavicencio v Lukban Section 2
Sovereignty  1. Kuroda v Jalandoni
 1. Peralta v Director of Prisons  2. Agustin v Edu
 2. Ruffy v Chief of Staff  3. Ichong v Hernandez
 3. Reagan v CIR  4. Gonzalez v Hechanova
 4. Province of North Cotabato v The Govt. of the RP  5. In Re: Garcia
C. State Immunity Section 4
 1. Republic v Villasor  1. People v Lagman
 2. Lasco v UNRENFRE Section 6
 3. SEAFDEC v NLRC  1. Aglipay v Ruiz
 4. Callado v IRRI Section 10 & 11
Testes to Determine if Suit is Against the State  1. Calalang v Williams
 1. Begoso v PVA  2. Almeda v Court of Appeals
 2. Del Mar v PVA  3. Ondoy v Ignacio
 3. Veterans Manpower v CA  4. Salonga v Farrales
Suit Against Govt. Agencies Section 12
 1. PNB v CIR  1. Meyer v Nebraska
 2. SSS v CA  2. Pierce v Society of Sisters
 3. Rayo v CFI  3. People v Ritter
 4. Malong v PNR  4. DepEd v San Diego
 5. Jesus P Disini v The Hon. Sandiganbayan  5. Virtuoso v Municipal Judge
 6. Dept. of Agriculture v NLRC Section 16
Suit Against Public Officers  1. Oposa v Factoran
 1. VMPSI v CA  2. LLDA v CA
 2. Larkins v NLRC Section 19
  1. Garcia v Board of Investments Section 7
Section 21  1. Dimaporo v Mitra
 1. Association of Small Land Owner in the Ph v Sec of DENR Section 11
Section 22  2. Jimenez v Cabangbang
 1. The City Govt. of Baguio City v Atty. Brain Masweng  3. People v Jalosjos
Section 25  4. Antero Pobre v Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiago
 1. Basco v PAGCOR Section 13
 2. Limbonas v Mangelin  1. Bengzon v Drilon
Section 28 Section 14
 1. Legaspi v CSC  1. Puyat v De Guzman
 2. Valmonte v De Villa Section 16
 3. Aquino-Sarmiento v Morato  1. Santiago v Guingona
 4. The Province of North Cotabato v Govt. of the RP Peace Panel  2. Osmena v Pendatun
 3. Paredes v Sandiganbayan
E. Separation of Powers  4. US v Pons
 1. In Re: Manzano  5.Casco Phil. Chemical Corp v Gimenez
 2. Angara v Electoral Commission  6. Arroyo v De Venecia
 3. Easter Shipping Line v POEA Section 17
 4. Casibang v Aquino  1. Lazatin v HRET
 5. Belgica et al v Ochoa et al  2. Bondoc v Pineda
 6. Sanidad v COMELEC  3. Chavez v COMELEC
 7. Daza v Singson  4. Pimentel v HRET
 8. ABAKADA GURO Partylist v Hon. Cesar V. Purisima  5. Rep. Jovito Palparan jr v HRET
 9. Araullo (Disbursement Acceleration)  6. Walden F. Bello v COMELEC
F. Delegation of Power Section 18
 1. Garcia v Exec. Secretary  1. Daza v Singson
 2. People v Vera  2. 3Coseteng v Mitra
 3. Eastern Shipping Line v POEA  3. Guingona v Gonzalez
 4. Ynot v IAC Section 19
 5. Tablarin v Gutierrez  1. Wigberto Tanada v COMELEC
 6. Belgica et al., v Ochoa, et al Section 21 & 22
 7. Pacific Stream Laundry Inc. v Laguna Lake Devt. Authority  1. Bengzon v Senate Blue Ribbon Committee
G. Legislative Department  2. Camilo Sabio et al v Gordon et al
Section 1  3. Senate et al v Ermita et al
 1. RA No. 6735  4. Gudani et al v Lt. Gen. Senga et al
Section 5  5. Mary v Senate Committee of Accountability
 1. RA No. 7941  6. Reghis Romero v Sen. Jinggoy Estrada et al
 2. Tobias v Abalos H. Section 24
 3. Veterans Fed. Party v COMELEC  1. Tolentino v Sec. of Finance
 4. Ang Bagong Bayani-OFW Labor Party v COMELEC  2. Alvarez et al v Guingona et al
 5. Banat v COMELEC Section 25
 6. Sen. Benigno Aquino v COMELEC  1. Garcia v Mata
 7. Rai Sandra Sema vs COMELEC  2. Demetria v Alba
 8. COMELEC En Banc v AKB  3. Philconsa v Enriquez
Section 6 Section 26
 1. Romualdez-Marcos v COMELEC  1. Philconsa v Gimenez
 2. Aquino v COMELEC  2. Tio v Videogram Regulatory Board
 3. Co v HRET  3. Philippine Judges’ Ass. v Prado
  4. Tolentino v Sec. of Finance
 5. Tan v Del Rosario
Section 27
 1. 2Tolentino v Sec of Finance
 2. Gonzales v Macaraig
 3. Bengzon v Drilon
 4. Philconsa v Enriquez
Section 28
 1. Kapatiran ng mga naglilingkod sa pamahalaan ng pilipinas v Tan
 2. Prov. of Abra v Judge Hernando
 3. Abra Valley College v Aquino
Section 29
 1. Pascual v Sec of Public Works
 2. Aglipay v Ruiz
 3. Guingona v Carague
 4. Osmena v Orbos
 5. Philconsa v Enriquez
Section 30
 1. First Lepanto Ceramic Inc. v CA
 2. 1Diaz v CA
Section 32
 1.Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority v COMELEC