DMC COLLEGE FOUNDATION
INTEGRATED SCHOOL
“Teaching Minds. Touching Hearts. Transforming Lives”
Subjects PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
The learner demonstrates
understanding of:
 the characteristics,
strengths, weaknesses,
and kinds of quantitative
research
 the importance of
quantitative research
across fields
 the nature of variables
 the range of research
topics in the area of inquiry
 the value of research in the
CONTENT
area of interest
STANDARD
 the specificity and
feasibility of the problem
posed
 the criteria in selecting,
citing, and synthesizing
related literature
 the ethical standards in
writing related literature
 the formulation of
conceptual framework
 the research hypotheses (if
appropriate)
 the definition of terms as
used in the study
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
A De La Salle Supervised School
SY: 2018-2019
PERFORMANCE TASK
2ND
Teacher RIZA LEE M. LIBAO S.Y. 2018 - 2019 Quarter
The learners shall be able to… The students will be able to
independently use their learning
 decide on suitable to…
quantitative research in
different areas of  Construct chapter 1, 2,
interest and 3 of a research
 formulate clearly the paper
statement of research  Present a research
problem proposal
 select, cite, and
synthesize judiciously
related literature and
use sources according
to ethical standards
PERFORMANCE  formulate clearly TRANSFER
STANDARD GOAL
conceptual framework,
research hypotheses (if
appropriate), and
define terms used in
study
 present objectively
written review of related
literature and
conceptual framework
Goal Your goal is to construct chapters 1 to 3 of a research and propose your research to the Ethics Review Committee.

Role You are a researcher, an entrepreneur, and an experimenter.

Audience Your target audience is the Ethics Review Committee.

Situation The Ethics Review Committee looks on the extent of sensitivity of your research especially that your target respondents or instruments are
human beings. They will also take into account the purpose of your study whether or not it helps in elevating the living of the people as well
as in the progress of the community.
Product You need to produce 4 soft-bound copies of your chapters 1 to 3 to be submitted to the ERC (3) and to the research adviser (1). You also
need to create a PowerPoint presentation during your research proposal.
Standards Each group is composed of four to six members. The paper and the presentation must include the following: Introduction, Problem
Statement, Purpose of Study, Research Hypothesis, Literature Review, References, Writing Mechanics, Presentation Skill, Visual Aids,
Overall Presentation Quality

SCORING GUIDE FOR PRODUCT

Excellent (5) Competent (4) Needs Improvement (3) Incomplete (1)

Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Incomplete

An intriguing introduction
Introduction based on facts leads clearly
into the research proposal.
Excellent
A fairly well formulated
introduction with some
evidence to support the topic
leads into the research
proposal.
Competent
Introduction is not well Lacks a proper introduction.
constructed, uninteresting, or
does not lead into the research
proposal.
Needs Improvement Incomplete

