Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

1.

6 Pre Layout and Post Layout Comparison


Positive edge triggered DFF

Pre Layout Post Layout


Process Corner TT FF SS TT FF SS
𝝉𝑷𝑳𝑯 (nS) 0.84 0.69 1.03 0.866 0.716 1.06
𝝉𝑷𝑯𝑳 (nS) 0.86 0.72 1.03 0.88 0.73 1.04
𝝉𝑷𝑫𝒂𝒗𝒈 (nS) 0.85 0.705 1.03 0.873 0.723 1.05
𝑷𝒅𝒚𝒏𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒄(𝜇𝑊) 0.42 0.467 5.83 0.835 0.799 0.971
Area(𝜇𝑚2) NA 150.96 (14.8 x 10.2)

Negative edge triggered DFF

Pre Layout Post Layout


Process TT FF SS TT FF SS
𝝉𝑷𝑳𝑯 (nS) 0.91 0.75 1.11 0.9 0.8067 1.17
𝝉𝑷𝑯𝑳 (nS) 0.84 0.70 1.01 0.853 0.711 1.009
𝝉𝑷𝑫𝒂𝒗𝒈 (nS) 0.875 0.725 1.06 0.87 0.758 1.09
𝑷𝒅𝒚𝒏𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒄(𝜇𝑊) 0.41 0.363 5.35 1.278 1.186 1.31
Area(𝜇𝑚2) NA 112.8 (12 x 9.4)

Pre Layout Post Layout


D Flip Flop Total Avg FOM Total Avg FOM
Power(𝜇𝑊) Delay(nS) (power-delay Power(𝜇𝑊) Delay(nS) (power-delay
product) product)
Positive Edge 0.51 0.85 0.4335 fJ 0.835 0.873 0.728 fJ
Triggered
Negative Edge 0.49 0.875 0.4288 fJ 1.278 0.87 1.11 fJ
Triggered

Page | 1
1.6.1 Positive egde triggered DFF
Layout

Page | 2
Output Waveform

LVS Report

Page | 3
Parasitic Extraction report

Page | 4
1.6.2 Negative egde triggered DFF
Layout

Page | 5
Parasitic Extraction report

LVS Report

Page | 6

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen