Sie sind auf Seite 1von 18

Composites Science and Technology 45 (1992) 135-152

Prediction of on-axes elastic properties of


plain weave fabric composites
N. K. Naik & V. K. Ganesh
Aerospace Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Powai, Bombay 400 076, India

(Received 14 February 1991; revised version received 4 September 1991; accepted 2 October 1991)

Two fabric composite models are presented for the on-axes elastic analysis of
two-dimensional orthogonal plain weave fabric lamina. These are two-
dimensional models taking into account the actual strand cross-section
geometry, possible gap between two adjacent strands and undulation and
continuity of strands along both warp and fill directions. The shape functions
considered to define the geometry of the woven fabric lamina compare well
with the photomicrographs of actual woven fabric lamina cross-sections. There
is a good correlation between the predicted results and the experimental
values. Certain modifications are suggested to the simple models available in
the literature so that these models can also be used to predict the elastic
properties of woven fabric laminae under specific conditions. Some design
studies have been carried out for graphite/epoxy woven fabric laminae. Effects
of woven fabric geometrical parameters on the elastic properties of the
laminae have been investigated.

Keywords: woven fabric lamina, prediction, two-dimensional, plain weave,


elastic constants

NOTATION g Gap between the adjacent


strands
a Strand width h Maximum strand thickness
a~*, b~*,d~* Extensional, coupling and hm Thickness of matrix at
i,j=1,2,6 bending compliance x=0, y=0
constants hx,(x, y), Thickness of matrix and
ax,, Zx, Parameters as defined in i=1,2,3,4 strands in X - Z plane at a
Fig. 6 point as defined by co-
ay,, z r` Parameters as defined in ordinates x and y (Fig. 6)
Fig. 5 hyi(y), i = 1, 2, 3, 4 Thickness of matrix and
Ao, B j, Dij Extensional, coupling and strands in Y - Z plane at
i , j = l , 2, 6 bending stiffness constants x = 0 (Fig. 5)
EL, ET, ~/LT, GET, Grr UD composite elastic pro- H Total thickness of WF
perties along the fibre and lamina
transverse fibre directions k Transverse bulk modulus
eL(o), eT(o), vLT(o), Local reduced elastic con- Qij, i , j = 1, 2, 6 Reduced stiffness of
CLT(O), C (O) stants for undulation angle lamina
0 %, Local reduced and aver-
Ex, vxy, Elastic constants of unit i,j=1,2,6 aged compliance constants
cell/WF lamina V Volume
Fibre volume fraction
Vm Matrix volume fraction
Composites Science and Technology 0266-3538/92/$05.00
© 1992 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd. x, y, z Cartesian co-ordinates
135
136 N. K. Naik, V. K. Ganesh

ZX i(x, y), i = 1, 2 Shape functions of strand 1 INTRODUCTION


undulation in X - Z plane
(Fig. 6) The increasing use of composite materials has
zyi(y), i = 1, 2 Shape functions of strand revolutionised the aerospace industry over the
undulation in Y - Z plane past two decades. The ability to vary the
(Fig. 5) properties and performance of composite mate-
O(x), O(y) Local off-axis angle of the rials has been in large measure responsible for
undulated strand the great impact that these materials have had.
O Maximum off-axis angle of Traditionally, advanced composite structures
the undulated strand have been fabricated from tape prepregs which
were systematically stacked to form a laminate.
This type of construction tends to give optimal
Subscripts in-plane stiffness and strength. Since the primary
f Quantities in fill direction loads usually are in-plane, the use of such
L Quantities in fibre composites appeared logical. However, there are
direction many situations where neither primary nor
T Quantities in transverse secondary loads are in-plane. In such situations
fibre direction tape prepreg laminates may not be the most
W Quantities in warp appropriate.
direction The future for composites is undergoing a
transition. The aerospace performance criteria
consisting of high specific stiffness and high
Superscripts specific strength are being supplemented with
el Quantities of element high toughness and efficient manufacturability.
f Quantities of fibre With this, textile structural composites in general
m Quantities of matrix and woven fabric (WF) composites in particular
O WF composite overall are finding increasing use in primary as well as
properties secondary structural applications along with
pm Quantities of pure matrix unidirectional (UD) tape composites. Making use
s Quantities of strand of the unique combination of light weight,
sl Quantities of slice flexibility, strength and toughness, textile struc-
* Quantities of UD crossply tures like wovens, knits, braids and nonwovens
laminate have now been recognised as attractive reinfor-
Overbars indicate average values/quantities trans- cements for structural applications.
formed to global direction Woven fabric is formed by interlacing two
mutually perpendicular sets of yarns. The
lengthwise threads are called warp and the
Abbreviations crosswise threads fill or weft. The interlacing
CCA Composite cylinder as- pattern of the warp and fill is known as the
semblage (model) weave. Two-dimensional (2-D) fundamental
CLT Classical laminate theory weaves are plain, twill and satin. The micro-
EAM Element array model mechanical behaviour of woven fabric laminates
MKM Modified Kabelka's model depends on the fabric properties, which in turn
MMPM Modified mosaic parallel depend on the fabric structure. The parameters
model involved in determining the fabric structure are
PS Parallel-series (model) weave, fabric count, fineness of yarn, fibre
SAM Slice array model characteristics, yarn structure, degree of undula-
SP Series-parallel (model) tion, etc. The architecture of a WF lamina is
UD Unidirectional complex and therefore the parameters controlling
WF Woven fabric the mechanical and thermal properties of WF
1-D One-dimensional composites are too numerous. This makes it
2-D Two-dimensional impractical to characterise the WF composites
3-D Three-dimensional through tests alone, necessitating analytical
Prediction of on-axes elastic properties o f plain weave fabric composites 137

models which can predict the mechanical and consideration the undulation in both warp and fill
thermal properties of the WF composites. directions, but the actual strand cross-sectional
A variety of analytical models (Raju et al. ~) geometry was not considered. The properties of
has been proposed for the prediction of the the undulated warp and fill strands were
thermo-elastic properties of WF laminae. The evaluated under the constant stress condition in
models are based on the classical laminate theory the strand and then the classical laminate theory
(CLT) 2-4 or finite element analysis, s-7 Halphin et was used to predict the overall properties.
al. 2 extended the laminate analogy developed to A 3-D finite element analysis was presented by
predict the elastic stiffness of a randomly- Raju et al. ~ to predict the thermal expansion
oriented, short-fibre composite to 2-D and 3-D coefficients of the WF lamina. Here, again the
woven fabric composites. The weave geometry WF lamina was idealised as an assemblage of
considered here represents the fabric in 1-D only asymmetric crossply laminates. Whitcomb 6 also
and also the circular geometry of the strand used the 3-D finite element analysis to analyse
cross-section considered here is not realistic. WF lamina. Here, the undulation and continuity
Chou & Ishikawa 3 have presented three models of the strands were considered in order to study
to predict the elastic properties of WF lamina. the effect of various weave parameters on the
These are the mosaic model,S the fibre mechanical properties of the WF lamina. The
undulation model s and the combination of the undulation shapes at the interlacing considered in
above two, the bridging model. 9 The mosaic the above studies were very approximate and
model idealises the WF lamina as an may not present an accurate behaviour of a plain
assemblage of asymmetric crossply laminates. weave fabric lamina.
Depending on whether the pieces of the crossply Zhang & Harding 7 and Dow & Ramnath 14
laminate are in parallel or in series, i.e. isostrain presented fabric models based on energy
or isostress condition, respectively, the bounds of principles. Zhang & Harding 7 used the strain
the stiffness as predicted by the mosaic model can energy equivalence principle to predict the elastic
be evaluated. This model does not consider the properties of a plain weave lamina. The finite
strand continuity and stress disturbance at the element method was used to evaluate the strain
interface of the assemblage. The fibre undulation energies of the constituent phases for the
model considers the strand continuity and analysis. In these studies (Refs 7 and 14), the
undulation, but it is a 1-D model as it considers undulation of the strand was considered in the
the undulation of the strand in the loading loading direction only and therefore all the
direction only. The combination of mosaic and inherent discrepancies present in 1-D models
fibre undulation models, called the bridging would also be present.
model, was proposed to analyse satin weave
fabrics. The model considers the bridging effect
present in the satin weave fabric due to the 1.1 The choice of a 2-D model
presence of non-interlacing regions. The bridging
model considers the fibre continuity and is a 2-D A single layer WF composite is designated as WF
model for satin weave, but reduces to fibre lamina. The woven fabric can be in the form of
undulation model in the case of plain weave. This an open weave or a close weave. In the case of
model considers the undulation in the loading the open weave, there may be gaps between two
direction, as in the case of the fibre undulation adjacent strands, whereas close weave fabrics are
model, but the strand undulation in the tightly woven without any gap between two
transverse direction and its actual cross-sectional adjacent strands. There can also be certain
geometry are not considered. These models were fabrics made of twisted strands which would
later extended to evaluate the thermal properties invariably have a certain amount of gap even if
and to analyse hybrid WF laminae. ~°-~2 In they are tightly woven. It is obvious that the
general, the analytical predictions did not presence of a gap between the adjacent strands
correlate well with the experimental results ~3 for would affect the stiffness of the WF lamina and
plain weave fabric composites. hence should be accounted for while evaluating
Kabelka 4 suggested a method of evaluating the the thermo-mechanical properties.
elastic and thermal properties of a plain weave The experimentally determined fibre volume
fabric lamina. This is a 2-D model taking into fraction, Vf, of the WF lamina is the overall Vf,
138 N. K. Naik, V. K. Ganesh

z z
ho

~ I
,:~::~ ,

ho
SECTION S o- S O SECTION S~- S~
h 0 = hm/2

,z ., ?z .',

~.. i

I ,
SECTION S z - S z SECTION S 3 - S 1

t1 1 -t--
• o~12 WARF

i " " " "


lllfl .---_54
5a
Ii ---5Z
SECTION S 4 - S~ j~_~11" IIIJlIF . "---51
h4=(hm+ hf) /2 S0 E PLAN ,----~o x
Fig. 1. Plain weave fabric lamina structure--cross-sections at different intervals.

V~', but for the analysis of the WF lamina the Figure 1 presents the cross-sections of a plain
strand Vf, V~, forms the input. It is therefore weave fabric lamina at different sections from the
necessary to evaluate the strand Vf from the midpoint of the fill strand (So-S0) to the midpoint
overall Vf determined experimentally. The
available methodologies do not take into account
the gap between the adjacent strands, the actual
cross-sectional geometry of the strand, and
strand undulation transverse to the loading
direction. Mathematically, the series model 3
should give the lower bound of stiffness due to
the assumption of the isostress condition and
thereby higher complementary energy. But
owing to the gross simplification of not
considering the above mentioned parameters, the
1-D series model predicts higher stiffness than
the expected lower bound. Also, for the
evaluation of the strand Vf from the overall Vf,
the information about the gap and strand
undulation in both warp and fill directions is Fig. 2. Optical micrograph---cross-sectionalview of a plain
necessary. weave fabric laminate.
Prediction of on-axes elastic properties of plain weave fabric composites 139

is called a slice array model, abbreviated SAM.


In the second model, the unit cell is discretised
into slices either along or across the loading
direction. The slices are further subdivided into
elements. The individual elements are analysed
separately. The elements are then assembled in
parallel or series to obtain the slice elastic
constants. Further, the slices are assembled
either in series or parallel to obtain the elastic
constants of the unit cell. This scheme of
discretising the unit cell into slices and further
Fig. 3. Plain weave fabric structure. into elements is called an element array model,
abbreviated EAM.

of the gap ($4-$4). Figure 2 is an optical 2. 1.1 Slice array model (SAM)
micrograph showing the typical cross-sections of In the analysis, the strand is taken to be
the plain weave fabric lamina at different transversely isotropic and its elastic properties
sections. A typical plain weave fabric structure is are evaluated from the transversely isotropic
shown in Fig. 3. It is seen that the thickness of fibre and matrix properties at strand Vf. It should
the fill strand decreases gradually from the be noted that owing to the presence of pure
midpoint of the strand to zero in the gap region. matrix pockets in the WF lamina, the strand Vf
This reduction due to the strand cross-sectional would be much higher than the composite overall
geometry would reduce the overall stiffness of Vf. The strand properties are evaluated using the
the WF lamina. Therefore, the geometry of the composite cylinder assemblage (CCA) model
strand cross-section should be considered while (Refs 15 and 16) which is briefly presented in the
evaluating the stiffness and this requires a 2-D Appendix. The details of evaluation of strand Vf
model. The available 1-D models predict higher from composite overall Vf is discussed later.
stiffness as the maximum strand thickness is The representative unit cell of a WF lamina is
considered in these models. taken as shown in Fig. 4(a). By virtue of the
symmetry of the interlacing region in plain weave
fabric, only one quarter of the interlacing region
is analysed. The analysis of the unit cell is then
2 FABRIC COMPOSITE MODELS performed by dividing the unit cell into a number
of slices as shown in Fig. 4(b). These slices are
The plain weave fabric composite models then idealised in the form of a four-layered
presented here are 2-D in the sense that they laminate i.e. an asymmetric crossply sandwiched
consider the undulation and continuity of the between two pure matrix layers as shown in Fig.
strand in both the warp and fill directions. The
4(c). The effective properties of the individual
models also account, for the presence of the gap
layer considering the presence of undulation are
between adjacent strands and different material
used to evaluate the elastic constants of the
and geometrical properties of the warp and fill
idealised laminate. This, in turn, is used to
strands. evaluate the elastic constants of the unit cell/WF
lamina.
In order to define the undulation and geometry
2.1 Refined models
of the strand cross-section the following shape
functions are used. The below mentioned
Two refined models are presented in this section.
expressions are with reference to Figs 5 and 6.
In the first model, the unit cell is discretised into
In the Y - Z plane, i.e. along the warp direction
slices along the loading direction. The individual (Fig. 5)
slices are analysed separately and the unit cell
elastic properties are evaluated by assembling the hf :~y
zy,(y) = - ~- cos - - (1)
slices under the isostrain condition. Such a model ayt
140 N. K. Naik, V. K. Ganesh

kZ
hm/2
. jJ''
_ _ _ ~ ~ ( y ) ..............
" ~ hZ f ~
i

•; - " ~
hw WARP
hY2 [Y)

(a) UNIT CELL

c hf 0 L_ __

$
hm/2
- - o f f 2 - - -~ gfl2
Fig. 5. Plain weave fabric lamina cross-section: warp
direction.

and
hyl(y) - hf
~ + hm zy2(y)

hy2(y) = hw
(b) ACTUAL SLICES
hy3(y) = zy2(y) - zy~(y) y = O--~afl2
=0 y = ae/2----~ (af + g,)12
hy4(y) = hf
~ + hm zy~(y)
(3)
In the X - Z plane, i.e. along the fill direction
(Fig. 6)
hw :rx hm
zxl(x, y) = -~- cos - - - hy~(y) + - - (4)
2 ax, 2
hw ~rx hm
* FACTORED h w zx2(x, y) = - -~- cos (aw + gw) hyjy) + ~ (5)
(c) IOEALISEDSLICES

Fig. 4. Plain weave fabric lamina unit cell and its


idealisation.

and

zy2(y) hf :ry (2)


= ~ c o s ia r + gf)
I
where i FILL hx3!(x,y)
hf
Jtaf
r
ay t =
2 [ ~ - cos-,(2zY'~ ] J
J
\hf/J i
hm/2
~ . . . . axt/2---

4 aw/2
h, ( ~ae ~
zy, = + ~- cos \2(af + &) / Fig. 6. Plain weave fabric lamina cross-section: fill
direction.
Prediction of on-axes elastic properties of plain weave fabric composites 141

where
$'t'aw
axt =
_~[2z~;~
2 cos t~
\hw/
h~ [ n:a.
Zx, = - - ~ COS~, - - ~
2 2(a. + g . ) // 0.09rnrn--=~ O-&8mm

and Fig. 8. Actual geometry of the plain weave fabric lamina


cross-section: simulated.

hXl(X, y) = hw + h.,_ _ zxl(x, y) strands mathematically, which was otherwise not


2
possible if the same expression is used for zx~ and
hxz(x, y ) = zx,(x, y ) - zx2(x, y) zx2 and similarly for zy~ and zyz. These
x = 0---~awl2 (6) parameters only steepen the outer contour of the
strand cross-section without disturbing the
= 0 x = aw/2--->(aw + gw)/2
overall undulation of the strand. The slope of the
hx3(x, y) = hy3(y) fill strand is so maintained that at a given point in
hx4(x, y) = zxz(x, y) - hx3(x, y) all the sections across the loading direction the
slope of the strand is the same, i.e. the local off-axis
+ (hw + h,,)/2 + hf
angle of the fill strand, Of, is not a function of y.
The validity of the above expressions can be Similarly, the local off-axis angle of the warp
ascertained by comparing the optical micrograph strand, Ow, is not a function of x. The steepening
of the actual WF lamina cross-section along the of the outer contour and maintaining the same
fill direction (Fig. 7) and the simulated plot off-axis angle in all the planes across the loading
making use of the same strand parameters (Fig. direction at a given point make the cross-section
8). of the WF lamina unit cell unsymmetrical about
It can be seen in the above expressions that the its midplane. This can be seen in Fig. 1 which
parameter z~, would reduce to zero and ax, to aw presents the cross-sections of two adjacent unit
when the gap between the adjacent warp strands cells. Only the cross-sections at the midpoint of
is zero ( X - Z plane). Similarly, in the Y - Z plane, the strand (S0-S0) and the gap ($4-$4) are
zy, would reduce to zero and ay, to a~. The idea of symmetric about their midplanes. Here, asym-
introducing these parameters in the shape metry or symmetry indicates the presence or
functions is to simulate the gap between the absence of averaged coupling stiffness terms of
that cross-section, respectively. In all the other
sections it is seen that the thickness of the top
pure matrix layer is less than that of the bottom
pure matrix layer. With this, h~>h~ and h~'>h~
and ha'> h~. This is the behaviour in the region
AB (Fig. 1), whereas the behaviour is assumed to
be the reverse in the region BC. In other words,
the thickness of the pure matrix layer would be
more at the top than at the bottom in the region
BC. Mathematically, it means that the coupling
effect of region AB and BC are balancing each
other. This exercise is done to see that the
averaged coupling terms are zero for the unit
A C D E and this is true as the plain weave fabric
composites do not twist globally on extension.
This apparent twisting of the fabric on extension
was seen because of the shape function
considered. The other way of eliminating the
coupling terms is to pull the entire fabric in such
Fig. 7. Actual g e o m e t r y of the plain w e a v e fabric lamina a way that h ~ - h l in section S~-S1, h 2 - h 2 in
It __ ? tf ~ t

cross-section: scanning electron micrograph. section Sz-S2 and so on.


142 N. K. Naik, V. K. Ganesh

The volume of the pure matrix region in the written as (Ref. 17)
unit cell can be evaluated by calculating the
1 m4
thicknesses in the pure matrix region for the s,,(8) - - -

shape functions considered and then integrating EL(S) El.


to get the volume of the matrix in the pure 1 2VLT]m2n2+ n4
matrix region. The thickness ordinates in the
pure matrix region are given by hx,(x, y) and
I i
hx4(x, y) as given in expression (6). Knowing the &2(o) = (lO)
overall Vf of the WF lamina the strand Vf can be ET(0) ET
calculated. S12(0 ) ~-----VTL(0) _ VTL
2 _ m + --V'r'rn2
The strand fibre volume fraction is given by ET(0) ET ET
vw o 1 m2 n2
V~-~- W ° - V pm (7) s (o) = _ _ -- ..[_ _ _
GLT(0) GET Gvr
The transversely isotropic strand elastic con- where m = cos 8, n = sin 0.
stants can be evaluated from V~ and the fibre and For the fill strand the mean value of the
matrix properties. It should be noted here that compliance is expressed as
these properties are the properties of the straight
strand, i.e. the properties of the equivalent UD
lamina.
The elastic constants of the undulated strands
S~j=~
afo° Sij(O) dO (11)

In an actual WF lamina O is very small, and


along the global axes are to be determined in therefore the functions sin 0 and cos 0 can be
order to evaluate the global elastic constants of substituted by the first term of their Taylor series
the WF lamina. In the case of warp strands (Fig. in the integration of eqn (11).
4), it is done by transforming the compliance of Integrating eqn (11), the effective elastic
the warp strand for the off-axis angle at the constants of the fill strand are
midpoint of that slice. In the case of fill strands,
the effective mean value of the compliance is EL
calculated by considering sections of infinitesimal
thicknesses along the fill strand and transforming 1+5-
the compliance of these infinitesimal sections
along the global direction and then integrating
them in the interval ( 0 - ~ O 0 , Here, O~ is the Oz (12)
off-axis angle at x = (aw+gw)/2 i.e. the maxi-
mum off-axis angle.
GET
The local off-axis angle in the fill strand Of(x) is
(~fLT = (~2( G L T - 1)
expressed as
1 + 3 \GTr
0f(x) = tan -l d [zx2(x, y)]
After evaluating the reduced elastic constants
of the warp strand as explained earlier and of the
=tan- / _ --- sin } (8) fill strand by using eqn (12) in the slice, and also
\2(aw + gw) (aw + gw) considering the presence of pure matrix layers,
and in the warp strand it is expressed as the extensional stiffness of that slice can be
expressed as
d 1 4
Ow(y) = tan-'-d-y [Zy2(y)] A~(y) = ~ ~ hXk(X, Y)(Q_.ij)k (13)
k=l
1[ :rhf ~y
=tan-/ --- sin ] (9) where, hxk(x, y) and (Qij)k are the thicknesses
\2(af + g0 (ae--+gf) and mean transformed stiffness of the kth layer
The respective off-axis angle reduces the in the nth slice. Here, hxk(x, y) is evaluated at
effective elastic constants in the global X and Y constant x, for different values of y.
directions. The reduced compliance can be The thickness of the warp strand is maximum
Prediction of on-axes elastic properties of plain weave fabric composites 143

at x = 0 and zero from x = a , / 2 to x = ( a , + c


gw)/2. Therefore the mid thickness of the warp
strand is taken for the extensional stiffness
calculations i.e. the thickness hw is multiplied by
a factor [0.71a,/(a, + gw)]. The balance of the
thickness is assumed to be filled with pure
matrix.
From the extensional stiffness of the slices the
elastic constants of the unit cell are evaluated by
assembling the slices together under the isostrain
condition in all the slices, i.e. the averaged
in-plane extensional stiffness is evaluated. The (a) SERIES-PARALLEL COMBINATION
C'
averaged in-plane extensional stiffnesses of the
unit cell/WF lamina can be expressed as
2 ~(.,+go/2 S'

Aij = (af + gf) Jo A~!(y)dy (14)


Z X
A"
It can be seen from Fig. 4 that the unit cell is
not symmetric about its midplane and therefore
the coupling stiffness terms are present. But
owing to the nature of interlacing of the strands
in the plain weave fabric the coupling terms in z¢"
two adjacent unit cells of the WF lamina would (b) PARALLEL-SERIES COMBINATION
have opposite signs and therefore are zero for the Fig. 9. Plain weave fabric lamina unit ceil discretised into
slices and elements.
WF lamina as a whole. The elastic constants of
the unit cell/WF lamina can then be obtained
from the expressions: TM subdividing the slices into elements (1, 2, 3) of
infinitesimal thickness (Fig. 9). Then, within
Ex=A~,(1 A~2 ) these elements, the elastic constants of the warp
and fill strands are transformed for the local
Gxy=A66 (15) off-axis angle (Fig. 9) and CLT is used to
A~2 evaluate the stiffness of that element. The
Vyx A22 average in-plane compliance of the slices are
evaluated under the constant stress condition in
In the case of balanced plain weave fabrics the every element of that slice, i.e. the mean integral
Young's moduli in both fill and warp directions, value of the element compliance over the length
i.e. Ex and Ey, are the same. For an unbalanced of the slice along the fill strand are evaluated.
plain weave fabric, the Young's modulus in the From the compliances of the slices the stiffnesses
warp direction should be calculated by the same of the slices are calculated and then the elastic
procedure as in the fill direction. constants of .the unit cell are evaluated
considering a constant strain state in all the
2. 1.2 Element cirray model (EAM) slices. This procedure where the elements in the
The limitations of SAM are that this method slices are assembled in series (isostress condition)
approximates the stiffness contribution of the and then the slices are considered in parallel
warp strand and accounts for the gap between (isostrain condition) is one way of evaluating the
the adjacent warp strands approximately. It overall stiffness (Fig. 9(a)). Such a scheme is
should also be noted that when the maximum referred to as a series-parallel (SP) combination.
off-axis angle, O, is substantially high such that The other way is to make the slices across the
the first term of the Taylor series would not be loading direction as shown in Fig. 9(b). The slices
accurate enough to define the sine and cosine A', B' and C' are subdivided into elements.
functions, SAM would fail to give accurate Then the elements in the slices A ' , B' and C' are
results. assembled with isostrain condition to obtain the
In E A M these constraints are overcome by slice stiffness. The slice stiffnesses are inverted to
144 N. K. Naik, V. K. Ganesh

obtain the slice compliances. The slices A', B' 3 MODIFIED SIMPLE MODELS
and C' are placed in series along the loading
direction. The unit cell compliance is obtained by The simple models available in the literature are
the integrated average of the slice compliances. not accurate for the prediction of the elastic
The unit cell stiffnesses are obtained by inverting constants of 2-D plain weave fabric laminae.
the unit cell compliances. Thus is the parallel- Here, modifications are suggested to the existing
series (PS) combination. simple models, 3'4 which make the results of these
Here, the expressions used to define the models comparable with the refined model
undulation and the geometry of the strand predictions.
cross-section are the same as the ones used in
SAM, i.e. eqns (1)-(6). The strand Vf and the 3.1 Modified mosaic parallel model (MMPM)
local off-axis angle in fill and warp directions are
calculated from eqns (7), (8) and (9), respec- In the 1-D parallel model, 3 the fabric is idealised
tively. The elastic constants of the warp and fill as an assemblage of units of antisymmetric
strands within the element are transformed using crossply laminates placed in parallel across the
eqn (10). Then the stiffnesses of the elements are loading direction. Here, the continuity and
calculated from CLT. The elastic constants of the undulation of the strands are not considered. A
unit cell/WF lamina are then evaluated as constant midplane strain is assumed in order to
described earlier, i.e. by either a series-parallel evaluate the stiffness of the WF lamina. From
or parallel-series combination. this assumption the equations for the in-plane
In the SP combination (Fig. 9(a)), the average stiffness for a plain weave fabric lamina reduce to
of the slice coupling compliance, (b*~ , a, ~, in the
Aij = A~ (16)
n t h slice would be nullified by a similar slice in
the adjacent unit cell. But, the element coupling In the above model the crossply stiffnesses are
stiffness, (Bij) e~, and bending stiffness, (D~j)e~, calculated from the elastic properties of the UD
would increase the value of the element lamina at the strand Vt. Therefore the stiffnesses
" *'~ , on inversion. This
extensional compliance, taxi) predicted by the mosaic parallel model are much
would amount to local softening of the element higher than the experimental results. If the
and hence a reduction in the stiffness of the slice overall Vf of the WF lamina experimentally
and finally the WF lamina. But in a PS determined is used to evaluate the elastic
combination (Fig. 9(b)), the average of the slice properties of the UD lamina and then the mosaic
coupling stiffness in the nth slice, (B~j)S~, would be parallel model is used to predict the WF lamina
nullified by a similar slice in the adjacent unit stiffness properties, the results are in good
cell. In a PS combination, since the slice coupling agreement with the predictions of the refined
stiffnesses are zero, the slice extensional com- models as well as the experimental results.
*'~ , are not affected by the coupling
pliances,"~aij)
and bending stiffness terms on inversion. A PS 3.2 Modified Kabeika's model (MKM)
combination would therefore predict a higher
value of stiffness compared to a SP combination. In this model (Ref. 4), the WF lamina is idealised
In a WF lamina, locally induced moment as a three-layered laminate consisting of two
resultants would be present as a result of the undulated laminae in the crossply configuration
application of the in-plane stress resultants. For a (Fig. 10) and one pure matrix layer. Here,
plain weave fabric lamina, owing to the nature of the UD elastic properties of the undulated
interlacing the induced moment would be such laminae in the crossply configuration are reduced
that it constrains the local bending deformation. for undulation and then CLT is used to evaluate
This would amount to setting the element the elastic properties of the WF lamina.
curvature terms to zero. When this is done, both The local off-axis angle of the fill and warp
SP and PS combinations would give the same strands are expressed a s : 4
results. d [hw z~x~
In SAM the mean integral value was calculated 0f(x) = tan -1 ~ t - - cos - - t (17)
\2 aw/
by using an exact integration. But in E A M the
integration becomes complex and the integral Ow(y) = t a n - l - v - cos (18)
should therefore be evaluated numerically. uy
Prediction of on-axes elastic properties of plain weave fabric composites 145

Y stiffness of the WF lamina is evaluated using


J
CLT.
In this method, the thicknesses of the warp and
fill laminae are taken as the thicknesses of the
respective strands. But, in an actual case,
normally the strands are elliptically shaped with
maximum thickness at the mid section. This
YJ model would therefore give a higher stiffness
because the maximum strand thickness is
considered for calculations. Secondly, the pre-
sence of a gap is not accounted for.
The presence of a gap can be approximately
taken into account by replacing the strand width
by strand width plus the gap between the
~X corresponding adjacent strands in eqns (17)-
(19).
In order to account for the elliptical shape of
the strand, the strand thickness is factored to its
mid value while calculating the in-plane stiffness.
IZ h.,,, ,-",,,,(y) e~
The remaining thickness is taken as pure matrix
layer. The ordinate of the strans thickness
,y follows the sine function, therefore the mid
thickness of the warp and fill strand would be
Fig. 10. Plain weave fabric lamina--representation of hf = 0.707hf
interlacing. (21)
/~w= 0-707hw
The ratios hw/aw and hf/ae can be considered to If the gap is present, the average thickness can be
be very small for the actual strand configurations. approximated as
Hence the maximum off-axis angles in the fill and
warp directions are ae
/~f = 0"707h'((af + gf)) (22)
:rhw
Of =
2aw (19) hw= 0"707hw((aw+wgw))
:thf
Ow ~--
2ae
4 EXPERIMENTAL WORK
The reduced elastic properties of the equiv-
alent warp and fill laminae are evaluated by The experimental programme was designed to
finding the mean integral value of the local determine the elastic moduli of the WF lamina
compliance of the respective lamina. This is done along the warp and fill directions. The experi-
by transforming the compliance for the local ments were carried out on E-glass/epoxy and
off-axis angle and then integrating the trans- carbon/epoxy laminae. The thickness of the
formed compliance. E-glass fabric was 0.2 mm, and the warp and fill
The average compliance may be expressed as thread counts were 15 per cm, while the
thickness of the carbon fabric was 0.16 mm and
S0= ~ S0(t~) d 0 (20) its warp and fill thread counts were 8-8 per cm. It
may be noted that even though the number of
The above expression can be used for both counts are the same along the warp and fill
warp and fill strands by inserting the respective directions, the fabrics are not balanced because
strand geometrical and elastic parameters. of different gaps along the warp and fill directions
Inverting the compliance, the effective elastic and hence a different degree of undulation. The
properties can be found. Knowing the effective epoxy resin LY556 with hardener HY951
elastic properties of the equivalent laminae, the supplied by Cibatul, India, was used and the
146 N. K. Naik, V. K. Ganesh

laminae were prepared at room temperature in a Table 1. Elastic properties of fibre and matrix
specially designed matched die mould. The
Material
overall fibre volume fractions of the laminae (GPa) (OPa) (GPa) (GPa)
were determined as described in the ASTM
specification D 3171. Fibre
Carbon t9 230-0 40-0 24-0 14-3 0-26
Static tensile test specimens were prepared E-glass~ 72.0 72.0 27-7 27.7 0-30
according to ASTM specification D 3039. The Graphite 19 388.0 7.2 6.8 2-4 0-23
laminae thicknesses of the E-glass/epoxy and Matrix
epoxy~ 3.5 3.5 1.3 1.3 0-35
carbon/epoxy composites were less than the
minimum required by ASTM D3039. Since no Isotropic.
other standards are available for such testing, the
same standard was used for the specimens made
from WF laminae. The tests were performed on a In order to examine the micromechanical
Lloyd M50K machine. The specimens were approaches for the prediction of the elastic
tested at room temperature (27°C) at a crosshead constants of a WF lamina, three material systems
speed of 1 mm/min. A total of 40 specimens was with different weave geometries were considered.
tested. The scatter range for carbon/epoxy for Ey The elastic properties of the fibres and matrix are
was 56-61 GPa and for Ex it was 47-50 GPa. For given in Table 1. Assumed geometry within the
E-glass/epoxy, the scatter range was 17-21 GPa. practical range was taken for the graphite/epoxy
The mean values of the test results are presented material system in order to study the sensitivity
in the next section. of the fabric geometry on the elastic properties of
The geometrical parameters of the fabric were the WF lamina. The fabric geometrical para-
determined by means of an optical microscope at meters of carbon/epoxy and E-glass/epoxy WF
a magnification of 20. laminae are the actual dimensions measured with
an optical microscope (Table 2). These two
material systems were considered to compare the
5 RESULTS A N D DISCUSSION results of the proposed models with the
experimental results. Table 3 presents the
Two fabric composite models have been pre- measured V~' and the corresponding calculated
sented for the on-axes elastic analysis of 2-D V~. In the case of the graphite/epoxy WF lamina,
orthogonal plain weave fabric laminae. The V~' was calculated from a V~ of 0.8. The
models consider the actual strand cross-sectional maximum V~ was assumed to be 0.8 to ensure
geometry and the presence of a gap between the that the fibres do not become contiguous. In the
adjacent strands. An analytical technique to above calculations the V~ values of the warp and
evaluate VI from V~' determined experimentally fill strands were assumed to be the same and this
is also presented. The shape functions considered assumption is valid as the diameter of the fibres
are compared with a scanning electron micro- in the warp and fill strands are the same and the
graph. The shape functions agree well with the processing conditions are the same.
actual geometry of the WF lamina. It is seen from Table 3, that V~' is almost half
Some approximations are incorporated in of V~. This is possible in the case of a plain
SAM in order to reduce the computational weave fabric lamina because of the number and
complexity without compromising on the final size of pure resin pockets present. It may not be
results for actual WF lamina configurations. possible to achieve a V~' of about 0.5 and above
These approximations would predict slightly in the case of plain weave fabric laminae. With
higher stiffness compared to EAM. In E A M two this the maximum V~ of 0-7-0.8 would have been
combinations of assembling the element stiffness attained.
are presented. In the SP combination, the local Table 4 presents the elastic properties of the
bending deformations can be considered or they UD lamina at VI and V~' calculated from the
can be assumed to be constrained by locally composite cylinder assemblage (CCA) model. 15,16
induced moments. The assumption that the local With these U D lamina properties and different
bending deformations are constrained is realistic models described in the preceding sections and
considering the nature of interlacing of the plain Ref. 4, the elastic properties of the WF laminae
weave fabric composites. considered were predicted. In the case of the
Prediction of on-axes elastic properties of plain weave fabric composites 147

Table 2. Plain weave fabric lamina strand and weave geometrical parameters

Material Fill strand W a r p strand H V~


(mm)
af hf gf aw hw gw
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)

Carbon/epoxy 0.96 0.08 0-18 1.10 0-08 0.04 0.16 0.44 a


E-Glass/epoxy 0-62 0-10 0-05 0.62 0.10 0.05 0-20 0.42 a
Graphite/epoxy 2.00 0-50 0,50 2-00 0.50 0.50 1-00 0.41 b

a Determined experimentally.
b Calculated from strand Vf of 0.80.

Table 3. Overall Vf and the corresponding strand Vf Table 4. Elastic properties of UD lamina using CCA model
Material Overall Vf (Vf°) Strand Vf (V~) Material EL ET GLT Gaa- VLT Vf
(GPa) (GVa) (GPa) (GPa)
Carbon/epoxy 0-44 0.78
E-Glass/epoxy 0.42 0-70 Carbon/epoxy 182.50 18-50 7-55 6.70 0.28 0.78
Graphite/epoxy 0-41 0.80 105.40 8.60 3.00 3.00 0.40 0-44
E-Glass/epoxy 5 1 . 5 0 17-50 5.80 6.60 0.31 0.70
32.25 8.55 2.85 3.10 0.39 0.42
E-glass/epoxy WF lamina, the strand appeared, Graphite/epoxy 311.00 6.30 4-40 2,10 0.25 0.80
when seen through an optical microscope, to 161.00 5.00 2-27 1,70 0-30 0.41
have a slight twist. Ideally, the UD lamina
properties evaluated using the CCA model calculations. But, in this case, as the angle of
should be multiplied by the fibre-to-strand twist was small the translation efficiency factor
property translation efficiency factor and then was taken as unity. The predicted results are
these properties should be used for further tabulated in Table 5.

Table 5. Elastic properties of plain weave fabric lamina: Comparison of predicted and
experimental results

Material Model Er Ex Gxy Wx V7


(GPa) (GPa) (GPa)

Carbon/epoxy SAM 58.9 52-4 5.1 0.07


EAM--PS 57-1 51-2 4-7 0.10
--SP 35.6 35.4 4.7 0-10
MMPM 57.6 57.6 3.0 0.07
MKM 64.8 58.5 5.3 0.04 0.44
Experiment 60.3 49.3 -- --
Kabelka's method
(Ref, 4) 89.3 89-3 7,0 0.04
E-Glass/epoxy SAM 20-3 20.3 3,7 0-23
EAM--PS 19.6 19.6 3.7 0.20
raSP 17-9 17.9 3-7 0.20
MMPM 20.7 20-7 2.9 0.17
MKM 21.7 21.5 3.9 0.13 0.42
Experiment 19-3 19-3 -- --
Kabeika's method
(Ref. 4) 29.2 29.2 4.9 0-12
Graphite/epoxy SAM 28.8 28-8 2.8 0.08
EAM--PS 23-7 23.7 2.8 0-12
--SP 16.2 16.2 2.8 0.12
MMPM 80.1 80-1 2-3 0.02
MKM 32.2 32.2 3.0 0-04 0.41
Experiment . . . .
Kabelka's method
(Ref. 4) 44-3 44.3 3.7 0.03

MMPM--Modified mosaic parallel model,


MKM--Modified Kabeika's model.
148 N. K. Naik, V. K. Ganesh

The unit cell was subdivided into 50 slices the E-glass/epoxy and graphite/epoxy WF
parallel to the loading direction in SAM. In laminae whereas they are different for the
E A M , the unit cell was subdivided into 50 slices. carbon/epoxy WF lamina. For the carbon/epoxy
The slices were along the loading direction in the WF lamina, since aw > af and gw < g~, one would
SP combination whereas they were across the expect E,. to be greater than Ex. Such results are
loading direction in the PS combination. For obtained from SAM and PS. For SP, the trend
both the SP and PS combinations, each slice was can be different depending upon the effect of
further subdivided into 50 elements. Hence, the coupling terms. The contribution of the absolute
total n u m b e r of elements was 2500. This was values of the coupling terms is more in the
arrived at after a convergence study. In the case overlap region than in the gap region.
of carbon/epoxy and E-glass/epoxy, the ex- In the case of the carbon/epoxy and
perimental values of Young's moduli along the E-glass/epoxy WF laminae the difference in
warp and fill directions are also presented in results of SAM and PS is less, but the results of
Table 5. The comparison of the predicted results PS in the case of a graphite/epoxy WF lamina are
by SAM, PS, the modified mosaic parallel model considerably lower than the results predicted by
(MMPM) and the modified Kabelka's model SAM. This is due to the lower strand thickness to
(MKM) exhibit good agreement with the strand width (h/a) ratio in the case of
experimental results in the case of carbon/epoxy carbon/epoxy and E-glass/epoxy WF laminae
and E-glass/epoxy. and higher h/a for graphite/epxoy WF lamina.
The local bending deformation is considered in Recalling SAM, in order to consider the net
SP and therefore the results of SP are lower effect of the warp strand, warp strand thickness
compared to the results of PS. But, in an actual was factored to its mid value and the effect of the
plain weave fabric lamina, local bending gap was taken into account approximately. The
deformations due to the coupling effect in each difference in the results of SAM and PS is due to
unit cell can be assumed to be constrained. The this approximation in SAM. The approximation
results of PS in which the element coupling terms seems to be valid when the h/a ratio is low as the
do not affect the slice compliance are therefore slope of the strand outer contour would be small
taken as realistic. It should be noted that the and the thickness of the strand would be nearly
results of PS with or without the coupling terms uniform along the strand width. In PS, the slices
would be the same and the results of SP without are subdivided further into elements and the
the coupling terms would be the same as the thickness of the warp strand at the midpoint of
results of PS. The results presented in Table 5 that element is considered while calculating the
against SP combination are the results obtained stiffness. Therefore, this m e t h o d would give
considering the local bending deformations. consistent results for all h/a ratios and the results
Comparing the results of PS and SP of E A M , would always be less than that of SAM. The only
it can be seen that the coupling terms have drawback of PS is that it involves more
affected the carbon/epoxy WF lamina results calculations and therefore consumes more com-
more than the E-glass/epoxy or graphite/epoxy putational time.
WF lamina results. This is due to less undulation General evaluation of approximate methods is,
in carbon/epoxy WF lamina and larger EL/ET of course, impossible. The validity of the
ratio of the equivalent carbon/epoxy U D lamina. modified simple models, i.e. M M P M and MKM,
This would increase the absolute value of the is therefore assessed only on the basis of
coupling terms and thereby lead to greater local individual cases. Two actual WF laminae
softening. In the case of the graphite/epoxy WF configurations and one assumed geometry case
lamina, although its equivalent U D EL/E.r ratio were considered to assess the modified simple
is high, the effect of coupling terms is smaller, by models. The assumed geometry case was
comparison with the carbon/epoxy WF lamina, considered to evaluate the modified simple
because of the greater undulation of the strands. models at a high level of undulation and for the
It may be noted that the E-glass and graphite sake of generality.
plain weave fabrics considered are balanced The results obtained from the refined models,
whereas the carbon plain weave fabric is modified simple models and a simple model (Ref.
unbalanced (Table 2). Hence, the elastic moduli 4) are tabulated in Table 5. The simple model
along the warp and fill directions are the same for presented in Ref. 4 is only for close weave and
Prediction of on-axes elasticproperties of plain weavefabric composites 149

hence it does not take the presence of a gap into are constant for all h/a ratios and a given gap.
account. For the present calculations, therefore, This is true because the variation of h/a would
the gap was assumed to be equal to zero. The correspondingly reduce the total thickness of the
results of MMPM compare well with the results lamina and the volume of pure matrix regions,
of refined models in the case of carbon/epoxy thereby keeping V~' constant. This clearly
and E-glass/epoxy WF laminae and is grossly indicates that MMPM gives the same result for
inaccurate for a graphite/epoxy WF lamina. But all h/a ratios for a given material system and gap.
the results of MKM compare well for the Figure 12 shows the variation of V~' and V~ as a
E-glass/epoxy WF lamina and not so well for function of the gap width to strand width (g/a)
graphite/epoxy and carbon/epoxy WF laminae. ratio. Here, it is seen that V~ reduces with the
MMPM gives an accurate prediction for same V~ as the gap increases. Now, with this
carbon/epoxy and E-glass/epoxy WF laminae, observation it can be shown that MMPM
because these WF laminae configurations have considers the gap indirectly, i.e. with the
lower h/a ratios. It may be noted that while presence of the gap, V~' falls and correspondingly
formulating this model the presence of undula- alters the equivalent U D elastic constants. MKM
tion was ignored and lower h/a amounts to considers the effect of the reduced Vf by
undulation angle tending to zero. The authen- considering the balance of the factored warp and
ticity of this can be verified by comparing the fill layer thicknesses as a pure matrix layer.
results of MMPM with the results of the refined The predicted values of Gxy and vxy are also
models in the case of a graphite/epoxy WF presented in Table 5. In general, the refined and
lamina. Here, it is seen that MMPM gives very modified simple models give lower values of WF
high modulus values as it does not consider the lamina G~y, whereas these models give higher
undulation whereas the undulation is the values of Vxy compared to the simple model. The
principal parameter which reduces the stiffness in lower values of G~y are due to the lower value of
the case of a graphite/epoxy WF lamina. V~' and the presence of undulation. The higher
The prediction of MKM compares well with values of Vxy occur for the same reasons. The
the results of refined models compared to the values of Gxy were evaluated by carrying out the
results of MMPM for the fabric structures having analysis along the warp and fill directions
higher h/a, i.e. for graphite/epoxy. For the case separately in the case of carbon/epoxy WF
of a carbon/epoxy WF lamina, though the lamina. The same results were obtained in both
prediction is not as accurate as that of MMPM, cases.
the results are also not grossly inaccurate. This is The degree of undulation depends on the
because MKM mainly considers the stiffness h/(a + g) ratio. Lower h/(a + g) ratio indicates a
reduction due to the presence of undulation and lower degree of undulation and vice versa. Figure
the undulation is quite small for a carbon/epoxy 11 presents the effect of the hw/aw ratio on E~ as
WF lamina. a function of gap (gw) for a balanced, plain weave
The stiffness reduction in a WF lamina is fabric lamina with aw = af, hw = hf and gw = gf. It
mainly due to the lower V~' and the presence of is obvious from the plot that as the hw/aw ratio
undulation in the strands as compared to the U D increases for a given gap, Ex reduces. This is
crossply laminates. MMPM considers the re- attributed to the fact that as the hw/aw ratio
duced V~' by considering the strand properties at increases, the effect of undulation is increased.
V~', but does not consider the undulation of The reduction in E~ is steeper for larger values of
strands. This model is therefore applicable for gw. As seen from Fig. 11, the presence of larger
fabric structures having very much less undula- gw can further reduce the undulation and
tion. It is worth noting here that most of the consequently the higher value of E~ is obtained
actual woven fabrics used in structural applica- than with lower values of gw until an optimum
tions and made of high modulus fibres have lower hw/aw value is reached. The trend would be the
h/a ratios. There can be a combination of Vf and reverse above the optimum value of the hw/aw
undulation which would give practically the same ratio. In other words, in this range, lower values
results by MMPM and MKM. This can be seen in of Ex would be obtained with higher values of gw
the case of E-glass/epoxy WF lamina. Figure 11 than with lower values of gw.
shows the variation of V~' and V~ as a function of The variation of Ex as a function of gw/aw for
h/a ratio. Here, it is seen that both V~' and V~ different hw/aw ratios is presented in Fig. 12 for a
150 N. K. Naik, V. K. Ganesh

100 GRAPHITE /EPOXY 1-0


k
-

~,,B----- gw l a w = 0-5 Ow= 2'0 mm


90

I 0.8
80 -- _ ~ ~ ' S T R AND Vf
" ~ gw = 0"5 mm

70
0'6
o 60
O.
-o /)'\
50
t,L,l 0.4
\~. --OVERALL Vf
40 _ ~N~ gw = 0"5mm

30
0,2

20

10 1 I l I O-0
0"0 0-1 0"2 0"3 0"4 05
hw/a w
]Fig. 1]. Variation of K~ and Vr as a function of h~/a,~.

balanced, plain weave fabric lamina. The effect that the optimum gap would give the maximum
of gwiS twofold. As the gap is increased, possible elastic moduli. In addition to this, the
obviously V~' would decrease with the same V~, fabrics with gaps between adjacent strands, i.e.
in turn the elastic moduli would reduce. On the open weave fabrics, provide better wettability
other hand, the presence of a gap would reduce and in turn better performance of the WF
the degree of undulation and hence the elastic lamina/laminate. It is seen from Fig. 12 that as
moduli would increase. From this it is obvious gw/awincreases, Ex increases until an optimum gw
40- -1-0
GRAPHITE /EPOXY
a w = 2"0 mrn

hw/aw= 0.15
0"8
""STRAND V~
3s = "r-~

h w / a W = 0-2 0'6
A
o __~_ .,c ~
(1.

