Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
UNIT OUTLINE
Subject: PDHPE Course: PDHPE Number of Weeks:
Unit title: Preliminary Core 4-6 (36 hours)
1- Better Health for Individuals
Key Concepts/ Big Ideas The importance of this learning
In this module, students investigate the following This compulsory module studies the meanings of health, the perceptions individuals have
critical questions: about health and the range of factors and behaviors that influence health. After studying
- What does health mean to individuals? this module, students will gain a strong understanding on the value of a wide variety of
- What influences the health of individuals? factors that interrelate to encourage an individual to achieve a better and healthier
lifestyle. This strong understanding is then further established in the HSC core module,
Health Priorities in Australia.
Unit context within Scope and Sequence/Purpose Syllabus Outcomes
In stage 6 PDHPE, students start off by learning Core
. A student:
1: Better Health for Individuals, which .runs in term P1: identifies and examines why individuals give different meanings to health
1, is 30% of the course time (approx. 10 weeks). The
body in motion is core 2 and is 30% of the. course P2: explains how a range of health behaviours affect an individual’s health
time. This tends to run for approximately.10 weeks in P3: describes how an individual’s health is determined by a range of factors
term 2. Term 3 follows with 2 options running for
approximately 6 weeks each (20% course. time) P4: evaluates aspects of health over which individuals can exert some control
which consists of 2 of the following; first. aid (20%), P5: describes factors that contribute to effective health promotion
Composition and performance (20%), fitness choices
(20%) or outdoor recreation (20%). . P6: proposes actions that can improve and maintain an individual’s health
. P15: forms opinions about health-promoting actions based on a critical examination
of
relevant information
. P16: uses a range of sources to draw conclusions about health and physical activity
concepts.
Literacy Focus Numeracy Focus ICT Focus Assessment Task
Delivery of presentations Interpretations of Internet searches Differentiation
Plan and deliver presentations organisations and - Differentiated worksheets to meet the needs of gifted and talented
demonstrating particular initiatives students
- Researching - Role play: allocated roles
Kiara Calarco 18041907 PDHPE
elements of researching and - Analysing results and - ICT to research and upload - Assessment:
case studies percentages tasks for assessment and - Responses in class discussions and collaborative learning
feedback
- ICT in videos and presentations
the degree of control assess the degree Add key words to word glossary Case study powerpoint
individuals can exert of control Students collaborative discuss ways in which resource 1
over their health individuals have individuals may have control over their health, or
2 modifiable and non- over their health, be able to modify the health determinants
modifiable health by exploring - Come together as a class and share ideas
determinants questions such Students design a table with the determinants of
the changing as: health and classify them into modifiable and non-
influence of how much modifiable
determinants through control do
different life stages Students read the case study, regarding Paul, as a
individuals
class
have over the
determinants? - Slide by slide, students complete the activities
relating to the case study
what can
individuals Students construct a timeline of an individual’s
do to modify life from a child to an adult where they show the
the stages where a person takes responsibility for
determinants their own health (with examples)
they have Compare timelines with other students and
little control discuss choices
over?
how does the
level of
influence of
the
determinants
change over
time?
notion that health is better or worse Class Debate: challenging the idea that health is
solely an health than solely an individual’s responsibility.
individual’s others
responsibility - Differentiation: Provide a debate scaffold with
examples for arguments
- Have allocated roles for students to choose from
(scribe, speaker, etc.)
Students present arguments one at a time as well
as any rebuttals they may have
What strategies help to describe the Add key words to word glossary Worksheet resource 2
3 promote the health of various health Collaborative brainstorm on what is health Powerpoint
individuals? promotion roles promotion? Canva
what is health and Watch introduction video on health promotion https://www.canva.com/
promotion (up to 1:50) WHO
responsibilities
responsibility for health http://www.who.int/about/en/
adopted by Differentiation: clarifying any
promotion uncertainties of key terms and areas by
individuals, groups
individuals showing a picture/interactive form of
community and governments health promotion
groups/schools Mindmap on areas where health is promoted in
non-government Australia with specific examples like percentages
organisations dedicated to each area in the country
government - Share with a partner and add to own mindmap
international Students complete resource 2 worksheet where
organisations, eg they match the health promotion role to the group
WHO, United that is responsible in pairs
Nations Differentiation: a second worksheet as
been provided for those who struggle with
key terms and meanings
Students research and create a powerpoint
presentation evaluating Medicare as an important
initiative when it comes to promoting health for
all Australians with relevant statistics
Kiara Calarco 18041907 PDHPE
Name:
Complete the Sentence
Use the words in the list below to complete the sentence
Created o n TheTeac hers Co rner.net Fill-in-the-Blank Maker
Name:
Complete the Sentence
Use the words in the list below to complete the sentence
Created o n TheTeac hers Co rner.net Fill-in-the-Blank Maker
PART C – Justification
This unit of work was based on the stage 6 syllabus of PDHPE taught in the preliminary
course of year 11. It is Core 1: Better Health for Individuals and covers 30% of the total
course time. This unit of work was designed with an inquiry based approach as it is focused
on a student-centred behaviour for learning. When students gain control over their learning,
and question their learning development, it produces deeper knowledge and understanding for
learning (Spronken-Smith, et al., 2008). Teachers support, mentor and facilitate learning
throughout the inquiry method allowing students to adopt a self-directed approach to their
learning. It is evident, thoughout this unit of work, that students experience and participate in
a wide variety of self-directed activities such as collaborative posters and research tasks, role
plays and case studies where they build on their research skills to further develop their high-
order thinking.
Pedagogic practices are based around a set of processes whereby teachers use them in order
to achieve and direct learning of students. The measures these practices use, challenge
students to learn, scaffold and guide their activities where students are further challenged to
question their learning as well as expanding their knowledge. In turn, feedback is provided
where reviewing and evaluating of teaching practices occurs. The types of knowledge
outcomes learnt by students as well as their attitudes and beliefs regarding knowledge, are
influenced by these measures (Carey & Grant, 2015). The practical application of the stage 6
syllabus in PDHPE is effective as it offers opportunities for student-centred learning
throughout, as well as developing deep knowledge in all aspects of the content and outcomes.
Cognitive and social learning constructivist theories provide deep support regarding
pedagogical and social activities. Cognitive constructivists have the understanding that
individuals have differences and, as learns, they can produce different levels of knowledge
when given the same conditions. This therefore concludes that teaching practices must
facilitate learning through satisfying the needs of all individual learners through various
learning activities. (Wang, 2008). Teachers need to ensure their programs are meeting the
needs of their students and this is shown throughout the unit outline with the incorporation of
role plays, class debates, research tasks and more. On the contrary, social constructivists
emphasise the importance of collaborative learning and how it facilitates positive and deep
knowledge intake amongst students (Katherine & Kalina, 2009). This theory encourages the
use of technology and web-based learning in lessons as well as supporting Vygotsky’s theory.
This theory has also been shown throughout the unit outline where students engage in online
tasks, web bases for research tasks and group scenarios.
Kiara Calarco 18041907
PDHPE
Blooms taxonomy is for learning assures the differentiation of content and curriculum in the
classroom to meet all learning needs and styles (Halawi, McCarthy & Pires, 2009). It also
encourages direction in the cognitive processes which ensures higher-order thinking amongst
all learners. Bloom also implemented a digital taxonomy which emphasised the importance
behind ICT in teaching practices. Through implementing ICT in learning activities and
programs, students develop a greater understanding of the content where they are able to
further enhance their critical thinking skills. (Skiba, 2013).
Throughout the unit of work, ICT, literacy and numeracy were consistently focused on.
Students learn best when teaching practices incorporate strategies that meet each individual
learning style. When teachers fail to implement these strategies, students reveal decreasing
levels of focus and engagement in the classroom. There are a wide range of instructional
design models available to assist teachers in integrating ICT into their teaching practices.
