Sie sind auf Seite 1von 48

AIS eRAN11.

1 eMIMO
Beta Report

eRAN11.1 Beta Project Team

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 1


Content

Beta Test Plan


Beta Site/Route/Equipment
Beta Configuration
Principle
Network KPI
Drive Test

Page 2
eMIMO Beta Test Plan

Beta Test Plan


2016.1.25 2016.2.1 2016.3.29

Performance
Comparison Output Test Report Done
Trial Discussion Software Upgrade
between eMIMO Doing
Meeting and
and 6-sector with Planning
Confirm Test
SFN and 6secoter
Results
Solution and Time LTE eMIMO Sites Field Test Test Result
Plan Discussion Deployment (~8 weeks) Confirm
(1 week)

 The software upgrade is containing eNodeB,U2000 and CME upgrading to the corresponding eRAN
V100R011C10 version
eNodeB hardware of UBBPd or UBBPe is needed, which has been installed in the test sites

Page 3
Beta Test Plan

Beta Test Plan-1

Page 4
Beta Test Plan

Beta Test Plan-2


Week Date Feature open plan

2016/3/9 [Change the neighbor cell’s PA/PB from (-3,1) to (0,0); open]
2016/3/10 KPI monitor
W11
2016/3/11 KPI monitor
2016/3/12 KPI monitor
2016/3/13 KPI monitor
2016/3/14 KPI monitor
2016/3/15 KPI monitor

2016/3/16 [Change the neighbor cell’s PA/PB from (-3,1) to (0,0); close];
W12 6 SECTOR(SFN-->2CELL) OPEN
2016/3/17 KPI monitor
2016/3/18 KPI monitor
2016/3/19 KPI monitor
2016/3/20 KPI monitor
2016/3/21 KPI monitor
W13 2016/3/22 KPI monitor
2016/3/23 6 SECTOR(2CELL-->SFN)6 SECTOR CLOSE

Page 5
Content

Beta Test Plan


Beta Site/Route/Equipment
Beta Configuration
Principle
Network KPI
Drive Test

Page 6
Beta Sites

Beta Sites

PB11M RHSKM PRB6M


Page 7
Sites Distribution and RF Parameters
Sites Distribution and RF Parameters
eMIMO Beta Sites Parameters
RS
eNB Local power
Name eNB ID cell ID PCI (0.1dBm) Ant_H(m) Azimuth MT ET
102 26 140 4 4
107 168 164 26 200 4 4
Selection area 1 617001
103 26 240 4 2
AYOTM 108 170 164 26 300 4 2
101 25 350 2 9
106 251 164 25 50 2 9
617038
103 25 230 2 8
The Cell Load is Higher. PB11M 108 249 164 25 290 2 8
101 27 25 2 6
106 144 164 27 85 2 6
102 27 150 2 5
617046
107 226 164 27 210 2 5
103 27 250 2 5
RHSKM 108 62 164 27 310 2 7
101 22 15 4 4
PRB6M 616007 106 215 164 22 75 4 4

Page 8
DT Area and Route

DT Area and Route

AYOTM

PB11M
RHSKM

PRB6M

Page 9
Test Equipments

Test Equipments
 Test UE: TUE(suport 4*4 MIMO), E392
 Test Equipments

Equipments Number Status Remark


Laptop 3 OK
Fix Point Test
LTE Test UE 3 OK
and Drive Test
LTE SIM Card 3 OK
Download
FTP Server 1 OK
and Upload  Test Tools: Probe & Assistant
Test Vehicles 3 OK Drive Test
Test Tools 3 OK Probe
Analyze Tools 1 OK Assistant
GPS 3 OK Drive Test

Page 10
Content

Beta Test Plan


Beta Site/Route/Equipment
Beta Configuration
Principle
Network KPI
Drive Test

Page 11
Beta Configuration

Beta Configuration

Case Serving cell Neighbor cell (Non eMIMO)


Total RS Actual PDSCH (Pa,Pb) total RS power Actual RS PDSCH (Pa,P
Power Power RS Power power /dBm Power power b)
/w /dBm Power /dBm /w /dBm /dBm
/dBm

SFN 2x20 16.4 16.4 13.4 (-3,1) 2x20 16.4 16.4 13.4 (-3,1)

6sector 2x20 16.4 16.4 13.4 (-3,1) 2x20 16.4 16.4 13.4 (-3,1)

eMIMO 2x20 16.4 13.4 13.4 (-3,1) 2x20 13.4 13.4 13.4 (0,0)
Equal total
power
eMIMO 2x40 19.4 16.4 16.4 (-3,1) 2x20 16.4 16.4 13.4 (-3,1)
double
total power

Page 12
Content

Beta Test Plan


Beta Site/Route/Equipment
Beta Configuration
Principle
Network KPI
Drive Test

Page 13
eMIMO Principle
eMIMO Principle
2T2R 2T2R
2T2R Normal 4T4R (SFN/6Sector) (SFN/6Sector) eMIMO 4T4R

2T 2T 2T 4T 4T
4T
(Performance (Performance
is close to is close to
2x2MIMO) 2x2MIMO)
4T
• To get 4T in overlap area, each RRU sends 4port sinal , each physical port send 2 logical port
•To keep coverage same, normal 4T4R should add one RRU, and
the total power is doubled. • In order to keep the power do not exceed the limit power, RS power will be decrease 3dB
• To keep coverage same, each RRU total power should be doulbed

Page 14
eMIMO Principle
RS Power and PDSCH Power impact
 RS Power: used for cell reselection/HO.
 If RS Power decreased, the absolute RSRP will decrease, and if there is deep coverage(Macro site coverage
building), weak coverage point maybe appear, and the User number and RRC setup ratio will be decreased.
However, eMIMO‘s user number and RRC setup ratio keep stable from the counter monitoring. So we judge
the coverage keep stable after eMIMO RS Power decreased 3dB.
 For cell reselection/Inter RAT HO, if neighbor cell’s PA/PB not be changed , cell reselection/Inter RAT HO
parameters should be decrease 3dB, in order to keep user camping the same cell. If the neighbor cell’s
PA/PB/RS Power is changed cell reselection/Inter RAT HO parameters needn’t to be modified.
 PDSCH Power: used for data RE transmission and data demodulation.
 For PDSCH Power, eMIMO keep the power same as SFN/6sector, so the data channel coverage and
demodulation will not deteriorate.

Page 15
eMIMO Principle
RS power decreased 3dB impact

User RSRP among the 3 ellipse


with dotted line will decrease  RS Power decrease 3dB
because both RS power decreased.
impact : User RSRP among the
3 ellipse with dotted line will
decrease because both of the
eMIMO cell and non-eMIMO
cell RS power decreased.

(or F1/F2)
 However, it can be found that

eMIMO cell F1 Non-eMIMO cell user didn’t go to


UMTS(Page33)

Page 16
Content

Beta Test Plan


Beta Site/Route/Equipment
Beta Configuration
Principle
Network KPI
Drive Test

Page 17
Deployment Suggestion

Deployment suggestion
Item Solution Benift
1 With enough left power (Double 1. eMIMO Coverage : Keep stable.
total power) 2. User throughput : Improved when cell load> 20%.
3. User number and Network KPI : Keep stable .
2 Without enough left power 1. eMIMO Coverage : Keep stable.
(eMIMO equal total power with 2. User number and other KPI : Improved when cell load> 20%.
neighbor cell opt.) 3. User number and Network KPI : Keep stable .

Deployment suggestion:
Double total Power
(1)If left power is more than 3dB, add it to eMIMO cell.
(2)If left power is less than 3dB or without left power, decrease UMTS power ,add it to eMIMO cell.
Equal total power with Neighbor cell opt.
(1) eMIMO neighbor cell opt. , Pa/Pb change from (-3,1) to (0,0) .
(2) All LTE cell Pa/Pb change from (-3,1) to (0,0), then eMIMO cell change from (0,0) to (-3,1)

Page 18
Summary-1
Summary of network KPI
Item Gain(vs SFN)
eMIMO vs SFN: keep stable.
Base KPI
eMIMO vs 6sector: improved
With equal total power and neighbor cell opt.: Keep stable
User Num
With double total power : Keep stable
Throughput Throughput Gain is Showed as the figures bellow:

DL User THP Gain (vs SFN) Cell DL THP Gain(vs SFN)


25% 20%

20% 15%
eMIMO Equal total Power eMIMO Normal total Power
15%
eMIMO Double total Power 10% eMIMO Double total Power

