return to updates

Las Vegas Hoax

by Miles Mathis

First published October 10, 2017

As usual, this is just my opinion, based on a good eye.

My guest writer Josh has saved me some time on this one, and I start by linking to his recent analysis. I
find it good, as usual. But I am here today because I have a few things to add. No doubt I will have a
few more as time passes.

First of all, what's wrong with the photo above? You have to look closely at these pictures and think
them through. Almost nobody does that. It is a paste-up. How do I know? Because it makes no sense.
Look at the two people climbing over the fence. That is the major clue. Isn't it odd to find them both
in the same position, within a few feet of one another? Let me ask you this: would you climb a low
fence in that way? I wouldn't. If someone was shooting at me, I would vault that sucker. But here we
have a guy and a gal, both apparently young, both bellying over as if they are on a drunken treasure
hunt. They look chosen and placed to me. The photo looks composed. What else? Well, these two
are scrambling over the fence, but on the other side people are just lying and sitting around. They don't
seem to be still worried by an active shooter, do they? So they don't match the climbers in attitude.
They are acting like that fence is a perfect barrier, but it is just made of mesh. Plus, it is only about
four or five feet high. The shots are allegedly coming from 32 stories up, so it would be no protection
at all. What else? Note the lighting, which makes no sense. We are supposed to be at 10pm here, and
I assume these people have just climbed a fence on the outer edge of the concert grounds. So why are
they lit like it is during the day, at about 5pm? The faces are in half-light, like in the evening. Stage
lights or floods wouldn't light them like that.

OK, let's move on. Not only is alleged shooter Stephen Paddock admitted to have worked for at least
three years for a company that later merged with Lockheed Martin, he also worked for the IRS. So he
has spook markers on him already. But those are just the tip of the iceberg. It is now known he had a
pilot's license and has owned his own planes. He has also been linked to an Intelligence subsidiary
called Volant. He is a multi-millionaire, owning real estate in many places. He has travelled
extensively in the past decade, going all over the world, including the United Arab Emirates. Doesn't
sound like the bio of a mass murderer to me. Sounds like the bio of a planted agent.
Some on youtube are using this to connect him to ISIS, but that is absurd. Why? Because ISIS
doesn't exist. Like this shooting hoax, ISIS is a construct of US Intelligence and nothing more. It is
another paper moon on a cardboard sea, propped up to give the US something to spend money fighting
against. It is another created hole that politicians can shovel money into, to keep the billionaires
properly fattened month by month.

Josh linked Mandalay Bay Casino and MGM Resorts head honcho Jim Murren to Department of
Homeland Security, but he is also linked to Contemporary Services Corporation. What is that? It just
happens to specialize in crowd control and crowd creation. Convenient, eh? Some are saying they
couldn't have created a crowd of 20,000 in Las Vegas, but they can. Wikipedia admits Nazi director
Leni Riefenstahl had a crowd of 30,000 extras to work with back in the 1930s, so if they could do it
then they can certainly do it now.

Other researchers have shown that prior to the fake shooting spree, Crowds on Demand placed ads in
Craigslist and other places looking to hire crisis actors by the thousands. We may assume they found
them.

Speaking of the Department of Homeland Security, did you know that there were other smaller
shooting events that night at other Las Vegas casinos? They have been overshadowed by the Mandalay
Bay event, but shots (again probably blanks) were fired at many casinos. This according to people
staying at those casinos. Did you know that DHS is pushing to install expensive body scanners at all
Las Vegas casinos? Of course this hoax is the perfect pretext for that, isn't it? Do you know what
company developed the body scanners currently in use? Lockheed Martin. Just a coincidence, right?
The body scanner business is now owned by L-3 Technologies, which posted 10.5 billion in revenues
in 2016 and expects even more profits in 2017-18. It is now one of the top-10 government contractors.
It was previously Loral Corporation, a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin run by Bernard Schwartz until
2006. Loral already had 5.5 billion revenue in 1995 by itself. Remember, they don't tell us what
company “that later merged with Lockheed Martin” Stephen Paddock worked for. I suggest it was
Loral. It looks like the Carlyle Group is also involved, since one of Loral's “other acquisitions” listed
at Wikipedia is LTV missiles, now known as Vought Aircraft Industries. Carlyle owned Vought until
2010, when it sold to Triumph Group, formerly Alco Standard.

All these name changes are just window dressing, meant to hide the real owners. The important thing
here is the money behind L-3, since that is who will profit from the body scanners in Las Vegas.
Before we get there, it is useful to know that L-3 has acquired many big companies recently, including
Paramax. Paramax was formerly SDC, the first computer software company. It spun-off from RAND
in 1957. SDC sold to Burroughs Corporation in 1980. You may remember that writer William S.
Burroughs came from this family. In 1986, Burroughs merged with Sperry to become Unisys. Unisys
became Paramax in 1991. L-3 acquired Paramax in 1997. Paramax supplies much of the computer
technology for the military.

Anyway, Vanguard is by far the largest stockholder in L-3. It has over 3 trillion in managed assets,
and yet calls itself a non-profit. Can you believe the chutzpah of these assholes? If we lived in a real
democracy or republic, do you think the billionaires could get away with hiding assets and ownership
like this? These investment groups like Vanguard were created specifically so that you couldn't
discover who really owned companies like L-3, and Congress lets them get away with it. Just more
proof Congress is defunct. According to this site, the owners/shareholders of Vanguard are the
Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc. There is no way to verify that, but we may assume
the richest people in the world are indeed hiding behind Vanguard and other investment groups. They
are certainly not non-profit. That is just a way to dodge taxes on their profits.

Along with Cheney and Rumsfeld, we should suspect people like Michael Chertoff, Sheldon Adelson,
Rahm and Ari Emanuel (real surnames Auerbach and Smulevitz), the Bushes, and the Goldman Sachs
people. And, since Josh showed us Paddock's grandmother was a Koehn, we should suspect the richest
members of the Kohn/Kohen/Cohen family, looking first to places like the Aspen Institute, the
Brookings Institute (where Jim Murren is on the board), and such places. We can be sure that people
like the Kochs and Gates are also hiding behind these investment groups like Vanguard, Fidelity,
Blackrock/Blackstone, and so on. In short, just think of the richest jerks in the world, and you can
assume they are hiding behind these investment groups as well as these money-making hoaxes. This is
the way the billionaires become billionaires, and the billionaires become trillionaires. Riding on their
coattails will be many smaller creeps and creepazoids, who would invest in kitten sandwiches if it
turned a profit.

OK, let's move on. Josh has shown you that many planted stations on youtube are telling us people
were killed, even though this was a false flag. But there is no evidence of that. All evidence is in the
opposite direction: no one was killed and this was all staged. Video shows flashes from a lower (4 th?)
floor, which some are using as evidence of multiple shooters, but again that is a jump to a conclusion.
What we have in video and audio is evidence of flashes and sounds of gunfire, but that is not the same
as evidence of real gunshots. Arms experts have pointed out that in audio from the concert floor, we do
not hear any whizzing of bullets or sounds of hits. Hits would be quite loud locally, either hitting
bodies or hitting the ground. There is none of that, indicating the sound of shots is on the speakers, not
live. And the flashes are proof of nothing. You can create those flashes without real bullets being shot,
you know. You can see this in any one of thousands of Hollywood movies.

My favorite is video in one of the lobbies, I suppose the Mandalay Bay, where police are allegedly
having a shootout with someone. Not sure who it is, since Paddock is supposed to have killed himself
in his room. But we see many bystanders running and screaming and hitting the floor. Several are very
overweight, which is amusing in itself, seeing them flopping off the walls and floors. The thing that
stands out is that most of these “bystanders” seem to have on ear protection. Why would people
walking through the lobby of a casino have on big orange earmuffs? Obviously, because they are crisis
actors in the vicinity of very loud blanks in an enclosed area. Without earmuffs they might experience
real ear damage. Did they really think we wouldn't notice this?

Then there is the matter of surveillance cameras. Las Vegas is the most surveiled city in the world. It
has more cameras per square mile than any place outside the Pentagon. Not only do we have no
footage from these cameras, instead relying on iffy handheld cellphone coverage, we have the
ridiculous story about Paddock installing his own cameras outside his hotel door. But wait, there would
be surveillance cameras already in the hallway, watching his every move. No one noticed him
installing his own camera on a service cart, and that cart just remained there for days for his own
convenience? Really? Plus, room service wants to get in and change your sheets every morning, right?
And yet Paddock was there for days with a large cache of military rifles. No maid ever got suspicious?
She thought the 23 machine guns on the bed were squirt guns? And what about the 6000 rounds of
ammunition. Where did he hide that, in the ashtray? They really think you are stupid. They don't even
have to come up with a story that makes sense.

Then there is the problem of the gun sounds, which don't match the guns found. The guns said to have
been found in the room were AK47s and AR15s. But the sounds on the speakers are of an M240 or
similar machine gun. So they forgot to match the guns to the sounds. It isn't even close, as you see at
that link. The M240 has a much slower rate than the AR15, 10 rounds per second to 14 rounds per
second. A difference of 40%, easily heard by any ear.

And yet another fatal problem, one I didn't spot until later. In the common photos and videos, it is hard
to tell how far away the Mandalay Bay is from the concert site. Since the hotel is huge, it looks quite
close. But it isn't. Wikipedia admits Paddock was 400 yards from his targets. That's near or beyond
the maximum range for the guns said to be used. Plus you have a bullet drop of around 18 inches at
that distance, making it impossible to aim at moving targets in the dark. Nonetheless, Paddock is
supposed to have hit around 600 targets. There were 547 people hit, and many of them were apparently
hit multiple times, according to the stories posted. Indiscriminate spraying of a sparsely packed crowd
at that distance would yield a hit with only about 1 in 10 bullets, if that. So he must have fired around
6000 rounds. That's 200 clips. With 23 guns, that's around 260 rounds per gun. Again, the maximum
for a lot of AK47s, according to this video. In the opening moments, he admits the WASR10 melted
down at 265 rounds exactly. So we are supposed to believe Paddock sat there in his hotel room and
melted down 23 guns in a row, with no damage to himself? As usual, these people don't know how to
do math.

Notice that the guy in the video is shooting with a welding mask, heavy gloves, and chest protection.
That would cut down on your accuracy a lot as well, since you can't even see what you are shooting at.
Also notice that he shoots about 300 rounds in five minutes, and is breathing very hard at the end of it.
He is worn out long before shooting 1000 rounds. But Paddock is supposed to have stood there for an
hour, firing 6000 rounds out the window before firing another 200 at police through the door? He must
have been the 64-year-old man of steel.

Actually, the mainstream tells us Paddock only fired for 10 minutes, between 10:05 and 10:15. Is it
even possible to fire 6000 rounds in 10 minutes? No. That is only time enough to shoot about 600
rounds, as we see in the video above. You have to reload twenty times in ten minutes, which slows you
way down. But if that is the case, we are supposed to believe Paddock shot 600 rounds and achieved
about 600 hits, with almost no misses. With an AK47 or AR15 from 400 yards at night? As I say, they
think you are really stupid and will believe anything.

Josh tells us that Mandalay Bay is owned by MGM, but who owns MGM? Most people don't know
that MGM Studios went bankrupt in 2005, being taken over by its creditors. At that time, those
creditors were a Sony-led consortium, we are told. But that isn't quite right. If we check the
percentages, the consortium was led by investment group Providence Equity Partners (29%), not Sony
(20%). CIA-front Comcast (20%) was also a major partner. By 2010, that consortium had apparently
changed, according to Wikipedia. It was then led by CreditSuisse and JPMorganChase. We don't
know for sure who is behind Vanguard, but we do know the Rockefellers are behind JPMorganChase.
So once again we find the usual suspects here.

But let us return to James Murren, a bigwig at MGM Resorts since 1998. In fact, he was involved with
MGM back to the mid-90s, when he was responsible for recapitalizing MGM Grand while he was still
working for Cyrus J. Lawrence. He is now Chairman and CEO. In 1996, Murren worked for
DeutscheBank as a Managing Director. All that is very strange, considering what we discovered above.
Remember, MGM was taken over by its creditors in 2005, and those creditors were big banks like
CreditSuisse and JPMorganChase. Was DeutscheBank another of those creditors? We aren't told. But
in any case, it is strange for a former major bank director to come in as CFO of MGM Resorts in 1998,
and seven years later MGM is bankrupt—taken over by the banks. Given the bankruptcy, you would
have thought he would have been fired in disgrace in 2005, but no, he was promoted to COO in 2007
and Chairman and CEO in 2008. Can you say, “INSIDE JOB”? You will tell me I am conflating
MGM Resorts with MGM Studios, but Kirk Kerkorian (MGM Studios head back to 1969) owned
MGM Resorts until 2009, at which time it also tanked. Kerkorian lost his majority ownership, which
was taken over by investment groups like Vanguard, Capital, Price and Blackrock. Remember,
Vanguard is also the major stockholder in Lockheed Martin spin-off L-3, which owns the body
scanners. So you see how this all comes together. It can be no coincidence that Vanguard owns large
parts of both the Mandalay Bay and the incoming body scanners.

On the way out, I want to comment on a couple of “Truthers” at youtube spreading lies. The first is
Kevin Barrett, using “ex-CIA” phony Robert Steele to promote the idea people were “shredded by
hollow-point bullets in a massacre”. To start with, there is no such thing as ex-CIA. Once CIA, always
CIA, so I don't know why anyone trusts these guys. If I were ex-CIA, would you trust me? No, so
why trust this guy? Notice that in the first moments of the interview, Steele takes the existence of ISIS
as a given. That is one of the desiderata of his analysis: that you believe ISIS exists. It doesn't. Or, it
exists exactly like Osama bin Laden existed. There were and are real people getting their pictures
taken and doing things. They aren't SIMs or CGI. But they aren't terrorists as you are told. Osama
was a rich Saudi working for us mainly as an actor, and the ISIS goons are the same. They are a group
of actors who look Middle-Eastern working for worldwide intelligence. They are our created enemies
right now.

So, Barrett is compromised. I don't trust him and you shouldn't either. What about his ex-partner Jim
Fetzer? Same deal. Fetzer and Barrett fall together. Notice that in Fetzer's hour-long video, his buddy
Dean Ryan compares Las Vegas to the Kennedy Assasination before the two-minute mark, selling them
both as real. Ryan claims his ex-girlfriend's uncle was killed in the shooting. Sorry, Dean, I think we
are going to need more than that. How about a name, so we can non-confirm it?

So I assume all these guys are planted agents. You now see why I have refused to be interviewed by
either Fetzer or Barrett. Fetzer wanted to use my Charlottesville analysis for his new book and I told
him no. He mentioned that he wanted to post a disclaimer on my Kennedy remarks in that paper, since
of course he is still selling that event as real. I told him I didn't want to be a part of his book, with or
without the disclaimer. I want to have nothing to do with these guys, since I can see they are
controlling the opposition.

Same for Mike Adams, who has popped up as a prominent voice in this one after a long silence on such
matters. Remember, he took down his Boston Marathon analysis, but now he is back. I guess they
called him up and asked him to get involved. He is also selling the idea of multiple shooters. He does
a scientific-looking acoustic analysis, allegedly showing us proof of two shooters. I say “scientific-
looking” because it is fake science. All he proves is that there are two separate audio tracks on the
tape, but he does nothing to prove the sounds are live and not recorded. Remember, there were huge
speakers in the vicinity: this was a concert in progress. But even if the sounds are live and not
recorded, that also does not prove anything, as I noted above. Sounds do not mean real bullets, since
the sounds could have been created with blanks or in several other ways. Notice that not once does
Adams admit that possibility exists, despite supposedly being an expert on the subject.

Same for Alex Jones, who—it appears—has also been tapped by Intel to promote the multiple-
shooters/ISIS-is-real angle on this, while confirming other parts of it as a false flag.
Jones/Adams/Barrett/Fetzer and many others are looking more alike every year, indicating they are all
being promoted by the same faction. The entire early 911 Truth crowd has now exposed itself as a
fraud, in my opinion, and I no longer trust any of them.

The specific point of the Las Vegas hoax appears to be to install more body scanners and ramp up the
police state another notch, making billions more for the already obscenely wealthy. But the longer goal
of all these similar hoaxes is the creation of fear. They have been doing that for centuries, as we have
seen. It has accelerated recently, simply because they are trying to squelch a revolution. The best way
to do that is to create even more fear. They want you to be afraid you will be sprayed with hollow
point bullets by your own government, though I personally think that threat is hollow. Like these fake
events, it is all a bluff. But since the bluff has always worked for them, I guess it doesn't much matter.
They have been bluffing your parents and grandparents out of trillions of dollars for centuries, and it
looks like they will continue to do it to you and your children.

Addendum October 12, 2017: OK, I finally got around to watching extensive video of Stephen
Paddock's alleged brother Eric. The first time I watched it, I couldn't watch past about 20 seconds,
because I could tell he was lying and acting. I didn't want to watch that. However, something told me
to go back and give it a second look. This time I simply looked closely at him, without paying
attention to the lies spewing from his mouth. I'm glad I did, because it soon dawned on me that this
guy Eric matched the pictures we have been given of Stephen Paddock. It's the same guy, folks! I see
no difference between him and his alleged brother. They just took pictures of this guy, whoever he is,
and posted him as his fake brother. That's why his eyes are closed in the main picture posted by the
mainstream: they don't want you to notice he is the same guy as Eric Paddock. They don't want you to
make the match I finally made. Remember, when they block someone's identity in a photo, what do
they do? They put a black bar across the eyes, right? That is enough to keep you from making an
identity, in most cases. The main recognition is in the eyes. Well, they fooled most people, but they
didn't fool me.

That would explain why Josh found that if you do a people search on Stephen Paddock of Mesquite,
NV, you get pictures of a guy who looks nothing like either brother. See the first link above. It also
explains why if you search on Stephen Craig Paddock of Nevada, age 64, at Intelius.com, you find
Stephen has no brother named Eric. His only relatives are given as Peggy and Bruce. And if you
search the same site for Eric Paddock of Nevada, age 57, you do find one, but he isn't related to any of
these people.
They have pulled an Adam Lanza on you here, my friends. Remember, I showed you Adam Lanza of
the Sandy Hook Hoax never existed. They simply manipulated photos of his brother Ryan Lanza.
Same thing here. Want proof? OK:

Two mainstream photos tagged as Stephen Paddock, the first from CBSnews, the second from
ABCnews. What to notice in the first one: crooked mouth, tending to go up on your left. Nose also
slopes to your left. What to notice in second one: small mole on cheek to your right. You have to look
closely, since it is not dark or raised, but it is right in the middle of the cheek.

That is from the Las Vegas Review-Journal, and as you see from the subtext, it is tagged Eric Paddock.
Let's see: crooked mouth raising to your left, check; nose sloping to your left, check; faint mole middle
of cheek to your right, check. Also note the dent between his eyebrows, closer to the eyebrow to your
right. We see the same thing on Stephen Paddock. Even identical twins wouldn't have moles in the
same place like this. We simply have the same guy playing both parts. He didn't even bother to shave
cleanly or cut his hair differently. This is how much they respect your ability to read faces.

Another thing you can notice now that we are done. In both pictures of Stephen Paddock, he has no
eyebrows. But in both pictures, the area of the eyebrows looks retouched. It is blurrier or the wrong
color. This indicates they removed the eyebrows in the photos to throw you off. You also go to
eyebrows for an identity, but here you can't do that. We had to look at more subtle things, didn't we?

Addendum October 14, 2017: This will be my last addendum, since I suspect one reason these events
are run is to keep researchers like me off more important topics. It is all about misdirection, as we
know. Sometimes I feel like it is me versus all the psychological operations units worldwide—and
they are still losing. Before I get to the point of this addendum, I wanted to mention that Jim Fetzer has
now joined the group of trolls spamming my inbox. He is sending me large files unasked-for. Funny
that I don't read Fetzer or email him, but he finds the need to read me and email me more than once a
day. It just proves I am now part of his pathetic assignment. All these bozos have been assigned the
task of surrounding my research with noise. They aren't doing a very good job of it, are they?

Anyway, I am getting a lot of emails from tools and fools who are still convinced people died in Las
Vegas. I have been sent the victims list as the perfect proof of this, and I agree that it is the perfect
proof. . . of a hoax. Before we hit the individual names, just notice that very few of these people have
middle names on the main list. Only three of 58 have middle names. That is a red flag off the top.
Also a disproportionate number of Jewish names. Also, why are they alphabetized by their first names?

I will start with the “fishiest” name on the list: Denise Salmon Burditus. Just looks fake, doesn't it?
Maybe now we know why they didn't give the others middle names. If they had, they would have
names like cod, flounder, seabass, and trout. Anyway, they have a listing for her at Intelius.com, but it
is still a big red flag. To start with, although allegedly 50 years old, she has worked at only one place:
Heritage Financial Group, Inc. That is suspicious immediately, given what we uncovered above. But if
we do a quick search on Heritage Financial, it gets even worse. Although said to manage businesses in
several states, its website is a single white half-page that looks like it was just created last night on a
Big Chief tablet.

That's the whole enchilada. I think DHS needs to hire a better tech team to fake these pages. That is
just pathetic. Instantcheckmate.com also has a page for her, and it tells us she has also lived in Joint
Base Lewis- McChord, WA. Oooo, that sounds good! What is that? It is a military base, and its scary
webpage starts by telling you that you are accessing a restricted site, authorized for government use
only. You are warned there that the USG routinely intercepts and monitors communications on this site
for, among other things, “counterintelligence investigations”. Intrigued?

So yeah, this lady seems like a normal attendee at a country music concert. At least we have indication
she has worked at other places than Heritage Financial. What could those places be, I wonder? Well,
Joint Base Lewis-McChord is the site of 12th Psychological Operations Group. It is connected to the
324th and 349th in Aurora, CO, and the 353rd in Las Vegas. Also the 14 th Psychological Operations
Battalion in Mountain View, CA, which links us to some of these other alleged victims. Mountain
View also links us to the tech companies I mentioned above, all owned in part by Vanguard.
Remember, Mountain View is the home of Google, Mozilla, Symantec, Intuit, LinkedIn, and many
other tech companies. It was the home of Schockley Semiconductors, which we saw in my paper on
Steve Jobs. So it looks like we have found another one of the keys to this event: Psychological
Operations. We have intuited this was a major psyop from the get-go, but here we see it is hard-linked
to many actual Psychological Operations Groups. We may infer that this is where the planning was
done, and some of the fake victims were apparently taken from the vicinities.

Next, let's hit Jessica Klymchuk. That sort of pops out at you, doesn't it? Instead of taking us to her
page, Intelius takes us directly to a Juliya L. Klymchuk, who I guess is supposed to be the same person.
But shouldn't the mainstream be posting the real names of these people, not their nicknames or aliases?
Plus, how does Intelius know Jessica is the same as Juliya L.? Are we supposed to just take their
word for it? If it is not her, why are we directed to her page? Why not just say, “none found”? Juliya
is supposed to have a sister named Yuliya. But wait, isn't that the same name? Do you really think
their parents named two sisters Yuliya and Juliya? They are pronounced the same, so it isn't a very
good job of naming. As you are seeing, this is all just another joke. Instantcheckmate apparently hasn't
yet been informed that Jessica is the same as Juliya, although they are tied into the same big
government computers as Intelius. That site tells us there is no such person as Jessica Klymchuk.
Could be because Jessica is supposed to be Canadian, and these sites only scan the US. That's
convenient, since several of the other victims are also Canadian. What are the odds that so many
Canadians would be in Las Vegas listening to country music? However, canada411.ca has no listing
for a Jessica Klymchuk in all of Canada. There is a J. Klymchuk in Edmonton, but Jessica is supposed
to be from Valleyview. And no, Valleyview is not a suburb of Edmonton. Valleyview is about 150
miles away.

Jordan McIldoon is supposed to be from Maple Ridge, BC, Canada. But again, the people searches
have never heard of him. There is no Jordan McIldoon listed in all of Canada.

Next let's look at Neysa Tonks. Intelius tells us she worked for Cisco Systems, a big red flag. Cisco—
a major tech company—was founded by Bosack and Lerner in 1984. It controls a large part of the
computer routing business (think LAN). It was the most valuable company in the world in 2000, said
to be worth $500 billion. Right. About what I am worth. Bosack later worked for Bell Labs and the
Department of Defense in creating ARPAnet. This links us to research above, specifically the
companies SDC and Paramax. And guess who now owns Cisco? Vanguard, Blackrock, and other
major investment groups. Just another coincidence, right? Although Cisco is headquartered in San
Jose, it owns many subsidiaries that also link us to Mountain View, CA.

Then we have Adrian Murfitt of Achorage, said to be a fisherman. Unfortunately for that story, his
Intelius profile indicates he is an attorney working for some major Jewish law firms that represent big
oil and the Mormons. Why are they hiding that, I wonder?
We also have a big problem with James “Sonny” Melton, since Intelius has never heard of him. No
James Melton, age 29, of Paris, TN, related to Heather. In fact, no James Melton anywhere near that
age in all of Tennessee. Instantcheckmate has a James N. Melton of Paris, TN, no age, no relatives.
Just that suspicious “i”. The big computers know of no relatives for this person? Not even his wife
Heather? Hmmm.

Intelius has also never heard of Stacee Ann Etcheber of Novato, California, age 50. The closest they
have is a Suzanne Etcheber of Walnut Creek, age 41.

Instantcheckmate has never heard of Quinton Robbins, age 20, of Henderson Nevada. They list eight
Quinton Robbins nationwide, but the youngest is 31 from Alabama. Intelius has a Quinton Robbins in
Nevada, but they don't seem to know how old he is.

Intelius has also never heard of Lisa Marhefka-Patterson. None found nationwide. Also no Lisa
Patterson of Lomita, CA. We do find a Lisa Patterson, age 46, who works for General Dynamics. But
she otherwise does not match Lisa Marhefka-Patterson.

Intelius has also never heard of Thomas Allen Day, Jr., of Corona, CA, age 54. There is a Thomas
Allen Day, age 75, who might be senior, but no junior. If there were, you would think Junior would be
listed as one of his relatives. But no. He has seven relatives listed, but no Thomas, Jr.

I have now done ten, and you can see the problems. Why are these people so hard to find? The people
searches are not that hard to use. All real people are easy to find. Type in your own name at Intelius,
for instance. Or type in mine. They know everything about me, even where I went to preschool.
Mecham Kindergarten. Right. Wow. I guess they know what color underwear I have on right now. So
why can't they seem to locate these people killed in Las Vegas?

OK, now let's do Bill Wolfe, Jr. He is listed, but no places that he has studied at or worked at are
listed. His father is listed right above him: he has five places listed where he has worked and two
universities he attended. For Junior, nothing. So why do they know where I went to pre-school but
they don't know where this Bill Wolfe has been?

How about Bailey Schweitzer? No middle name given. She is supposed to be the 20-year-old
daughter of the family that owns Bakersfield Speedway in Bakersfield, CA. Bailey allegedly went to
Centennial High School in Bakersfield. That's strange, since according to a people search on Bailey
Schweitzer of Bakersfield, Bailey Schweitzer is from Mount Horeb, WI, where she went to Wilcox
High School. No age is listed for her. But this can't be her, because the relatives are wrong. They gave
her relatives in memorials, and there is no match. Also curious is that a general search on Bailey
Schweitzer nationwide finds five, all 26 or under. We find a 21 year old in CT, and a 19 year old in
MN. None are found in Bakersfield. Instantcheckmate does list a Bailey Schweitzer of Bakersfield,
but she has no age. But why doesn't Intelius know she exists? At any rate, I discovered Bakersfield
has a large presence on this victims list, so someone else might research that angle. I will be told it is
because Bakersfield is near Las Vegas, but it is no nearer than Riverside or Glendale, and those places
didn't come up at all.

How about Calla-Marie Medig of Jasper, Canada? Well, they don't bother to tell us if that is Jasper,
ON, or Jasper, AB, but it doesn't matter, since there is no Calla Medig in either place. In fact, there is
no Calla Medig in all of Canada. I guess they just figure you don't know how to do people searches in
Canada.
How about Derrick Bo Taylor? That already looks like a joke. Remember Bo Derek from the movie
Ten? Well, we do find him at Intelius, but with the wrong age. He is 54 there, but given as 56 in the
list. Instantcheckmate has Derrick D. Taylors of both ages, both from Oxnard, not Ventura. So another
fail.

How about Cameron Robinson of Las Vegas? We do find him, but again with red flags. His
mainstream bio simply says he worked for the city as a legal records specialist. I guess they forgot to
tell you he also worked for MGM and Cinemark. That is what it says at Intelius. They didn't think it
was pertinent that he worked for MGM? And what about Cinemark? That links us back to the Batman
shooting, which happened at a Cinemark theater. By the way, you may not be up-to-date on that. In
2016, Cinemark won a case against the shooting victims. The victims had sued Cinemark, but lost and
had to pay Cinemark's legal fees of $700,000. The lesson they want you to learn? Don't sue big
companies.

What about Austin Meyer, 24, of Reno? Once again, Intelius has never heard of him. The only
Austin Meyer they list in Reno is Austin Drennan Meyer, age 45.

Same thing with Candice Ryan Bowers, 40, from Garden Grove. Intelius has never heard of her. We
find only Candice R. Bowers from Garden Grove, but she is listed as being 71 years old.

What about Sandra Casey, 34, of Redondo Beach? Same thing: wrong age. The only Sandra Caseys
in that age range in CA are 37 and 40.

What about Lisa Romero-Muniz, 48, of Gallup, NM? Intelius brings up nothing. A search on Lisa
Muniz takes us to Lisa V. Muniz, but she is in Taos and not Gallup, and she is listed as 47. A search on
Lisa Romero takes us to Lisa M. Romero, 48, of Gallup. But if this is her, why can't the mainstream
get her name right?

And John Joseph Phippen, 56, of Massapequa, NY? Intelius has never heard of him. There are two
John Phippens in Massepequa, but they have the wrong middle names and ages (77 and 79).

And Kelsey Brianne Meadows, 28, no location given? She is listed, but we see why they didn't give
her location. She lives in Taft, on Naval Petroleum Reserve no. 2. Instantcheckmate has her listed as
29 and living in Lake Elsinore, not Taft, CA. But the most interesting thing is her relative listed there
as Althea Varela. If we search on that, we find an Althea Gabrielle Varela, nee Meadows, so that is
probably her sister. This Althea Varela was arrested this year in Orange County.

What about Charleston Hartfield, the black police officer killed? He is listed, but again with red
flags. On his locations list we also find Ft. Bragg and Henderson, NV. Both places may link him to
Intelligence.

What about Tara Ann Smith, 34, of Okotoks, AB, Canada? No one by that name in all of Canada. No
Tara Smith in Okotoks. Curiously, we do find an obit for her at heavenslie.com. Note the name of the
site. Oh my heavens, not another lie!

I've done almost half now. Do I need to go on? If this event had been real and these people actually
killed in it, a victims' list would not throw up so many dead ends and red flags. I have definitely
proven that either 1) this event was faked, or 2) Intelius is worthless as a people search. My enemies
will claim it is the latter, but this would mean the big government computers are about as smart as Jim
Fetzer at the end of a whiskey binge. The computers weren't able to locate and confirm a sizeable
percentage of these victims, which is pretty difficult to understand. I mean, this wasn't a bagpipe
concert on an Amish farm. These people weren't living off-the-grid in dugouts in woodland Arkansas.
These were supposed to be North Americans like you and me, tracked from birth with a mountain of
paperwork, a bloated bureaucracy, and now a spy-state—complete with satellites, security cameras,
drones, black helicopters, open mail, bugged phones, and round-the-clock surveillance. So it looks to
me like you either have to give up your belief in the Las Vegas event, or give up your belief in the big
computers. Since they somehow know where I went to preschool (in 1969—before computers), you
can see why I have no belief in the Las Vegas event.

You will say, “if the computers are so smart, why wasn't the information from Las Vegas fed into them?
Wouldn't it have been easy to update Intelius with the information on the victims' list?” It would seem
so, but as we have seen before, apparently they prefer to not to. Either someone is stopping them, they
are too lazy (knowing no one will do the research, and if he does no one will care), or they are testing
some of us. They do seem to leave overt clues on purpose, possibly for their own amusement. Or
maybe this is a real-life IQ test. I admit it is more interesting than Stanford-Binet.

Although I have shown you that many of these people may have been made up, I concede that it is
possible some of them died the week of the Las Vegas event (from natural or other causes—car wrecks,
bungee jumping accidents, slot-machine fatalities, etc.) and were simply inserted into this list later.
We have seen evidence of that in other events, such as the Gabby Giffords shooting. I also remind you
that we have seen people in previous events fake their deaths when they go into Intelligence. This is
how they go undercover. So, again, it is possible a few of these people were recently recruited into
covert ops, and were inserted into this list for that reason. This would explain why even some of those
close to them believe they died. Some of my readers can't understand how that works, but that is how
it works. Therefore, if you hear from someone you trust that so-and-so has died, it is possible that
trustworthy person really believes it, and may have seen good evidence of it. Not perfect evidence, but
good evidence. But just because a trustworthy person tells you something doesn't mean it is true. It
just means they have been fooled by someone. It isn't that hard to accomplish. You see it all the time
in the movies, and have no trouble believing it then. But for some reason people don't believe this
happens in real life. It does. The military does stuff like this everyday, and has for centuries.

I have seen it happen here locally. A girl from my town fooled all her friends into thinking she died,
and they still believe it. It never occurs to most people to question things like this. Most people accept
everything on faith, which is why these big events like the one in Las Vegas are so easy for the
government to sell.

And, truth be told, people aren't only gullible, they have a morbid streak a mile wide. Although they
would deny it, most people want to believe in serial killers and mass murderers. That is my experience.
They are very attached to the macabre, and don't want to give it up. It would take a certain light out of
their boring lives. I figured this out after Sandy Hook. I thought people would be happy to know those
children weren't shot in the face, but I found that wasn't the case. They actually got angry at me for
suggesting it to them. How dare I take their ghoulish glee away from them? We see the same thing
here, and I have to say that it seems women have a stronger attraction to the blood and guts than men
do. They will try to tell you it is because they are more compassionate, and I used to believe that. I no
longer do. They are attached to these events in a way that is foreign to me, but it doesn't look like
compassion. As I say, it looks like a simple—or not so simple—fascination with the macabre.
Remember, slasher movies are made for women, and they flock to them. Is that explained by
compassion? No. Compassion is primal, and women have their fair share of it, but something else
primal is being tapped in these bloody events. The governors know what they are doing, and they can
control you via either your finer or your baser instincts. That is, unless you learn to control yourself.

Addendum October 16, 2017: A reader from Canada sent in some confirming information:

OTHER RED FLAGS are the “injured” Canadians.

Top of the heap is Sheldon Mack, the son of former CHEK TV news anchor Hudson Mack, the nightly
news in Victoria BC.

https://www.gofundme.com/a-cdn-in-the-us-help-sheldon-mack

What are the odds this news anchor's son would be one of the victims in Las Vegas? It’s claimed he
didn’t have travel insurance, and his hospital bills were going to reach $30k, thus the need to raise $.
This story was fed into the British Columbia media machine, and most prominently in the donors list
we have Bruce Allen donating $500. Bruce Allen is singer Bryan Adam’s manager and local right wing
media blowhard.

Miles: the surname Mack is also a red flag, since it is from the (sometimes crypto-) Jewish families,
related closely to the Mathers, Benedicts, etc. See David S. Mack, for instance, admitted to be Jewish,
mother is a Kaufman. His brother Earle Irving Mack was CEO of the New York State Council of the
Arts, which may go some way to explaining why art in New York is what it is. But the reason the
Macks are involved in this Las Vegas event is due to a guy named Jerome Mack, President of the Bank
of Las Vegas and Valley Bank until the late 1990s. He was also Chairman of the United Jewish Appeal.
His mother was a Solomon and his wife a Rosenberg. His daughter Karen married Russell Goldsmith,
currently CEO of City National Bank. Since 2015, City National is a wholly owned subsidiary of. . .
Royal Bank of Canada. I hope you caught the Canadian link there. RBC is the largest bank in
Canada. City National is based in Beverly Hills, but it is also involved in Las Vegas. Anyway, you can
take this link out of Jerome Mack's Wiki page, which goes to the Los Angeles Times. It is an article
from 2009 by Mack's daughter Karen, and it starts out with this quote from Senator Harry Reid:

I don't say this lightly: Jerry Mack and Perry Thomas built Las Vegas.

So now you know who these Macks are.