Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SECTOR BRIEFING
number
Sachin MITTAL
Telecom, Media and
Technology Analyst
DBS Group Research
sachinmittal@dbs.com
Daniel FOO
Analyst
DBS Group Research
danielsmfoo@dbs.com
Produced by:
Asian Insights Office • DBS Group Research
go.dbs.com/research
@dbsinsights
asianinsights@dbs.com
04 Investment Summary
07 Introduction to 5G
Why Develop 5G
10
5G Timeline: Asian Telcos Leading the Pack
What Can 5G Do?
High Costs a Hurdle
15 5G Single Network Implementation Model
Benefits of a Single Network
Shared Networks: Tried and Tested
Forms of Network Sharing
18
Regulatory Response a Key Determinant
5G’s Financial Implications
Leasing 5G network
Sharing 5G Network
23
Owning 5G Network
Strategic Responses to 5G
Telco Equipment Vendors Well Positioned
Telcos at a Critical Crossroad
Investment Summary
A
gainst the backdrop of rapidly growing data consumption and telecommunication
companies or telcos’ inexorable pursuit of network entrenchment opportunities,
Asian telcos are leading the charge in implementing Fifth-Generation (5G)
networks. Japan and South Korea’s KT have plans to launch trial 5G networks
by 2017; hot on their heels would be China Mobile, which intends to roll out a massive scale
network by end-2020.
Paradigm shift The allure of 5G’s enhanced capabilities and wide range of applications is, however, accompanied
by an unprecedented slew of highly demanding technical standards and specifications. We
believe the sheer intensity of 5G-related operational and capital requirements would set forth
a paradigm shift in telcos’ business models and financial returns.
While telcos might be drawn to retain network advantages by owning and individually
implementing 5G networks, they would be presented with major challenges and discover that
they would not be able to replicate the success of previous generations of networks under this
similar model. This beckons the consideration of alternative implementation models of sharing
or leasing access to a single 5G network as discussed below.
Intensive capital outlay Telcos which perpetuate the network ownership model would be presented with two main
challenges. Firstly, they would be laden with gargantuan capital outlays – required to enhance
current telecommunication infrastructure – estimated to be 2.5x of current levels over the next
five years. Their diminished cash flows might also hamper their ability to obtain financing for
these capital expenditures at a feasible cost. Secondly, additional expenditure from operating
the 5G equipment would cause a drag on their earnings. As a result, these telcos would
experience a reduced return on invested capital (ROIC) of 12%.
Asian telcos’ ROIC projections under various 5G implementation models in 2020
Leasing – the preferred Under the leasing model, telcos would access 5G networks from a single network provider,
model and achieve a ROIC of 15%, comparable to that under the 5G network sharing model.
This occurs as the absence of additional capital outlays is mitigated by lease payments to
the single network provider. Under this structure, the single network provider – likely to be
a telco equipment provider – would take on the 5G infrastructure assets under favourable
financing conditions due to the stability of cash flows generated. The value from the lower
costs of financing of the single network provider underpins the difference between the 5G
network leasing and sharing models. Notably, even with the carve-out of 5G infrastructure
assets, telcos under the leasing model are capable of achieving comparable earnings as
telcos which possess their own 5G networks.
Opportunity to Leasing or sharing the 5G network will lead to the telcos’ loss of network differentiation.
transform However, we believe that this is a fair trade-off as they could then transform their business
models to differentiate themselves in the domain of digital services.
Asset-light telcos under the leasing model to differentiate themselves in digital services
We recommend that telcos under the 5G network-sharing and leasing models judiciously
manage their 5G-related capital expenditure (capex) savings by investing in fast-growing
and established digital businesses. This is preferred to small investments scattered across a
wide range of digital services, which tend to yield less favourable results. We also believe
that digital business should be the focus, as it represents approximately 7x the market size
of providing incremental connectivity services. This transformation toward digital businesses
as a diversified source of earnings could potentially elevate telcos’ ROIC further.
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
06
Introduction to 5G
T
he Next Generation Mobile Networks (NGMN) Alliance defines 5G1 as “an end-
to-end ecosystem to enable a fully mobile and connected society. (5G) empowers
value creation towards customers and partners, through existing and emerging
use cases, delivered with consistent experience, and enabled by sustainable
business models”.
Why Develop 5G
Explosion of data Global mobile data traffic will grow over 8x (or at a five-year compound annual growth rate or
consumption CAGR of 53%)3 from just 3.7 Exabytes (EB)* per month in 2015 to 30.6EB per month by 2020.