10% eMIMO Equal total Power eMIMO Normal total Power


with Neighbor Cell opt. 5% with Neighbor Cell opt.
6sector 6sector
5%

0%
0% all day[PRB Usage=12%] busy hour[PRB
all day[PRB Usage=12%] busy hour[PRB Usage=16%]
Usage=16%] -5%
-5% Page 19
eMIMO KPI (Equal total Power)
Weekly KPI Comparison of day time during 06:00~22:00
E-RAB Intra-Freq User DL User UL
RRC Setup Traffic DL PRB UL PRB Cell DL Cell UL Cell DL Cell UL
Setup HO Call Drop Throughp Throughp
Date Success User Usage Usage Traffic(Gbi Traffic(Gbi Throughp Throughp
Success Success Rate(%) ut(Protoc ut(Protoc
Rate(%) Avg(User) Rate(%) Rate(%) ts) ts) ut(Kbps) ut(Kbps)
Rate(%) Rate(%) ol)(Kbps) ol)(Kbps)
SFN(2016/2/3-
99.959 99.906 99.913 0.021 185.162 12.012 8.198 957.22 111.764 11301.33 2223.218 5146.28 2659.029
2016/2/9)
eMIMO equal total
power
99.862 99.898 99.136 0.218 166.574 9.295 7.877 910.171 105.841 12026.57 2408.378 5130.493 3051.545
TR5(2016/2/17-
2016/2/23)
eMIMO equal total
power SPC060
99.961 99.888 99.887 0.04 182.345 9.321 9.477 980.552 117.3 11931.65 2468.787 5509.339 3166.251
(2016/2/24-
2016/3/1)
Gain(eMIMO equal
total power SPC060
0.099 -0.01 0.751 -0.178 9.50% 0.30% 20.30% 7.70% 10.80% -0.80% 2.50% 7.40% 3.80%
vs eMIMO equal
total power TR5)
Gain(eMIMO equal
total power SPC060 0.002 -0.018 -0.026 0.0186 -1.50% -22.40% 15.60% 2.40% 5.00% 5.60% 11.00% 7.10% 19.10%
vs SFN)

• With Equal total power , coverage of eMIMO decrease , User number decreased slightly with new 4G users increasing.
• PRB Usage Rate of eMIMO decreased 22%, it can get higher cell capacity gain when PRB Usage Rate is higher .
• User DL Throughput gain of eMIMO is 7%.
• Deterioration of network KPI for TR5 version is due to the core network problem.
Page 20
eMIMO KPI (Equal total Power)
Weekly KPI Comparison of busy hours during 18:00~22:00
E-RAB Intra-Freq User DL User UL
RRC Setup Traffic DL PRB UL PRB Cell DL Cell UL Cell DL Cell UL
Setup HO Call Drop Throughp Throughp
Date Success User Usage Usage Traffic(Gbi Traffic(Gbi Throughp Throughp
Success Success Rate(%) ut(Protoc ut(Protoc
Rate(%) Avg(User) Rate(%) Rate(%) ts) ts) ut(Kbps) ut(Kbps)
Rate(%) Rate(%) ol)(Kbps) ol)(Kbps)
SFN(2016/2/3-
99.968 99.904 99.939 0.023 229.285 16.317 9.526 331.051 40.207 10835.62 2320.534 4969.24 2743.988
2016/2/9)
eMIMO equal total
power
99.963 99.899 99.193 0.245 216.775 12.714 9.259 317.858 40.033 11481.73 2542.477 4905.41 3095.541
TR5(2016/2/17-
2016/2/23)
eMIMO equal total
power
99.963 99.895 99.908 0.055 242.837 12.596 10.816 350.175 43.406 11349.8 2507.363 5503.819 3120.978
SPC060(2016/2/24-
2016/3/1)
Gain(eMIMO equal
total power SPC060
0 -0.003 0.715 -0.19 0.12 -0.90% 16.80% 10.20% 8.40% -1.10% -1.40% 12.20% 0.80%
vs eMIMO equal
total power TR5)
Gain(eMIMO equal
total power SPC060 -0.005 -0.009 -0.031 0.032 5.9% -22.80% 13.50% 5.80% 8.00% 4.70% 8.10% 10.80% 13.70%
vs SFN)
• With equal total power , coverage of eMIMO decrease , User number decreased slightly with new 4G users increasing.
• PRB Usage Rate of eMIMO decreased about 23%, it can get higher cell capacity gain when PRB Usage Rate is higher .
• User DL Throughput gain of eMIMO is 11%.
• Deterioration of network KPI for TR5 version is due to the core network problem.
Page 21
eMIMO KPI (Double total Power)
Weekly KPI Comparison of day time during 6:00~22:00
E-RAB Intra-Freq User DL User UL
RRC Setup Traffic DL PRB UL PRB Cell DL Cell UL Cell DL Cell UL
Setup HO Call Drop Throughp Throughp
Date Success User Usage Usage Traffic(Gbi Traffic(Gbi Throughp Throughp
Success Success Rate(%) ut(Protoc ut(Protoc
Rate(%) Avg(User) Rate(%) Rate(%) ts) ts) ut(Kbps) ut(Kbps)
Rate(%) Rate(%) ol)(Kbps) ol)(Kbps)
SFN(2016/2/3-
99.959 99.906 99.913 0.021 185.162 12.012 8.198 957.22 111.764 11301.33 2223.218 5146.28 2659.029
2016/2/9)
eMIMO equal total
Powr (2016/2/24- 99.961 99.888 99.887 0.040 182.345 9.321 9.477 980.552 117.3 11931.65 2468.787 5509.339 3166.251
2016/3/1)
eMIMO double total
power(2016/3/2 99.961 99.896 99.890 0.036 234.587 12.021 10.950 1352.393 162.682 12307.3 2568.35 5998.05 3255.32
2016/3/8)
gain(eMIMO double
total power vs
0.000 0.007 0.003 -0.004 28.6% 29.0% 15.5% 37.9% 38.7% 3.1% 4.0% 8.9% 2.8%
eMIMO equal total
power)
gain(eMIMO double
0.002 -0.011 -0.023 0.015 26.7% 0.1% 33.6% 41.3% 45.6% 8.9% 15.5% 16.6% 22.4%
total power vs SFN )

• With double total power , coverage of eMIMO keep stable , and User number and traffic volume both increased
obviously with new 4G users increasing.
• User DL Throughput gain of eMIMO is 16.6%.

Page 22
eMIMO KPI (Double total Power)
KPI Comparison of busy hour during 18:00~22:00
E-RAB Intra-Freq User DL User UL
RRC Setup Traffic DL PRB UL PRB Cell DL Cell UL Cell DL Cell UL
Setup HO Call Drop Throughp Throughp
Date Success User Usage Usage Traffic(Gbi Traffic(Gbi Throughp Throughp
Success Success Rate(%) ut(Protoc ut(Protoc
Rate(%) Avg(User) Rate(%) Rate(%) ts) ts) ut(Kbps) ut(Kbps)
Rate(%) Rate(%) ol)(Kbps) ol)(Kbps)

SFN(2016/2/3-
99.968 99.904 99.939 0.023 229.285 16.317 9.526 331.051 40.207 10835.618 2320.534 4969.240 2743.988
2016/2/9)

eMIMO equal total


power
99.963 99.895 99.908 0.055 242.837 12.596 10.816 350.175 43.406 11349.798 2507.363 5503.819 3120.978
SPC060(2016/2/24-
2016/3/1)

eMIMO double total


power(2016/3/2 99.958 99.912 99.910 0.039 300.912 16.157 12.255 463.706 53.524 12326.062 2544.784 6040.235 3015.014
2016/3/8)

gain(eMIMO double
total power vs
-0.005 0.017 0.002 -0.016 23.9% 28.3% 13.3% 32.4% 23.3% 8.6% 1.5% 9.7% -3.4%
eMIMO Normal
total Power)
gain(eMIMO double
-0.011 0.009 -0.029 0.0156 31.2% -1.0% 28.6% 40.1% 33.1% 13.8% 9.7% 21.6% 9.9%
total power vs SFN )

• With double total power , coverage of eMIMO keep stable , and User number and traffic volume both increased
obviously with new 4G users increasing.
• User DL Throughput gain of eMIMO is 21.6%.
Page 23
eMIMO KPI (Equal total power with Neighbor Cell Opt.)
Weekly KPI Comparison of day time during 6:00~22:00
RRC E-RAB Intra-Freq User DL User UL
Traffic DL PRB UL PRB Cell DL Cell UL Cell DL Cell UL
Setup Setup HO Call Drop Throughp Throughp
Date User Usage Usage Traffic(Gb Traffic(Gb Throughp Throughp
Success Success Success Rate(%) ut(Protoc ut(Protoc
Avg(User) Rate(%) Rate(%) its) its) ut(Kbps) ut(Kbps)
Rate(%) Rate(%) Rate(%) ol)(Kbps) ol)(Kbps)

SFN(2016/2/3-2016/2/9) 99.959 99.906 99.913 0.021 185.16 12.01 8.20 957.22 111.76 11301.33 2223.22 5146.28 2659.03

eMIMO equal total


99.961 99.888 99.887 0.04 182.35 9.32 9.48 980.55 117.30 11931.65 2468.79 5509.34 3166.25
Power(2016/2/24-2016/3/1)