Stated the research
problem clearly, and provided
Problem Statement
motivation for undertaking the
research.
Excellent
Purpose of Study
Very clearly stated purpose of
the study and demonstrated its
Fairly well posed statement of
the problem that provides
evidence but the evidence is
not as strong as it could be.
Competent
Fairly well stated purpose of
the study but did not
Statement of the problem is not Lacks a proper statement of
clearly stated and/or lacks the problem.
quality evidence to support the
problem Evidence presented does not
support the thesis or problem
statement.
Needs Improvement Incomplete
Purpose of the study is not Lacks a purpose of the study
clearly stated and/or the value is statement.
 potential value.
Excellent
Research Hypothesis Well stated research hypothesis Fairly well stated hypothesis
based on the purpose of the
study.
Excellent
Demonstrated basic knowledge
Literature Review of literature in the area, and of
prior work on the specific
research problem. Mentioned
at least 1 theory.
Excellent
References are given for 15 or
References
more than 15 relevant sources.
Prescribed citation style is
used.
Excellent
Very well written proposal
with few grammatical errors.
Writing Mechanics Adheres to all the proposal
writing format requirements as
presented in the guidelines.
demonstrate its potential
value.
Competent
based on the purpose of the
study.
Competent
Demonstrated basic knowledge Unclearly mentioned some
of literature or previous
research in the area, but did not
mention any theories.
Competent
References are given for 14 to
10 relevant sources. Prescribed
citation style is used.
Competent
Well written proposal with few
grammatical errors. Adheres to
most of the proposal writing
format requirements as
presented in the guidelines.
not stated.
Needs Improvement
Stated hypothesis is unclear
based on the purpose of the
study.
Needs Improvement
previous work in the area.
Needs Improvement
References are given for less
than 10 relevant source.
Prescribed citation style is
used.
Needs Improvement
Fairly written proposal that
lacks clarity; has poor transition
sentences. There are several
grammatical errors. Adheres to
most of the proposal writing
format requirements as
presented in the guidelines.
Incomplete
Lacks a hypothesis.
Incomplete
Did not mention any
previous research, literature,
or theories.
Incomplete
No references are provided,
or they are not cited
correctly.
Incomplete
Poorly written paper that
lacks organization. There are
multiple grammatical errors.
Fails to adhere to the
proposal writing format
requirements as presented in
the guidelines.
 Excellent
Excellent eye contact, no
distracting gestures,
Presentation Skill
appropriate volume, clear and
consistent
enunciation. Creative and
charismatic.
Excellent
The presentation includes
appropriate and easily
Visual Aids
understood visual aids, which
complement and enhance the
presented information.
Excellent
Excellent use was made of the
Overall Presentation student's presentation time (4
Quality minutes). Each section of the
written proposal was
mentioned. English quality was
advanced.
Prepared by:
RIZA LEE M. LIBAO
Teacher
Recommending Approval:
MYRA CONSUELO L. SY, RN
OIC Principal, SHS
Competent
Good eye contact, no
distracting gestures,
usually has appropriate
volume, overall clear
enunciation.
Competent
The presentation includes
appropriate and easily
understood visual aids, which
complement and enhance the
presented information.
Competent
Good use was made of the
student's presentation time (4
minutes). Each section of the
written proposal was
mentioned. English quality
was acceptable.
Needs Improvement
Inconsistent with eye
contact, volume, and
enunciation. Obvious
distracting mannerism(s).
Needs Improvement
The presentation includes
appropriate visual aids, but
these are too few, or are
difficult to understand, or the
presenter does not
refer to or explain them.
Needs Improvement
Acceptable use was made of the
student's presentation time (4
minutes). Most sections of the
written proposal were
mentioned. English quality was
inconsistent.
Checked by:
CATHERINE G. DEQUITO, LPT
Academic Coordinator
Approved by:
CARISSA PIA M. CONCHA, RN
VP for Basic Education
Incomplete
Poor eye contact,
volume too low or loud,
poor enunciation.
Incomplete
The presentation includes no
visual aids. Or the visual aids
do not complement the
information.
Incomplete
The presentation was not
timed appropriate. Some
portions of the proposal were
ignored. English was
difficult to understand.
 DMC COLLEGE FOUNDATION
INTEGRATED SCHOOL
A De La Salle Supervised School
“Teaching Minds. Touching Hearts. Transforming Lives”
SY: 2018-2019

PERFORMANCE CHECK

2ND
Subjects PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 Teacher RIZA LEE M. LIBAO S.Y. 2018 - 2019 Quarter
The learner demonstrates The learners shall be able to… The students will be able to
understanding of: independently use their learning
 decide on suitable quantitative to…
 the characteristics, research in different areas of
strengths, interest  Construct chapter 1, 2,
weaknesses, and  formulate clearly the statement and 3 of a research
kinds of quantitative of research problem paper
research  select, cite, and synthesize  Present a research
 the importance of judiciously related literature and proposal
quantitative research use sources according to
across fields ethical standards
 the nature of  formulate clearly conceptual
variables framework, research
 the range of research hypotheses (if appropriate),
CONTENT topics in the area of PERFORMANCE and define terms used in study TRANSFER
STANDARD inquiry STANDARD  present objectively written GOAL
 the value of research review of related literature and
in the area of interest conceptual framework
 the specificity and
feasibility of the
problem posed
 the criteria in
selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related
literature
 the ethical standards
in writing related
literature
 the formulation of
conceptual
 framework
 the research
hypotheses (if
appropriate)
 the definition of
terms as used in the
study

Goal Your goal is to construct each chapters of the research paper up to chapter 3 only.

