Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
directly posterior to the patients implanted pacemaker. The physician order calls for a
elevated daily doses.1 This situation presents several concerns and difficulties, as it is very
important to maintain patient safety when designing and implementing a treatment plan with
curative intent.
The location of pacemakers must be strongly considered as they contain and make use of
complementary metal oxide semiconductors (CMOS), which are highly susceptible to ionizing
and electromagnetic radiation.2 At my clinical site, AAPM TG-34 recommendations are followed
which suggest that radiation therapy patients with implanted pacemakers be planned so as to
limit accumulated dose to the pacemaker to 2 gray.3 There is also communication with nursing
and physics to determine the specific device model and whether or not more stringent dose
restrictions must be followed. Physicians will often determine that the device can or cannot be
moved prior to the CT simulation for planning. In the event that the device could be moved
superiorly, full arcs could be used with heavily restrictive constraints on the pacemaker to reduce
the dose to the lowest reasonable amount possible in case there is future need for radiotherapy. In
the event that the device could not be moved, I would consider several other options.
In planning this SBRT case where there is no option to move the device, I would first
ensure that all of the fields used were low energy photons less than or equal to 10 MV in order to
lower the risk for neutron contamination. It is understood with some evidence that there is a
correlation between high energy photons and complications in cardiac implantable electronic
devices.4 Next, I would consider designing beams with partial arcs in order to create fields that
limit entrance and exit dose to device. Following the planning process and approval by physics
and the physician, thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) would be placed on the first day of
treatment over the area of the device. TLD measurements will be read by physics, who will then
determine whether or not the dose is within tolerance from that seen in the treatment planning
system and not overdosing the implanted device. In order to provide a patient with a safe and
implanted devices.
1. Radiological Society of North America, RSNA, American College of Radiology. Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)
and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT). Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) | Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
(SBRT). https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=stereotactic. Accessed November 5, 2018.
2. Prisciandaro J, Makkar A, Dox C, et al. Dosimetric review of cardiac implantable electronic device patients
receiving radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015;16(1):254-263. https://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5189
3. Management of Radiation Oncology Patients. American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_45.pdf. Accessed November 5, 2018.
4. Hurkmans CW, Knegjens JL. Management of radiation oncology patients with a pacemaker or ICD: A new
comprehensive practical guideline in The Netherlands. NCBI.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3528416/. Published November 24, 2012. Accessed November 5,
2018.