0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
53 Ansichten2 Seiten
This document contains a grading rubric for a pediatric occupational therapy intervention plan. It assesses students on 17 criteria such as providing an occupational profile, analyzing performance, setting goals, and identifying intervention approaches. The student mostly meets expectations, with some areas identified as outstanding or needing improvement. Their final grade on the written documentation is 97% of the total possible points. With their additional interview score of 68.25 points, their total score on the SPA assignment is 286.5 out of a possible 300 points, equivalent to 95.5%.
This document contains a grading rubric for a pediatric occupational therapy intervention plan. It assesses students on 17 criteria such as providing an occupational profile, analyzing performance, setting goals, and identifying intervention approaches. The student mostly meets expectations, with some areas identified as outstanding or needing improvement. Their final grade on the written documentation is 97% of the total possible points. With their additional interview score of 68.25 points, their total score on the SPA assignment is 286.5 out of a possible 300 points, equivalent to 95.5%.
This document contains a grading rubric for a pediatric occupational therapy intervention plan. It assesses students on 17 criteria such as providing an occupational profile, analyzing performance, setting goals, and identifying intervention approaches. The student mostly meets expectations, with some areas identified as outstanding or needing improvement. Their final grade on the written documentation is 97% of the total possible points. With their additional interview score of 68.25 points, their total score on the SPA assignment is 286.5 out of a possible 300 points, equivalent to 95.5%.
Student’s Name ___________________________________________________________
Pediatric SPA Intervention Grading Rubric
Intervention Plan Grading Criteria Skill Level Demonstrated
Rebekah Strobel Below Meets Outstanding expectations Expectations +.5-2pt. -.5 – 3pts. 1. Demographic information, diagnosis, concerns, x precautions, reason for referral, therapist’s name 2. Occupational Profile +1.25 States comprehensive understanding of occ. Hx, experiences, patterns of daily living, interests, values, and needs & reason x for seeking services. strengths and weaknesses (person) identified potential areas of occupation disruption identified Supports and barriers (context & environment) identified Parent’s Priorities & concerns for intervention identified 3. Analysis of occupational performance +.5 Assets & px more specifically identified from observation Actual performance data described from observation x Performance analyzed & identified priorities supported Identified targeted outcomes – Need to relate the targeted occupations to overall outcomes (table 9 OTPF) Concise, cogent and comprehensive narrative 4. Problems prioritized +1 x 5. Identifies two personal supports/strengths X Appropriately identify two specific personal factors (client factors/performance skills) that are promoting participation in selected occupations/priorities of intervention (use OTPF language) 6. Identifies two contextual supports/strengths X Appropriately identify two specific contextual factors that are promoting participation in selected occupations/priorities of intervention (use OTPF language) 7. Identifies two activity demand supports/strengths X Appropriately identify two specific activity demands that are promoting participation in selected occupations/priorities of intervention (use OTPF language) 8. Identifies two personal barriers/limitations X Appropriately identify two specific personal factors (client factors/performance skills) that are limiting participation in selected occupations/priorities of intervention (use OTPF language) 9. Identifies two environmental barriers/limitations X Appropriately identify two specific contextual factors that are limiting participation in selected occupations/priorities of intervention (use OTPF language) 10. Identifies two activity demand barriers/limitations x Appropriately identify two specific activity demands that are promoting participation in selected occupations/priorities of intervention (use OTPF language) Student’s Name ___________________________________________________________ 11. Correctly writes two long term goals Good job – in goal #1 X need to add and sustain interaction and it’s perfect! Uses COAST/SMART format +1.5 Outcomes emphasize function 12. Correctly writes two short term goals for each long term x goal 1. Good say Improve pincher grasp – and if you have min assist you don’t need accuracy. 2 – What skill are you working on here? Same as above 3 – Just approach? I would add approach get attention and initiate interaction….#4 good – this is sustaining and interaction though – your previous STG was inititating. Uses COAST/SMART format (includes 6th item – Contributing client factor or performance skill) Outcomes emphasize function 13. Correctly identifies FofR/ practice model and rationale with X each STG – I would use social participation or behavior acquisition for #4 – MOHO tell you WHAT to focus on but you +1.5 need a supporting model that directs HOW you will address the issue. Write a rationale & explain how and why you chose the model(s) to address this specific short term goal and how it addresses the contributing ‘client factor/performance skill’ stated in STG that is problematic in client performing specific occupation targeted in the goal. 14. Correctly identifies intervention approach(es)/ type(s) x 15. Correctly identifies 3 relevant outcomes x 16. Lists person(s) developing plan and date x 17. Spelling/Grammar +2 Clearly communicates information x Checks spelling Grading Rubric Student “meets expectations” in all criterion categories = 138/150 (~92/100) Add 2 points for each box marked “outstanding” +7.75 Subtract 3 points for reach box marked “below expectations” -0 145.75/150 = 97% Students Final Grade = 218.25/225 total pts. SPA Total Points: 300 (75 pts. interview/225 written documentation) Written SPA: 218.25 Interview: 68.25 Total SPA Score: 286.5/300 = 95.5%