Throughout the unit of work, students participate in research tasks, interactive mind maps and
flow charts as well as case studies where they develop a deeper understanding of the content.
Literacy and numeracy tasks are also shown throughout where students take part in word
glossaries and closed passages to ensure they understand key terms. Having these resources
available to students allows increased motivation, concentration and engagement in the
classroom where it promotes interactive classroom learning (Smith, Hardman & Higgins,
2013).
Differentiated instruction is another important aspect in student learning as it supports diverse
student learning meets all individual learning styles. Implementing differentiation into
teaching activities, student-cantered learning is the focus rather than teacher-centred learning.
In this approach, students positively benefit as they are able to self-direct and have choice in
learning. Differentiation, with reference to gifted and talented students, plays a vital role in
assuring these students reach their full potential. Without these educational encounters, gifted
and talented students are more susceptible to underperforming due to lack of concentration,
boredom and frustration (Reid, 2011). Differentiation, such as, visual representations and
assisted worksheets shown in the unit, are considered effective when they are optimal and
when they are seen to guide and scaffold student activities to enhance knowledge and
understanding (Griffin, 2007).
Assessment and feedback are shown throughout the unit outline as measurements of
effectiveness of learning. Peer evaluation has seen to be a strong encouragement in student
Kiara Calarco 18041907
PDHPE
learning and motivation as it supports students to self-evaluate and self-assess. Through the
use of peer feedback during group presentations and videos in the unit, it regulates students to
have an effective role in the process of their own learning (self-regulation). Self-assessment is
enhanced through peer contributions in group and collaborative work where questions are
formed and challenges arise (Liu & Carless, 2007). Peers offer rich information which allows
other students to utilise this given information to make their own self-assessment on their
learning which in turn achieves improvement and development. Peer feedback not only
encourages self-assessment, but also offers quick and detailed information on the spot which
carries potential for improving performance in the classroom (Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick,
2007).
Kiara Calarco 18041907
PDHPE
References
Board of Studies. (2009). Personal development, health and physical education (PDHPE).
Years 11-12 Syllabus. Sydney: Board of Studies
Carey, G., & Grant, C. (2014). Teacher and student perspectives on one-to-one pedagogy:
practices and possibilities. British Journal Of Music Education, 32(01), 5-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0265051714000084
Griffin, P. (2007). The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in
Educational Evaluation.. 33, 87-99.
Halawi, L., McCarthy, R., & Pires, S. (2009). An Evaluation of E-Learning on the Basis of
Bloom's Taxonomy: An Exploratory Study. Journal Of Education For
Business, 84(6), 374-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/joeb.84.6.374-380
Katherine, P., and Kalina, C. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: developing tools
for an effective classroom. Education, 130 (2), 241-280.
Nicol, D., and Macfarlane‐Dick, D., (2007). Formative assessment and self‐regulated
learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Studies in Higher
Education, 31(2), 199-218. DOI: 10.1080/03075070600572090
Reid, M., (2011). Teaching implications of gifted and talented learners within the
mainstream classroom, Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 1(1),
2011, 29-32.
Skiba, D. (2013). Bloom's Digital Taxonomy and Word Clouds. Nursing Education
Perspectives, 34(4), 277-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-34.4.277
Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2013). The impact of interactive whiteboards on
teacher–pupil interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. British
Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443-457.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01411920600635452
Kiara Calarco 18041907
PDHPE
Spronken-Smith, R., Bullard, J., Ray, W., Roberts, C., & Keiffer, A.(2008). Where Might
Sand Dunes be on Mars? Engaging Students through Inquiry-based Learning in
Geography, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 71-86.
DOI: 10.1080/03098260701731520
Wang, W (2008). A generic model for guiding the integration of ICT into teaching and
learning, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 411-419. DOI:
10.1080/14703290802377307.