X
uJ 0'4

0'2
hw/aw= 0"3

1 I I I 0.0
0'0 0"2 0,4 0"6 0"8 1"0
gw/aw
Fig. 12. Variation of Ex and Vt as a function of gw/aw.
Prediction of on-axes elasticproperties of plain weave fabric composites 151

is reached, and thereafter it decreases. For larger Ministry of Defence, Government of India,
h/a ratios, the numerical value of the optimum Grant No. Aero/RD-134/100/10/90-91/659.
gap is greater than for lower values of h/a ratios.
For certain combinations of fabric geometrical REFERENCES
parameters, the optimum gap can be zero, as 1. Raju, I. S., Foye, R. L. & Avva, V. S., A review of
seen for hw/aw=O.15. Even though the per- analytical methods for fabric and textile composites.
centage gain in Ex due to optimum gw may not be Proceedings of the Indo-US Workshop on Composites
for Aerospace Application: Part I, Indian Institute of
considerable, the magnitude of gap achieved can Science, Bangalore, July 1990. pp. 129-59.
be significant enough to facilitate better wet- 2. Halpin, J. C., Jerine, K. & Whitney, J. M., The
tability and formability. The gain in Ex as laminate analogy for 2 and 3 dimensional composite
materials. J. Composite Mater., 5 (1971) 36-49.
presented in Fig. 12 is the absolute value. The 3. Chou, T. W. & Ishikawa, T., Analysis and modeling of
gain in terms of specific modulus would be much two-dimensional fabric composites. In Textile Structural
higher owing to the difference in densities of fibre Composites, ed. Chou, T. W. & Ko, F. K. Elsevier
Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1989, pp. 209-64.
and matrix. It may be noted that Figs 11 and 12 4. Kabelka, J., Prediction of the thermal properties of
are plotted by using SAM. fibre-resin composites. In Developments in Reinforced
For the balanced plain weave fabric lamina, Plastics--3, ed. Pritchard, G. Elsevier Applied Science
the properties along the warp and fill directions Publishers, London, 1984, pp. 167-202.
5. Raju, I. S., Craft, W. J. & Avva, V. S., Thermal
are the same. Hence, the discussion relating to expansion characteristics of woven fabric composites.
Ex along the fill direction and Ey along the warp Proceedings of the International Conference on
direction are the same. For the unbalanced, plain Advances in Structural Testing, Analysis and Design,
Vol. 1, Bangalore, July 1990. Tata McGraw-Hill, New
weave fabric lamina, the same analysis can be Delhi, pp. 3-10.
used along the warp direction to obtain Ey. 6. Whitcomb, J. D., Three-dimensional stress analysis of
plain weave composites. Paper presented at the 3rd
Symposium on Composite Materials: Fatigue and
Fracture, Orlando, Florida, October 1989.
6 CONCLUSIONS 7. Zhang, Y. C. & Harding, J., A numerical micromecha-
nics analysis of the mechanical properties of a plain
The predictions of the refined models have been weave composite. Computers and Structures, 36 (1990)
evaluated by comparison with the results of an 839-44.
experimental programme. It is seen that the 8. Ishikawa, T. & Chou, T. W., One-dimensional
micromechanical analysis of woven fabric composites.
predictions of the refined models match well with AIAA J., 21 (1983) 1714-21.
the experimental results. It should be noted that 9. Ishikawa, T. & Chou, T. W., Stiffness and strength
certain limitations are inherent in the use of behaviour of woven fabric composites. J. Mater. Sci., 17
(1982) 3211-20.
modified simple models in terms of the range of 10. Ishikawa, T. & Chou, T. W., Elastic behavior of woven
applicability. The results obtained from the hybrid composites. J. Composite Mater., 16 (1982)
modified simple models, however, certaintly 2-19.
11. Ishikawa, T. & Chou, T. W., In-plane thermal
indicate that these techniques, when used with expansion and thermal bending co-efficients of fabric
some judgment, are very satisfactory engineering composites. J. Composite Mater., 17 (1983) 92-104.
tools. 12. Ishikawa, T. & Chou, T. W., Thermo-mechanical
The refined model, SAM, was used to study analysis of hybrid fabric composites. J. Mater. Sci., 18
(1983) 2260-8.
the effect of h/a and g/a on the WF lamina 13. Ishikawa, T., Matsushima, M., Hayashi, Y. & Chou, T.
longitudinal modulus and V~'. It is seen that there W., Experimental confirmation of the theory of elastic
is a significant effect of the h/a ratio on the moduli of fabric composites. J. Composite Mater., 19
(1985) 443-58.
longitudinal modulus, but V~' is constant for all 14. Dow, N. F. & Ramnath, V., Analysis of Woven Fabrics
h/a ratios. With the optimum gap between the for Reinforced Composite Materials, NASA-CR-
two adjacent strands, the specific stiffness would 178275, (1987).
15. Hashin, Z., Theory of Fibre Reinforced Materials.
be the highest. The overall Vf of the WF lamina NASA-CR-1974, (1972).
reduces with the increase in the gap between the 16. Hashin, Z., Analysis of composite materials--A survey.
adjacent strands with the same strand Vf. J. Appl. Mech., 50 (1983) 481-505.
17. Lekhnitskii, S. G., Theory of Elasticity of an
Anisotropic Body. Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1963.
18. Tsai, S. W. & Hahn, H. T., Introduction to Composite
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Materials. Technomic Publishing Co., Lancaster, PA
1980.
This work was supported by the Structures Panel, 19. Engineered Materials Handbook, Vol. 1. American
Aeronautics Research & Development Board, Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1989.
152 N. K. Naik, V. K. Ganesh

APPENDIX transverse Young's modulus are bracketed by


close bounds. The bounds of G17- are given by
The composite cylinder assemblage (CCA) v,
model (Refs 15 and 16) gives simple closed form G-rr~-~ = G ~ +
1 (km + 2G~-r)Vm
analytical expressions for the effective composite +
moduli EL, GeT, VET and k, while the moduli GTr G~r - G~r 2G~n~r(km+ G~r)
and ET are bracketed by close bounds. Here, the
UD composite is modelled as an assemblage of
long composite cylinders consisting of the inner
circular fibre and the outer concentric matrix v - v ~ 1 + (,~v~ + W
shell. The fibre and matrix are considered to be when
transversely isotropic.
The transverse bulk modulus of the UD G ~ > G-~ and k' > k m
composite is given by Whereas
km(k e + G ~ ) ( 1 - G) + U ( k m + G ~ ) V f v~
k- G'rr(+) = G~r +
(k' + G~'-r)(1 - Vr) + (k m + G~r)Vf 1 (km + 2G~)Vm
+
Here GfTr -- G-~r 2G-~r(k m + G-~-r)
1 4 4V~T 1 (1 + t~,)v, ]
ke E~- E[ G~
1 4 4VLmT 1 P-'\ (av~-fl,))J
km E~ E~ G~ when
The longitudinal Young's modulus of the UD G~ < G~ and k f < k"
composite is given by Here
EL = EfLVf + E'~Vm
fl, - yfl~ Y+ fl,
4(VII - V~T)2Vm Vf c~= l + y f l 2 P= y-I
+
V.,/U + Vf/k m + 1 / G ~ k~ kf
The longitudinal Poisson's ratio and shear fi~ - k m + 2G~ flz = U + 2G~-v
modulus are given by f m
y = G'rr/G'rr Vm = 1 -- Vf
VLT= v~TV,+ v~TVm The bounds of ET are given by
( v [ T - v'~O(1/k ~ - 1/U)VW,,,
+ 4kG~±)
Vm/k f + Vf/k m + |/G~-r
ET(~) -- k + mG-r-r(~)
G~V~. + G'~T(1 + Vd
G ~ = G~mT. where
G~T(1 + V,) + GfLTVm 4kV2T
m = l + ~
The transverse shear modulus and the EL

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen