RUBRICS FOR PROPOSAL PRESENTATION

Performance Performance Ratings: -Encirce

Score
Elements
4 = exceptional 3 = Proficient 2= Satisfactory 1 = limited

MANUSCRIPT

A. Content Thesis statement/research problem is clear and appropriate. Exceptionally focused, informative and 4
Information and comprehensively developed and argued
Comprehension
The thesis statement is relevant and adequately developed, but has some unsupported arguments 3

The thesis statement is present, but is underdeveloped, lacking focus with inconsistent arguments 2

The thesis statement is flawed, vaguely developed showing poor understanding of the topic 1

B. Presentation Grammar and spelling are correct. Variety of proper sentence structures deployed using appropriate terminology 4
Grammar, spelling.,
Grammar and spelling are correct, but has some inconsistent sentence structure 3
vocabulary
A few grammar and spelling errors, but has some inconsistent structure 2

Many grammatical and/or spelling errors. (Fragmented/mechanically incorrect sentences) 1

C. Organization OF Logical progression and development of ideas introduction and conclusion. The ideas expressed clearly with 4
Material effective transition between ideas.
(Clarity, transition, and
Organization of intro to conclusion, has some ineffective transitions between ideas 3
flow)
Organization of intro to conclusion, has incoherent ideas and ineffective transitions 2

Incoherent organization. Lacks introduction with unclear and/or vague conclusion 1

D. Sources and Documentation is complete and correct. A variety of relevant, updated /peer reviewed references supporting the 4
Documentation argument is present
Variety, credibility of
Documentation is flawed, but some references lack accuracy or relevance to the thesis. 3
references
Appropriate sources Documentation is highly flawed dominated by unreviewed or outdated internet sources. 2
and formatting
Documentation is lacking. Very few references lacking variety and updatedness are used 1
E. Contribution to Thesis contributes to the body of knowledge 4
Research
The manuscript has minor corrections. An extract maybe submitted to a peer reviewed journal 3

The manuscript is flawed. An extract may be submitted to a non-peer reviewed journal 2

The manuscript is highly flawed. Any resulting written extract is not publishable at all 1

TOTAL

PERFORMANCE 4 = STRONGLY AGREE 2 = DISAGREE;

ELEMENTS 3= AGREE 1 = STRONGLY DISAGREE

ORAL PRESENTATION

A. Delivery and The PRESENTER……

Awareness
Is Confident, professional and appropriately dressed
of Audience
Spoke clearly and extemporaneously in a loud and clear manner and maintained the interest level of the audience

Gave a well prepared presentation within the allotted time

B. Strength and The PRESENTATION …

Organization
Was informative and delivered with a well organized PowerPoint presentation
of MAterial
Has clear and appropriate introduction, suitable structure and conclusion

Has sufficient relevant and up-dated literature review

C. Q & A The PRESENTERS……

Correctly argued/answered the questions which showed understanding of the basic concepts that demonstrated depth and
breadth

Was focused and engages the panel confidently

Has answered the research objectives with critical thought

RUBRICS FOR OUTPUT ORAL/PODIUM PRESENTATION

CRITERIA MAXIMUM ACTUAL SCORE

SCORE
Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4
NAME: NAME: NAME: NAME

Delivery: Do the speaker’s voice, poise and 20

eye contact make a favorable impression?
Does the speaker have smooth and clear
delivery? (Presenters may sue notes, but
should not read from them)

Organization: Does the presentation have a 15

logical organization? Doe the speaker make
clear what was done and how it was done?

Familiarity with the subject: Does the 25

presenter demonstrate adequate knowledge
of the subject? Did the presenter answer
questions fully and clearly?

Visual aids: Did the presenter use visual aids 10

appropriately?