Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The agreed Residue Disposal Strategy includes the construction • Operation of a multipoint perimeter discharge system
of a Neutralisation Facility to firstly neutralise and then secondly • Monitoring and control of red mud strength improvement
clarify and separate a large proportion of the water fraction from • Control of red mud beach development
the neutralised red mud underflow. This allows for much of • Water management monitoring and controls
the neutralisation waters to be handled separately and drying • Monitoring and control of groundwater levels
requirements for upstream construction to be achieved. The • Regular review of filling schedules and long range planning
strategy will provide residue storage capacity for a cumulative of raises.
alumina production of some 250 million tonnes.
5. Stage 1 Residue Disposal Project
The strategy will be implemented in a number of stages over its life.
Alumina and red mud production rates and volumes determine The initial Stage 1 of the Residue Disposal Project comprises:
the timing of these stages. Capital and operating expenditure
• Re-establishment of red mud storage in Parts D and E, the
will be scheduled to meet storage requirements. The most
first new areas on RMD1
significant step for the project is Stage 1. This is the initial stage
• The construction of new starter embankments for the
when the processing facility and the permanent foundations and
upstream construction in RMD1
initial embankments for the conversion of RMD1 are designed,
• The construction of foundations and civil works necessary
constructed and commissioned. A general arrangement of the
for future raises in RMD1
future red mud containment concept is shown in Figure 2.
• The establishment of a new on site neutralising facility to
Part C neutralise and thicken the mud prior to placement
Reactivate • Red mud delivery and distribution pipework to RMD1 and
Neutralising
RMD1 decant water management systems.
Facility
Part D
6. Design Challenges and Solutions
RMD 2 Designing the conversion of an existing single stage residue
subdivided into
Parts A & B N storage area into a multi-stage, upstream raised structure
required developing solutions to issues not often encountered in
Part E tailings storage facilities. These were not always related to design
Maintain Decant and included gaining the understanding and confidence of the
Existing
owner and regulators in unfamiliar concepts.
Decant
• Safe access over existing red mud and the potential for
bogging or engulfment
• Excavation through the red mud
• Stability of deep excavations in weak materials often with a
Figure 6. Typical Cross Section of Stage 1 Raise and Foundation Key
high groundwater table
• The presence of an operating red mud dam and decant 6.5 Environmental Impact
pond adjacent to the works area
• High voltage transmission lines and medium pressure water Designing the red mud dam conversion to remain within the
supply pipelines crossing the site. existing lease area minimised changes to existing licence
conditions and generally simplified the application for change
The design of the foundation key had to satisfy most of these process. However, some land clearing was necessary within
concerns. the lease and fauna and flora studies were carried out. These
identified several endangered habitats, including the rare Black
Whereas initial investigations and theory indicated that the key Breasted Button Quail in remnant vine thicket within the proposed
could be constructed, there was uncertainty with respect to the footprint. The dam embankment was realigned to preserve this
stability of temporary slopes since this depended on assumed habitat.
variables such as method of construction and groundwater levels
at the time. Trial excavations and embankments were proposed 7. Risk Analysis
and constructed to provide: A risk analysis process was used throughout the design
development of the strategy and Stage 1 design. Between the
9. Conclusions
This paper has described some of the challenges and issues
that had to be addressed when establishing a new upstream
constructed residue disposal area over an existing residue
storage area.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge Queensland Alumina Ltd and
GHD Pty Ltd for their support and approval to present this paper.
References
Peck, R B, 1969, ‘Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil mechanics’, Geotechnique, vol. 19, no.2, pp. 171-187.