Role You are a researcher, an entrepreneur, and an experimenter.

Audience Your target audience is your research adviser.

Situation Your research adviser will look into each chapter of the research paper and check the improvement of your research paper.
Product You need to produce a hard copy of each chapter of the research paper.
Standards Each group is composed of four to six members. The paper must include the following: Introduction, Problem Statement, Purpose of Study,
Research Hypothesis, Literature Review, References, Writing Mechanics

SCORING GUIDE FOR PRODUCT

Excellent (5) Competent (4) Needs Improvement (3) Incomplete (1)

Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Incomplete

An intriguing introduction
Introduction based on facts leads clearly
into the research proposal.
Excellent
A fairly well formulated
introduction with some
evidence to support the topic
leads into the research
proposal.
Competent
Introduction is not well Lacks a proper introduction.
constructed, uninteresting, or
does not lead into the research
proposal.
Needs Improvement Incomplete

Stated the research
Problem Statement problem clearly, and provided
motivation for undertaking the
research.
Fairly well posed statement of
the problem that provides
evidence but the evidence is
not as strong as it could be.
Statement of the problem is not
clearly stated and/or lacks
quality evidence to support the
problem
Lacks a proper statement of
the problem.
Evidence presented does not
support the thesis or problem

Excellent
Very clearly stated purpose of
Purpose of Study
the study and demonstrated its
potential value.
Excellent
Research Hypothesis Well stated research hypothesis Fairly well stated hypothesis
based on the purpose of the
study.
Excellent
Demonstrated basic knowledge
Literature Review of literature in the area, and of
prior work on the specific
research problem. Mentioned
at least 1 theory.
Excellent
References are given for 15 or
References
more than 15 relevant sources.
Prescribed citation style is
used.
Excellent
Very well written proposal
with few grammatical errors.
Writing Mechanics Adheres to all the proposal
writing format requirements as
presented in the guidelines.
Competent
Fairly well stated purpose of
the study but did not
demonstrate its potential
value.
Competent
based on the purpose of the
study.
Competent
Demonstrated basic knowledge Unclearly mentioned some
of literature or previous
research in the area, but did not
mention any theories.
Competent
References are given for 14 to
10 relevant sources. Prescribed
citation style is used.
Competent
Well written proposal with few
grammatical errors. Adheres to
most of the proposal writing
format requirements as
presented in the guidelines.
Needs Improvement
Purpose of the study is not
clearly stated and/or the value is statement.
not stated.
Needs Improvement
Stated hypothesis is unclear
based on the purpose of the
study.
Needs Improvement
previous work in the area.
Needs Improvement
References are given for less
than 10 relevant source.
Prescribed citation style is
used.
Needs Improvement
Fairly written proposal that
lacks clarity; has poor transition
sentences. There are several
grammatical errors. Adheres to
most of the proposal writing
format requirements as
presented in the guidelines.
statement.
Incomplete
Lacks a purpose of the study
Incomplete
Lacks a hypothesis.
Incomplete
Did not mention any
previous research, literature,
or theories.
Incomplete
No references are provided,
or they are not cited
correctly.
Incomplete
Poorly written paper that
lacks organization. There are
multiple grammatical errors.
Fails to adhere to the
proposal writing format
requirements as presented in
the guidelines.
Prepared by:

RIZA LEE M. LIBAO

Checked by:

CATHERINE G. DEQUITO, LPT

Academic Coordinator

Recommending Approval:

MYRA CONSUELO L. SY, RN

OIC Principal, SHS

Approved by:

CARISSA PIA M. CONCHA, RN

VP for Basic Education