Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Assignment 1
Gender is a social construct where people are linked to a specific sex based
on the social, cultural and psychological traits that they embody (Priya &
Dalal, 2015). It is different to the sex of a person as this only relates to the
biological characteristics that they display (World Health Organization, 2017).
Gender is a more fluid concept than sex (Cobb, Walsh & Priest, 2009) as it
can change based on contexts, such as time and place. Knowledge and
research surrounding the dynamic nature of gender has evolved and initiated
more sophisticated language to outline different gender identities including
Agender, Bigender, Cisgender, Gender Fluid, Gender Questioning, Intersex,
Non-Binary, Pangender, Transgender and Transsexual (Moon, 2014).
There are many sociological theories that link to gender, such as hegemonic
masculinity, social reproduction, biological essentialism (DeCecco & Elia,
2010), neo-biological determinism, feminist poststructuralist (Rawlings, 2016),
the social learning theory, psychological essentialism (Taylor, Rhodes &
Gelman, 2009) and social constructivism (DeCecco & Elia, 2010). Social
constructivism deems the individual an “empty vessel” (DeCecco & Elia,
2010) in which society plays a major role in shaping identity and gender. This
theory denies the individual of any power over his or her own gender. Tim
Blair, from The Daily Telegraph (2016), states that uniform policies are
changing across 80 state schools. This policy allows the students to choose
whatever uniform they feel comfortable wearing. This challenges the power
imbalance, noted in social constructivism, and gives the individual the power
to choose how they present themselves, constructing their own environment.
The NSW Teachers Federation (2012) reports that gender diverse individuals
are subjected to a disproportionate amount of violence and harassment
(Toomey, McGuire & Russell, 2012) when compared to cisgendered people.
The Teachers Federation (2012) recognises the marginalisation that occurs if
people do not conform to traditional gender roles. This pinpoints the role of
dominant discourse and power. Cisgendered individuals hold power over
those who identify as gender diverse because historically cisgender has been
the ‘norm’. To combat this negative discourse and reduce marginalisation of
gender diverse students, the Federal Government developed the Sex
Discrimination Act (1984) (Federal Register of Legislation, 2017). The act
states that it is against the law to discriminate against someone based on his
or her gender. The State Government has also devised some resources to
overcome this issue, such as, the ‘Gender, sexuality and identity policy 2011’
and ‘GLBTI (Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex) Resources
for Classroom Use’ library resource guide (NSW Teachers Federation, 2012).
These policies are a step in the right direction in an attempt to counteract the
marginalisation that these minority groups have endured, but it will take time
to curb the dominant discourse that gender diverse individuals are inferior to
cisgendered people.
The overarching cultural bias associated with society forcing gender roles on
students is that boys should possess ‘masculine’ characteristics and that
biological females should be ‘feminine’ (Rawlings, 2016). An idea supporting
this cultural bias is that “boys will be boys” (Taylor, Rhodes & Gelman, 2009),
suggesting that the way boys act is a direct reflection of their sex. This bias
also implies that boys all act in a stereotypical, ‘masculine’ way with traits
such as being rough, loud and disinterested in school (Brownhill, 2014). This
cultural bias idealises cisgender representations of behaviour while
marginalising gender diverse minorities.
References
Adams, M, & Bell, L. (2016). Teaching for diversity and social justice
https://www.adcq.qld.gov.au/resources/guidelines/discrimination
-in-education
from http://v7-
5.australiancurriculum.edu.au/GeneralCapabilities/Pdf/Intercultu
ral-understanding
Blair, T. (2016, June 13). Girls will be boys and boys will be girls. The
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au
246-261.
http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/10.1080/09540253.2014.9
01723
Diversity, Social Justice and Learning
Assignment 1
Cobb, R.A., Walsh, C.E., & Priest, J.B. (2009). The cognitive-active
http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/10.1080/08952830902911
339
DeCecco, J.P. & Elia, J.P. (2010). A critique and synthesis of biological
http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J082v24n03_01
Donnelly, K. (2016). Talking point: It’s only natural to think boys will be
http://www.themercury.com.au
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2014C00002
Hillier, L., Jones, T., Monagle, M., Overton, N., Gahan, L., Blackman,
University.
Jennifer Allen.
Kosciw, J.G., Palmer, N.A., Kull, R.M., & Greytak, E.A. (2013). The
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2012.732546
from https://books.google.com.au
Diversity, Social Justice and Learning
Assignment 1
https://www.nswtf.org.au/files/infoleaflet_supporting_people_of_
diverse_sexuality_and_genders_in_education.pdf
10.1177/0272431606294839
Taylor, M.G., Rhodes, M., & Gelman, S.A. (2009). Boys will be boys;
http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/10.1111/j.1467-
8624.2009.01272.x
Diversity, Social Justice and Learning
Assignment 1
187-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.03.001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2014.919912
Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs403/en/
hofstede.com/tl_files/images/site/social/Culture%20and%20edu
cation.pdf