Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
B
Issued 2007-10
AUDIT CRITERIA
Revised 2013-09
161 Thorn Hill Road
Warrendale, PA 15086-7527 Superseding AC7122 Rev A
Nadcap
AUDIT CRITERIA FOR
NONMETALLIC MATERIALS – TESTING LABORATORIES
P - PART MANUFACTURERS CAPTIVE LABORATORIES
Note: AC7122 Rev A previously included details on the accreditation process utilizing the AC7122 series documents and
all questions for P, I and R. For Revision B, the AC7122 document has been broken into four documents:
• AC7122 (base document) - Contains details on the accreditation process utilizing the AC7122 series documents.
• AC7122-P - Contains questions only applicable to Part Manufacturers Captive Laboratories
• AC7122-I - Contains questions only applicable to Independent Test Laboratories
• AC7122-R - Contains questions only applicable to Raw Material Manufacturers Captive Laboratories
PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising there from, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI values your input. To provide feedback on this document, please contact the appropriate commodity staff engineer.
(Contact information is located at http://www.eauditnet.com under “Contact Us”.)
Copyright 2014 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15 2-Jan-14
PRI AC7122-P Revision B -2-
-2-
PRI AC7122-P Revision B -3-
1.1 For re-accreditation audits, was corrective action from previous audits YES NO N/A
implemented and sustained?
2.2 Does the laboratory have one of the following active certifications: AS/EN/JISQ YES NO N/A
9100 (AS/EN9110)?
The Nadcap Composites Task Group - Non Metallic Materials Testing Sub-Group recognizes
AS/EN/JISQ9100 (AS/EN9110). If the supplier has been audited and approved by any Nadcap
recognized agency for compliance with AS/EN/JISQ9100 (AS/EN9110), then no further assessment for
quality management systems will be required. Although specific audit criteria for evaluation of the general
quality management system is not included within the text of this checklist, the requirements of
AS/EN/JISQ9100 (AS/EN9110) do form a part of the standard used in the Nadcap Non Metallic Materials
Testing Accreditation program.
As such, auditors may identify and record nonconformances related to the quality management system.
The supplier must address these nonconformances in order to obtain Nadcap Accreditation.
2.3 Is the testing environment designed to minimize vibrations, electrical transients, YES NO
voltage fluctuations, RF pollution, and atmospheric contamination?
2.4 Does the laboratory maintain cleanliness, housekeeping, and orderly handling of YES NO
material?
2.5 Is equipment used in an environment that is not detrimental to their function? YES NO
3.2 Are written procedures or computer programs, under revision control and (as YES NO
applicable) software quality assurance control, issued and followed for all
applicable tests?
3.3 Do test procedures include specimen preparation, and are they sufficiently detailed YES NO
so that the test can be consistently repeated in that laboratory?
3.4 Are test procedures or test methods being used of the latest revision, unless YES NO
otherwise specified by the customer?
-3-
PRI AC7122-P Revision B -4-
4.1 Are there documented procedures/work instructions established to uniquely YES NO N/A
identify specimens so they are traceable to the material lot number or part number
they represent?
5.1 Does the laboratory's system provide for tracking and accountability of all YES NO
specimens?
5.2 Are specimens stamped, tagged or otherwise identified to avoid inter-mixing, until YES NO
disposal or return?
5.3 Does a procedure exist that defines specimen handling policies, including: YES NO
a. Specimen protection for possible future examination
b.
6.1 Is computer controlled and/or data acquisition equipment calibrated as a system? YES NO
7.1 Are calibration status labels posted on each calibrated test machine and YES NO
measuring device? (Where a status sticker is impractical, other means shall be
used to identify the status of the calibration.)
8.0 STANDARDS
8.1 Are standards clearly identified to prevent mixing between primary, secondary, and YES NO
working standards and non-calibrated equipment and standards?
9.1 Is out of service equipment identified and segregated (if possible) from equipment YES NO
in use?
10.1 Is there a procedure addressing the calibration and usage of “employee-owned” YES NO
equipment used for acceptance purposes?
-4-
PRI AC7122-P Revision B -5-
11.1 Are all gage dimensions that are used in calculations measured and recorded? YES NO
11.2 Are specimens visually inspected for surface anomalies prior to test? YES NO
12.3 Are parts of fixture assemblies matched by number when meant to be used YES NO N/A
together? Refers to large pieces only.
12.4 Are fixtures traceable to test, if requested by the customer? YES NO N/A
13.2 Are exposed wires free of twists prior to junctions or per customer requirements? YES NO
13.4 If thermocouples are not individually calibrated, is wire calibrated (certified) in YES NO N/A
accordance with standards as specified by the customer (e.g. ASTM E220 or
EN60514-2)?
13.5 If calibrations are performed in-house, are thermocouple calibration procedures YES NO N/A
documented?
14.1 Is there a written policy for specimen replacement testing and retesting (in YES NO
accordance with customer requirements), established and referenced through the
Quality System?
14.2 When an outlier is identified in a set of specimen results, is there an assignable YES NO N/A
cause investigation?
15.1 Are all specimens tested by the laboratory accounted for, whether tested to YES NO
completion or failure, including replacement tests and retest?
15.2 Are replaced specimens documented in the laboratory’s internal records? YES NO
16.1 Is invalidation of test results authorized by the material specification, or other YES NO
contractual documents?
-5-
PRI AC7122-P Revision B -6-
17.1 Do the laboratory’s procedures concerning replacement testing require that invalid YES NO
tests, subject to replacement testing, be assigned a probable cause?
18.1 Does the laboratory document all valid test results in a test report? For captive YES NO
laboratories, this is controlled by a quality assurance function.
19.1 Is the use of `white-out' or erasures on the signed test reports, test record YES NO
documents or copies prohibited?
19.2 Are test results for all specimens in the same set included on the same test report? YES NO
20.1 Are revisions to test reports handled in one of the following manners: YES NO
a. A new test report number is issued, and referenced to the erroneous test
report.
b. An amended test report is issued.
c. If not addressed as in section a. or b., there is a procedure specifying the
method used by the laboratory.
21.1.1 Are temperature and humidity requirements of the testing environment monitored? YES NO
21.1.2 Are the tests performed within the requirements of temperature and humidity? YES NO
21.2.1 Is the load measuring system calibrated according to standards as specified by the YES NO
customer (e.g. ASTM E4 and/or ISO 7500-1)?
21.2.2 Is the load cell calibrated with the range of use to ensure accurate load data? YES NO
21.3.1 Is there a written strain gauge application procedure available which includes: YES NO
a. Specimen Surface Preparation
b. Strain Gage Alignment and Location
c. Bonding of strain gage to the specimen
d. Compatibility of the adhesives and gages to the material and test
temperature
21.3.2 Is adhesive cure temperature below the specimen’s minimum cure temperature? YES NO
-6-
PRI AC7122-P Revision B -7-
21.3.3 Are chemicals and adhesives used for strain gauging properly identified and YES NO
stored?
21.3.4 Are strain gages, if used, a minimum size of 6mm, unless otherwise specified? YES NO N/A
21.4.1 Are extensometers or compressometers directly attached to the gage length or as YES NO
required by the test specification and is the method of attachment recorded?
21.4.2 Are extensometers class B2 (ASTM E83), class 0.5 (ISO 9513) or better used, YES NO
unless otherwise specified by the test specification?
21.4.3 Are deflectometer class C (ASTM E83), class 1 (ISO 9513) or better used, unless YES NO
otherwise specified by the test specification?
21.5.1.1 If there is a customer test method requirement for grip alignment, is there a written YES NO N/A
procedure for carrying out the alignment check?
(P only)
21.6.1.1 Does the grip face texture prevent slipping or uneven loading? YES NO
21.6.1.2 If the laboratory uses other material between grip faces and the specimen, is this YES NO N/A
practice documented in the written procedure?
21.6.2.1 Does the grip face texture prevent slipping or uneven loading? YES NO
21.6.2.2 If the laboratory uses other material between grip faces and the specimen, is this YES NO N/A
practice documented in the written procedure?
21.6.2.3 Is the grip pressure recorded or documented for each specimen type? YES NO
21.7.1 Is parallelism of compression platens flat within 0.001 inch (0.025 mm)? YES NO
21.8.1 Does the laboratory carry out tests under crosshead displacement control? YES NO
21.8.2 Is the crosshead displacement rate during the test 0.05 in/min ± 0.01 in/min or 1 YES NO
mm/min ± 0.3 mm/min unless otherwise specified by the customer?
21.8.3 Is the crosshead displacement rate calibrated using equipment traceable to YES NO
National Standards?
-7-
PRI AC7122-P Revision B -8-
21.8.4 Does the test report identify the crosshead displacement rate used? YES NO
21.9.1 Is it ensured that coolants used for specimen machining are not detrimental to the YES NO
specimen material?
21.9.2.1 Are process variable criteria established for rough machining and blanking different YES NO
types of materials?
21.9.2.2 Do work instructions reference the process specification tolerances or engineered YES NO
tolerances?
21.9.2.3 Is it ensured that rough machining/blanking shall not cause damage to the YES NO
specimen gage section area?
21.10.1 Are approved tabbing materials, adherend and adhesive materials as specified YES NO
and processed per customer/supplier requirements?
21.10.2 For tensile specimens, is the taper machined correctly (approximately .005 to YES NO N/A
0.015 inches in height) or per customer requirement?
21.10.3 Is chemical processing, grit blasting or hand abrading performed to tab panels or YES NO
on adherends as per customer/supplier requirement where stock does not have a
peel ply?
21.10.4 Is the tab panel solvent cleaned and allowed to air dry prior to use? YES NO
21.10.5 Is grit blasting or hand abrading performed to test panel tabbing area as per YES NO
customer requirements where stock does not have a peel ply?
21.10.6 Is the test panel/adherends solvent cleaned per customer/supplier requirements? YES NO
21.10.7 Is there no fiber damage of test panel and tab faying surfaces due to grit blasting YES NO
or hand abrading?
21.10.8 Are control procedures in place describing shelf life and out time controls for YES NO
tabbing adhesive?
21.10.9 Is shelf life of expired tabbing adhesives extended with a lap shear or alternate YES NO
mechanical test that meets specification requirements?
21.10.11 Is the tabbing adhesive allowed to warm/thaw to room temperature without the YES NO
application of heat source prior to removing from bag?
-8-
PRI AC7122-P Revision B -9-
21.10.12 If a press is used, is it checked for parallelism within .010 inch? YES NO N/A
21.10.13 Is there a temperature profile of the press platen or autoclave and is it checked YES NO
annually?
21.10.14 Are records of the cure cycle with traceability to the test specimen maintained? YES NO N/A
21.10.15 Is tooling used to minimize excess adhesive in the gage area? YES NO
21.11.2 Where drilling is performed, are breakouts controlled within specification YES NO
tolerances?
21.12.2.1 Is each specimen visually inspected for surface damage prior to testing? YES NO
21.12.2.2 Does the finished surface exhibit uniform surface texture? YES NO
22.1.1 Are temperature and humidity requirements of the testing environment monitored? YES NO
22.1.2 Are the tests performed within the requirements of temperature and humidity? YES NO
23.1.1 Are temperature and humidity requirements of the testing environment monitored? YES NO N/A
23.1.2 Are the tests performed within the requirements of temperature and humidity? YES NO N/A
24.1.1 Are temperature and humidity requirements of the testing environment monitored? YES NO
24.1.2 Are the tests performed within the requirements of temperature and humidity? YES NO
-9-
PRI AC7122-P Revision B - 10 -
24.2.1 Are conditioned specimens tested within customer specified time after removal YES NO
from the conditioning chamber?
24.2.2 If specimens are not tested immediately upon removal from conditioning, are they YES NO N/A
stored per customer requirements?
24.3.1 Is all analytical testing equipment which is used less frequently than weekly YES NO
verified prior to use?
24.3.2 Is all analytical testing equipment which is used at least once per week verified YES NO
monthly?
24.3.3 Is analytical testing equipment verified whenever suspect results are obtained? YES NO
24.3.5 Are verification/calibration logs (or outside certification documents) maintained for YES NO
all chemical/thermal/analytical equipment? Logs include the following information.
a. Verification/calibration date
b. Procedure used
c. Technician’s name
d. Actual results
e. Required results range
f. Pass/Fail statement
- 10 -