Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Garrett Schuetz
MWF 11:45
Lens Essay
In Just Mercy, author Bryan Stevenson is a lawyer who specializes in death row cases in
Montgomery, Alabama, and founded the EJI (Equal Justice Initiative) to help wrongly convicted
people get a fair trial and a shot at freedom. Just Mercy is a personal narrative about the legal
cases that Stevenson worked on throughout the years and primarily focuses on the injustices of
race, demographic, and mental illnesses, as well as the need to remove the death penalty for
children. Throughout the book, Stevenson establishes himself as a credible lawyer in his
community taking on cases of racial injustice and wrongful sentencing, and by doing so, attempts
to persuade the reader to make a change for the good of society. Throughout Just Mercy,
Stevenson demonstrates incredible knowledge and insight into his cases, sharing his clients’
The reason that I chose Patricia Hill Collins On Intellectual Activism to be my lens is
because the ideas that she mentions throughout the book show the purpose for which Stevenson
wrote Just Mercy. One idea that she frequently talks about is the dual audience that exists within
writing, typically between the scholarly and the public. Stevenson provides this by recounting
specific details from his legal cases that changed the outcome in his favor. In Collins book, she
talks about speaking the truth to people and the truth to power to change the current state of the
social hierarchy. When I read Just Mercy, I interpreted the book as a call to action because of the
explicit injustice throughout it, and feel that anyone reading it should be shocked with the current
state of the criminal justice system and should fight to reform it. Since the judges, police officers,
Schuetz 2
and the prison guards are in a position of superior power, we need them to uphold the standard
that society has entrusted to them. Stevenson is able to bring the current problems that we face
such as bias and discrimination to light in his book through firsthand accounts and I believe if the
Just Mercy features strong instances of injustices of race, demographic, and mental
illnesses, and also explains the need to remove the death penalty for children. Stevenson displays
himself throughout the book as being credible, dedicated to his job, and thorough in his
investigations by using his experiences as a lawyer. One of the main focuses in On Intellectual
Activism is appealing to a specific/dual audience, and in order to accomplish that, you need to
gain credibility with the audience. Just Mercy author Bryan Stevenson establishes credibility
with his readers and indirectly claims that his appeals to the law should be heard and seriously
considered. Although there is no way to know if Stevenson was at all influenced by On
Intellectual Activism, both authors share many similar ideas in regards to speaking to power and
One main technique featured in Just Mercy can be described through this quote from
Collins, “One form of intellectual activism aims to speak the truth to power. This form of
truth-telling harnesses the power of ideas toward the specific goal of confronting existing power
relations. On a metaphorical level, speaking the truth to power invokes images of changing the
very foundations of social hierarchy where the less powerful take on the ideas and practices of
the powerful, often armed solely with their ideas.” (Collins, P. 12). This quote accurately
describes why and how Stevenson wrote Just Mercy, he spoke the explicit truth about the
injustices he and his clients have faced in order to promote social change. Since Just Mercy is
Schuetz 3
written to promote social and political change, you need to speak the truth to the two audiences
that have the reach to make changes, the scholarly and the general public.
Collin’s frameworks explain why Stevenson chose to write Just Mercy and present
information about his legal cases. Since Stevenson is a lawyer (or a “pure insider” as Collins
calls it), he has inside information that he is able to share with the general public that would
otherwise be hidden (Collins, P. 11). Stevenson tells the complete truth and speaks about his
inside information can be demonstrated during the McMillian trial, where even though the judge
knew that the african american jury members were being kept from entering the court, he
claimed it was just an excuse and punished Walter for it (Stevenson, P. 84). If the general public
knew that was happening, it would have been all over the newspaper and the judge would most
Another passage from On Intellectual Activism that talks about the truth-telling strategies
Stevenson used in Just Mercy can be found on page 13, where Collins says, “A second strategy
of intellectual activism aims to speak the truth to the people. In contrast to directing energy to
those in power, a focus that inadvertently bolsters the belief that elites are the only social actors
who count, those who speak the truth to people talk directly to the masses.” (Collins, P. 13).
Stevenson’s Just Mercy has two primary audiences, the first being regular people who can all get
together to promote change, and the second being people in power, who can read about the
injustices and have the power to enact change. Reading Just Mercy using this quote explains how
Stevenson is able to target a large audience that is able to make change, whether that be people in
power or people who can all stand together to make a difference. The way that Stevenson writes
Schuetz 4
Just Mercy is interesting because he gives very detailed explanations of what is happening, but
yet simple enough for the general population to understand. When mentioning terms that people
who aren’t lawyers wouldn’t understand, Stevenson explains them in a simple way so that
everyone can comprehend what the book is saying with little effort. Stevenson also knows a
great deal of information about his clients and is able to use it to his advantage when speaking to
power. For example, in the case of Trina Garnett, “46 percent of the city’s children were living
below the federal poverty level” and that Trina was going to the “worst-ranked public school
system among Pennsylvania’s 501 districts.” (Stevenson, P 197). Stevenson speaks the truth to
power by introducing new information that would make anyone in their right mind reconsider the
sentencing. By doing this, Stevenson is able to broaden his audience to not only the scholarly (or
those in power), but also the general public, gaining a wider audience and more support.
Throughout Just Mercy, Stevenson uses strong but necessary language as well as
influential information to make the reader feel a sense of injustice that needs to be fixed. Much
like Mari Evans’ poem “Speak the Truth to People”, stevenson attempts “to speak the truth to the
public about issues as diverse as racism” and others (Collins, P. 9). The way in which Stevenson
writes is very analytical, listing chronologically the shortcomings that have happened in his
client’s life. For example, when describing Trina Garnett’s timeline, Stevenson mentions the
moment when her father “beat the [pet dog] to death with a hammer and threw its limp body out
a window” (Stevenson, P. 197). This quote uses the raw truth-telling power that Collins talks
about and makes the readers truly understand the gravity of the situation. If the reader knew
nothing about this, they might not understand why Garnett suffers with mental health problems
later on in her life. Telling the detailed truth about Garnett makes his message have a dual
Schuetz 5
audience, with the details being specific enough for scholarly consideration, but colloquial
enough for the public to understand it. Stevenson attempts to take on the “very foundations of
social hierarchy” by informing the public of the current unfair justice system, exposing the
corrupt ways in which people are prosecuted (Collins, P. 13). Stevenson also speaks the “truth to
power” by identifying key examples of injustice within the court system, and also proposes
solutions that could resolve those injustices (Collins, P. 13). Since Stevenson’s main goal of
writing Just Mercy is for laws to be reformed for children being tried as adults during death row
cases, and to eliminate the racial and socioeconomic bias being held in the criminal justice
system, targeting the two audiences who are able to create change is a strong technique that
Works Cited
Collins, Patricia Hill. On intellectual activism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2013.
Stevenson, Bryan. Just mercy: A story of justice and redemption. Spiegel & Grau, 2015.
Schuetz 7
Author’s Writing Analytically says that “an important goal for writers is
to develop confidence in their ability to evaluate their own
Note work” (p. 143). Below are some rubrics (guides) to help you
review your work and pinpoint any last places for revision
before you submit your draft. Once you complete all these
sections, add this sheet to the top of your draft
Section 1. Short list of Things that Go Wrong” from Writing
Analytically p. 144 Read your draft and complete the table below. If you answer
yes to any of the questions, use WA 144-145 to identify a revision strategy and include
it below
Do you plug Do you Do you put Do you Do you Do you Are you
in assume evidence reduce substitute a offer a locked into
quotations the next to complex familiar, general five
from meaning claims subjects preconceive impression paragraph
readings as of words without to single, d point-- of a forms that
answers, (e.g. story, explaining overly some kind of reading, make you
but leave truth, how you general, cultural without list, instead
the quotes death) to derived the usual cliche like in referencin of analyze?
to speak for be self claim from unqualifie today’s g specific
themselves evident? the d claims? society--f or words or
? evidence? what is in a details?
reading?
Course Learning Course Meets expectations Does not meet
Goals Outcomes expectations
Critical thinking Use writing You collaborated with your You worked with your writing
The ability to processes as writing group in ways that group in a way that did not
identify, reflect tools for follow our community follow our community
upon, evaluate, learning and agreement, you reflected on agreement, you did not submit
integrate, and apply discover your challenges and successes author’s notes, and did not
different types of in author’s notes, and revised revise your writing
information and your writing using the feedback
knowledge to form you received.
independent
judgments. You will I turned in my drafts on time,
experience writing gave feedback to my writing
and other critical group, and revised my draft.
thinking processes
as a way to learn. Read and Your essay makes an argument Your essay only analyzes Just
analyze text for about how to best Mercy or the lens text, without
audience, read/understand/value Just connecting the two to make
speaker/writer, Mercy, drawing on a conceptual an argument.
purpose, lens from another text to make
message, and that argument
context
I use Collin’s text as a
way/beliefs system to
demonstrate Stevenson’s
ideas
Complexity Compose text You work closely with Just Mercy Your essay generalizes about
An approach to that resist by applying a concept from the relationship between texts,
understanding the overly another text to your reading of maybe only evaluating them
world that simplistic Just Mercy. Y ou support those without focusing on specific
appreciates binary thinking analyses with evidence from features and without using
ambiguity and both texts. evidence from the texts.
nuance as well as
Compose text
clarity and precision. Brought up specific examples
that engages
You increasingly from both texts that relate to
various
sensitive to the each other in a new and
perspectives
significance of insightful way
about text
cultural difference.
Communication Compose Your essay makes careful Your analysis jumps from
Interacting effective text rhetorical decisions about how ideas in ways that do not show
effectively with for audience to arrange your ideas so an the relationship between
different audiences, academic reader finds you them.
especially through credible
writing, speech, and
Schuetz 9
Section 3. Revision plan
Based on all the feedback you received, and your work above on these
self-evaluating rubrics, what is your plan for revising your essay?
1. I think I can introduce more specific quotes into my writing instead of relying on the main idea of
the quote