Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Dr Emily Nurse
2017
1 Introduction
In this module we will discuss the electroweak interaction, which is a merged theory describing both the
theory of electromagnetic interactions and the weak interaction of nuclear decay. We will learn that the
separate weak and electromagnetic interactions are low energy manifestations of the electroweak theory. We
will go on to discuss the Higgs mechanism that provides mass to the fundamental particles, and the associated
Higgs boson, with particular emphasis on its recent discovery at the LHC.
Before all this we will learn about some unexpected asymmetries (parity and charge conjugation violation)
that were observed in the weak interaction in the 1950s, which were eventually explained by the spin structure
in the weak interaction. This will lead to a discussion of another subtle asymmetry in the weak interaction,
that is still being understood today (CP violation).
2.1 Parity
There is a conserved quantity known as parity that comes from a symmetry under space-inversion1 . This
means that the physical laws of a system do not change if the spatial co-ordinates are inverted: x ! x,
y ! y and z ! z, which is equivalent to a mirror reflection (x ! x and y ! y) together with a
rotation through 180 (z ! z). We can establish the e↵ect of space-inversion on the following kinematic
properties of a system:
1 Often “parity” is used to mean the symmetry as well as the conserved quantity. I prefer to call the symmetry space-inversion
to avoid this confusion (note that in the previous examples this would be like e.g. energy and time having the same name).
1
PHAS3224: Nuclear and Particle Physics 2017
2
PHAS3224: Nuclear and Particle Physics 2017
3
PHAS3224: Nuclear and Particle Physics 2017
4
PHAS3224: Nuclear and Particle Physics 2017
exist it is clear that parity is violated. Similarly, charge conjugation transformation on a left-handed neutrino
turns it into a left-handed antineutrino, which also does not exist, demonstrating that charge conjugation
is also violated. However a combined CP transformation would change a left-handed neutrino into a right-
handed antineutrino, which does exist, so it appears CP can be conserved. We will see in the next sections
explicitly how the lack of the existence of right-handed neutrinos and left-handed antineutrinos led to the
observations in -decay and muon-decay that we have discussed.
5
PHAS3224: Nuclear and Particle Physics 2017
of the reaction rate, we would expect the rate to be just over two times that for the muons (see problem
sheet 3). Experimentally, however, the branching ratio to µ+ ⌫µ is (99.98770 ± 0.00004)% and that to e+ ⌫e is
(0.01230 ± 0.00004)%. This huge di↵erence in the branching ratios can be understood by helicity suppression
resulting from the spin structure of the weak interaction.
If you consider the process in the rest frame of the decaying ⇡ + , the `+ and the ⌫` would be produced back-
to-back, travelling in opposite directions in order to conserve momentum. Now, the ⇡ + is a spin-0 particle
and the `+ and the ⌫` fermions are both spin-1/2 particles. So, in order to conserve angular momentum, the
spins of the two particles must be anti-aligned. This gives two possible scenarios:
1. a left-handed ⌫` and a left-handed `+
2. a right-handed ⌫` and a right-handed `+
We know that 2. is forbidden, as right-handed neutrinos are not observed in nature. So the only way the
process can occur is via 1. But this involves a left-handed antiparticle, the `+ . If the `+ were massless,
this decay would not be possible. Since the charged leptons are not massless the decay is possible, but it is
⇣ 2 ⌘2
suppressed by the factor mc E , where m is the charged lepton mass and E is its energy. We can determine
the charged lepton’s energy in the rest frame of the ⇡ by conserving momentum and energy before and after
the decay to give: m⇡ c2 = E` + E⌫ and |p` |c = |p⌫ |c. The neutrino mass is negligible compared to the
2
energies giving: E⌫ = |p⌫ |c = |p` |c. Now write the expression: E`2 = p2` c2 + m2` c4 = m⇡ c2 E` + m2` c4 =
2 2 4 2 2 4
E` + m⇡ c 2m⇡ c E` + m` c and rearrange to give:
m2` + m2⇡ c2
E` = .
2m⇡
⇣ ⌘2
2m⇡ m`
This leads to a suppression factor of m2` +m2⇡
. Using m⇡ = 139.57 MeV/c2 , mµ = 105.7 MeV/c2 and
me = 0.51 MeV/c2 we can straightaway see that the muon is not highly relativistic in this decay, but the
✓ ◆2
me (m2µ +m2⇡ )
electron is. The ratio of the suppression factor for electrons to that for muons is mµ (m2 +m2 ) = 5.7⇥10 5 .
e ⇡
A detailed calculation, combined with the density of states factor mentioned above, leads to a ratio that is
in very good agreement with the experimentally determined branching ratios.