This is driven by i) the rising average data consumption (as more people use smartphones)
from 929MB to 4.4GB per month, and ii) the proliferation of connected devices to 11.6
billion4, exceeding the world’s population forecast of 7.8 billion people in 2020.
1 Exabyte = 1,024 Petabytes = 1,000,000 Gigabytes
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
08
Telco network providers would have to scale up their network capacities by several
times through the use of newer technology to ride on this rapidly rising wave of mobile
consumption. Those who do not will risk losing market share.
Source: Companies
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
09
Standards not yet However, one stumbling block to the earlier launch of 5G is the timeframe for the
finalised finalisation of its standards. 5G standards are expected to be finalised only by 2020,
making it difficult for telcos to pursue an earlier commercial launch. Currently, only South
Korea’s KT is likely to launch a commercially viable network prior to the finalisation of 5G
standards.
T
From wearables to VR he functional attributes of 5G allow it to serve as the enabling infrastructure for many
upcoming technologies, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), connected wearables,
augmented and virtual reality, autonomous vehicles, etc. Unlike 4G, 5G would be
capable of handling a significantly larger number of devices and array of traffic types.
For example, 5G could provide extremely fast connectivity for applications, such as virtual reality
or ultra-high-definition video streaming, and simultaneously handle low-data transfer speeds
from numerous IoT sensors with high reliability. Hence, 5G would be the first network with
a focus on enabling commercial applications, while also catering to the incremental need of
better connectivity among consumers.
More applications require lower latency and higher capacity (bandwidth throughput) of 5G
Source: www.gsmaintelligence.com
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
11
Autonomous vehicles
Autonomous cars, considered to be the next evolution of personal transportation, promise
improved safety levels, reduced travelling time, and higher traffic throughput. Intelligent traffic
management systems, coupled with embedded sensors in autonomous cars, enable better
coordination and eliminate human error. This allows vehicles to travel at higher speeds and
increased proximity. However, these traffic conditions demand a lower connection latency
between the traffic management system and cars than what is currently possible under the
current Long-Term Evolution (LTE) network.
With 4G’s latency at 50ms7, a car cruising at 100km/h would still move 1.4 metres from
between the time when it identifies an obstacle to that when it executes the braking command.
While 4G’s latency is already superior to the average human reaction time of 180ms8, this is
still insufficient in the context of high travelling speeds and proximity. In comparison, with 5G’s
lower latency of 1ms, that same car would only move forward by just slightly over an inch.
Lower latency could be the difference between a timely halt and a fatal collision
low latency will be vital. This is a crucial requirement of 5G when looking to support mission
critical and life-dependant applications. A connection disruption during a critical juncture of a
medical procedure would be the difference between the patient’s life and death.
Telco network providers would incur significantly higher capex and opex as they need to deploy:
required to achieve 5G’s higher data transfer speed, greater fidelity, and wider coverage.
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
13
Despite the ongoing advances in equipment and hardware, there remains a delay in signal
processing and transfer, as well as delays related to administrative functions, such as
authentication and security. Furthermore, transfer speeds on air and cable cannot be
improved further due to physical limitations.
Reducing distance To achieve 5G’s prescribed latency targets, telco network providers need to significantly
reduce the distance between the content servers and the end users’ devices to as low
as 1km according to GSMA. As a result, content servers would be closer to and possibly
integrated with the base stations. Correspondingly, there would be the proliferation of
content servers as the ancillary infrastructure to the thousands of small cell base stations
deployed, thus chalking up an ever greater amount of capex.
Enabling connectivity Data transfers between different telco network providers would have to occur at a
and collaboration similarly low latency of 1ms. Unprecedented levels of connectivity between network
providers at the base station level would be another crucial piece to realising the 1ms
low latency requirement. Compared to the few limited trunk connections present in
current networks, having such levels of connectivity would only exacerbate the capex
requirements of having individual networks.
Expanding spectral 5G aims to achieve data transfer rates of 1Gbps, which is usually associated with fibre
range and other high capacity wired connections. However, unlike fibre connections, data
throughput in wireless networks are substantially limited by available spectral resources.
Competing uses of the available spectrum such as broadcasting, satellite, etc., result in
mobile networks occupying only a fraction of that available to isolated fixed line or fibre
connections.
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
14
To achieve higher data speeds, industry participants have therefore considered implementing
high density small cell networks (leading to more base station level units) and potentially
expanding the spectral range beyond 6 GHz. However, the higher frequency bands offer
limited cell radiuses and hence rely on a technique known as “beam-forming”. This occurs
by focusing radio waves to form a beam for transfer across greater distances, and achieve
wider coverage.
This technique is particularly challenging in forming sustained connections with mobile devices
as the beam would have to be directed at and track the end user’s device amid interferences
and distortions in the air. Hence, the small cells would be equipped with the technology to
emit hundreds, if not thousands, of beams to simultaneously connect and track the end users’
devices. Integrating this intensive technology would only augment the already high capex
from the large scale deployment of small cells.
High data speeds above 1Gbps and throughput rates of 5G are achieved by linking base
transreceiver station (BTS) level cells, with a high capacity core fibre-based network. Fibre
connectivity is extremely capital intensive, involving high installation costs, and has only been
used recently by telcos to support their heaviest data transfer needs. Inevitably, the deployment
of a 5G network that connects thousands of small cells would be a substantial capex burden.
Representatives from carriers such as Verizon and NTT DoCoMo, for over the past year
or so, have indicated that 5G will not result in a massive capital burden for telcos. Fran
Shammo, Verizon’s executive vice president and chief financial officer, noted that Verizon
is looking to maintain its capital expenses at relatively consistent levels between US$17.2-
17.7 billion. Similarly, Seizo Onoe, the Chief Technology Officer of NTT DoCoMo, has
indicated that 5G’s deployment is unlikely to require massive investment, and that capex
for telcos had actually decreased over the last 15 years.
Notably, these divergent views of low-capex 5G networks held by some telco network
providers stem from their vision of 5G networks with only limited improvements from
present LTE-A networks. Verizon views 5G as a fixed wireless broadband solution to the
home9; while Onoe recognises the need to develop a new generation of wireless networks,
he opined that these networks should not support such a broad range of applications.
Consequently, these low capex 5G networks are drastically different and might fall short
of meeting the low latency, high speed, reliability, and full coverage requirements as
described in the preceding paragraphs. For a network to support the IoT, autonomous
vehicles, remote medical procedures, and patient monitoring applications, it will inevitably
involve massive amounts of investments, regardless of who implements it.
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
15
5G Single Network
Implementation Model
W
e believe the 2-3x capex burden of 5G will be prohibitively high for telcos,
the existing network providers, to bear individually. In addition, the greater
interconnectivity required to reduce latency between competitors’ networks
erodes network advantages and is therefore unlikely to sit well with telcos.
As a result, 5G will likely be implemented by leasing access from a single network. Under this
model, telcos would make regular lease payments for shared access to 5G, implemented by
a single network provider.
According to GSMA, sharing part, or all, of the radio access network (RAN) could result in up
to 20% increase in free cash flows for a typical European operator10. According to TMG, a
consultancy specialising in telecommunications, RAN sharing can save 30-40% in costs11. In
addition, Ericsson estimated that 40% of savings on total assets and 31% improvement to
cash flows could be achieved (where all the network resources are shared)12. Consequently,
even with the massive capex spending involved under the single 5G network model, network
providers, telcos or otherwise, would be able to achieve double-digit or near double-digit ROIC.
Impact of network sharing on telcos’ capex
Revenue and profit As the only network that is capable of supporting the demanding data needs of emerging
visibility smart solutions, the business of providing the single network will be a monopoly.
Therefore, 5G network providers will be able to generate predictable returns akin to other
infrastructure and utilities projects. The high visibility on the revenues and profits of the
single network is likely to attract funding at favourable rates, which will drive down the
cost of ownership of the network even further.
Sharing a single network laid out by a third party is also not a novel concept for telcos. The
Next Generation Broadband Network (NGNBN) in Singapore, for example, is owned by
the government and broadband capacity is made available to network operators for a fee.
Stockholm has a similar policy where Stokab, a company owned by the City of Stockholm,
lays out fibre optic networks in Stockholm, which are in turn lease it out to telcos.
Despite the structural similarity, it is worth noting that the key difference between
common networks mentioned above and 5G lies in 5G’s exclusivity. Unlike NGNBN in
Singapore or Stokab in Sweden, as existing players would need to pool their spectrum
portfolios when deploying 5G, access would only be to the original incumbent network
providers. New entrants to the telco industry are likely to experience significant barriers to
access the 5G networks e.g. significant upfront costs.
The simplest form of active network sharing where the operators share the RAN
– including towers and base stations that are responsible for connecting individual
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
17
devices to the network. Spectrum and core networking infrastructure will not be
shared in this type of agreements and telcos would have greater control on the
network than other forms of active network sharing.
Telcos pool their spectrum resources in addition to sharing the RAN. Each operator
would have its own component (Enhanced Packet Core) that separates the RAN
from the telco’s core network. MOCN offers greater flexibility for telcos though at a
relatively higher capex than GWCN, which in turn offers lower flexibility.
In addition to sharing the RAN, telcos will also share mobile switching centres, which
are responsible for routing calls and SMSes within the network and other components
(Serving GPRS Support Nodes and Mobility Management Entities) responsible for
packet data routing.
We believe the network sharing model for 5G will resemble GWCN with possibly better
integration such as the sharing of backhaul assets. As telcos lose their ability to compete
on network advantages with the deployment of a common network, they would be more
willing to share as many components of the network as possible in a bid to minimise their
investment on the network.
As national telco regulators generally support efforts to increase network quality and
lower costs, we believe many regulators would be agreeable to a national 5G network, as
long as it improves service quality and lowers prices. This has already been seen in fixed
networks such as Singapore’s NGNBN.
However, in markets where regulators are not keen on playing an active role in 5G
network implementation, we are unlikely to see much progress in the segment. Telcos are
likely to invest selectively in areas with the best returns while ignoring certain aspects of
5G networks such as lowering latency, which would lower capex burdens, but also limit
the network’s usability.
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
18
F
2-3x jump in capex, or telco network providers to reap the economic benefits of 5G, they would
investments have to invest approximately US$4 trillion in R&D and capex by 202015. To put
this into perspective, the total mobile network provider capex for the same
period without 5G is estimated to be between US$200-250 billion annually16.
This represents a 2-3x increase in capex on 5G annually (from 2015 to 2020), compared
to the total ongoing 2G, 3G, and 4G investments around the globe.
Leasing 5G Network
Telcos as lessees of the single 5G network
Based on our projections, telcos would be inclined toward adopting the leasing model,
where they would obtain access to 5G networks from a single provider. Their ROICs would
stand to gain close to 300 basis points (bps) compared to telcos which implement their own
5G networks. This is largely due to their asset-light business model, coupled with buoyant
earnings from the savings in depreciation and 5G-related opex. While telcos would have to
make lease payments to a regulated 5G infrastructure provider, there are economies of scale
to be enjoyed under this model with multiple telcos utilising the infrastructure. Thus, this
would lead to a 15% ROIC upon the rollout of the 5G network in 2020.
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
19
Based on our financial model, telcos under the leasing model would be able to achieve
comparable earnings as telcos that implement and own the 5G network. They would,
however, lose the competitive advantages from network differentiation. We believe that
this is a reasonable trade-off as telcos should progress to differentiate themselves in the
domain of digital services, which represents a market that is 7x larger than that offered by
connectivity services. The savings on 5G-related capex of telcos under the leasing model
would serve as a prime opportunity for them to invest in fast-growing and established
digital businesses, and achieve a transformation of their business model.
In our analysis, we consider an equipment vendor as the lessor of the single 5G network
infrastructure assets, operating under a regulated ROIC of 15%. We assumed these assets
to have a useful life of ten years and would be leased out to three telcos. The absence of
competitive pressures as a single regulated network provider and accompanying stable cash
flows would positively contribute to the infrastructure provider’s credit positioning. Its ability
to raise debt at a lower cost (assumed to be at 5% per annum in our model) to finance the
5G network capex, as compared to telcos in the 5G sharing model, would create additional
economic value. The leasing model is therefore preferred to the sharing model.
The sensitivity analysis of the telcos which lease the 5G network reflect resilience of the leasing
model. Even with an 500bps increase of the infrastructure providers’ ROIC requirement to 20%,
there would be a less-than-proportionate fall in the telcos’ ROIC by approximately 120bps to
13.8%. On the other hand, telcos in general, regardless of which 5G implementation model
they adopt, would be highly sensitive toward growth rates of 5G-driven revenues. This further
emphasises the need for telcos to diversify their income and transform their business model
by investing in fast-growing and established digital businesses.
Sharing 5G Network
Telcos which share the 5G network would retain some network advantages over
customers within their area of coverage. They would, however, have to incur capex
on the 5G equipment in their coverage area. We have assumed this to be 60% of
the 5G infrastructure capex under the ownership model, consequently reflecting a
higher depreciation charge. We also expect that there would be some 40% savings on
5G-related opex from the network sharing agreements relating to operating co-located
cell base stations and content servers. Notably, the additional time taken to transmit
signals between networks owned by different telcos might jeopardise the achievement of
5G’s low latency requirements. It remains to be seen how telcos would overcome these
operational challenges.
Owning 5G Network
Telcos which decide to retain all their network advantages would own and individually
implement the 5G network. This would incur the highest amount of capital outlay and
operational costs, which are expected to outweigh the incremental revenue brought by
5G, thus resulting in a significant reduction in earnings. Capex is expected to be at 2-3x
that of current levels, causing an enlargement of the capital employed by these telcos.
As a result, telcos which own and operate the 5G infrastructure would see the largest fall
from the current ROIC of 16% to 12% in 2020.
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
21
Pro-forma income statement of Asian telcos’ under various 5G implementation models in 2020*
2017 5G Rollout in 2020
Telco without 5G Telco owns 5G Telco shares 5G Telco leases 5G Equipment vendor
network network network as 5G infrastructure
provider
Revenue $710 $767 $767 $767 $185
Assumed 71% of Assumed 8% Similar to Similar to Assumed ~50%
capital employed revenue growth individual telco individual telco EBITDA margin
based on 2015 in 5G era: implementation implementation
Asian average 3% from IoT of 5G of 5G
connectivity & 5%
from data usage
in other areas
Opex ($470) ($507) ($492) ($477) ($34)
(excluding
5G lease & Baseline figure Opex growth at Sharing active Assume 80% Assume 10%
depreciation) 8% in line with networks savings from savings of
revenue growth generate 40% 5G-related opex 5G-related opex
savings in due to cost
5G-RAN opex synergies achieved
as a single
network provider
5G lease - - - ($62) -
payments
Assume three
telcos leasing 5G
infrastructure
EBITDA $240 $260 $275 $228 $93
Depreciation ($80) ($113) ($103) ($80) ($33)
Assumed to Ten-year useful From reduced Absence of Ten-year
be ~11% of life of 5G-related 5G-related capex 5G-related capex useful life of
revenues capex 5G-equipment
capex
Interest - - - - ($10)
expense
Assume 60% of
5G equipment
financed by debt
at 5% p.a.
Earnings $160 $147 $172 $147 $50
Strategic Responses to 5G
I
f telcos were to back down from the herculean task of rolling out the 5G network, there
would be two possible contenders to fill their shoes. The government could lay down
the network at its expense and lease it out to network operators. However, given the
immense scale, complexity, and administrative intricacies involved, we believe that the
government’s involvement would likely be limited to financial ownership and backing.
Technical know-how Given network equipment vendors’ prior experience in managing projects of comparable
scale, they would possess the core technical capabilities required to implement the single
5G network. Their superior expertise on 5G technology relative to telcos could translate
into the rollout of an optimised network.
While obtaining funding for a project of this scale could pose a problem to the equipment
vendors, securing project financing would not be an uphill battle, given the visible and
stable cash flow and likelihood of gaining regulatory support.
Volatile operating Major telecom equipment vendors such as Ericsson and Alcatel Lucent have witnessed
environment volatile earnings and depressing margins over the recent past. Intensifying competition
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
24
from Asian equipment vendors, such as Huawei and ZTE, and seasonality attached to
major network deployment; these have been the primary reasons behind the vendors’
unpredictable top-line numbers.
Network equipment vendors’ revenues and operating margins over the past ten years
Source: Reuters
The volatile earnings and depressing margins attached to the telecom equipment
business have also taken a toll on the share prices of these equipment vendors. Hence,
we believe their entry into a business that provides stable cash flow and revenues would
be favourable to their success and survival.
Loss of network advantages with 5G roll-out to prompt differentiation through digital services
Aspects such as net neutrality laws being implemented around the globe also significantly
erode the advantage telcos gain through network ownership over the long term. As a
result, we believe telcos would shift away from their traditional role as network providers;
equipment vendors would take over as consolidated network providers, benefitting from
the stable but lower returns of network ownership.
Due to the protracted implementation of 5G (at least till 2020) and the relatively capex
efficient network deployments of alternative cellular solutions of Heterogeneous Networks
(HetNet) and Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT), telcos will be in a position to drive down their
network capex over the next five-year period. This occurs even as telcos under the leasing
model discussed before would be able to achieve comparable earnings as those under the
5G network infrastructure ownership model. As a result, telcos under the leasing model
should use the capex savings on network investments to develop new digital businesses
and pay out dividends, in our view.
Asset-light telcos under the leasing model to differentiate themselves in digital services
For example, Gartner’s forecasts suggest that IoT will support total services spending of
US$263 billion by 2020, and only US$32 billion of the total IoT service opportunity or
12.3% is attributable to connectivity services. As the revenue base of telcos’ fixed and
mobile revenue is large, it will translate to less than 3% of their total revenue. Conversely,
the revenues attributable to digital services and applications are approximately 7x that of
connectivity services, comparable to approximately 21% of the telco market.
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
27
Capitalising on data In addition to IoT, there is an array of fast-growing digital segments that telcos are qualified
to establish themselves in. For example, telcos own a great deal of data such as customer
demographics, spending patterns, commonly visited locations, websites, all of which
could be used to provide targeted advertising solutions for digital advertisers. What’s
more exciting is that the mobile advertising market is set to grow at a CAGR of 32%
from 2015 to 2018, reaching US$114 billion by 2018, according to ZenithOptimedia17 .
The firm also predicts that mobile advertisements would account for 87% of all new ad
dollars added to the global market during these years.
Similarly, telcos could also potentially use the vast amounts of customer data and
techniques already used within the industry to establish themselves in the Big Data
analytics segment. Telcos naturally have an advantage in Big Data with the sheer amount
of data that they hold. Many telcos already use this data to customise their offerings to
reduce churn rates, analyse upcoming trends to offer proactive solutions, and so on.
Research firm Wikibon estimates the Big Data market to be worth US$50 billion by the
end of 2017, growing at a CAGR of 21% from 201418.
Acquisitions Telcos could also venture into not-so-obvious segments such as Big Data analytics or
production of virtual reality (VR) content. Whilst these segments may require the acquisition
of new capabilities, they would likely carry attractive return on investments, given the
rapid growth and expanding market. Acquiring VR content production capabilities could
also provide telcos with access to a market that is expected to exceed US$21 billion by
2020, according to research firm, Tractica19.
Telcos around the globe have already tested these waters. For example, in the mobile-
advertising segment, Verizon acquired Millennial Media, which specialises in mobile
advertisements, in 2015 for US$208 million. This was on top of the acquisition of AOL,
which also possessed mobile-advertising capabilities, among other things. Similarly,
Telefónica20 and Singtel21 have already made forays into the mobile-advertising segment.
Source: Reuters
However, the environment of stable, positive returns from investing in network assets
is likely to change in a 5G world. According to ABI Research, 5G revenues are expected
to reach US$247 billion by 2025, mostly from North America, Asia-Pacific, and Western
Europe. Even after including non-IoT related revenue such as increased data usage from
Augmented Reality (AR) / VR, telcos are unlikely to see incremental revenues from 5G
connectivity that will justify sky-high capex commitments in 5G. Once we consider the
additional operational expenses of maintaining the 5G infrastructure and the capex
expectations of US$4 trillion, the ROIC of 5G is likely to deteriorate to the mid-single
digits even in the most optimistic scenarios.
Telefónica, one of the largest telco groups in the world, was one of the telcos to
aggressively move into the digital space. Telefónica Digital was created in 2011, functioning
independently from the core telco business, so it will have the speed and agility to push the
boundaries of digital service innovation. Telefónica believed that the unit would allow the
telco to bring benefits in areas such as entertainment, financial services, and advertising.
As part of its expansion into digital services, the company invested in various areas that
covered both telco-related and non-related areas such as hosting, cloud and enterprise
communications, over-the-top (OTT) communications, financial services, health, advertising,
and OTT content. Telefónica’s digital investments include Axismed, a Brazilian chronic-
care management firm; TokBox, a video-chat platform; Boku, a global mobile-payments
network; Everything.me, a service that adds contextual capabilities to mobile phones;
AddFleet, a mobility platform enabling users to track the location of transport units in real
time; and many more. Many of these services were invested at the start-up level and some,
including Everything.me, have folded.
However, despite Telefónica Digital’s annual revenue growth of over 20%, the unit was
closed down in 2014. The management believed the digital businesses needed to be
embedded more deeply in the main organisation for them to succeed, and reorganised
Telefónica Digital services into other existing telco units. This also meant that many products
and services formally provided by Telefónica Digital would be bundled with existing telco
services going forward.
We believe this is a clear example of telcos’ pursuit of a wide range of small investments
in relatively new and sometimes unrelated areas which do not yield expected results.
Telefónica only realised afterwards that its best strategy to grow new digital businesses is to
focus on synergies that their existing network and brand can have with the new services,
so they can be effectively bundled and sold as a more compelling product to customers.
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
30
Verizon RYOT Corp N/A 2016 Content Producer of motion pictures and
Producer videos. Operates a VR recording
studio
Verizon Volicon Inc N/A 2016 Media Provides solutions for compliance
Intelligence monitoring of videos, ad verification,
and competitive analysis, as well as
repurposing video for the web and
social media
Telefónica AxisMed N/A 2016 Healthcare Provision of chronic patient and
Gestao preventive health-management
Preventiva solutions
da Saude
Singtel Trustwave US$770 2015 Cyber- Leading provider of managed security
million Security services in the US
Telia Springworks N/A 2015 Mobile Developer of mobile games
Sonera Gaming
Verizon Millennial US$248 2015 Mobile Developer of mobile-advertising
Media million Advertising software
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
31
Verizon has long been very keen on expanding into segments that transcend its traditional
role as a network operator. The company has made several multibillion-dollar investments
in an array of businesses but its acquisition of AOL stands out.
Verizon acquired AOL, a digital-content producer and advertiser for US$4.4 billion in 2015,
establishing itself as a key player in digital advertising and online blogging. AOL owned a
range of digital-advertising platforms and adtech including “One by AOL”, an automated
platform for buying ads across different media, and “Pictela”, a high-definition global
content-marketing platform. According to comScore, AOL was also the owner of several
famous blogs including the Huffington Post, Engadget, Moviefone, and TechCrunch22.
Verizon supplemented the digital advertising business of AOL, by acquiring Millennial
Media, a developer of software for mobile advertisers.
The acquisition of an established digital advertiser and content developer allowed Verizon
to gain a strong foothold in the US digital advertising market, set to reach US$105 billion
by 2020, according to eMarketer23. The company gained access to the digital-advertising
platforms, customers, and adtech owned by AOL, which could now be cross-matched with
subscriber data of over 108 million wireless subscribers of Verizon, to offer marketers new
advertising options. The acquisition was also of a strategic fit for Verizon as the company
now owned the content it delivered through its networks.
Furthermore, the acquisition of AOL buttressed Verizon’s plans to develop its own OTT
video-streaming service to compete with the likes of Netflix and Hulu. AOL’s blogs,
including the Huffington Post and TechCrunch, were very popular among millennials and
offered attractive content-development platforms for Verizon to capitalise on. Soon after
the acquisition of AOL, Verizon announced the launch of its video-streaming mobile app,
Go9024. Whilst the platform has received mixed reviews, it has put Verizon in a position to
boost its mobile-video advertising business, poised to record strong growth in the future.
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
33
Since the consolidation of AOL in 3Q15, the company has contributed over US$2.7 billion
to Verizon’s top line, accounting for about 2% of revenues each quarter. Verizon anticipates
that AOL will generate close to US$20 billion by 2020, according to a Bloomberg report25.
AOL’s capabilities, combined with the potential acquisition of Yahoo, would place Verizon
among the leaders of the global digital-advertising market.
Hence, despite the hefty price tags these acquisitions had carried, they have provided
Verizon with much-needed capabilities in growing segments that have helped mitigate the
declining appeal of its traditional telecom operations.
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
34
T
The implementation of 5G will be initially driven by government and regulator
interest in improving connectivity and providing smart solutions. Telcos are also likely
to take part willingly in cases where there is regulatory support and financial benefit.
As a result, after looking at the three developed regional telco markets of the US,
Europe, and Asia, we believe that Asian markets would most likely be the pioneers of 5G. This
will be closely followed by developments in European markets.
South Korea has vowed to get 5G ready for the PyeongChang 2018 Winter Olympics, and has
even brought forward the commercial launch by a year to 2019. This is also observed in Japan,
where NTT DoCoMo intends to launch a 5G trial network in 2017 and plans to adhere to a
government-prescribed timeline for a commercial launch in 2020.
Internet Plus Underpinning China’s Internet Plus strategy – set in its 13th Five-Year Plan from 2016 to 2020 –
is the enabling infrastructure of an integrated mobile network and connected population. This
is evident in China Mobile’s efforts and plans to execute a commercially viable and mass 5G
network by end-2020. Chinese telecom equipment vendor, ZTE, also intends to conduct trials
of 5G equipment spanning over 100 cities in China26.
This dynamic is similarly seen in Singapore, where a nation-wide 5G network would be essential
to the successful implementation of the government’s Smart Nation plans. The 5G roll-out
would also be much easier in Singapore, given its relatively smaller size. The largest telecom
operator in Singapore, Singtel, has already joined hands with telecom equipment vendor,
Ericsson, to study this technology27. The two companies recently conducted a demonstration of
5G technology that achieved download speeds of 27.5Gbps28.
Source: Reuters
Against this backdrop, European telcos are more likely to collaborate to share their active
network infrastructure, which could be crucial to the successful deployment of a 5G network.
According to Analysys Mason, Europe accounted for 61%31 (or 22) of the active network-
sharing arrangements in the world in 2014.
Extensive support Furthermore, European telcos would have extensive support from regulators when rolling out
5G. After the delay in rolling out 4G services in the Eurozone, the EU is seemingly keen on
pioneering the deployment of 5G. The EU Commission has already set out an action plan
for the deployment of 5G32. The commission is also discussing supplementary regulations,
such as the sharing of radio-spectrum resources33 among telcos, which could ease the process
of sharing active infrastructure among telcos. According to the action plan, the commission
intends to host preliminary trials on 5G by 2017 and introduce the network by 2018. 2020
has been set as the deadline for large-scale commercial introduction of the technology among
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
36
Hence, we believe Europe would be the most likely region to commercialise 5G technology,
given the motivation of the telcos to share their network assets and extensive support
from regulators.
Interim Technologies
Given 5G’s massive capex burden, we are unlikely to see such networks being commercially
available in the immediate future. Of the current developments in mobile technology, we
believe there are a few that could be implemented in the interim to address uses that would
otherwise be addressed by 5G.
Bibliography
1. http://www.ngmn.org/fileadmin/ngmn/content/downloads/Technical/2015/NGMN_5G_White_Paper_V1_0.pdf
2. https://www.gsmaintelligence.com/research/?file=141208-5g.pdf&download
3. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/mobile-white-
paper-c11-520862.html
4. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/mobile-white-
paper-c11-520862.html
5. https://www.ovum.com/press_releases/5g-will-hit-24-million-subscriptions-worldwide-2021/
6. http://www.pcworld.com/article/3053620/koreas-working-on-a-cool-combination-5g-and-the-winter-olympics.
html
7. http://www.huawei.com/minisite/5g/en/defining-5g.html
8. P. D. Thompson, J. G. Colebatch, P. Brown, J. C. Rothwell, B. L. Day and J. A. Obeso, “Voluntary Stimulus
Sensitive Jerks and Jumps Mimicking Myoclonus or Pathological Startle Syndromes,” Movement Disorders, Vol.
7, No. 3, 1992, pp. 257-262
9. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/5g-verizon-upcoming-capital-expenditures-174708532.html
10. http://www.gsma.com/publicpolicy/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Mobile-Infrastructure-sharing.pdf
11. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Regulatory-Market/Documents/CostaRica/Presentations/Session8_Daniel%20
Leza%20-%20Mobile%20Infrastructure%20Sharing%20-%2012%20March%202014.pdf
12. http://www.ericsson.com/res/thecompany/press/docs/2012/wp-wholesale-model.pdf
13. http://www.ericsson.com/res/thecompany/press/docs/2012/wp-wholesale-model.pdf
14. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/bell-teams-up-with-rival-telus-on-3g/article1200256/
15. https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/telecommunications_technology_business_transformation_
mobile_revolution/
16. https://www.gsmaintelligence.com/research/?file=141208-5g.pdf&download
17. http://www.zenithmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Adspend-forecasts-December-2015-press-release1.
pdf
18. http://wikibon.org/wiki/v/Big_Data_Vendor_Revenue_and_Market_Forecast_2013-2017
19. http://thefarm51.com/ripress/VR_market_report_2015_The_Farm51.pdf
20. Financial Times - Telefónica launches mobile ad exchange
21. http://info.singtel.com/node/11694
22. https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Rankings/comScore-Releases-February-2016-US-Desktop-Online-Video-
Rankings
23. https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Digital-Ad-Spending-Surpass-TV-Next-Year/1013671
24. https://techcrunch.com/2015/10/01/verizons-mobile-video-service-go90-launches-to-public/
25. http://www.bloombergquint.com/business/2016/06/23/verizon-wants-to-push-into-advertising
26. http://www.scmp.com/tech/china-tech/article/2025031/china-roll-out-5g-mobile-equipment-trials-across-100-
cities
27. http://info.singtel.com/node/13850
28. https://www.ericsson.com/news/160802-singtel-and-ericsson-first-to-showcase-5g-in-southeast-
asia_244039854_c
29. www.wsj.com/articles/european-telecom-companies-race-to-merge-1433160138
30. www.wsj.com/articles/european-telecom-companies-race-to-merge-1433160138
31. http://www.analysysmason.com/About-Us/News/Insight/Network-sharing-Europe-APAC-May2014/
32. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/5g-europe-action-plan
33. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/promoting-shared-use-europes-radio-spectrum
DBS Asian Insights
SECTOR BRIEFING 35
39
www.dbs.com