eMIMO double total


99.961 99.895 99.89 0.036 234.59 12.02 10.95 1352.39 162.68 12307.30 2568.35 5998.05 3255.32
power(2016/3/2-2016/3/8)
eMIMO equal total power with
neighbor cell opt.(2016/3/10- 99.94 99.896 99.863 0.036 226.76 12.88 10.83 1411.54 152.01 12367.33 2457.03 5670.03 3083.59
2016/3/16)
gain(eMIMO equal total power
-0.019 -0.01 -0.05 0.015 22.5% 7.2% 32.1% 47.5% 36.0% 9.4% 10.5% 10.2% 16.0%
with neighbor cell opt. vs SFN)
gain(eMIMO equal total power
with neighbor cell opt. vs eMIMO -0.021 0.008 -0.024 -0.004 24.4% 38.2% 14.3% 44.0% 29.6% 3.7% -0.5% 2.9% -2.6%
equal total power)
gain(eMIMO equal total power
with neighbor cell opt. vs eMIMO -0.021 0.001 -0.027 0 -3.3% 7.2% -1.1% 4.4% -6.6% 0.5% -4.3% -5.5% -5.3%
Double total power)
• With equal total power with neighbor cell optimization, coverage of eMIMO keep stable , and User number and traffic
volume both increased obviously with new 4G users increasing.
• User DL Throughput gain of eMIMO is 10.2%.
Page 24
eMIMO KPI (Equal total power with Neighbor Cell Opt.)
Weekly KPI Comparison of busy hour during 18:00~22:00
RRC E-RAB Intra-Freq User DL User UL
Traffic DL PRB UL PRB Cell DL Cell UL Cell DL Cell UL
Setup Setup HO Call Drop Throughp Throughp
Date User Usage Usage Traffic(Gbi Traffic(Gbi Throughp Throughp
Success Success Success Rate(%) ut(Protoc ut(Protoc
Avg(User) Rate(%) Rate(%) ts) ts) ut(Kbps) ut(Kbps)
Rate(%) Rate(%) Rate(%) ol)(Kbps) ol)(Kbps)

SFN(2016/2/3-2016/2/9) 99.968 99.904 99.939 0.023 229.29 16.32 9.53 331.05 40.21 10835.62 2320.53 4969.24 2743.99
eMIMO equal total
99.963 99.895 99.908 0.055 242.84 12.60 10.82 350.18 43.41 11349.80 2507.36 5503.82 3120.98
Power(2016/2/24-2016/3/1)

eMIMO double total


99.958 99.912 99.91 0.039 300.91 16.16 12.26 463.71 53.52 12326.06 2544.78 6040.24 3015.01
power(2016/3/2-2016/3/8)
eMIMO equal total power with
neighbor cell opt (2016/3/10- 99.958 99.916 99.877 0.042 291.47 17.92 12.32 513.45 55.51 12608.44 2604.60 5814.23 3153.94
2016/3/16)
gain(eMIMO equal total power
-0.01 0.012 -0.062 0.019 27.1% 9.8% 29.3% 55.1% 38.1% 16.4% 12.2% 17.0% 14.9%
with neighbor cell opt. vs SFN)
gain(eMIMO equal total power
with neighbor cell opt. vs eMIMO -0.005 0.021 -0.031 -0.013 20.0% 42.3% 13.9% 46.6% 27.9% 11.1% 3.9% 5.6% 1.1%
equal total power)
gain(eMIMO equal total power
with neighbor cell opt. vs eMIMO 0 0.004 -0.033 0.003 -3.1% 10.9% 0.5% 10.7% 3.7% 2.3% 2.4% -3.7% 4.6%
Double total power)

• With equal total power with neighbor cell optimization, coverage of eMIMO keep stable , and User number and traffic
volume both increased obviously with new 4G users increasing.
• User DL Throughput gain of eMIMO is 17%.
Page 25
eMIMO KPI (6-Sector)
Four-day KPI Comparison of all day during 6:00~22:00
RRC E-RAB Intra-Freq User DL User UL
DL PRB UL PRB Cell DL Cell UL
Setup Setup HO Call Drop Traffic Cell DL Cell UL Throughp Throughp
Date Usage Usage Throughpu Throughp
Success Success Success Rate User Avg Traffic Traffic ut(Protoco ut(Protoco
Rate Rate t ut
Rate Rate Rate l) l)
SFN(2.6-2.8) 99.95 99.89 99.94 0.02 171.42 11.05 7.94 58.11 6.95 11951.58 2221.55 5246.52 2734.85
Emimo equal total Power
99.96 99.89 99.89 0.04 171.80 9.17 9.94 57.91 6.95 12206.56 2453.93 5451.33 3180.77
TR5 SPC060(2.27-2.29)
Emimo Double total Power
99.96 99.89 99.90 0.03 223.41 11.85 10.97 85.39 10.97 12679.70 2729.54 6030.50 3533.21
TR5 SPC060(3.5-3.7)
vs Equal total power with
Neighbor Opt . 99.96 99.89 99.86 0.03 217.75 12.35 10.68 84.90 9.60 12526.56 2521.60 5858.37 3239.61
TR5 SPC060(3.12-3.14)
6sector(3.19-3.21) 99.66 99.89 99.90 0.19 224.58 12.05 7.85 91.55 10.99 11578.63 1967.58 5180.51 2325.12

6sector vs SFN -0.283 0.003 -0.042 0.174 31.0% 9.0% -1.1% 57.6% 58.2% -3.1% -11.4% -1.3% -15.0%

6sector vs equal total


-0.300 0.001 0.009 0.152 30.7% 31.3% -21.1% 58.1% 58.2% -5.1% -19.8% -5.0% -26.9%
Power

6sector vs Emimo Double


-0.300 0.003 -0.006 0.157 0.5% 1.6% -28.5% 7.2% 0.2% -8.7% -27.9% -14.1% -34.2%
total Power
6sector vs Equal total
power with Neighbor cell -0.296 0.005 0.031 0.159 3.1% -2.5% -26.6% 7.8% 14.5% -7.6% -22.0% -11.6% -28.2%
Opt .

• Compared with eMIMO , almost all the KPI deteriorated.


• Compared with eMIMO , the User DL Throughput deteriorated.
Page 26
eMIMO KPI (6-Sector)
Four-day KPI Comparison of busy hour during 18:00~22:00
E-RAB Intra-Freq User DL User UL
RRC Setup DL PRB UL PRB Cell UL
Setup HO Call Drop Traffic Cell DL Cell UL Cell DL Throughp Throughp
Date Success Usage Usage Throughp
Success Success Rate User Avg Traffic Traffic Throughput ut(Protoco ut(Protoco
Rate Rate Rate ut
Rate Rate l) l)
SFN(2.6-2.8) 99.973 99.875 99.962 0.020 207.49 14.99 9.10 74.86 9.74 10294.03 2338.64 4788.93 2939.72
Emimo equal total Power
99.965 99.886 99.888 0.083 225.34 11.69 11.02 80.30 10.36 11074.13 2550.63 5333.22 3237.37
TR5 SPC060(2.27-2.29)
Emimo Double total
Power TR5 SPC060(3.5- 99.955 99.907 99.904 0.044 276.51 15.48 11.92 111.45 12.57 12507.56 2559.17 6100.66 2997.30
3.7)
Emimo equal total power
with neighbor cell optTR5 99.958 99.906 99.861 0.049 278.14 16.85 12.14 119.62 14.72 12454.58 2905.48 6029.80 3763.42
SPC060(3.12-3.14)
6sector(3.19-3.21) 99.684 99.889 99.912 0.158 279.03 17.07 9.10 122.49 15.20 10633.04 2076.64 4789.92 2342.45

6sector vs SFN -0.288 0.014 -0.050 0.138 34.48% 13.82% -0.07% 63.62% 56.08% 3.29% -11.20% 0.02% -20.32%
6sector vs Emimo equal
-0.281 0.003 0.024 0.076 23.8% 46.0% -17.4% 52.5% 46.7% -4.0% -18.6% -10.2% -27.6%
total Power
6sector vs Emimo Double
-0.270 -0.018 0.008 0.114 0.9% 10.3% -23.7% 9.9% 20.9% -15.0% -18.9% -21.5% -21.8%
total Power
6sector vs eMIMO equal
total power with neighbor -0.273 -0.017 0.051 0.109 0.3% 1.3% -25.1% 2.4% 3.2% -14.6% -28.5% -20.6% -37.8%
cell opt.

• Compared with eMIMO , almost all the KPI deteriorated.


• Compared with eMIMO , the User DL Throughput deteriorated.
Page 27
User DL Throughput Rate(Equal total Power)
SFN-User DL Throughput(Protocol) eMIMO-User DL Throughput(Protocol) 线性 (SFN-User DL Throughput(Protocol)) 线性 (eMIMO-User DL Throughput(Protocol))

20000

18000

16000

14000
User DL Throughput[Kbps]

12000

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
User Num

• With user number increasing , user DL throughput gain of eMIMO is increasing.


Page 28
User DL Throughput Rate(Double total Power)
SFN-User DL Throughput(Protocol) eMIMO-User DL Throughput(Protocol) 线性 (SFN-User DL Throughput(Protocol)) 线性 (eMIMO-User DL Throughput(Protocol))

16000

14000

12000
User DL Throughput[-kbps]

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
user number

• With user number increasing , user DL throughput gain of eMIMO is increasing.


Page 29
User DL Throughput Rate(Equal total power with neighbor cell opt.)
SFN-User DL Throughput(Protocol) eMIMO-User DL Throughput(Protocol) 线性 (SFN-User DL Throughput(Protocol)) 线性 (eMIMO-User DL Throughput(Protocol))

25000

20000
User DL Throughput[Kbps]

15000

10000

5000

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
User Num

• With user number increasing , user DL throughput gain of eMIMO is increasing.


Page 30
User Number-1
Avg. User Number on workday ( 06:00~22:00 )

Feature eMIMO cells LTE cells UMTS cells


(including eMIMO)

SFN baseline baseline baseline

eMIMO equal total Power 0.9% 12.6% -0.9%

eMIMO double total power 29.9% 22.5% -2.5%

eMIMO equal total power with neighbor


24.9% 20.0% -1.3%
cell opt.

Increasing Stable

• With equal total power, the user number of eMIMO cells decreased about 10%.
• After power doubled or Neighbor cell Pa/Pb opt. , user number returned to previous level.
Page 31
User Number-2
UMTS SameSite- Traffic User Avg LTE cells-Traffic User Avg eMIMO cells-Traffic User Avg

900 400

350
800

300
700

250
600

200

500
150

400 eMIMO equal total 100


SFN
eMIMO equal total power eMIMO equal total eMIMO double total power with
(TR5) power (SPC060) Neighbor cell
300
power(SPC060)
opt.(SPC060) 50

200 0
2016/2/5

2016/2/6

2016/2/7

2016/2/8

2016/2/9

2016/2/10

2016/2/11

2016/2/12

2016/2/13

2016/2/14

2016/2/15

2016/2/16

2016/2/17

2016/2/18

2016/2/19

2016/2/20

2016/2/21

2016/2/22

2016/2/23

2016/2/24

2016/2/25

2016/2/26

2016/2/27

2016/2/28

2016/2/29

2016/3/1

2016/3/2

2016/3/3

2016/3/4

2016/3/5

2016/3/6

2016/3/7

2016/3/8

2016/3/9

2016/3/10

2016/3/11

2016/3/12

2016/3/13

2016/3/14

2016/3/15

2016/3/16
• With equal total power , coverage of eMIMO cells decrease due to RS power 3dB loss.
• However , user number of eMIMO cells did not decrease, due to new 4G user increasing , and after
power doubled and Neighbor cell PA/PB opt. , the user number of eMIMO cells increased.
Page 32
Redirection.E2W
L.RRCRedirection.E2W L.Traffic.User.Avg
18000 35

16000
30

14000
SFN E2W times
eMIMO E2W times is less than SFN 25
12000

10000 eMIMO E2W times during this time 20

increased following the new 4G user


8000
increasing. 15

6000
eMIMO Equal total 10
eMIMO Equal total eMIMO Equal eMIMO double total power with
4000 SFN
power (TR5) power (SPC060) power(SPC060) Neighbor cell
opt.(SPC060) 5
2000

0 0

• E2W Redirection times didn’t increase when eMIMO normal total power on, it means users didn’t redirection to UMTS , so RS
power decrease 3dB will not lead to weak coverage user go to UMTS.
• E2W Redirection times increased after power doubled because the total user number increased.
Page 33
Content

Beta Test Plan


Beta Site/Route/Equipment
Beta Configuration
Principle
Network KPI
Drive Test

Page 34
Summary-2

Summary of eMIMO Beta Test


Item Gain(vs SFN)
Peak Throughput TTC Lab: +100% / DT:+74%
eMIMO 2R vs SFN: +41%
eMIMO 4R vs SFN: +73%
DL Cell Capacity(DT)
6sector 2R vs SFN : +45%
6sector 4R vs SFN : +61%
eMIMO 2R(double total power) vs SFN : +20% | 6Sector vs SFN : -17%
DT(single user) eMIMO (double total power) vs eMIMO (equal total power): +11% ~
+21%

Ratio:15%(Equal total power)~ 22%(Double total power)


RANK3 ratio
Throughput gain at RANK3 point:More than 40%

Page 35
Peak Throughput Test Result
Peak Throughput of TTC Lab Peak Throughput of live network

SFN:107Mbps

SFN RLC peak throughput:105 Mbps

eMIMO:214Mbps

eMIMO RLC peak throughput:183 Mbps

eMIMO support 4*4 MIMO,peak throughput can get 214mbps in the TTC Lab.
Page 36
Cell Capacity Test Result(2 User)
User distribution Cell Capacity

140000 +41% +45%


120000
100000 37507
43621
80000
60000 29824

40000 71353 80276


•UE1 •UE2 51437
20000
0
sfn emimo 6sector

There is about 20 live network users during beta test UE1 UE2

UE SFN eMIMO 6sector


Positio throughp DLGrant*R RSRP(dBm DLGrant*R throughpu RSRP(dBm RS- DLGrant*R
n RSRP(dBm) RS-SINR(dB) throughput RS-SINR(dB)
ut B ) B t ) SINR(dB) B
UE1 51437 -46.53 28.55 34298 71353 -50.71 27.73 65997 80276 -46.39 23.11 69274

UE2 29824 -63.37 20.24 34664 43621 -64.76 18.04 54748 37507 -63.93 15.68 59115

eMIMO cell capacity increased 41%,due to RB multiplexing in non-overlap area.


Page 37
Cell Capacity Test Result (3user)
Cell Capacity
User distribution 120000
+73% 61%
100000 46%
40% 14292
11%
80000 10747 40096
0% 24343
60000
19858 24648 60986
55292 32835
40000 32673
•UE1 •UE2 24092 26506
20000
25861 29150
15187 20337 14552 20069
0
•UE3 sfn emimo 6sector sfn emimo 6s
2R 4R
There is about 20 live network users during beta test
UE1 UE2 UE3

UE SFN eMIMO 6Sector


Case Positio throughp RSRP(dBm DLGrant* RSRP(dB DLGrant* throughp RSRP(dB RS- DLGrant*
n RS-SINR(dB) throughput RS-SINR(dB)
ut ) RB m) RB ut m) SINR(dB) RB
UE1 15187 -74.63 16.94 22645 25861 -78.16 16.40 34358 20337 -72.51 14.87 35359
2R(3UE) UE2 24092 -60.52 23.30 22789 32673 -63.67 20.28 36324 55292 -60.67 15.02 62144
UE3 19858 -75.96 22.45 22664 24343 -77.26 19.43 32348 10747 -74.96 6.70 35580
UE1 14552 -75.07 15.26 23042 29150 -78.44 16.68 34081 20069 -72.80 15.57 34047
4R(3UE) UE2 26506 -60.98 23.27 22684 32835 -62.96 20.20 32195 60986 -61.41 16.58 64524
UE3 24648 -74.10 21.13 23345 40096 -77.49 18.19 31630 14292 -75.82 6.19 33838

eMIMO cell capacity increased up to 73%,due to RB multiplexing in non-overlap area and


4*4MIMO in overlap area .
Page 38
Driving Test Result—Throughput
eMIMO VS SFN VS 6Sector Equal total power VS Double total power

DT Single User Throughput(2R) Equal total power vs Double total power


42732 +11%
45000
-17% +20% 70000
59010
65239
40000 35573 35169 60000

throughput(kbps)
35000
29662 50000 +21% 42732
30000 40000 35169
kbps

25000
30000
20000
20000
15000
10000
10000
5000 0
equal total double total equal total double total
0 power power power power
6Sector SFN eMIMO equal total eMIMO double
power total power emimo 2R emimo 4R

Avg Avg
29662 35573 35169 42732 35169 42732 59010 65239
THP(kbps) THP(kbps)
RSRP -71 -70 -74 -71 RSRP -74 -71 -73 -71
SINR 13.28 14.66 13.96 16.39 SINR 13.96 16.39 15.98 17.29
Note: The DT result is affected by the test time.

eMIMO equal total power vs SFN : keep stable | eMIMO double total power vs SFN : Gain+20%
6Sector vs SFN : Gain = -17%.
eMIMO (double total power) vs eMIMO(equal total power) , throughput gain is 11-21%.
Page 39
Driving Test Result —Rank3/4 ratio
Rank Ratio of DT test Rank3 Point Throughput comparation
120000
Rank 4 0%
Equal_power

100000
Rank 3 15%
Rank 2 79% 80000

Rank 1 6% 60000
Rank 4 0%
Double_power

40000
Rank 3 22%
20000
Rank 2 73%
Rank 1 5% 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
sfn emimo Equal total power emimo Double total power
SINR
Rank 1 5.29
eMIMO Equal_total eMIMO Double_total
Equal_power Rank 2 16.04 SFN
power power
Rank 3 16.75
Rank 1 7.50 Avg 65783 68081
46331
Double_power Rank 2 16.79 THP(kbps) (42% increased) (47% increased)
Rank 3 17.08

• 15-22% of Rank3 in DT test.


• More than 40% throughput gain in Rank3 point compared with SFN.
Page 40
Driving Test Result —RSRP(2R)

SFN 6Sector eMIMO(2R) eMIMO double power(2R)

Page 41
Driving Test Result —SINR(2R)

SFN 6Sector eMIMO(2R) eMIMO double power(2R)

Page 42
Driving Test Result —DL Throughput(2R)

SFN 6Sector eMIMO(2R) eMIMO double power(2R)

Page 43
Driving Test Result —RSRP(4R vs 2R)

eMIMO(2R) eMIMO double power(2R) eMIMO(4R) eMIMO double power(4R)

Page 44
Driving Test Result —SINR(4R vs 2R)

eMIMO(2R) eMIMO double power(2R) eMIMO(4R) eMIMO double power(4R)

Page 45
Driving Test Result —DL Throughput (4R vs 2R)

eMIMO(2R) eMIMO double power(2R) eMIMO(4R) eMIMO double power(4R)

Page 46
Driving Test Result —RANK Ratio (vs SFN)

eMIMO(4R) eMIMO double power(4R)

Page 47
Thank You

Page 48